LIBRARY AND INFORMATION USE PATTERNS BY ENGINEERING FACULTY AND STUDENTS Lisha Li William Baer June 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IStart Tutorial Office of International Education (OIE) Fall 2011.
Advertisements

Academic Success: How Library Services Make a Difference Ying Zhong and Johanna Alexander Walter W. Stiern Library California State University, Bakersfield.
Marketing Interlibrary Loan: A Blessing AND/OR a Curse? Sue Leibold Library Director Clarke University.
Student Information Search Skills and Help Acquisition Differences Across Three Faculties Linda Bedwell Reference & Instruction Librarian Dalhousie University.
Roberta Spalter-Roth, Ph.D Director of Research American Sociological Association Enhancing Diversity in Science: Working Together to Develop Common Data,
CMU has been said to be the “most wired campus in the US” for two years in a row. What kind of impact does such a infrastructure has on the daily academic.
Queen’s Libraries User Surveys Selected information from the Faculty and Student surveys June 2002.
E-learning in LIS education: satisfaction of part-time LIS students with Omega Marko Tot, young researcher Faculty of Humanities and Social Sceiences,
Are Wells Fargo’s 401(k) Communications to Health Care Employees O(k)? Tuesday, May 15, 2007 Jennifer Cresap.
Graduating Senior Exit Survey Lindsay Couzens, M.S. And Bea Babbitt, Ph.D. Academic Assessment 1.
Alcohol & Sexual Behavior at Rowan University Michael Carotenuto Lauren Davis Allison Griffiths Michael Carotenuto Lauren Davis Allison Griffiths.
User Keene State College, Mason Library Irene Herold Director, Mason Library April 7, 2006.
Get an article or book that the library does not have? If C-N Library does not have a book or the journal for an article that you need, you may still be.
LibQUAL+ Process Overview Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
A Coach’s Communication Strategy and its Relationship to a Collegiate Player’s Motivation to Perform as an Athlete Dana Neil, Andrea Pendergast, Amy Schmidt,
Julia Bauder, Grinnell College & Jenny Emanuel, University of Illinois Be Where our Faculty Are: Emerging Technology Use and Faculty Information Seeking.
Reading Habits Across Disciplines A Study of Student E-book Use Lee Cummings | Anne Larrivee | Leslie Vega.
Thinking the unthinkable – doing away with the library catalogue UKSG Webinar, June 2014 Simone Kortekaas.
The Harold Schiffman Music Library Team 4 Needs Assessment David Covert, Mia Jordan, Rachel Koury, Lara Patterson, Savannah Whitaker.
The Design and Use of a Career Portfolio to Promote Student Career Development Jill Lumsden Katie Meyer Robert Reardon James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State.
Developing a programme of information literacy. Strategy Will you work at an institutional level? Will you work at a course level? Will you work at a.
The University of Memphis Libraries Faculty Survey Spring 2001 Executive Summary Prepared by Perveen Rustomfram November 2002.
Shona Franklin Ally Harper Kenny Stubbolo Kevin Quinn Mariama Bonetti.
Center for Information and Communication Studies The Link Among Faculty Purposes of Reading, Information Seeking Patterns, Aspects of Use, Value and the.
Alice’s Adventures in LibQual-Land Kitty Tynan Assistant Director for Public Services CUA Libraries All illustrations from The Victorian Web: A Tenniel.
Joe C. Clark Kent State University Midwest MLA Chapter Meeting October 11, 2013.
Motivational Factors for Student Participation in Collegiate Club Sports at Indiana University Ben Smith.
TEACHERS APPROACH TO ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RESOURCES Dr. G.SIVAPRASAD Lecturer in Library Science, MVGRR Degree college, Bhattiprolu Guntur (Dt.) B. DHANA.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Faculty Survey Results Buswell Memorial Library, 2014.
Student Survey Results.  Conducted Feb. 29/12 to March 15, 2012  Student respondents only  20 questions  Incl. one open ended ‘add’l comments’  498.
Usage of Electronic Books in Academic Libraries: LIS Professionals’ View Point Sadaf Rafiq Mphil Scholar (PU) Librarian (CMH LMC Lahore) Presented by:
Maximizing Learning Using Online Assessment 2011 SLATE Conference October 14, /12/ P. Boyles, Assistant Professor, Chicago State University,
Porter and Stern (2002) asserted that firms operating in advanced nations whose economies are innovation-based would not obtain a sustained competitive.
Confidential Faculty Development Needs Assessment: Report on Findings Institution: AIEP – Universidad Andrés Bello Response to Final Survey.
HPD Shelves DOCLINE OCLC Login Account Online Local & Distance Resources Local & Distance PatronsInteribrary Loan & Document Delivery.
Google and Beyond: What Sources are Students Really Using? Don MacMillan University of Calgary WILU 2007, Toronto May 17, 2007.
The Impact of Scholarly Communication on LIS Education Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.
Introduction To Ohio University Libraries Araba Dawson-Andoh Africana Librarian Alden Library Room 122A
Bringing Together Survey Results of the UNLV Student Experience
St. Thomas University ALUMNI SURVEY Executive Summary Undergraduate and Graduate alumni in university database from 2001 to 1991 were mailed a copy of.
National Career Development Association Conference 2004 Evaluation of an Online Career Portfolio: How Technology Promotes Career Development Jill Lumsden,
Usability, the User Experience & Interface Design: The Role of Reference July 30, 2013.
 Interest in enhancing student learning with technology  Interest in how students and faculty prefer to learn a new technology  Interest in beliefs.
Undergraduate Science Students and Electronic Scholarly Journals Dr. Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
The Liaison Librarian Program – Meeting Faculty Needs? Daphne Flanagan, AUS University Librarian, Alanna Ross, AUS Associate University.
Instructors’ General Perceptions on Students’ Self-Awareness Frances Feng-Mei Choi HUNGKUANG UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH.
® LibQUAL+ ® Implementation Procedures The Third Lodz [Poland] Library Conference Technical University of Lodz June, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson.
College Level Cooperatively Taught Information Literacy and Subject Area Course Background and Assignments.
PERCEPTION AND EXPECTATION OF THE USERS OF BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY: A STUDY GUIDEC.RANGANATHAN ASSITANT PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY THIYAGU.C.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
USE PATTERN OF ELECTRONIC JOURNALS BY FACULTY MEMEBRS IN K.L.UNIVERSITY LIBRARY: A STUDY Smt. K. Usha Rani Librarian K L University, Vaddeswaram Guntur,
An E-Learning Approach to Data Information Literacy Education Jon Jeffryes University of Minnesota Lisa Johnston University of Minnesota June 24, 2013.
Group 2 Dung Nguyen Linh Nguyen Anh Nguyen Dung Tran Katarina Djakovic Devin Dorman.
Kenneth C. C. Yang The University of Texas at El Paso Presented at 2016 Sun Conference TEACHING INFORMATION LITERACY SKILLS IN COLLEGE CLASSROOMS: EMPIRICAL.
Collection Budget Management and Individual Article Purchase Doug Bates Tennessee Tech University.
A STUDY TO IDENTIFY GARDEN ICONOGRAPHIES This survey aims to identify specific iconographies of selected gardens of the world. It will also identify preferred.
Hospitality and Tourism Students Use of Technology Cary C. Countryman Michael Sciarini Matthew Roberts.
UNO Earl K. Long Library Library Needs of On-Campus Undergraduate Students Esteban Sotomayor.
Introduction In these challenging economic times, the value of academic libraries to the institution’s core goals and mission comes under close scrutiny.
It Takes a Community to Cultivate the Assessment Crop
Dr. Manoj Kumar Verma Assistant Professor
INSIGHTS FOR PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT & MARKETING
Digital experiences with Moodle at Divine Word University
A tale of three surveys: How librarians, faculty and students perceive and use electronic resources March 2009 © SkillSoft Corporation 2003.
LIRBARY RESOURCES AND SERVICES IN VIGNAN’S GROUP OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS: A USAGE PATTERNS AND SATISFACTION LEVELS AMONG FACULTY Smt. A. Rajani Kumari.
What are they asking? An analysis of questions asked at in-person and virtual service points.
Hong Li Xiaocan (Lucy) Wang
Presentation transcript:

LIBRARY AND INFORMATION USE PATTERNS BY ENGINEERING FACULTY AND STUDENTS Lisha Li William Baer June 2009

Outline  Purpose  Methodology and process  Survey Responses  Survey Results  Limitations  Conclusions

Purpose  To study the library usage patterns by engineering faculty and students  To compare usage patterns among different groups  Using the results of study to improve services in the following areas: Library out-reach Library instruction Resources access

Methodology & Process  Online survey (CEE & ME)  Questionnaire with multiple choices and open end questions.  Focus on: library use and information resources use habits.  Number of questions: Student survey:17 Faculty survey: 18  Online tools used: Survey Monkey.

Methodology & Process Questionnaire design – Oct IRB review – Oct survey link to departments (twice in 2 weeks) – Nov Data collection – Dec Faculty survey reopened – Feb Analysis – Dec Feb. 2009

Survey Population and Response Rate  Student population: Total enrollment (Fall 2008): 19,413 Total enrollment in COE: 11,079 Total students in ME & CEE:3,398 Total responses: 274 Response rate: 8%

Survey Population and Response Rate (cont.)  Faculty population: CEE Faculty: 89 ME Faculty: 97 Total Faculty: 186 Total Response: 25 Response Rate: 13%

Demographics  Student Participants: Undergraduates: 216 (79%)  Freshmen: 34  Sophomore:38  Junior: 60  Senior: 84 Graduates: 58 (21%)  Masters:13  Doctoral:45

Demographics (cont.)  Student Participants By gender:  Female – 95 (35%)  Male – 178 (65%) By school:  CEE – 90 (33%)  ME – 184 (67%) International:23 (8%)  Graduate: 18 31% of all graduate  Undergraduate: 5

Demographics (cont.)  Faculty Participants: By Academic Level  Assistant Professor: 4  Associate Professor: 7  Professor: 12  Other: 2  Total: 25 By Gender  Female: 2  Male: 23

How Often Students Come to the Library?

How Often Faculty Come to the Library?

Top 5 Reasons Students Use the Library - Undergraduate

Top 5 Reasons Students Use the Library - Graduate

When Students Prefer to Study in the Library?

Google Effect Q:“Google is sufficient to meet most of my research needs.” (%)

Resources Use Rankings (by Undergraduate ) Q: Where do you go to meet your academic information needs? (Please rank your 1st, 2nd, 3rd... choices) – (Undergraduate)

Resource Use Rankings (by Graduate ) Q: Where do you go to meet your academic information needs? (Please rank your 1st, 2nd, 3rd... choices) – (Graduate)

Resource Use Rankings (by Faculty) Q: Where do you go to meet your academic information needs? (Please rank your 1st, 2nd, 3rd... choices) – (Faculty)

Best Databases (by Graduate) Q: What are the best databases in your field(s)? (Please rank choices 1, 2, 3, and 4) – (Graduate)

Best Databases (by Faculty)

How Well the Undergraduates Feel They Know the Databases? Q: How would you categorize your level of familiarity with using the following library resources? - (Undergraduate)

How Well the Graduates Feel They Know the Databases? Q: How would you categorize your level of familiarity with using the following library resources? - (Graduate)

Training Preferences Q: What types of training in library resources do you prefer? (Check all that apply) - Students

Seeking Help with Research - Students Q: How do you seek research help from the Library? (Check all that apply) – All Students

Seeking Help with Research - Faculty Q: How do you seek research help from the Library? (Check all that apply) - Faculty

ILL Use – Students Q: How many articles/books have you ordered through the interlibrary loan (ILLiad) services in the past 12 month? – (All students)

ILL Use – Faculty Q: How many articles/books have you ordered through the interlibrary loan (ILLiad) services within the past year? - Faculty

Satisfaction with Electronic Journal Access - Students Q: How satisfied are you with obtaining journal articles electronically through the Georgia Tech Library?

Limitations  Response rate  Timing of the survey  Interpretation of questions  Answer choices

Conclusions  Undergraduate students rely on the library as a space to study.  Over all, students prefer online tutorials for database training. But online tutorials can not replace other methods of instruction.  Seniors and graduate students have more knowledge about library resources compared to other students. But we still need to do more to promote library resources.

Conclusions (cont.)  Faculty rely on the electronic resources and interlibrary loan services for research.  We need to be more creative in promoting library resources and services.

QUESTIONS?

THANK YOU!