Imaging fault geometry to learn about earthquake mechanics Phillip G Resor Wesleyan University Vanessa Meer, Giulio Di Toro, Ashley Griffith.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Analysis Lecture 10 SLIDE 1
Advertisements

A Pseudo-Dynamic Rupture Model Generator for Earthquakes on Geometrically Complex Faults Daniel Trugman, July 2013.
EARTHQUAKE FOCAL MECHANISMS (FAULT PLANE SOLUTIONS)
Earthquake recurrence models Are earthquakes random in space and time? We know where the faults are based on the geology and geomorphology Segmentation.
(Introduction to) Earthquake Energy Balance
The Community Geodetic Model (CGM): What is it and how does it relate to studies of lithospheric rheology? Jessica Murray, David Sandwell, and Rowena Lohman.
How Important is the Motion of Subducting Slabs Relative to the Underlying Mantle: A Proposed Study Walter R. Roest & R. Dietmar Müller The University.
Subduction Zone Observatory Big Geodynamics-Related Science Questions Magali Billen Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences UC Davis Collaborators & Students:
Open questions in earthquake physics and the contribution of array seismology J.-P. Ampuero Caltech Seismolab Acknowledgements: Lingsen Meng (now at UC.
GE177b- Objectives Introduce a variety of techniques to describe ‘quantitatively’ deformation of the lithosphere and fault slip history. Introduce.
Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence: Tutorial 2 Jim Dieterich University of California, Riverside.
Using Induced Seismicity to Predict and Monitor Reservoir Permeability Pathways STRM LLC.
Slides for Ben Study Area 500 km N Great Earthquakes, Strongly-Coupled Arc Pacific plate motion 1938, , M S 7.4 tsunami earthquake 1957, 9.1.
Structural Geology: Deformation and Mountain Building
Fault friction and seismic nucleation phases Jean-Paul Ampuero Princeton University J.P. Vilotte (IPGP), F.J. Sánchez-Sesma (UNAM) Data from: W. Ellsworth,
A DECADE OF PROGRESS : FROM EARTHQUAKE KINEMATICS TO DYNAMICS Raúl Madariaga Laboratoire de Géologie, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
Ch 3: Characterization of the SFBR Earthquake Sources Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, 2002.
GreatBreak: Grand Challenges in Geodynamics. Characteristics of a Desirable Geodynamic Model Ties together observational constraints on current state.
A New Approach To Paleoseismic Event Correlation Glenn Biasi and Ray Weldon University of Nevada Reno Acknowledgments: Tom Fumal, Kate Scharer, SCEC and.
Earthquake interaction The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.
Earthquake Energy Balance
Stress III The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.
(Chapter 10 in D & R) Geometry and Kinematics: Plates.
The Spectrum of Fault Slip Behaviors 18 Sep. 2013, C. Marone, Geosc500 Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting Stick-slip dynamics and Instability. Introduction.
I. Introduction II. Methods in Morphotectonics III. Methods in Geodesy an Remote sensing IV. Relating strain, surface displacement and stress, based on.
San Andreas Big Bend A geometric feature Restraining the relative plate motion Nature’s solution Impacts include:  patterns of faults, seismicity  Rupture.
Earthquake nucleation How do they begin? Are large and small ones begin similarly? Are the initial phases geodetically or seismically detectable? Related.
Earthquake scaling and statistics
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
Quantitative Structural Analysis: Where does it start? David D. Pollard, Stanford University Stephen J. Martel, Univ. of Hawaii Structural Geology and.
Induced Slip on a Large-Scale Frictional Discontinuity: Coupled Flow and Geomechanics Antonio Bobet Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Virginia Tech,
Dr. Jeff Amato Geological Sciences 8/26/08 GEOL 470 Structural Geology OUTLINE Why structure is important An example of structural analysis Earth Structure.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
GAPSS Geothermal Area Passive Seismic Sources Sismicità associata allo sfruttamento del campo geotermico di Larderello-Travale G. Saccorotti, D. Piccinini.
Scientific Drilling Into the San Andreas Fault zone San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD)
March 2006 WGCEP Workshop Ruth A. Harris U.S. Geological Survey.
Quantifying and characterizing crustal deformation The geometric moment Brittle strain The usefulness of the scaling laws.
Mid-Term Review Meeting, February 13-14, Tutzing Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European network Local scale.
Massimo Cocco INGV Rome INGV The First EarthScope Institute on the Spectrum of Fault Slip Behaviors October 11-14, 2010, Portland, Oregon.
Large Earthquake Rapid Finite Rupture Model Products Thorne Lay (UCSC) USGS/IRIS/NSF International Workshop on the Utilization of Seismographic Networks.
Inherent Mechanism Determining Scaling Properties of Fault Constitutive Laws Mitsuhiro Matsu’ura Department of Earth and Planetary Science Graduate School.
GNS Science Natural Hazards Research Platform Progress in understanding the Canterbury Earthquakes Kelvin Berryman Manager, Natural Hazards Research Platform.
Earthquake Dynamics and Inversion for source characteristics Raul Madariaga Sergio Ruiz and Maria Lancieri Laboratoire de Géologie CNRS ENS Paris, France.
Stress- and State-Dependence of Earthquake Occurrence Jim Dieterich, UC Riverside.
Corinth Gulf Landslides 3HAZ Program WP5 T. Lebourg, S. El Bedoui, A. Deschamps and Y. Guglielmi 3HAZ MEETING, 2-3 DECEMBER 2006, ATHENS.
Correlating aftershock sequences properties to earthquake physics J. Woessner S.Wiemer, S.Toda.
SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European.
Geodetic Deformation, Seismicity and Fault Friction Ge Sensitivity of seismicity to stress perturbations, implications for earthquakes nucleation.
Near Fault Ground Motions and Fault Rupture Directivity Pulse Norm Abrahamson Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
The rupture process of great subduction earthquakes: the concept of the barrier and asperity models Yoshihiro Kaneko (Presentation based on Aki, 1984;
Earthquakes and crustal Deformation - Objectives of class- Introduce a variety of techniques to describe ‘quantitatively’ deformation of the lithosphere.
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data … also, use ENVISAT (C-band) data from the same time period to resolve vertical/horizontal components of surface velocity.
‘At present there is no possibility of earthquake prediction in the popular sense; that is no one can justifiably say that an earthquake of consequence.
Room: 407 Tel: Patrice Rey.
Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.
On constraining dynamic parameters from finite-source rupture models of past earthquakes Mathieu Causse (ISTerre) Luis Dalguer (ETHZ) and Martin Mai (KAUST)
Future Directions and Capabilities of Simulators Jim Dieterich
Deep Earthquakes.
Shoreline and Hosgri Faults, Central Coast
Plate tectonics: Quantifying and characterizing crustal deformation
Rock mechanics view of a seismogenic fault zone
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
Friction: The rate-and-state constitutive law
Earthquakes and crustal Deformation - Objectives of class-
Slopes of Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
On the relation between Geodetic strain, Seismicity and fault frictional properties Nepal Sumatra Taiwan.
Southern California Earthquake Center
CHAPTER THREE DISCONTINUITIES
Kinematics VI: Quantifying and characterizing crustal deformation
Susan Bilek University of Michigan
Presentation transcript:

Imaging fault geometry to learn about earthquake mechanics Phillip G Resor Wesleyan University Vanessa Meer, Giulio Di Toro, Ashley Griffith

Fault zones record an integrated history of fault slip Fault geometry and earthquakes: the seismological record Geometry and kinematics of exposed fault surfaces Looking inside rocks to see the frozen record of ancient earthquake

Slip during earthquake rupture is heterogeneous Observed in surface ruptures And inversions of seismological and geodetic data Mai and Beroza, 2002, JGR Treiman et al., 2002, BSSA

Slip heterogeneity is attributed to asperities and barriers Shipton and Cowie, 2001, JSG Rheological: fault zone materials Geometrical: Slip surface geometry Fault Analysis Group

Fault geometry effects earthquake dynamics Km-scale discontinuities: earthquake initiation, termination, near fault stress Wesnousky, 2006, Nature Small-scale slip-perpendicular roughness: frictional properties, near fault stress Sagy and Brodsky, 2009, JGR

Fault surfaces are characterized by a suite of slip-parallel features Hancock and Barka, 1987, JSG Corrugation axis Gutter Tool Track Slickenside lineations

Fault surface roughness is fractal (self-affine) in nature Power et al, 1987, EPSL Dixie Valley Fault Candela et al, 2011, BSSA dx -> dx dz ->  dz 0 ≤ H < 1 linear decay of the power spectrum with slope of 1+2H dz

TLS and other technologies have led to a renaissance in fault surface analysis Sagy et al, 2007, GeologyBrodsky et al, 2011, EPSL Photo: Emily Brodsky  =1

Can we document effects of fault topography on fault kinematics? Resor and Meer, 2009 EPSL

Surface Morphology Striation Orientation Data Collection

Visualizing Surface Morphology

Slip perpendicular profiles Slip parallel profiles Quantifying Morphology Spectral Analysis Resor and Meer, 2009 EPSL

Incremental slip varies across the corrugated surface Resor and Meer, 2009 EPSL

Fault normal and striation orientation are correlated across the entire exposure Spherical correlation, significant at 99% probability Striations Fault Normals Resor and Meer, 2009 EPSL

Observations from creeping faults corroborate role of slip-parallel features Rubin et al., 1999, Nature Earthquake streaks on creeping faults are slip-parallel independent of local geology

Summary of work on exposed fault surfaces Fault surface exhibit self-affine scaling over many orders of magnitude Faults evolve (slowly) toward smoother profiles in the slip direction Faults roughness perturbs fault slip direction But, these results are derived from faults from <~5 km depth

Dynamic Rupture experiments reveal a number of lubrication processes Di Toro et al., 2011, Nature Pseudotachylyte (frictional melt) is the only unequivocal evidence of earthquake rupture velocities preserved in fault zones

Pseudotachylyte-bearing fault surfaces are not widely exposed Bistacchi et al, 2011, Pageoph TLS and photogrammetry used to image 3D geomtry of fault trace

Roughness of pseudotachylyte-bearing faults appears similar to small-slip faults Self-affine scaling over 3-5 orders of magnitude Smoother in slip direction

Micro-roughness is critical to dynamic slip and melt lubrication CT scanning allows us to image micro-scale roughness of fault surface Experiments reveal that weakening distance decreases with increasing normal stress

L05_07 core from extensional fault bend Griffith et al, 2010, JGR

Extensional bend surface roughness due to fracture and wear Griffith et al, 2010, JGR

L05_06 core from contractional fault bend Griffith et al, 2010, JGR

Contractional bend surface roughness dominated by differential melting Griffith et al, 2010, JGR

Conclusions and future directions Exposed fault surfaces exhibit self-affine roughness Evolves with slip Perturbs incremental slip direction How is roughness generated? Ferril et al., 1999, JSG Sagy and Brodsky, 2009 JGR Pseudotachylyte-bearing fault traces also exhibit self- affine roughness at larger scales Fault zone geometry may be different Micro-roughness is controlled by melting Tie fault observations to experimental work

Slow to High Velocity Apparatus (SHIVA), INGV “Rocks [melt] like butter in Rome” G. Di Toro

Corrugation axes are correlated with long wavelength shape Spherical correlation significant at 99% probability Corrugation Axes Fault Normals