2012 TRACS ANNUAL CONFERENCE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES 101 Dr. Gino Pasquariello.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session 26 The Bible in Ethical Decisions The Bible in Ethical Decisions.
Advertisements

Meeting a Higher Standard in Student Success and Retention Dr. Gino Pasquariello TRACS Annual Conference November 2012.
What This Course Is About Instructor: John Edmiston (310)
The General Education Program at Westmont
Expository Preaching.
Revised criteria for the Order of the Ministry. The personThe work  Qualifications ◦ 10 qualities anticipated in persons engaged in ministry in the CCDOC.
Singapore Bible College
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training Implementing English K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division BPC Conceptual Framework.
Growing Forward 2014 Catholic Education Symposium Faith Infused Curriculum.
BUT CAN YOU TEACH THEOLOGY PROPERLY ON THE WEB? Joan Robson Faculty of Education Australian Catholic University PO Box 256, Dickson, ACT 2602.
Dr. Gino Pasquariello 2011 Annual TRACS Conference.
{ Preparing to write your paper on Biblical Integration Proposal for Biblical Integration.
Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Idea Purpose ◦ Organize and classify educational goals ◦ Provide a systematized approach to course design Guided.
Assessing Student learning
Overview of the 3-Step Method We must study before we can interpret! Course Guide Dr Rick Griffith Singapore Bible College Biblestudydownloads.com.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Inductive Bible Study Method How do you study the Word of God?
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
GoStrategic’s Strategic Life Training. HISTORY Strategic Life Training began in the home of Dennis Peacocke in the 1980s with a vision to equip his children.
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
Writing and Processing Theological Reflections 1.
2011 Annual TRACS Conference Dr. Gino Pasquariello.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
Presents… Basics of Grace History of Grace DVD Mission Statement Shepherding God’s People By God’s Grace For God’s Glory To maturity in Christ To reaching.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.
NEW VISION OF FAITH MINISTERIAL INSTITUTE GREAT THINGS ARE IN STORE FOR YOU!!!!
Social Studies Grades What is Social Studies? “Social Studies provides coordinated, systematic study drawing on such disciplines as anthropology,
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
“Outcomification”: Development and Use of Student Learning Outcomes Noelle C. Griffin, PhD Director, Assessment and Data Analysis Loyola Marymount University.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Response to 2008 Faculty Orientation Presentations Dr. Ed Robinson August 15, 2008.
FLIBS Dec Biology Category 1 Session 2: Learning Biology within the IB Philosophy.
Interpreting Sacred Scripture The Living Word: The Revelation of God’s Love, Second Edition Unit 2, Chapter 5 Document#: TX
Types of Sermons There are three main types of sermons for the purpose of our study: I. Expository Sermons A. Expository sermons are biblical sermons.
Presents… Welcome to Grace Topics: Week 1 Week 1 –The History of Grace –Mission Statement –Philosophy of Ministry Week 2 Week 2 –A Portrait of a Growing.
Introduction to Content Standards Jacqueline E. Korengel, Ed.D.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
Assessment Workshop 2 Developing Student Learning Outcomes.
Global Christian Movement Session 4 Theological Foundations.
Objectives of EFL Teaching objectives The difference between ”aims”, “goals” and “objectives”.  An aim is an expression of a long-term purpose, usually.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
+ The Composite model Dr Margaret Carswell. + A composite model 1995 Masters of Education Thesis: Educating into Discipleship.
“If a doctor, lawyer, or dentist had 40 people in his office at one time,all of whom had different needs, and some of whom didn’t want to be there and.
The Rise of David: Archetype of a King Week 5. Goals. Evaluate the role of leadership of Saul and David as kings of Israel.. Analyze the biblical text.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Writing and Revising SLOs with Best Practices in Mind
Learning Assessment Techniques
More and Better Pastors
Making Practice Visible: The Impact of the FdA in Early Years
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Biblical Exegesis The Bible Course, Unit 1 Document #: TX
Proposal for Biblical Integration
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Creating Meaningful Student Learning Outcomes
Expository Counseling Center
Biblical Exegesis The Bible Course, Unit 1 Document #: TX
COMPONENTS OF CURRICULUM
Skills development in the study of History
Biblical Exegesis The Bible Course Document #: TX
Presentation transcript:

2012 TRACS ANNUAL CONFERENCE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES 101 Dr. Gino Pasquariello

Student Learning Outcomes  Student Learning Outcomes  Define the expected learning outcomes and proficiencies resulting from taking the course  Map to institutional and program learning outcomes  Relate to Scope and Sequence  Are evaluated by course assignments  Promote learning at the intended academic level

Blooms Taxonomy

Writing Student Learning Outcomes  State Instructional Objectives as Intended Learning Outcomes  Not Teaching Process  Not Course Activities  Begin each objective with a learning action verb (analyze, compare, contrast, evaluate, define, etc.)  Defined in terms of observable performance and instructional intent “As a result of taking this course, the student will be able to …” “Evaluate the four major views of Sanctification”

Student Learning Outcomes The student who successfully completes this course will be able to… (include Blooms Taxonomy) Institutional Objectives Program Outcomes Course Assignment

Writing Student Learning Outcomes  Each outcome should begin with a verb (use the appropriate level of Bloom’s Taxonomy) which corresponds to the appropriate and specific learning outcome (cognitive, affective, or psychomotor).  Each outcome contains one singular performance component that describes what the learner will know or be able to do in specific terms.

Writing Student Learning Outcomes  Each outcome is clearly stated without ambiguity.  Each outcome clearly states a measurable learning outcome.  Each outcome is directly linked to an appropriate assignment.  Each outcome is appropriate, reasonable and attainable for the level of degree program education.

Student Learning Outcomes  Student Learning Outcomes Table Included with syllabus submission for review and approval * The program objectives and institutional objectives are published in the current School Catalog. The student who successfully completes this course will be able to … Program Objective* Institutional Objective Course Requirement 1. Articulate the major doctrines related to the nature of Scripture MDIV #1INST #1Assignment #1 Research Paper 2. Apply an inductive methodology in Bible study MDIV #2INST #2Assignment #2 Inductive Bible Studies 3. Relate theological concepts to contemporary situations MDIV #3INST #4Assignment #3 Theological Reflection Paper 4. Present Biblical expository sermons MDIV #3INST #4Assignment #4 Sermon Presentation

Sample Learning Outcomes  Evaluate major theological doctrines related to the Nature of God  Relate theological concepts to contemporary situations  Understand key hermeneutical principles  Apply an inductive methodology in Bible study  Articulate a personal philosophy of Christian education  Develop a program of small group discipleship  Present Biblical expository sermons  Demonstrate Servant Leadership in local church ministry

Sample Learning Outcomes (What Not to Do!)  Analyze, discuss, and write about selected documents and ideas in church history.  Learn how to connect the church's past to our present in a careful, responsible, and practically helpful way.  Develop habits of worshipful exegesis that are both rigorous and fruitful  Hermeneutical sensitivity in the appropriation of Biblical texts to contemporary Christians.

Sample Learning Outcomes (What Not to Do!)  Students will be exposed to the content of selected passages of Scripture as test cases for studying the interpretive process.  Students will explore the implications of their presuppositions on the nature of Scripture, its inspiration, inerrancy, sufficiency, and authority, for the interpretive process.  Students will study the history of interpretation partly as a means of connecting this history with other aspects of church history and partly to see the diversity of interpretations across different times, cultures, and places throughout church history.

Sample Learning Outcomes (What Not to Do!)  Gain knowledge of the basic conceptual frameworks and themes of the purpose and method of systematic theology, the doctrine of the Triune God, God the Creator, and the authority of Scripture.  Develop and demonstrate the ability to lead through thinking; i.e., to think critically and engage in theological reasoning that is aimed at human transformation by presenting critical analyses and constructive responses to particular doctrinal points of view.  Move into a deeper relationship with God by the power of the Spirit of Christ in worshipful response to the love of God the Creator and Redeemer.

Sample Learning Outcomes (What Not to Do!)  An understanding of the character of Scripture, a confidence in its trustworthiness and intrinsic power, and a conception of how it can and should function as the Word of God to the Church  A commitment to a life-long pursuit of an overall grasp of biblical truth and its application to life  A foundational and biblically-informed vision of the glory, character and gracious activities of the one true and triune God  Sensitivity towards sound appropriations of the selected Biblical texts for today’s Christian communities and the world.

Contact Information Blessings and Thanks! Dr. Gino Pasquariello Dean of Student Services and Institutional Research Southern California Seminary El Cajon, CA Office: Cell: