Sophomore Design Class Automated Highway Simulation Group 2: Jeremy Sletten Patrick Murphy Michael Olson Randa Ibrahim.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robo-Lab Team 5 Derek Evers, James Bettes, Keith Pearson, Amanda Brown, and Bryce Bell.
Advertisements

MESA Mouse Trap Powered Cars
Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
FIRE FIGHTING ROBOT ELECTRO-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS TERM PROJECT 1
Students : Hiba Ghannam Hawa’ Osama Supervisor : Aladdin Masri R OBOTIC V ACUUM C LEANER.
Design and Computer Modeling of Ultracapacitor Regenerative Braking System Adam Klefstad, Dr. Kim Pierson Department of Physics & Astronomy UW-Eau Claire.
5. Using Newton’s Laws. Newton’s Third Law 3 Law of Action and Reaction Forces always occur in equal and opposite pairs A B A acts on B B acts on A.
Mechanical Engineering 8936 Term 8 Design Project February 3, 2012.
PS 141 Presentation By Gabe, Tanya Mae Kim, Jaeyoun Ong, Raymond Carey.
One of the most common types of drivetrain is known as a skid steer drivetrain, which may also be referred to as a tank drive. A skid steer drivetrain.
Wireless Controller Steven Mays Faculty Advisor: Frank Hludik Start Date: 10/27/09 End Date: May 2010.
1 Autonomous Parallel Parking Alex Braun & Sergey Katsev.
1 Autonomously Controlled Vehicles with Collision Avoidance Mike Gregoire Rob Beauchamp Dan Holcomb Tim Brett.
A.G.I.L.E Team Members: Brad Ramsey Derek Rodriguez Dane Wielgopolan Project Managers: Dr. Joel Schipper Dr. James Irwin Autonomously Guided Intelligent.
Engineering H193 - Team Project Gateway Engineering Education Coalition P. 1 Spring Quarter 2008 Robot Programming Tips Week 4 Day 2 By Matt Gates and.
Solar Car Data Collection System Matt Boyden Rene Dupuis Ryan Lavallee 4/23/08.
Solar Car Data Collection System Matt Boyden Rene Dupuis Ryan Lavallee 4/8/08.
Team Mejor – The Spyder Critical Design Review -12/7/04.
Senior Project Design Review Remote Visual Surveillance Vehicle (RVSV) Manoj Bhambwani Tameka Thomas.
Preliminary Design Review Group A3: HMS “Bloodhound” Matt Morris Matt Prygoski Jay Slaggert Fred Thwaites Dan Zibton Thursday, April 3, 2008.
The Enforcer Laura Celentano Glenn Ramsey Michael Szalkowski.
Team P.A.C.K men EE 296 Project. Chris Mcleod Hardware Specialist.
PT 5000 Pooja Rao Ted Tomporowski December 7, 2004.
Senior Design Project Fall, 2007 Michael Garrity, Peter Nahas, Cory Haflett Objective: The Autonomous Mail Deliver System (AMDS) was designed for use in.
Curry Mouse EE296 Final Presentation Wednesday, May 10, 2006.
Sophomore Design A Proposed Project Format R. E. Haskell 4/26/2003.
EMRAM Mini-Sumo Project INNOVATIONS. EMARAM INNOVATIONS Team Members: Nick Enriquez Project Manager, MCU Programmer, PCB Design Christian Marquez Parts.
Final Presentation EE 296 – Micromouse Spring 2007 Friday, May 4, 2007 POST 214.
Curry Mouse EE296 Design Review Presentation Saturday, March 11, 2006.
DC Motor Control  mouse EE 496 Advisor: Dr. Tep Dobry.
Micromouse Meeting #3 Lecture #2 Power Motors Encoders.
Figure 13.1 The UP3-bot uses an R/C car battery and R/C servos for drive motors.
OPTICAL FLOW The optical flow is a measure of the change in an image from one frame to the next. It is displayed using a vector field where each vector.
Athletic Field Marking Device Anthony Cortese, Ryan Crump, Matthew Lawler, Patrick Shaughnessy (Team Leader), John Sudia.

ENGR 6806 – Motor Control Prepared By: Rob Collett September 15, Office: EN2074.
Microcontroller Robot Design Spring 2003 Advisor : Prof. Hayler Engineering Team: Mark Vo Jing Hua Zhong Abbas Ziadi.
The Making of Micromouse Yantriki Level 3 Competition Techfest 2004.
Xin Jin Zelun Tie Ranmin Chen Hang Xie. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale.
Engaging Undergraduate Students with Robotic Design Projects James O. Hamblen School of ECE, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA
GROUND UTILITY NETWORK DECIPHERING AUTOMATED MACHINE GROUP 10 BLAKE SIMONINI DIDIER LESSAGE GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ G.U.N.D.A.M.
Team 4 Shane Sunada – Project Leader Malcolm Menor – Project Manager Nathan Umeda – Technical Supervisor Joseph Longhi – Documentation Final Presentation.
Problem Statement Need to build a manually controlled robot capable of moving around and gripping and lifting objects. Basically we can divide this problem.
EEL 5666: Intelligent Machine Design Laboratory Final Presentation by Rob Hamersma April 12, 2005.
Benjamin Chen Suhail Gul Wai-Sze Lok Rob Merkle Brian Shaw Renee Soenen.
Structural Design Considerations Small or 0° turn radius Given size restriction and ground clearance Friction Type of drive-train Weight and center of.
Automatic accident avoiding system PROJECT MEMBERS MUTHUKUMAR.K (05ME33) SAKTHIDHASAN.S (05ME39) SAKTHIVEL.N (05ME40) VINOTH.S (05ME56) PROJECT GUIDE:
RACE Reactive Autonomous Coordinate Executor Created by: Neil Javalla Dustin Torres Derrick Yanga.
In Unit 5: Speed, Power, Torque, and DC Motors, you build a VEX test stand winch that enables you to learn key engineering concepts and principles so.
Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Team Amaze Me. EE 296 Project (MicroMouse) Members –Brandon Gibu –Ah Ram Kim –John-Kalani Miyajima –Justin Ogata Website.
Figure 12.1 The UP1-bot. Figure 12.2 Left: Radio Control Servo Motor and Right: Servo with Case and Gears Removed.
Robot Project by Ahmad Shtaiyat Supervised by Dr. Salem Al-Agtash.
Electrical and Computer Engineering Midway Design Review Team 22: Driver Assist.
BLDC Motor Speed Control with RPM Display. Introduction BLDC Motor Speed Control with RPM Display  The main objective of this.
Casne.ncl.ac.uk Taking care of the CrumbleBot Please do NOT stress the robot's motors 1.Do NOT push the robot 2.Do NOT hold the.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
TIRE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEMS
PRESENTATION ON Line follower robot.
Using Arduino to modify RC controls Nick Carter 12/31/2015
Stringing your car to determine wheel alignment is decidedly old school, but it's also effective, efficient and cheap. Begin by placing your car in a level.
ECE Computer Engineering Design Project
Monitoring Robot Prepared by: Hanin Mizyed ,Abdalla Melhem
Robotic Vacuum Cleaner
OBJECTIVES Describe the operation of a pressure-differential switch and a brake fluid level sensor switch. Describe the operation of a residual check valve.
ARDUINO LINE FOLLOWER ROBOT
Review and Ideas for future Projects
Introduction to H-Bridge
MAHARANA PRATAP ENGG. COLLEGE SENSOTRONIC BRAKE CONTROL
Bluetooth operated Arduino Controlled Car
Tire-Pressure Monitoring Systems
Presentation transcript:

Sophomore Design Class Automated Highway Simulation Group 2: Jeremy Sletten Patrick Murphy Michael Olson Randa Ibrahim

Purpose The purpose of this course was to create a line-following car that simulates the operation of an automated highway system. This vehicle would then be used as the design model for a sophomore design class.

Project Constraints Total price for the car must be under $200, assuming bulk orders for most items. Because this car was to be designed in the sophomore design course, all subsystems had to be designed on a level that is known to, or can easily be taught to sophomore level students.

Top Level Car Design We decided to build our own car from the ground up, instead of taking a pre built R/C car and modifying the controls for speed and steering. Justification: – Less expensive to purchase in bulk – Easier and more cost effective to manufacture

Micro-controller Board We chose the Axiom CML-9S12DP256. Justification: – Availability – Currently in use at OU for various CSE courses – Image Craft C compiler

Chassis Made from lightweight aluminum Easy to assemble All screw holes and slots would be pre drilled Negligible cost Manufactured here at OU Had to modify our design late in the project.

Final Chassis Design The original tracks created too much tension on the motors The chassis was redesigned to drive solely from the wheels on the motors A third, center-mounted pivoting castor was added to improve support, without causing drag when turning

H-Bridge Had a lot of problems getting pre-built H-Bridges with the appropriate surface mounts. Resorted to building our own H-Bridge out of transistors. Due to the power requirements of the motors, an additional circuit was made to amplify the PWM signal coming from the 68HC12 to have a peek voltage capable of controlling the H-Bridge setup.

H-Bridge – 2 nd Design

Motors Performed some basic calculations based on the total weight of our vehicle and a frictional coefficient of.9 (Rubber on Pavement) Reviewed a variety of motors made available to us and found one that met the minimum calculated torque requirements.

Sensors Sharp GP2Y0A02YK – Long range – Allows us to slow down or even stop to avoid another vehicle or obstacle in the road. Fairchild QRB1134 – Better detection range – Currently using a 3 sensor array to follow the line, however the number of sensors used could be increased to give smoother turning and line detection.

Software Simple implementation Takes 4 inputs from the sensors (1 distance and 3 line following) Sets the PWM output duty cycle accordingly.

Software Flow Chart

Software Flowchart cont.

Line Following Algorithm Vehicle StateOperation Straight Continue on in normal operation.

Line Following Algorithm Vehicle StateOperation A little to the left Turn slightly to the right

Line Following Algorithm Vehicle StateOperation A lot to the left Turn more to the right

Line Following Algorithm Vehicle StateOperation Off the track to either the left or right Check against previous state to see which side the car is off of. Turn back hard in the opposite direction.

Line Following Algorithm

Cost Considerations Microcontroller - Axiom CML-9S12DP256 - $115 Motors - $4-ea. X 2 motors = $8 Distance Sensor - $12.50 Line Following Sensor - $2-ea. X 3 sensors = $6 NS LMD18200 H-bridges X 2 = $18 Misc. transistors and resistors - $5 Getting the manufactured materials at a negligible cost and free labor…

Cost Considerations – Cont. Priceless!!!

Cost Considerations – Cont. Total Cost ~ $ Future considerations for remaining balance could be left up to the students. – Higher powered motors (Faster car) – Additional sensors (More accurate turning) – Higher powered battery packs (Longer run time) – Paint / Body Kits (More aesthetically pleasing)

Development Issues H-Bridges took a long time to come in and set our timelines back a lot further then we were comfortable with. Made motor testing impossible until very late in the design. Hard to determine total vehicle weight early on, ended up with high rpm motors bordering on insufficient torque. Due to the problems involving the Motors / H-Bridge our original design for a tracked vehicle had to be modified.

Questions ? ? ? The End