Sense and Sensibility – A Review of Two Post Award Office Structures Presenters: Rochelle Athey – Executive Director Sponsored Programs University of Nevada.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Division of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Knowledge Management and Transfer Project 7/30/12.
Advertisements

Research Administration Capacity Building in an Established Institution Presenter: M.M.Aboud, MD Director of Research and Publications, MUHAS.
SFOS Central Support Services. Unit Staff ACADEMICACADEMIC IMSIMS ChristinaBethMadeline RobbieDebiLaura.
Office of Grants and Sponsored Programs Faculty Orientation.
SPS Open Forum: The new OMB circular and grant/contract close-out.
Life Cycle of an Award1 Office of Sponsored Programs Post-Award Overview of Award Management/ Life Cycle of an Award.
University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center HSC Office of Grants and Contracts Update.
Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Institutional Projects.
Grant Review & Analysis Office Heather Offhaus, Director 11/1/2011.
University Of Hawai‘i Office of Research Services UH Manoa Faculty Senate Meeting December 10, 2008 ORS Overview.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2014 Implementation at the University of Washington Northwest Chapter of Internal Auditors August 5 th, 2014 Ted Mordhorst Asst. Dir.
OSP Update MRAM - 6/12/2014 Lynette Arias Director, Office of Sponsored Programs University of Washington.
Purchasing Updates Faculty and Staff Presentation Fall, 2010
Bolt-On Module: Grants Event Log Friday November 11, 2005 USM Regional Oracle/People Soft Conference Towson University.
MANAGING THE SUBMISSION AND AWARD PROCESS Office of Sponsored Projects Main Campus and Branches.
What is Chapter Affairs? Global View and Support –Leadership Forum –Chapter Executive Workshop –Chapter Awards Program Liaison between Chapters and ACC.
Foundation Financial Services Post Award Nancy Gomez Post Award Analyst.
Audit and Fiscal Oversight Responsibilities VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP December 15,2010.
Managing Your Grant Roberta Teliska Vice President for Sponsored Programs Operations The Research Foundation of SUNY October 6, 2008.
Diane Rathbun, Office of Grant & Research Development, Lauren Hatley, Sponsored Programs Services,
DAS: State Controller's Division1January 2010 Department of Administrative Services State Controller’s Division Updated January, 2010.
ORIENTATION Grants Development Office. Who We Are Grants Development – GDO (“Pre-Award”) is part of the Division of Academic Affairs, Office of Academic.
Research Administration at Yale
HSC and Main Campus Presentation December 4 & 5, 2012 Financial Services Center.
1 The Auditor’s Perspective Division of Sponsored Research Research Administration Training Series Presented by: Joe Cannella Audit Manager,
Department of Grants and District Initiatives 1 San Antonio Independent School District Department of Grants and District Initiatives The purpose of the.
THE RESEARCH AUTHORITY.  MISSION: THE MANDATE OF THE RESEARCH AUTHORITY OFFICE INCLUDES PROMOTING AND PROVIDED RELATED SERVICES TO RESEARCHERS AT THE.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
10/16/2015 Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators/ Program Directors/ Project Directors.
Office of Research & Sponsored Programs (ORSP) Darren McCants, Director David Azbill, Assistant Director Cindy Brown, Program Mgr, Corporate Research Robbie.
1 QEM/BIO Workshop October 21, 2005 Award Administration.
Georgia State University’s Grants System: PeopleSoft Grants and Beyond Tonia Davis-Greenway University Research Services and Administration Office of Research.
College of Agricultural Sciences & Hatfield Marine Science Center Business Center May 7, 2009.
FISCAL OFFICER Financial Policy I-1 Role of Fiscal Officer, Account Manager, and Account Supervisor.
Business Operations Overview “Supporting Yale Together” Reporting Relationship between Business Managers and Finance & Administration Steve Murphy Associate.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review.
Presentation Title | May 4, 2009 UMass Boston Feedback to F&A on 2013 and 2014 Jan 21, 2014 VC A&F.
ORSP Update Bill Bowers, Ph.D. Associate Provost for Research Development and Administration Office of Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP) State University.
Presentation Title | May 4, 2009 F&A Advisory Group Suggestions Responses & Proposed Changes CONTROLLER’S OFFICE, UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON Presented.
I have a Grant, Now What??! John Hulvey Office of Sponsored Programs Administration and Accounting.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Improving COI Information Management Special Projects COI Committee Lois Brako, Assistant Vice President for Research Regulatory Compliance Oversight June,
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session One: INTRODUCTION.
Fiscal Compliance Corner – Uniform Guidance Update MRAM October 2014 Ted Mordhorst Assistant Director for Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting.
College of Agricultural Sciences & Hatfield Marine Science Center Business Center May 13, 2009.
1 Office of Grants and Contracts Accounting (OGCA) ROOM 530 – NORTH DECATUR BUILDING MAIN TEL MAIN FAX
Introduction to Sponsored Projects Accounting Navigating the University: Research & Resources Management Retreat August 19, 2014.
Building A Bridge from Central Administration to Departments, Centers and Institutes Mary E. Schmiedel, JD, CPCM Georgetown University Mary Glasscock Georgetown.
Presentation to Provost’s Department Chairs Leadership Program Suzanne Bardouche November 29, 2007.
Washington University Hilltop Campus Research Administrators Forum August 23, 2002.
Strategic Resource Planning Council June 26, 2013 Merit Policy.
Reinventing the Award Review and Set-Up Process NCURA Annual Meeting November 2012 Marcia Smith, Associate Vice Chancellor, Research Administration, UCLA.
TOP Practices in Post Award Administration
The Gold Standard: Sharing Tips of the Trade and Best Practices
SHARED SERVICES CENTER (SSC) TASK FORCE OVERVIEW
Jackson State University
Foundation or Sponsored Programs?
NCURA 54th Annual Meeting * November 4-7, 2012 * Washington, DC
Maryland Governor’s Grants Office Higher Ed Conference
New Faculty Orientation
Jackson State University
Office of Sponsored Programs
BUDGET-AWARD MANAGEMENT
Jackson State University
Jackson State University
BUDGET-AWARD MANAGEMENT
Research Community Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Sense and Sensibility – A Review of Two Post Award Office Structures Presenters: Rochelle Athey – Executive Director Sponsored Programs University of Nevada Las Vegas Kim Calvery – Assistant Director Office of Post Award Administration Oregon State University

UNLV The experience of a combined post-award office in a growing, medium-sized research university

Background Information “One does not love a place the less for having suffered in it, unless it has been all suffering, nothing but suffering.”

UNLV Post-Award Statistics  $106M in awards in FY07  $104M in expenditures in FY07  Experienced expenditure growth of 16.5% annually over the past five years  Staff has not increased significantly during that time frame 1 Assoc Dir; 4 Sr. Research Administrators; 2 Grant Coordinators

UNLV Post-Award History  Co-located with the pre-award office in November 2005  Combined with pre-award in May 2006 as Sponsored Programs  Oversight under Vice President for Research  Many adjustment issues after combination

Advantages of a Combined Office  One Vice President to provide vision and leadership  One Director to manage office  Unification of policy, procedure and process  Better staff understanding of cradle to grave business processes  Team work is easier

Disadvantages to a Combined Office  Potential audit issues – no separation of duties  Potential for weak or disfunctional relationship with other divisions at university if under Research, then potential relationship issues with Finance or vice versa  Sometimes there is little understanding by your division leadership for aspects of your workload that may be more familiar to another division (try explaining F&A proposal development to a sociologist)

OSU The experience of a separate post-award office in a growing, large - sized research university

Background Information “Be so good they can’t ignore you.”

OSU FY07 Statistics  Carnegie Foundation designation Very High Research Activity  $145 million in Awards  $149 million in Expenditures  2,800 Active Awards  Cognizant Agency is DHHS  Major Sponsors are NSF, USDA, HHS  No Audit Findings for Last 12 Years A-133 Audits; OIG Investigations; OIG Close-out Audits

Staff – Post Award Admin  Twelve Total Staff 1 - Assistant Director 1 - Assistant Manager 5 - Grant Accountants 1 - High Risk Monitoring Accountant 1- Accountant 2 – Award set-up 1- Fiscal Coordinator – Cash Mgmt, Cost Share 1- Lead Fiscal Coordinator – Subcontracts 1- Admin Program Specialist – PAR, Electronic Files

Duties of Post Award Admin  Award Set-up in FIS – Banner  Invoicing Agencies  Accounting/Monitoring  Budget Changes  No Cost Extensions  Reporting/Closeout  High Risk Expenditure Approvals  Audit Coordination  Cost Share  Subcontract Admin  Electronic Filing System  Effort Reporting  Fellowship Admin  Training Campus Department Staff

OSU Pre and Post Award Structure  OSU has separate Pre and Post Award Offices Pre-Award and Contracts combined – Report to VP for Research Post Award – Report to VP for Finance  July 2006 Contracts Combined with Pre-Award Previously co-located with Post Award

Advantages of Separate Offices  Commended by Internal Audit  Allows for Separation of Duties  Maintain Focused Missions  Post Award Reports to Finance VP  Understanding of Financial Issues

Disadvantages of Separate Offices  No Flexibility for Exceptions Unique Circumstances Post-Award very focused on Regulations  Pre-Award Doesn’t Understand Post-Award Issues with Invoicing and Budgets  Communication Breaks Down or non-Existent  Conflicting Policies and Procedures  Hard to Establish “Seamless Operation” with Faculty

Culture- UNLV “One man’s ways may be as good as another’s, but we all like our own best.”

Culture and Transition at UNLV  New mission and focus for institution  Workload changes  Technology  External and internal environmental awareness

Culture – Age of UNLV  Experience with non-standard research issues  Reputation of university

Culture – Centralization v. Decentralization  University Systems Use to your advantage  Risk management and Office Role  Distribution of Activities Time/effort monitoring Expenditure monitoring Other post award activities

Culture at OSU “As long as you’re going to think anyway – you might as well think BIG!”

Culture – Centralization v. Decentralization at OSU Business Centers

Business Centers at OSU  Combine College Thematic Areas  Central Accounting Office Pay Bills up to $500,000; Reimbursements Process HR Actions Review Proposal Budgets Effort Report Monitoring  Reports to Finance and Administration Ensures compliance Provides separation of duties for Colleges

Business Centers at OSU  Train Staff Grant Accountants come to OPAA for Training  Immersion in OPAA (Central Admin functions)  Train for 4-6 months  Include in staff meetings/social functions when return to Business Center Grant Accountant from OPAA will Rotate to Business Center to Establish Compliance Culture

Growth at OSU “Surprises are foolish things. The pleasure is not enhanced, and the inconvenience is often considerable.”

Plan for Growth at OSU  50% Increase in Awards Occurred over 3 years  No New Staff Reclassed only Admin Support position to Grant Accountant  Little or no Overtime Allowed Budget Constraints  Leadership Change in Post Award New Ideas

Plan for Growth at OSU  Review Processes Can you stop doing non-essential functions?  Double reviews; Shadow Accounting Systems Automate Invoicing  Hand typing invoices and forms Decentralize Functions  Bill payment; non-standard invoicing Student Labor vs Classified Staff

Plan for Growth at OSU  Automate Processes  Keep VP’s Informed of Growth Let them know your struggles  Staff Very Team Oriented Suggestions taken from Staff Nothing implemented w/o staff buy-in  Celebrate Your Successes!! Make them Public

Growth at UNLV “Surprises are foolish things. The pleasure is not enhanced, and the inconvenience is often considerable.”

Growth – Complexity at UNLV  Contract requirements  Export control  Cash  Interest  Program Income  Cost Sharing

Growth – Efficiency at UNLV  Consolidation of activities in post award  Business processes  Benchmarking Keep statistics of process functions Time tracking

Growth – Audit and Compliance  Increased funding  Contracts  International awards  Small business relationships

Communication “Seldom, very seldom, does complete truth belong to any human disclosure; seldom can it happen that something is not a little disguised, or a little mistaken.”

Communication Between Separate Pre- Award and Post-Award Offices  Close Proximity of Offices Co-locate if you can  Meet Weekly to Discuss Issues  Develop Joint Policies and Procedures  Develop Joint Communications to Campus  Develop and Present Training Jointly  Review Websites for Conflicting Information

Communication Between Separate Pre- Award and Post-Award Offices  Release Data Jointly OSU offices work together for award and expenditure data releases  Host Joint “Meet and Greets” for Campus  Create Opportunities for Staff Get to know each other Mentor each other in procedures Encourage team building

Communication in a Combined Office  Weekly meetings between Associate Vice President for Research and Executive Director  Weekly individual meetings with Executive Director and Associate Directors of pre and post award to discuss issues  Monthly combined meetings of Executive Director and both Associate Directors  Monthly staff meetings  Regular meetings with Finance Division staff

Communication in General  Ad hoc work or issue groups OSU utilizes for policy implementation  Formal university committees  Informal networking within university OSU meets monthly with campus University Research Administrators  External networks and groups

Lessons Learned at UNLV “We have all a better guide in ourselves, if we would attend to it, than any other person can be.”

Lessons Learned  Quantify  Create policies and procedures  Write it down and document  Business process redesign  Quality  Network  Communicate

Lessons Learned “Working together works.”

The End Any Questions?  Contact Information: Rochelle Athey Office of Sponsored Programs University of Nevada Las Vegas  Contact Information Kim Calvery Office of Post Award Administration Oregon State University /postawards/