Assessment and the Curriculum Department Chair Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Advertisements

Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
Evaluation for 1st Year Grantees Shelly Potts, Ph.D. Arizona State University
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Why We Are Here: Context for Curricular Design and Clinical Education Copyright 2008 by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC.
General Education Models General Education Reform Committee Lloyd Duman Carol Lindsay Sherry Simkins Karen Ruppel Bob Vogeler Peter Zao Bob Murray.
Assessment in the Biology Department in AY Caroline Solomon Friday December 5.
Assessing General Education Joe Safdie San Diego Mesa College Joe Safdie San Diego Mesa College.
PSU Anthropology Department Assessment Procedures Dr. Michele Gamburd
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT PLANNING Presentation to CLAS Unit Heads Nov. 16, 2005 Maria Cimitile Julie Guevara Carol Griffin.
Rationale for the Historical Understanding Measure: NPDEP Impact Study of FHAO.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Student Learning Outcomes: Tools for Intentionality.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Program Level Outcomes Jessica Carpenter Elgin Community College.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Academy for Student-Centered Learning – Workshop Two Melia Fritch, Shawna Jordan, & Shannon Washburn October 28, 2013 CREATING STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING.
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
CCSS Implementation July 2010: State Board of Education adopts Common Core State Standards for English and Mathematics : Implementation of.
Department of Mathematical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.A. in Mathematics CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Core Curriculum and Transfer Students Summer 2015.
Outcomes-based Education at UC. Created, Implemented, Maintained and Assessed by Faculty (Supported by Everyone!)
Frameworks for South Dakota Schools.  Provide basic information on South Dakota’s Capstone Experiences.  Discuss how Capstone Experiences fit into South.
Jason D. Powell Ferrum College Saturday, October 15, :30-2:30 PM ACA Summit Asheville, NC.
Eportfolio: Tool for Student Career Development and Institutional Assessment Sally L. Fortenberry, Ph.D., and Karol Blaylock, Ph.D. Eportfolio: Tool for.
Promoting and Communicating Learning Quality at NKU Mapping Student Learning Outcomes and Assessing Student Learning D. Kent Johnson, PhD.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD REPORT, DECEMBER 7, 2010 SLO Coordinators: Maggie Taylor (FCC) and Eileen Apperson(RC)
Developing Programmatic Objectives Presentation to Department of English SUNY Oneonta October 1, 2008.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
MA Thesis/Papers-In-Lieu Overview and Process. Thesis: What is it?  A thesis is a scholarly manuscript that reports on a significant in-depth investigation.
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
Assessment Plan Department of Biology, Queens College 12/10/2012 Assessment Forum Cathy Savage-Dunn.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Introduction to the Teacher Work Sample Portfolio Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Education 1.
Draft implementation plan for our new purposes and objectives for General Education. Interim report of the Task Force on General Education and the Faculty.
1 Orientation 101 General Education Program Student Learning Outcomes.
MIRMASTER OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 5 YEARS EUROPEAN ACCREDITATION FROM AQAAA (Agency for Quality Assurance and Accreditation Austria)
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Saddleback College In-Service August 18, We are at a distinct disadvantage because few of our programs require students to follow a sequence of.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
Teaching Business: BADM Major Requirements Six Foundational Courses BADM 101 Introduction to Business BADM 110 Foundations of Management BADM 226 Organizational.
Title Slide In the Murky Middle “In the Murky Middle: Assessing Critical Thinking and Integrative Learning Across the General Education/Major Divide” Dr.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
MU Core Revision Proposal The Atom Visual Structure Please read information provided in each slide as well as the notes under each slide.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
PDP Presentation Trinity Washington University
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
“Bridging General Education and the Major: Critical Thinking, the Mid- Curriculum, and Learning Gains Assessment” Dr. Jane Detweiler, Associate Dean, College.
Presentation transcript:

Assessment and the Curriculum Department Chair Workshop

Curriculum Integrity Program Review Program Approval Class Assessment Assessment

CIA relationship curriculumassessmentinstruction

of learningfor learningas learning

How do your students experience the curriculum?

Discrete experiences graduate course

Sequenced and outcomes focused outcome course outcome course outcome course

How does learning take place? core concepts entry breadth expansion midpoint synthesis contextual exit

core knowledge elective projectcapstone Developmental Assessment View of learning over time

It all starts with clear expectations for learning Over the course of the major, what do you expect students to learn? Broad statements about exit behaviors No more than 5-6 broad outcomes Define by proficiency/expected level

C ORE C OMPETENCIES A DVANCED P ERFORMER S OLID P ERFORMER B ASIC P ERFORMER U NDER -P ERFORMER T HEORETICAL C ONTEXT OF P OLITICS Has an excellent grasp of theory in various contexts and can apply theory to understand past, present and possible future outcomes. Understands the importance of theory as a tool as well as the normative and ethical components of politics. Has a solid understanding of the theoretical foundations of politics. Realizes the value of theory for making sense of the past and present and predicting future outcomes, and is aware of the normative and ethical components of political science. Has a general sense of what theory in its various incarnations is and why it is important, but cannot understand or apply sophisticated theoretical arguments or concepts. Has vague sense of the normative and ethical components of the discipline. Does not understand the content or the utility of theory. Cannot apply theoretical constructs to contemporary or historical problems. Does not understand normative or ethical components of the discipline. H ISTORICAL C ONTEXT OF P OLITICS Uses history as a framework for understanding contemporary politics. Has a well- developed understanding of patterns and their disruption as a critical part of the discipline. Comprehends historical trends in both American and international political life. Makes connections between contemporary political life and its historical antecedents. Has a general understanding of history and its relevance to contemporary politics. Thinks of history in broad outlines instead of specific factors that contribute to contemporary political life. Has little sense of historical trajectory and fails to make connections between the contemporary world and the past.

Identify what assessment milestones and tools to use. Look for existing assessments in program courses that most students take throughout the program. i.e. introduction to … Capstone Research paper Field based learning project Internship

Political Science Assessments The Political Science Department uses multiple methods of assessment as outlined below. Student Portfolio In the senior capstone course (84-401) students produce a formal (bound) portfolio of what they consider to be their best work in the major accompanied by reflective statements on their political science career at UWO and on each paper chosen for inclusion in the portfolio.

Political Science Assessments Major Research Paper In the senior capstone course (84-401) students produce and present a major research paper that demonstrates qualitative and/or quantitative research methods and analytical writing abilities (examples of such assignments is appended). Graduating Senior Survey The Political Science Department also uses a graduating senior survey to gain insight about the department’s ability to facilitate student achievement of the learning goals, about what parts of the program worked best for students, and what parts of the program could be strengthened.

Align Which outcome? When/Where? What assessment format? OutcomeWhen/whereFormat

Political Science alignment C ORE COMPETENCIES C OURSE /P ROGRAM C OMPONENT A SSESSMENT F ORMAT Theoretical Context of Politics ,105,115, Pre/Post Tests, Capstone Paper, Portfolio Reflections, Major Field Text (ETS) Historical Context of Politics ,105, Pre/Post Tests, Capstone Paper, Portfolio Reflections, Major Field Text (ETS) Contemporary Politics ,105, Pre/Post Tests, Capstone Paper, Portfolio Reflections, Major Field Text (ETS) Civic and Global Engagement Portfolio Reflections Analytical Ability ,105,115, Pre/Post Tests, Portfolio Reflections, Major Field Text (ETS) Written and Oral Communication Skills Portfolio Reflections, Capstone Paper, Capstone Presentation

Analysis Process Describe how you will analyze results Department meeting/retreat

Sample process A NALYSIS OF R ESULTS F EEDBACK M ECHANISMS The Political Science Department offers two sections of the capstone course each year. Instructors are asked to compile assessment related measures from the portfolio, major paper and presentation, and the major field and internal test. Instructors are also asked to solicit student comments about program and compile anecdotes about students’ post graduate plans. These measures, along with all other assessment measures indicated above, are discussed at an annual faculty retreat each summer. Results are also used for required reporting on assessment and student achievement. Because the Department is small, these discussions can result in immediate curricular actions.

Alignment of Findings Assessment Method/Con text Results?What do results tell us about learning? Program Response/C hange

Sample Findings Based on prior discussions of student learning outcomes, the following changes were underway before : offer the senior capstone course (PS401) every semester offer the research methods course (PS245) every semester in a small class size advise students to take PS245 early in career (sophomore year) to increase ability to apply methods related skills to student research The following changes were discussed at the 2009 summer retreat and implemented over the course of : increase upper division offerings during interim to reduce time to degree alternate between American Politics focused faculty and Comparative Politics International Relations focused faculty. increase political theory sub-field offerings design and implement a civil engagement emphasis/minor to improve student achievement of learning goals

What will assessment of learning tell us about the curriculum?

Curriculum characteristics Organization of the Curriculum Sequence-Are courses sequenced in a way to assist students to develop knowledge and skills? Articulation-How are courses related to one another? How does each course build upon or support learning from the previous course? Coherence-Is there a logical consistency of a set of well understood principles throughout the curriculum?

Curriculum Characteristics Rigor-Are students challenged? Are students meeting expectations put forth by the faculty? Integration-Can students incorporate knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes into their own lives? Learning Process-Can you identify areas where students have significant challenges with their learning? Where students are successful?

Assessment Guidelines I.Program Goals and Intended Student Learning Outcomes II.Assessment Methods/Tools for Learning Outcomes III.Analysis of Results Feedback Mechanisms IV.Interpretation of Assessment Results V.Assessment Results Used to Inform Change

Web Resources Provost Webpage sment