Conference Goals Understand the need for validated and routine developmental screening; Become familiar with screening tools that can be used in primary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developmental Screening and Surveillance DENVER II
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Developmental screening and surveillance: A review of the evidence Serena Yang, MD, MPH Assistant Clinical Professor Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Fresno.
Who Put “Instructional Monitoring” On My To Do List? Suggestions for Principals M. Ann Levett, Ed.D.
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Integrating Behavioral Health into Wellness Visits in Pediatric Primary Care Jean Cobb, Ph.D. J. David Bull, Psy.D. Behavioral Health Consultants, Cherokee.
Changes to Medical Documentation Form and Requirements 1.
Birth to Five: Watch Me Thrive! Developmental and Behavioral Screening and Support Christy Kavulic, EdD Office of Special Education Programs.
Supporting Young Homeless Children with Developmental Delays: A Successful Cross- System Model July 10, 2007.
Does this look like your RTI team?. Maybe this looks like your team!
REGIONAL WEBINARS OCTOBER & NOVEMBER, 2013 What If…? Understanding Part C Eligibility Determination, Assessment and Transition Requirements Through Scenarios.
University of Hawai’i Integrated Pediatric Residency Program Continuity Care Program Medical Home Module Case 4.
Healthy Inclusion: Caring for Children with Special Needs in Child Care © The National Training Institute for Child Care Health Consultants,
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
1 Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data. 2 What factors work to improve the quality of your data? What factors work to lessen the quality of your data?
Early Childhood Information Sharing Toolkit for Community Providers.
Early Childhood Information Sharing Toolkit for Community Providers June 2009.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
Developmental Screening Tools: What they are and do they work Alison Schonwald MD Children’s Hospital, Boston Harvard Medical School Massachusetts Developmental.
Communities Coordinating for Healthy Development General Introduction.
REAL-START : Risk Evaluation of Autism in Latinos (Screening Tools and Referral Training) Assuring No Child Enters Kindergarten With an Undetected Developmental.
Why Health Care Providers Should Add Their Own Concerns Before Scoring Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS)
Developmental Screening at Rangel Quality Improvement Project Chief of Service May 20, Quality Improvement Project Chief of Service.
Connecting Families to Community Resources Help Me Grow.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Training and Procedural Manuals Section A 1.
How To Make Developmental Services Easy to Use Judith S. Palfrey MD Alison Schonwald MD Children’s Hospital Boston Opening Doors Initiatives.
CHIPRA Quality Demonstration Grant and Pennsylvania’s Early Intervention Strategies David Kelley MD, MPH Chief Medical Officer Office of Medical Assistance.
Continuity Clinics as Medical Home Hawaii Dyson Initiative Louise Iwaishi, MD March 5, 2005 Hawaii Dyson Initiative.
Best Practices Outreach Management Case Management Expenses Management Common Mistakes.
Can Bright Futures Be Implemented in a Busy Clinical Setting? Lessons Learned from the Preventive Services Improvement Project: A National Collaborative.
Prevention in the Medical Home Lisa A. Cosgrove, MD, FAAP Florida Pediatric Medical Home Demonstration Project Learning Session 2 April 27-28, 2012.
Screening Implementation: Referral and Follow-up What Do You Do When the Screening Test Is of Concern? Paul H. Lipkin, MD D-PIP Training Workshop June.
Bright Futures Preventive Services Improvement Project Sixteenth Street Community Health Center Milwaukee, WI Our Team: Drs. Emilia Arana, Alisen Huske.
Project Screening: Lessons Learned Alison Schonwald, MD Kelly Horan, MPH Noelle Huntington, PhD.
Responding to Student Writing: Tips on Grading and Providing Constructive Feedback A presentation by the Academic Writing Centre.
Adapted from Marian Earls, ABCD project, Commonwealth Fund (
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data 1 I know it is in here somewhere Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.
Parent checks in/Regsiters- updated demographics, insurance is collected) Encounter Formsent to Nurses Station Nursepulls chart, encounter form, anticipatory.
MPPDA 2014 Presidential Address Russ Kolarik, MD MPPDA National Meeting April 10, 2014.
2012 Role Delineation Study: What is it, and why do it?
CHIPRA Activities to Tackle Barriers Electronic developmental and behavioral screening Electronic referral with ASQ and M-CHAT results Shared script for.
The New Autism Guidelines Daniel L. Coury MD. Faculty Disclosure Information In the past 12 months, I have had the following financial relationships with.
Outreach to Physicians to Increase Early Identification and Referrals to Early Intervention Linda Tuchman-Ginsberg, PhD Director of the Early Childhood.
I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME.
Informed Clinical Opinion During Eligibility Determination Please Call Enter Code # What do you find to be your most valuable.
University of Hawai’i Integrated Pediatric Residency Program Continuity Care Program Medical Home Module Case 2.
We have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this.
Arbitre Consulting, Inc.
Systems Change Using Quality Improvement: From a “Good Idea” to a Practice Culture Artwork by Caroline S. © 2010 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Children's.
Brightening Oral Health: Teaching and Implementing Oral Health Risk Assessments in Pediatric Care QuIIN Members Multiple studies document that the development.
LINKS Evaluation. Why evaluate? Evaluation of the LINKS Advising Program is particularly important in this pilot year. It gives participating staff, students.
Fundamentals of Workflow Analysis and Process Redesign Unit Process Change Implementation and Evaluation.
PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP Seminar Unit 3 Identification and Early Intervention.
Children’s Policy Conference Austin, TX February 24, ECI as best practice model for children 0-3 years with developmental delays / chronic identified.
PED 212 Entire Course PED 212 Week 1 DQ 1 Current Issues  PED 212 Week 1 DQ 1 Current Issues  PED 212 Week 1 DQ 2 Critical Thinking  PED 212 Week 2.
ASQ-3 HMG Home Visiting July Discussion points What is developmental screening What are the basic features of the ASQ-3 When should you adjust for.
What Is Child Find? IDEA requires that all children with disabilities (birth through twenty-one) residing in the state, including children with disabilities.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
Discussion Background Objectives Office Based Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect: Lessons Learned from the Practicing Safety QuIIN Project Diane Abatemarco,
A FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRESCRIPTION PROGRAM
Developmental Screening: Putting It In Practice
Creating a SWYC Screening Plan, Part 4/5 Assign your roles and train your staff Ellen C. Perrin, MD R. Christopher Sheldrick, PhD Kate Mattern, BA.
Jessica A. Lanerie, MD1 and Teresa K. Duryea, MD2
PED 212 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
PED 212 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
How to manage the Electronic Signature Process
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Developmental Screening Learning Collaborative
Presentation transcript:

Conference Goals Understand the need for validated and routine developmental screening; Become familiar with screening tools that can be used in primary care; Choose strategies for implementing a new tool in the primary care setting; Overcome obstacles integrating routine screening into practice; Create a referral system for management of children identified with possible developmental needs.

Conference Goals Only 57% of parents surveyed reported that their child’s development was ever assessed in a pediatric visit. Parents who report receiving developmental assessments are more likely to report other anticipatory guidance (reading, toilet training, discipline) and are more satisfied with pediatric care. Source: Halfon, Pediatrics, 2004

Conference Goals – Dr. Tyler Studies demonstrate the need for developmental screening. While 12 to 18% of US children have a developmental disorder, fewer than 30% of these children are identified by clinician judgment before entering school. Developmental screening can boost this identification rate considerably.

Conference Goals – Dr. Tyler It’s reasonable to question the value of incorporating a new screening procedure when we are pressed on time and resources. And since most of us already use milestone checklists and our clinical judgment, you may wonder if that isn’t enough.

Conference Goals – Dr. Tyler While we are picking up the more impaired children, we’re missing many who have more subtle issues, children who may be great responders to intervention. We can’t possibly review language, social, fine motor, gross motor, functional, and behavioral development with the same thoroughness for every child at every visit. Though most of us use checklists of developmental skills, these do not provide standardized cut-offs for the number of missed milestones that indicate a need for referral. Validated tools, by contrast, provide standardized data to guide practice and assure uniform care for all patients.

Conference Goals – Dr. Tyler Though most of us use checklists of developmental skills, these do not provide standardized cut-offs for the number of missed milestones that indicate a need for referral. Validated tools, by contrast, provide standardized data to guide practice and assure uniform care for all patients.

Conference Goals – Practical Implementation Given our limited time and resources in primary care, there are understandable reservations about adding yet another step to well child visits. But developmental screening ends up saving us time and improving the care we provide.

Conference Goals – Early Intervention Fortunately, the tools that help us identify children at risk for developmental delays finally exist. These tools enable early intervention, which in turn helps your practice. Early intervention has been shown to limit long term morbidity. Participants have higher graduation rates, higher employment rates, and less criminality than those who did not receive early intervention. It’s important to note that developmental screening boosts the identification rate at low cost to time and budget.

Conference Goals – Early Intervention Despite the obstacles we all face, validated screening can be integrated into primary care practice to improve care of our most vulnerable patients.

Screening Tools Dr. Rachelle Tyler UCLA

How To Implement Dr. Chris Landon Moderator Director PDC Practice Based Research Network Dr. Rekha Krishnankutty Consulting Pediatrician Sierra Vista Family Medical Center Dr. Andrei Bobrow Consulting Pediatrician Las Islas Family Medical Clinic Dr. Michelle Laba Mandalay Bay Women and Children’s Medical Group Dr. Heather Nichols Santa Paula West Pediatric Clinic

Why Do We Emphasize PEDS Implementation? The PEDS is a validated parental survey tool that is designed to detect children eligible for special education. It identifies developmental, academic, and behavioral issues. Survey consists of ten carefully constructed questions that target parental concerns Parent completes form in 5 minutes Providers score and interpret the results in 2 minutes Sensitivity 74-79% Specificity 70-80% across age levels

Why Do We Emphasize PEDS Implementation? The PEDS poses ten questions that target parental concerns. The form is translated into many languages and is written at a 5th grade reading level; but even so, parents with literacy limitations may need support.

The Process 1.The office staff responsible for handing out the survey pulls the form, the clipboard, and the pen from the supply area near check-in or the weight room. 2.This person gives the tool to the parent (or responsible family member) and briefly explains that the provider wants to know how the child is doing and if the parent has any concerns. 3.The parent completes the form before provider enters the exam room so the provider can review it during the visit.

The Process The survey becomes the structure of your discussion about the child’s behavior and development. Providers often start visits asking for parent concerns, and now they have it written up and covering each developmental realm. Sounds simple, but survey completion is our biggest obstacle. The parent may lose it or just not complete it. We’ve learned that incomplete forms may be due to language and literacy barriers and placed blank forms in convenient places for providers to use.

The Process Scoring is completed by the provider and takes just a few moments. Concerns registered in the survey generally correspond to checkboxes on the scoring form. If the parent has noted a concern but hasn’t left any comments, there may be a literacy problem on the part of the parent. At that point we review all the questions for more detail. No parent concerns are ignored, even if the parent is not concerned after discussing it with the provider and even if the concern doesn’t correspond directly to a developmental issue. This is one of the unexpected benefits of screening – we are finding concerning issues that previously were not on our radars. Scoring forms are kept in the patient’s medical record and are tracked with each visit. An electronic version is available but we STILL use paper charts!

The Process No parent concerns are ignored, even if the parent is not concerned after discussing it with the provider and even if the concern doesn’t correspond directly to a developmental issue. This is one of the unexpected benefits of screening – we are finding concerning issues that previously were not on our radars. Scoring forms are kept in the patient’s medical record and are tracked with each visit. An electronic version is available but we STILL use paper charts!

The Process

Implementation In Different Practice Settings Identify practice champions Introduce the idea to your practice Share web sites with previous practice experience Elicit ideas, concerns, and suggestions from all staff members Acknowledge that change is hard Choose a tool Review the available tools Pick one for trial that matches practice needs

Implementation In Different Practice Settings Train appropriate staff in administering, scoring and interpreting Consider methods of implementation At what visits will screening be included? How will tool be distributed - in the office, via mail, or posted electronically online? What will you do with completed screens? Discuss operations - identify the person(s) who will... Purchase and reorder the tool Maintain supplies Hand out (or mail) the tool and explain it to parents Be responsible for scoring Document findings and plan in the medical record Return pens and clipboards to storage site Where will supplies be stored?

Implementation In Different Practice Settings Referral system Will you need a new system? Is your system paper-based, electronic, or both? Who will maintain it?

Implementation In Different Practice Settings Practice run Assign one staff member to be a "parent" Starting at the front desk, have them walk through the typical visit,with the screening steps now included Assign another staff member to be the "provider" and/or support staff,and walk through the steps of interpreting, scoring, and acting on the results Fix any operational glitches you find Communicate consistently Request regular feedback from all staff - particularly, but not only, after the practice run Give staff regular feedback on their successes and the changes you believe necessary