Jessamine County Schools Pyramid of Interventions Update 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Advertisements

Harrison County Schools Professional Learning Community (PLC) Implementation Plan.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Monitoring Monday 4 years later Lessons Learned. WHAT WE NEEDED FIRST TRUST, TRUST,TRUST We still make it perfectly clear this is not an evaluation -
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Teacher Evaluation Model
SCHOOL-BASED PS/RTI IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Plan Overview & Development.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
1 Presented by Media Services Media Specialists Connections and Issues Training: November – December Zone Based Meetings.
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Response to Intervention Making it Work in Jessamine County Michelle Gadberry, Psy. S. Assistant Director of Special Programs.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
PBIS Coaches Network pbis.sccoe.org
Implementation Phase Great Prairie AEA - December 2012 Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance TODAY’S AGENDA Event versus Process Monitoring.
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
P arent I nvolvement A nalysis? The Parent Involvement Analysis is designed and developed by Academic Development Institute What is.
March 25, 2009 NHSTE Event at SERESC in Bedford, NH Dr. Cathy Higgins March 25, 2009 Spring Update from NH Department of Education Office of Educational.
SYSTEMS COACHING AND BUILDING LOCAL CAPACITY Utah Multi-Tiered System of Supports SPDG, 2014.
PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
MiBLSi Systems of Support for Training October 9,
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
District Leadership Practices that Support Instructional Coach (TOSA) Implementation and Effectiveness Presented by Lea Curcio, Director of Curriculum.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Update Cambrian School District March 8, 2012.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
School-wide Facilitator Training September 15, 2010 School-Wide Positive Behavior Support.
Strategic Problem Solving Committee Report Progress during the School Year SPECIAL EDUCATION.
1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Rhode Island Model Educator Performance and Support System Training.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
Company LOGO Professional Development in the Zone Organizational Meeting January 13, 2005.
Polk County Public Schools. Why do we need a web-based Professional Development System?
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
Curriculum Focused Visit In Search of Standards. People’s minds are changed by observation and not through argument. (Will Rogers) What gets monitored.
April 28, 2014 CISD Support: Beth Brophy Mitch Fowler Carrie Johnson Facilitated School Improvement Planning.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Office of School Improvement Updates Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary December 3, 2012.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Completing the Summary Rating Form and End-of-Year Summative Conferencing.
Focus on Professional Learning Communities State Personnel Development Grant D. Ahrens 5/10/2013.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
West Virginia Support for Improving Professional Practice (WVSIPP)
SW-PBIS Cohort 10 Spring Training & Celebration February and March 2016.
Transition- SSIP Cohort 1 Where we are & where we are going! Catawba County Schools presenting for February Northwest Region EC Directors Mtg.
Module 2 : Using Data to Problem-Solve Implementation Issues Session 3 Phase I Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
VTPBiS Coordinators as Coaches Learning and Networking Meeting 1 May, 2016.
Tier 1 Instructional Delivery and Treatment Fidelity Networking Meeting February, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Financial Management of ECE Programs.  Go to “Tools”  Click on “Personal Information” to edit your personal information (including address) or.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Jessamine County Schools Pyramid of Interventions Update 2009

Agenda I.Process II.Pyramids of Intervention – programs III.Professional Development IV.Monitoring and evaluation V.How did we get here?

Teacher Handbook Read pages 3, 4 and 5 Divide into groups of 5 Section handbook for reading: -Page 6-10WOW -Pages 11-13FROG -Pages 14-18FISH -Pages 19-22YOU ROCK -Pages 23-27SUPER STAR

Group Activity Each person read their section and then share/discuss with group using the following guiding questions: *What is the general content of the section? *Why do you think we included this information in the handbook? *How does this help us communicate district expectations?

Share Out Each group share out one insight or comment about the Teacher Handbook

POI Blog Log in using generic user name/password UN: jctcag Pass: farms Explore the blog Click on Documents and then scroll down. Click on the link to access the documents. We have copies of forms for you also.

District Required Forms Coaches developed as a team TIP Level change rubric Implementation Documentation Referral Checklist Next steps? (JTPT)

Pyramids of Intervention Divide the different pyramids up between the people seated at your table. You might work in pairs or individually to answer the following questions: How do the interventions change from level to level? What are ways that teachers can use these pyramids? What are ways the school can use these pyramids? You’ll have 2 minutes to analyze your assigned pyramid. Be ready to share with the others at your table.

Pyramids of Intervention Pyramids outline variety of choices available for meeting student needs Have been created over the last couple of years and we are continually refining them Provide a framework for: –Teachers to help make decisions about Tier 1 interventions –School teams during problem solving meetings Next steps? –Create student profiles to match with programs –Ensure that the training is provided for every teacher, assistant working with students on the programs

PD: POI University Look through the different sessions and sort them into strands. How and why do you think we included the topics that we did? Share with a partner your insights and how you will use this information.

PD: POIU the details CRAs helped develop list of sessions by surveying teachers on topics. Priority was given to finding in-district “Experts” to present sessions. Teacher registration was completed online. Evaluations were very positive!

On Line PD Goal: Have “just in time” training on different intervention programs to enable schools to readjust their program based on student needs. Videotaped live trainings. Worked with teachers to create on line version that involved video clips, informational reading, and directions. Use the program with student(s) and bring examples to school’s Principal or CRA along with any questions they may have about implementation.

PD for Administrators : Ensuring fidelity of program implementation Videotape teacher using the program with students Create observation checklists Train administrators/coaches on observation tool and providing effective feedback We are just beginning this process with one training completed and several started. Goal to have each Coach provide a program PD and follow it up with development of on line version

Next Steps: Moodle

Monitoring and evaluation School Level –Intervention Resource Teachers –CRA/Principal walkthroughs –Fidelity Checklists District Level –Monthly school site visits by Asst. Director-M –Twice yearly data review with district team-C –Walkthroughs by district PLCs_C –DoSE reviews EVERY referral prior to acceptance-M –JTPT-c

Intervention Resource Teachers Job Description – part data manager, part coach, part intervention teacher Funding and School Plans Elementary vs. Secondary Monitoring and Supervision –Principals Walkthroughs –IRTs observe other staff conducting interventions and offer support

District-Level Monitoring and Feedback Asst. Director meets with all Elementary IRTs and Secondary IRTs on a monthly basis. Every month, Asst. Director visits two schools for a full day to observe interventions. Twice a year, a district team conducts data review visits

How did we get here? Planning Use the CDIP/CSIP process to: outline framework ensure priority create need for funding Transition from elementary coaches to Intervention Resource Teachers at each school-M C

How did we get there? Administrative Retreat Summer 2008 Met with administrators by level for hourly sessions Four days of learning Focus on basic process, key components, expectations, communication plans and monitoring plans M

How did we get there? Data Review Meetings Scheduled 2 times during year Collected common data from each school Provided opportunity for Central Office staff to: –Check implementation –Problem solve with school staff –Identify needed resources –Identify strengths in different schools and pair schools together as needed Outcomes from these meetings: –Sharing of interventions between schools –Fidelity checklists –Pyramid of Interventions University –IRT unfunded need in CDIP process –Refinement of tier change process C

How did we get there? Funding Variety of sources: –Special Education –Textbook –ESS –Title 1 –ARRA funds ARRA funds –Goal to create a system of support –Transition Elementary Coaches to IRTs –Coach charged with developing capacity of teachers to sustain the work –Combination of Title 1 and Special Education resources