HEMS Mountain Operations TGL 43

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
Advertisements

1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
05 July 2007Cologne NPA WG66.009: Type and Group Ratings Juan Anton.
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance
Regulation of Low Level Waste Management
Flight Time Limitations for Business Aviation A Snapshot of EBAA Activity Andrea Němec Manager Safety and Rulemaking BBGA Annual Conference 12 March 2013.
Safety Regulation Group Slide 1 INCAPACITATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SENIOR CABIN CREW MEMBERS 2 nd Presentation to OST 28 March 2006.
Slide 2 OST 07-2 HEMS Performance JAR-OPS 3.005(d) HSST WP-07/3.4 HSST EASA Form 07/001.
Participation Requirements for a Patient Representative.
JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002 NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES.
Slide 2 OST 07-1 Use of Headsets JAR-OPS 3 OST WP HSST WP-06/15.3.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
Helicopter Hoist Operations JAR-OPS 3
Safety Regulation Group Slide 1 INCAPACITATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SENIOR CABIN CREW MEMBERS Presentation to OST 29 November 2005.
Slide 2 OST 07-3 SE Piston Operations JAR-OPS 3 Appendix 1 to 3.005(e) & Appendix 1 to 3.517(a) HSST WP-06/10.5 HSST EASA Form 07/002.
JAA/FAA 20th Annual JAA/FAA International Conference 1 Repair Data Acceptance Presented by W. Schulze-Marmeling.
Oint Aviation Authorities June 2004OST 04-2, Helsinki1 TGL No. 36 Approval of Electronic Flight Bags (EFBs) Georges Rebender – JAA Operations Director.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Health and Safety.
WORK HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT IMPLICATIONS FOR SMALL BUSINESS
LEGISLATION OVERVIEW & PROCEDURES Douglas Walker Chairman Scottish Registration Board Structural Engineers Registration Ltd.
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Financial Intermediaries and Resettlement Planning Instruments.
3 – 5 June Update on EASA FSTDs related matters 2008 US – Europe International Aviation Safety Conference.
Appendix 8.1 – Waste Management Plan Oil Spill Contingency Plan – Land Document Number: KOC.SA.020 Incident Name: Incident Date/Time: Incident Location:
ISO STANDARDS TRAINING & CONSULTING
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board The Clarified ISAs, Audit Documentation, and SME Audit Considerations ISA Implementation Support Module.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Organ, body, authority Prof. Gyula Bándi. A reference to the competent organ or body, particularly to the competent authority, are part of legal regulation.
Rom for bransjestandard?
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
1 World Dispatch Summit Toronto, Canada May 2002 ETOPS Presentation Ralph Webster Transport CanadaTransports Canada Safety & SecuritySécurité et sûreté.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
Prime Responsibility for Radiation Safety
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Regulations and Procedures Please ensure you are familiar with the regulations surrounding examination as laid out in the Research Degree Regulatory Framework.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
A FIRST LOOK: Information and Issues A FIRST LOOK: Information and Issues Recreational Boating Accident Reporting Manual (COMDTINST M ) Federal Register.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
Radiation Safety Regulations
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Radiation protection of the public IAEA Regional Training Course on Radiation Protection of patients for Radiographers,
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
Gasunie is one of the biggest gas infrastructure companies in Europe. Within the company, we give safety the highest priority; it forms the basis of our.
Slide 1 POA Seminar 02 March 2016 Personnel Competence Including Certifying Staff and Release to Service Andy Swift / Michael Greer.
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Phillipa Silcock Using and discharging conditions.
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
Monitoring the State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties
NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Particular Conditions of Contract & Appendix to Tender
HSE rules & regulations
Particular Conditions of Contract & Appendix to Tender
AIRWORTHINESS OF AIRCRAFT
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
IPPC first consultation 1 July to 30 September 2018
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Legal and Organisation requirements for data recording
Adult Education Survey Anonymisation Point 6
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
CR-GR-HSE-302 Management of change
Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)
HSE Requirements for Pipeline Operations GROUP HSE GROUPE (CR-GR-HSE-414) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule defines the minimum HSE requirements related to the.
Presentation transcript:

HEMS Mountain Operations TGL 43 HSST WP-06/08.10

Situation It had been suggested that the existing requirements for HEMS Mountain operations did not take into consideration the limitations imposed by the lack of One Engine Inoperative (OEI) performance that apparently exists when twin-engine helicopters are operated at altitudes up to and above 8,000ft. It had also been suggested that some singles can fly up to these altitudes and still have sufficient reserves of performance to conduct HEMS.

Situation It was thought that Appendix 1 to JAR-OPS 3.005(d) might have be amended to permit single-engine helicopters to conduct HEMS in mountainous areas - i.e. in a hostile environment - where the flights have to be operated to HEMS Operating Sites above an altitude of 5,000ft. HSST WP-06/08.0 was developed to review the relevance of the suggestions and to propose a suitable amendment. Following discussion of the original paper, an additional amendment to the performance rules (WP-07/03.4) was proposed, accepted by OST and forwarded to EASA in May 07.

Situation A follow-up paper was requested by the HSST to clarify the remaining issues and conclusions were offered to interested parties. The paper was rewritten with its scope widened to consider HEMS Mountain operations in the High Alps. This has resulted in a final set of conclusions and recommendations which might have been transposed into a proposed ACJ but for the current regulatory framework. The TGL route for more rapid publication was suggested by JAA-T LO and accepted by the HSST.

Background Issues The existing JAR-OPS 3 HEMS requirements do not take into consideration the limitations that could exist for All Engine Operating (AEO) Hover Out of Ground Effect (HOGE), and One Engine Inoperative (OEI) performance, when twin-engine helicopters are operated at altitudes up to 16,000ft – particularly with temperatures in excess of ISA

Background Issues The requirements do not take into consideration the effect on HEMS response time when the number of potential casualties is subject to exceptional conditions that result from an influx of a large, and transient, population engaged in recreational activities such as winter sports.

Background Issues The requirements do not take into consideration techniques and equipment currently used for the insertion and extraction of personnel in the mountain rescue environment. Because of the nature of mountain operations, landing is not always possible at HEMS/rescue sites; it is therefore necessary to have available a means of access/recovery utilising Human External Cargo (HEC) provisions. HEC is undertaken by hoist, long haul or short haul (the last two using fixed ropes attached to the cargo hook(s) – suitably approved for that purpose).

Background Issues Some reliance is placed on interpretation of Note in Appendix 1 to 3.005(d) “The Authority is empowered to decide which operation is a HEMS operation in the sense of this Appendix” This can lead to different interpretations At least one State facing a challenge on requiring compliance with this Appendix Guidance was needed to alleviate concerns (and to avoid a potential legal challenge) Regulatory change timing precludes providing guidance inside JAR-OPS 3

Draft TGL 43 The proposed TGL will provide guidance for affected Authorities to determine the conditions under which some HEMS mountain operations, conducted by an AOC holder, might be taken outside the scope of CAT regulation whilst retaining the level of safety necessary for such operations by the appropriate assessment and management of risk.

Information HEMS operating site: A site selected by the commander during a HEMS flight for HHO, landing and take-off. Because this is the primary pick up site related to an incident or accident, its use can never be pre-planned and therefore attracts alleviations from operating procedures and performance rules - when appropriate

Appendix 1 to JAR-OPS 3.005(d) Information Appendix 1 to JAR-OPS 3.005(d) Helicopters conducting operations to/from a HEMS operating site located in a hostile environment shall as far as possible be operated in Performance Class 2. accordance with Subpart G (Performance Class 1). The commander shall make every reasonable effort to minimise the period during which there would be danger to helicopter occupants and persons on the surface in the event of failure of a power unit Performance Class 3 operations shall not be conducted over a hostile environment

TGL Composition The TGL is extensive and contains: Discussion Analysis Conclusions Recommendations Consideration was made to shorten the paper but then aspects of the subject might not be fully addressed TGL is therefore complete with all references and detail to enable an Authority to determine the conditions under which an Operator might be granted an Approval

TGL - Main Conclusions Some aspects of mountain rescue cannot be conducted under the existing requirements of the HEMS appendix Provision should be made to permit a contingency plan for evacuation of a casualty when operations to/from the HEMS Operating Site at high altitudes are beyond the capability of a twin-engine helicopter operating in PC2 Provision should be made to permit a contingency plan to come into effect when the number of missions exceeds the (agreed) normal operational capacity

TGL - Main Conclusions Clarification that for mountain rescue involving more than one helicopter, the one which, as part of its mission, is performing the act of inserting, or extracting, the mountain specialist(s) is not considered to be operating in CAT Clarification that mountain rescue involving a helicopter using a Personal Carrying Device System (PCDS) in a Fixed Line Flyaway is not considered to be CAT The Authority should ensure that adequate equipment, meeting the requirements of CS 27/29 in respect of HEC, together with procedures in the OM, provides a JAR-OPS 3 equivalent safety for crew members and casualty

TGL – Main Recommendations An AOC holder with a HEMS Approval should be alleviated from the requirement to conduct specific phases of operations under the (full) requirements of CAT Such alleviation should be permitted to an AOC holder only when in compliance with a risk assessed contingency plan submitted to, and accepted by, the Authority Specific phases of operation should not be regarded as being operations in CAT and therefore should not be required to be conducted under the requirements of JAR-OPS 3

Consultation Considerable consultation has been conducted within the HSST and in the HEMS organisations (EHA/EHAC) together with several of the affected mountain operators they are in support of the this guidance material

Summary and Final Assessment The TGL will provide guidance for Authorities and Operators (on the intent of the ‘note’) so that they might develop suitable procedures to address the special conditions experienced by HEMS operators in high mountain areas which were not intended, or expected, to be covered under the basic tenets of JAR-OPS 3 Appendix 1 to 3.005(d) It is recommended that the TGL be approved for publication as soon as possible to give the information some provenance and so that use may be made of it by those concerned