1 Preliminary stuff Summer09 ppMuMuX sample with CMSSW_3_3_2 –it requires opposite charge generated dimuons from heavy processes or K, pi, K0 L decays.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2006 Status of analysis.

Advertisements

Measuring the bb cross- section using B  D o X   decays Liming Zhang & Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.

Cocktail algorithm studies Carmen Diez Pardos Silvia Goy López CIEMAT Madrid Muon POG 07/04/2011 1C. Diez Pardos.

PDCMSSW - Luca Perrozzi1 Looking for… Punch throughs… Looking for… Punch throughs…

Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.

07/16/2002 p. 1 Muon Fake RatesPetra Merkel Muon Fake Rates Concept: determine rate of fake muons due to pion/kaon punch-through (PT) muons out of pion/kaon.

FVTX dEdx digitization Zhengyun You Peking University Los Alamos National Lab Jun 05, 2007.

1 Datasets /DoubleMu/Run2012A − 13Jul2012 − v 1 /DoubleMu/Run2012A −recover – 6Aug2012 – v1 /DoubleMu/Run2012B − 13Jul2012 − v 1 /DoubleMu/Run2012C − 24Aug.

Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February

A. Dabrowski, June Ratio(ke3/pipi0) 1 Final Results Γ(Ke3)/ Γ(pipi0) Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Collaboration Meeting 08 June.

1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.

1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.

1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.

MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.

Muon rates from minimum bias (without PionDecayer)

Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Semileptonics Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February.

B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.

Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.

BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.

H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.

Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.

Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.

NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.

Study of L1 and HLT efficiency in VBTF Monika Jindal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Jasbir Singh (panjab University, Chandigarh), Kajari Mazumdar (TIFR,

FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,

Caroline Fletcher Advisor: Dan Karmgard.  Astrophysics  Compact Muon Solenoid.

PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.

Drell-Yan study in CMS at 10 TeV, with 100 pb -1 Monika Jindal K.Mazumdar, D. Bourilkov, J.B. Singh 1LHC Physcis meeting.

Muons from  /K CSC samples vs generator predictions: preliminary comparisons.

1/27/2016 R.Seidl: status of simulation1 W muon analysis in PHENIX Status of the background understanding, signal, smearing and asymmetries R.Seidl (RBRC)

1 Selection of non-triggering muons in J/ψ  μμ events for the calibration of the Muon System 1)Offline Selection:  use of Mass Constrained Global Fit.

Study for rejection of muons from p/K decays Sergio Grancagnolo Stefania Spagnolo Andrea Ventura.

Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.

Daniel Sherwood 03/2005 Search for Crypto-Exotic States in Babar Daniel Sherwood Dr. Liliana Teodorescu.

Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.

Data vs MC … issues of the K +- group 1.Accidentals … contribution from Erika & Roberto 2.DC background.

Recent D0 results on Quarkonium HAN, Liang Univ. of Science & Technology of China Univ. of Manchester presenting D0 Collaboration ( commented by Rick Van.

Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.

Reduction of background in observation of W – decay using FVTX tracker Abraham Meles New Mexico State University DNP2012 – Newport Beach, CA. Oct 25, 2012.

Muon Efficiency and Fake Rate Two Dimension Fit Exclusive B->JPsiMuMu Analysis in CMSSW_3_1_2 1.

Muon Reconstruction and Vertex Constraint Giovanni Abbiendi Bologna CMS meeting, 20 November 2007.

EWK Drell-Yan: Status and Plans

Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.

Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India LHC weekely meeting.

QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.

Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.

K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,

Cocktail algorithm studies

psi(2S) Measument with CMS 10 TeV Data

Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis

Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction

Muon momentum scale calibration with J/y peak

F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi

Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS

Tracking Variable Study

(2S) Measument with CMS 10 TeV Data

ttbar + jets AOD analysis

Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1

Muons from light meson decays

Samples and MC Selection

Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).

Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi

Converted photon and π0 discrimination based on H  cut-based analysis Zhen Zhang IHEP

Topology rapidity study

Muon Trigger Acceptance Study

Study of MDC tuning.

Hit and Tracking Data set used: From loose to tight cuts Pythia p+p

Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi

Low pt muon identification

K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment

Presentation transcript:

1 Preliminary stuff Summer09 ppMuMuX sample with CMSSW_3_3_2 –it requires opposite charge generated dimuons from heavy processes or K, pi, K0 L decays in flight Muon properties: –Pt > 2.5 GeV –Eta < 2.5 –Muon has a track Tracker + Global –“Muon has a track” does not imply is a Tracker Mu, it can be Global Mu without beeing Tracker Mu Muons are defined –Prompt if R xy < 4.4 cm –DiF (decays in flight) if R xy > 4.4 cm

2 All muons

3 DeltaR distribution, ALL

4 DeltaPt distribution, ALL

5 DeltaPt vs DeltaR, ALL

6 DeltaPt vs DeltaR, PROMPT

7 DeltaPt vs DeltaR, DiF

8 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt all muons

9

10 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt all muons

11 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt all muons

12 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR all muons

13 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR all muons

14 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR all muons

15 Prompt muons

16 Reminder: DeltaR & DeltaPt distribution, ALL

17 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt prompt muons

18 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt prompt muons

19 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt prompt muons

20 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt prompt muons

21 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR prompt muons

22 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR prompt muons

23 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR prompt muons

24 DiF muons

25 Reminder: DeltaR & DeltaPt distribution, ALL

26 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF muons

27 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF muons

28 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF muons

29 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF muons

30 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR DiF muons

31 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR DiF muons

32 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR DiF muons

33 ALL muons from PIONS

34 DeltaR distribution, ALL vs ALL_Pions

35 DeltaPt distribution, ALL vs ALL_Pions

36 DeltaPtVSDeltaR distribution, ALL vs ALL_Pions

37 DiF muons from PIONS

38 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF pions

39 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF pions

40 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF pions

41 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF pions

42 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR DiF pions

43 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR DiF pions

44 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR DiF pions

45 ALL muons from KAONS

46 DeltaR distribution, ALL vs ALL_Kaons

47 DeltaPt distribution, ALL vs ALL_Kaons

48 DeltaPtVSDeltaR distribution, ALL vs ALL_Kaons

49 DiF muons from KAONS

50 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF kaons

51 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF kaons

52 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF kaons

53 Effects of DeltaR cut on DeltaPt DiF kaons

54 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR DiF kaons

55 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR DiF kaons

56 Effects of DeltaPt cut on DeltaR DiF kaons

57 Preliminary Conclusions Prompt and DiF muons have very different distributions Loose cuts retain most Prompt and DiF –e.g. DeltaR =0.05, DeltaPt =0.1 Tight cuts reject most DiF –e.g. DeltaR =0.005, DeltaPt =0.05