Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory “We solve problems to make the world safer and better.” Serving.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Willie J. Fitzpatrick, PhD Chief, Aviation Division
Advertisements

European EO data & model fusion ( to maximise the value of ESA EO Data ) Alan ONeill National Centre for Earth Observation.
Technology Module: Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0 SOURCE INFORMATION: The material contained in this lecture.
Technology readiness levels in a nutshell
Robbie Hood, Alexander MacDonald, Robert Atlas, Frank Marks, Steve Koch, Jim McFadden, Robert Rogers, Joseph Cione, Michael Black, Eric Uhlhorn, Christopher.
EInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) US Resource Centers Perspective: implementation and execution challenges Alan Blatecky Executive Director SDSC.
NOAA Hydrology Program Geoff Bonnin Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA National Weather Service x103 Geoff Bonnin.
1 WRF Development Test Center A NOAA Perspective WRF ExOB Meeting U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. 28 April 2006 Fred Toepfer NOAA Environmental.
About Us Vision: A national center for new imaging detectors. Mission: To design, develop, and implement new advanced sensor technologies in collaboration.
Information Systems Development Lecture 2: the idea of the Life Cycle.
1 Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere CIRA Colorado State University An Overview Prepared by: Mary McInnis-Efaw Department Manager, CIRA.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
System Engineering Instructor: Dr. Jerry Gao. System Engineering Jerry Gao, Ph.D. Jan System Engineering Hierarchy - System Modeling - Information.
What are MRLs ? Alfred W. Clark Dawnbreaker, Inc.
A LONG-RANGE PERSPECTIVE ON THE POTENTIAL ROLES OF MODEL TESTBEDS IN IOOS CHRIS MOOERS DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PORTLAND STATE.
Technology Input Formats and Background Appendix B.
IGCP 565: The workshop series and recommendations Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory, University of Nevada,
NE II NOAA Environmental Software Infrastructure and Interoperability Program Cecelia DeLuca Sylvia Murphy V. Balaji GO-ESSP August 13, 2009 Germany NE.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Hydrometeorology & Air Force Weather Col Charles (Dean) Corpman Chief,
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
IntroductionUnderstanding the IOOS ProjectThe SAIC Team OverviewSummaryPast PerformanceThe SAIC Team Approach 1 Agenda  Introduction  The SAIC Team.
Andrew Faulkner1 Technology Readiness Levels 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon Technology Readiness Levels TRLs Andrew Faulkner.
Intelligent Large Scale Sensing Systems (ILS 3 ) initiative Initiative Status and Activities Kevin M. McNeill, PhD Research Assoc. Professor Director,
Enhancing the Value of GRACE for Hydrology
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Cyberinfrastructure Architecture Overview Michael Meisinger September 29, 2009.
Lecture 7: Requirements Engineering
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Hydrologic and Water Quality Modeling of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Huan.
The Center for Space Research Programs CSRP Technology Readiness Level.
Reclamation Climate Variabilaity Activities March 28, 2014 Tucson, AZ.
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
“America’s NOAA National Weather Service: Protecting Lives, Livelihoods, and A Way of Life” Water Resources Vision 2020 Deliver a broader suite of improved.
111/27/2015 User Education & Training End-to-End Cycle for NOAA's Satellite Program Anthony Mostek NOAA - NWS – OCWWS - Training Division Anthony Mostek.
IWRSS & Fusion Team Brief Missouri Basin River Forecasters’ Meeting Wednesday, January 29, 2014 Noreen Schwein National Hydrologic Services Policy Leader.
NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June
1 Critical Water Information for Floods to Droughts NOAA’s Hydrology Program January 4, 2006 Responsive to Natural Disasters Forecasts for Hazard Risk.
NASA Applied Sciences Program Update John A. Haynes Program Manager, Weather National Aeronautics and Space Administration Applied Sciences Program Earth.
Near Real-Time Verification At The Forecast Systems Laboratory: An Operational Perspective Michael P. Kay (CIRES/FSL/NOAA) Jennifer L. Mahoney (FSL/NOAA)
Gary Jedlovec Roadmap to Success transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations.
MODEL-BASED SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES.  Models of software are used in an increasing number of projects to handle the complexity of application domains.
Cross fertilisation Technology readiness level From Space and Aeronautic to ITS ? 11/06/2014Topos proposal done by JPhM1.
1 1 Title of Proposal Programme/Topic Number: SSH Type of Proposal; Collaborative Project (Small) Proposal Number: Programme/Topic Number: SSH
Earth System Curator and Model Metadata Discovery and Display for CMIP5 Sylvia Murphy and Cecelia Deluca (NOAA/CIRES) Hannah Wilcox (NCAR/CISL) Metafor.
Assessment of Fusion Development Path: Initial Results of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego ANS 18 th Topical Meeting on the.
JNTC Joint Management Office
Matt Rodell NASA GSFC Multi-Sensor Snow Data Assimilation Matt Rodell 1, Zhong-Liang Yang 2, Ben Zaitchik 3, Ed Kim 1, and Rolf Reichle 1 1 NASA Goddard.
SAS_08_Legacy_Safety_Hill Assurance and Recertification of Safety Critical Software In Legacy Systems Janie Hill NASA Kennedy Space Center, Florida
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT) Project Future Directions.
Horizon 2020 – 2016 Transport Call
July 2003 At A Glance The GMSEC provides efficient and enabling GSFC mission services and products for the next decade. Benefits Establishes a Single Strategic.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Cross-Domain Semantic Interoperability ~ Via Common Upper Ontologies ~ Presentation to: Expedition Workshop #53 15 Aug 2006 James Schoening
Modeling Surface Energy Balance Using the MEP Method Jingfeng Wang 1 and Rafael L. Bras 1,2 1 University of California at Irvine 2 Georgia Institute of.
The ESA call for the 9 th Earth Explorer mission (EE9)
CS646: Software Design and Architectures Introduction and Overview †  Definitions.  The general design process.  A context for design: the waterfall.
Band 14 (11um) Winds Low-Level >700 mb Mid-Level mb High-Level mb   NPP VIIRS Polar Winds Products The GOES-R AWG Derived Motion Winds.
Dr. Thomas D. Fiorino November 2002
Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA)
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
User Preparation for new Satellite generations
IEEE Std 1074: Standard for Software Lifecycle
Concept Idea Title Summary of the effort to include:
About Us Vision: A national center for new imaging detectors.
Systems Engineering for Mission-Driven Modeling
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
G. Technology Readiness Levels (TRL*)
Brian Killough (NASA, SEO), Mirko Albani (ESA, WGISS Chair)
Presentation transcript:

Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory “We solve problems to make the world safer and better.” Serving the Nation since February 1, 1961 BUILDING STRONG ® Interagency Surface Dynamics Working Group USDA Southwest Watershed Research Center Tucson, AZ March 1-3, 2011 Presenter: John Eylander U. S. Army ERDC/CRREL Hanover, NH, USA

BUILDING STRONG ® Monday AM Agenda 08:30 - Welcome and Introductions (Dr. Moran & Dr. Harmon 08:45 – 09:15Meeting overview and goals (Eylander) 09:15 – 09:45Dr. Jeff Cetola & Mr. Chris Franks Air Force Weather Agency (AFWA) Operational Land Surface Modeling overview at AFWA 09:45 – 10:30Dr. Christa Peters-Lidard NASA-Goddard Hydrological Sciences Branch The Land Information System as a Research-to-Operations Tool 10:30 – 10:45 Break 10::45 – 11:15Gary McWilliams (via telecom) US Army Research Lab Review of Joint Polar Satellite System and Defense Weather Satellite System 11:15 – 12:00Dr. Enrique Vivoni Arizona State University Small catchment activities at Jornada and Santa Rita Experimental Range, and large-scale soil moisture network in Sonora

BUILDING STRONG ® Monday Afternoon Agenda 12:00 – 13:00Lunch 13:00 – 13:30Mike Tischler (via telecom) USACE Topographic Engineering Center (Alexandria, VA) TEC soil property mapping update 13:30 – 14:00Mike Follum USACE ERDC Coastal & Hydraulics Lab (Vicksburg, MS) Use of remotely sensed data in hydrologic prediction 14:00 – 14:30Dr. George Mason USACE ERDC Geotechnical and Structures Lab (Vicksburg, MS) 14:30 – 15:00Hsu & Gao Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing UC Irvine 15:00 – 15:15Break

BUILDING STRONG ® Monday Afternoon Agenda (cont’d) 15:15 – 15:45 Jingfeng Wang & Rafael Bras University of California at Irvine Modeling Surface Energy Balance Using the MEP Method 15:45 – 16:15Dr. Scott Tyler Univ. of Nevada, Reno Desert Research Institute Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing for Soil Moisture and Environmental Studies: NSF's Community User Facilty. 16:15 – 16:45Dr. Jan Hendrickx New Mexico Tech Assimilation of METRIC Evapotranspiration and soil moisture in a distributed hydrologic model 16:45 – 17:30Open discussion & Wrap up 19:00 -Group Guadalajara Grill

BUILDING STRONG ® Goals –Increase organization ties between R&D and OPS groups –Understand methods to support technology transition –Explore ideas for increase interagency research inititives –Increase technology transition rates –Create 2-way information flow among agencies (wherever possible)

BUILDING STRONG ® Bridging the “Valley of Death” Understanding the gap between research and Operations communities

BUILDING STRONG ® Spanning the “Valley of Death” How do you “bridge the gap” –Know/document your functional TRL level –Understand the integration “process” –Take advantage of common “R&D to OPS” software tools in your research Land Information System (LIS) Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model –Collaborate!

BUILDING STRONG ® Technical Readiness Levels BASIC PRINCIPLES OBSERVED AND REPORTED: Transition from scientific research to applied research. Essential characteristics and behaviors of systems and architectures. Descriptive tools are mathematical formulations or algorithms TECHNOLOGY CONCEPT AND/OR APPLICATION FORMULATED: Applied research. Theory and scientific principles are focused on specific application area to define the concept. Characteristics of the application are described. Analytical tools are developed for simulation or analysis of the application ANALYTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL CRITICAL FUNCTION AND/OR CHARACTERISTIC PROOF-OF- CONCEPT: Proof of concept validation. Active Research and Development (R&D) is initiated with analytical and laboratory studies. Demonstration of technical feasibility using breadboard or brassboard implementations that are exercised with representative data COMPONENT/SUBSYSTEM VALIDATION IN LABORATORY ENVIRONMENT: Standalone prototyping implementation and test. Integration of technology elements. Experiments with full-scale problems or data sets.

BUILDING STRONG ® Technical Readiness Levels SYSTEM/SUBSYSTEM/COMPONENT VALIDATION IN RELEVANT ENVIRONMENT: Thorough testing of prototyping in representative environment. Basic technology elements integrated with reasonably realistic supporting elements. Prototyping implementations conform to target environment and interfaces SYSTEM/SUBSYSTEM MODEL OR PROTOTYPING DEMONSTRATION IN A RELEVANT END-TO-END ENVIRONMENT (GROUND OR SPACE): Prototyping implementations on full- scale realistic problems. Partially integrated with existing systems. Limited documentation available. Engineering feasibility fully demonstrated in actual system application SYSTEM PROTOTYPING DEMONSTRATION IN AN OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT (GROUND OR SPACE): System prototyping demonstration in operational environment. System is at or near scale of the operational system, with most functions available for demonstration and test. Well integrated with collateral and ancillary systems. Limited documentation available ACTUAL SYSTEM COMPLETED AND "MISSION QUALIFIED" THROUGH TEST AND DEMONSTRATION IN AN OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT (GROUND OR SPACE): End of system development. Fully integrated with operational hardware and software systems. Most user documentation, training documentation, and maintenance documentation completed. All functionality tested in simulated and operational scenarios. Verification and Validation (V&V) completed.

BUILDING STRONG ® Technical Readiness Levels ACTUAL SYSTEM "MISSION PROVEN" THROUGH SUCCESSFUL MISSION OPERATIONS (GROUND OR SPACE): Fully integrated with operational hardware/software systems. Actual system has been thoroughly demonstrated and tested in its operational environment. All documentation completed. Successful operational experience. Sustaining engineering support in place.

BUILDING STRONG ® Research Software “Buy-Back” Research to OPS software technology transitions incur significant software redevelopment period –“Up-time” requirements –Database and infrastructure engineering –Data handling (input/output) issues –Error handling –Coding standards –Network requirements –Data format External/R&D groups generally not concerned with most OPS center software issues, leading to delays in tech transition Software buy-back process goal is to share same software environment Basic R&D Applied Research Prototype Development Integration Process Research Buy-Back

BUILDING STRONG ® Research Network Enabling Concept Goal: Adapt “buy-back” process across DoD weather & terrestrial science programs –Collaborative software tools –Collaborative research environments –Shared software development process –Reduced costs to basic/applied research organizations –Faster rate of integration LIS Basic Research Applied Research Prototype Development Integration & Test Ops Integration

BUILDING STRONG ® New Concept: Science Logistics Management Goal: Manage technology transition between TRL’s and research funding programs –6.1 -> 6.2 -> 6.3……. –TRL 1 –> TRL 2 -> TRL3 –Army working to establish new management structure to support weather/terrestrial science tech transition future Air Force Weather involvement