Search for the Schiff Moment of Radium-225

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LRP2010 WG5 Fundamental Interactions Nathal Severijns ( K.U.Leuven) for WG5 Scoping workshop Frankfurt, October th 2009.
Advertisements

Atomic Parity Violation in Ytterbium, K. Tsigutkin, D. Dounas-Frazer, A. Family, and D. Budker
Ra-225: The Path to a Next Generation EDM Experiment
Structure of the ECEC candidate daughter 112 Cd P.E. Garrett University of Guelph TRIUMF Excellence Cluster “Universe”, Technische Universität München.
Electric dipole moment searches
University of Liverpool
Marina Quintero-Pérez Paul Jansen Thomas E. Wall Wim Ubachs Hendrick L. Bethlem.
Laser cooling of molecules. 2 Why laser cooling (usually) fails for molecules Laser cooling relies on repeated absorption – spontaneous-emission events.
Quantum Computing with Trapped Ion Hyperfine Qubits.
Another Route to CP Violation Beyond the SM – Particle Dipole Moments Dave Wark Imperial/RAL WIN05 Delphi June 10, 2005.
Philip Harris University of Sussex (for the EDM Collaboration) The Neutron EDM Experiments at the ILL.
Electric dipole moments : a search for new physics E.A. Hinds Manchester, 12 Feb 2004 Imperial College London.
A Search for Temporal and Gravitational Variation of  in Atomic Dysprosium Variation of Constants & Violation of Symmetries, 24 July 2010 Arman Cingöz.
Search for the Electron Electric Dipole Moment Val Prasad Yale University Experiment: D.DeMille, D. Kawall, R.Paolino, V. Prasad F. Bay, S. Bickman, P.Hamilton,
The Forbidden Transition in Ytterbium ● Atomic selection rules forbid E1 transitions between states of the same parity. However, the parity-violating weak.
Weak Interactions in the Nucleus III Summer School, Tennessee June 2003.
Zheng-Tian Lu Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory Department of Physics, University of Chicago Search for a Permanent Electric Dipole Moment.
Experimental Atomic Physics Research in the Budker Group Tests of fundamental symmetries using atomic physics: Parity Time-reversal invariance Permutation.
Histogram of Blinded eEDM Data Number of Measurements T-Statistic of Blinded eEDM Measurements Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole.
Trapped Radioactive Isotopes:  icro-laboratories for fundamental Physics EDM in ground state (I=1/2) H = -(d E + μ B) · I/I m I = 1/2 m I = -1/2 2ω12ω1.
Studying dipolar effects in degenerate quantum gases of chromium atoms G. Bismut 1, B. Pasquiou 1, Q. Beaufils 1, R. Chicireanu 2, T. Zanon 3, B. Laburthe-Tolra.
Measurement of the electron’s electric dipole moment
One-loop analysis of the 4-Femi contribution to the Atomic EDM within R-parity violating MSSM N. YAMANAKA (Osaka University) 2010/8/9 Sigma Hall Osaka.
Electric Dipole Moment of Neutron and Neutrinos
TRIµP Laser Spectroscopy: Status and Future U Dammalapati TRI  P Facility Lasers for Na  -decay Ra Spectroscopy & EDM Towards cooling of Heavy Alkaline.
Search for an Atomic EDM with
Funded by: NSF Timothy C. Steimle, Fang Wang a Arizona State University, USA & Joe Smallman b, Physics Imperial College, London a Currently at JILA THE.
Fundamental interaction and nuclear structure studies with atom traps Peter Müller.
Photoassociation Spectroscopy of Ytterbium Atoms with Dipole-allowed and Intercombination Transitions K. Enomoto, M. Kitagawa, K. Kasa, S. Tojo, T. Fukuhara,
Ultrahigh precision observation of nuclear spin precession and application to EDM measurement T. Inoue, T. Furukawa, H. Hayashi, M. Tsuchiya, T. Nanao,
Experiments with ultracold RbCs molecules Peter Molony Cs Rb.
Future electron EDM measurements using YbF
Simple Atom, Extreme Nucleus: Laser Trapping and Probing of He-8 Zheng-Tian Lu Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago Funding: DOE, Office of.
Progress Towards Formation and Spectroscopy of Ultracold Ground-state Rb 2 Molecules in an Optical Trap H.K. Pechkis, M. Bellos, J. RayMajumder, R. Carollo,
Low-frequency nuclear spin maser and search for atomic EDM of 129 Xe A. Yoshimi RIKEN SPIN /10/11-16 Trieste, ITALY Collaborator : K. Asahi (Professor,
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
Applications of polarized neutrons V.R. Skoy Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
Fundamental Interactions Physics & Instrumentation Conclusions Conveners: P. Mueller, J. Clark G. Savard, N. Scielzo.
Experiments with Stark-decelerated and trapped polar molecules Steven Hoekstra Molecular Physics Department ( Gerard Meijer) Fritz-Haber-Institutder Max-Planck-Gesellschaft.
Atomic Parity Violation in Francium
Cavity-Enhanced Parity-Nonconserving Optical Rotation in Hg, Xe, I (and Cs) T. Peter Rakitzis Department of Physics, University of Crete, & Institute of.
Neutral atom nuclear EDM Experiments Investigating Radium Lorenz Willmann KVI, Groningen ECT* Trento, June 21-25, 2004.
Laser Laboratory (-ies) Peter Müller. 2 Search for EDM of 225 Ra Transverse cooling Oven: 225 Ra (+Ba) Zeeman Slower Optical dipole trap EDM probe Advantages:
Possible measurement of electron EDM in atoms with spatially alternating electric field T. Haseyama RIKEN, Japan ( The Institute of Physical and Chemical.
June 2010 The search for permanent electric dipole moments Klaus Kirch ETH Zürich & PSI Villigen CP violation and electric dipole.
1 Yuri Shestakov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia Tagging system of almost-real photons for photonuclear experiments at VEPP-3 Moscow,
Laser Cooling and Trapping Magneto-Optical Traps (MOTs) Far Off Resonant Traps (FORTs) Nicholas Proite.
Parity nonconservation in the 6s 2 1 S 0 – 6s5d 3 D 1 transition in Atomic Ytterbium: status of the Berkeley experiments K. Tsigutkin, J. Stalnaker, V.
Fundamental interactions and symmetries at low energies what does NUPECC say…. Time-reversal violation and electric dipole moments Time-reversal violation.
State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation National Research Institute for Physical-Technical and Radio Engineering Measurements Progress in deep.
Electric dipole moment searches E.A. Hinds Birmingham 11 th July 2011 Centre for Cold Matter Imperial College London.
Spatial distributions in a cold strontium Rydberg gas Graham Lochead.
The TRI  P programme at KVI Tests of the Standard Model at low energy Hans Wilschut KVI – Groningen Low energy tests e.g. Time reversal violation precision.
Neutron and electron EDMs PPAP meeting, Birmingham, 18 th September 2012 Mike Tarbutt Centre for Cold Matter, Imperial College London.
The YbF T-violaton experiment Ben Sauer. YbF experiment (2011) d e < 1 x e.cm (90% c.l.) We (and others!) are aiming here! What is interesting.
Tests of Symmetries with Neutrons and Nuclei at Very Low Energies Stephan Paul TU-München.
Derek F. Jackson Kimball. Collaboration Dmitry Budker, Arne Wickenbrock, John Blanchard, Samer Afach, Nathan Leefer, Lykourgas Bougas, Dionysis Antypas.
Standard Model Tests with Nuclei and Energy Applications Jerry Nolen, ANL and Guy Savard, ANL/Uof C (Standard Model) Yousry Gohar, ANL and Shekhar Mishra,
1 m Tungsten Carbide Spectroscopy for electron EDM Measurement Jeongwon Lee June 23, 2011 Jinhai Chen, and Aaron E. Leanhardt Department of Physics, University.
 The electron electric dipole moment (eEDM) is aligned with the spin and interacts with the giant (~84 GV/cm) effective internal electric field of the.
Neutron and electron electric dipole moments
Probing New Forces with Isotope Shift Spectroscopy
P-347 Measurements of octupole collectivity in Rn and Ra nuclei using Coulomb excitation Addendum Peter Butler, David Joss and Marcus Scheck on behalf.
Electric Dipole Moments: Searches at Storage Rings
Kellogg Radiation Lab, Caltech Pasadena, CA
Electric Dipole Moments: Searches at Storage Rings
NEW DIRECTIONS IN ATOMIC PARITY VIOLATION
University of California, Berkeley
Outline “Search for octupole-deformed nuclei for enhancement of atomic EDM” 1Umesh Silwal, 2Prajwal Mohanmurthy, 1Durga P. Siwakoti, 1Jeff A. Winger 1Mississippi State University.
Searches for atomic electric dipole moments
Presentation transcript:

Search for the Schiff Moment of Radium-225 EDM Spin _ + P Search for the Schiff Moment of Radium-225 Zheng-Tian Lu Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory Department of Physics, University of Chicago

EDM Searches in Three Sectors Nucleons (n, p) Quark EDM Physics beyond the Standard Model: SUSY, etc. Quark Chromo-EDM Nuclei (Hg, Ra, Rn) Electron in paramagnetic molecules (YbF, ThO) Electron EDM Sector Exp Limit (e-cm) Method Standard Model Electron 9 x 10-29 ThO in a beam 10-38 Neutron 3 x 10-26 UCN in a bottle 10-31 199Hg 3 x 10-29 Hg atoms in a cell 10-33 M. Ramsey-Musolf (2009)

The Seattle EDM Measurement 199Hg stable, high Z, groundstate 1S0, I = ½, high vapor pressure E Optical Pumping E mF = +1/2 7s2 1S0 F = 1/2 7p 3P1 mF = -1/2 Courtesy of Michael Romalis s+

The Seattle EDM Measurement 199Hg stable, high Z, groundstate 1S0, I = ½, high vapor pressure E E Courtesy of Michael Romalis Limits and Sensitivities Current: < 3 x 10-29 e-cm -- Griffith et al., PRL (2009) Next 5 years: 3 x 10-30 e-cm Beyond 2020: 6 x 10-31 e-cm f 15 Hz

1S0

EDM of 225Ra enhanced and more reliably calculated Closely spaced parity doublet – Haxton & Henley, PRL (1983) Large Schiff moment due to octupole deformation – Auerbach, Flambaum & Spevak, PRL (1996) Relativistic atomic structure (225Ra / 199Hg ~ 3) – Dzuba, Flambaum, Ginges, Kozlov, PRA (2002) - = (|a - |b)/2 + = (|a + |b)/2 55 keV |a |b Parity doublet Enhancement Factor: EDM (225Ra) / EDM (199Hg) Isoscalar Isovector Skyrme SIII 300 4000 Skyrme SkM* 2000 Skyrme SLy4 700 8000 Schiff moment of 225Ra, Dobaczewski, Engel, PRL (2005) Schiff moment of 199Hg, Dobaczewski, Engel et al., PRC (2010) “[Nuclear structure] calculations in Ra are almost certainly more reliable than those in Hg.” – Engel, Ramsey-Musolf, van Kolck, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. (2013) Constraining parameters in a global EDM analysis. – Chupp, Ramsey-Musolf, arXiv1407.1064 (2014)

EDM measurement on 225Ra in a trap t1/2 = 15 d Collaboration of Argonne, Kentucky, Michigan State Efficient use of the rare 225Ra atoms High electric field (> 100 kV/cm) Long coherence time (~ 100 s) Negligible “v x E” systematic effect Transverse cooling Oven: 225Ra Zeeman Slower Magneto-optical Trap (MOT) Optical dipole trap (ODT) EDM measurement Statistical uncertainty 100 d 100 kV/cm 10% 100 s 106 Long-term goal: dd = 3 x 10-28 e cm

Trap Lifetimes Magneto-Optical Trap (MOT) in the first trap chamber Optical Dipole Trap (ODT) in the EDM chamber

EDM in an optical dipole trap – Fortson & Romalis (1999) Fiber laser: l = 1550 nm, Power = 40 Watts Focused to 100 mm  trap depth 400 mK EDM in an optical dipole trap – Fortson & Romalis (1999) v x E , Berry’s phase effects suppressed Cold scattering suppressed between cold Fermionic atoms Rayleigh scat. rate ~ 10-1 s-1 ; Raman scat. rate ~ 10-12 s-1 Vector light shift ~ mHz Parity mixing induced shift negligible Conclusion: possible to reach 10-30 e cm for 199Hg

Apparatus Argonne National Lab Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Preparation of Cold Radium Atoms for EDM 2006 – Atomic transitions identified and studied; 2007 – Magneto-optical trap (MOT) of radium realized; 2010 – Optical dipole trap (ODT) of radium realized; 2011 – Atoms transferred to the measurement trap; 2012 – Spin precession of Ra-225 in ODT observed; 2014 – Attempt to measure EDM of Ra-225. N.D. Scielzo et al., PRA Rapid 73, 010501 (2006) J.R. Guest et al., PRL 98, 093001 (2007) R.H. Parker et al., PRC 86, 065503 (2012) Sideview MOT & ODT Head-on view ODT 0.04 mm Precession frequency:

B & E Fields Installed EDM (d) measurement: B = 10 mG E = 100 kV/cm Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Spin Precession – Oct, 2014 Expected period = 56(6) ms

Absorption Detection of Spin State Photons scattering events 2-3 photons per atom 1P1 F = 1/2 Signal-to-noise Ratio For 100 atoms, SNR ~ 0.2 483 nm 1S0 F = 1/2 mF = -1/2 +1/2 Ra-226 Atom number detection Ra-225 Spin detection

STIRAP (stimulated Raman adiabatic passage) F = 3/2 1P1 F = 1/2 1429 nm 483 nm 3D1 1S0 F = 1/2 mF = -1/2 +1/2 Stimulated, Adiabatic process No fluorescence

Absorption Detection on a Cycling Transition mF = +3/2 F = 3/2 Photons scattering events 2-3 photons per atom 100-1000 photons per atom 1P1 F = 1/2 Signal-to-noise Ratio For 100 atoms, SNR ~ 0.2 For 100 atoms, SNR ~ 10 483 nm 3D1 1S0 F = 1/2 mF = -1/2 +1/2

Improve trapping efficiency with a blue upgrade Trap, 714 nm 7s2 1S0 7p 3P1 420 ns 6 ns 6d 3D1 Pump #1 Slow & Trap, 714 nm 6d 1D2 430 ms 6d 3D2 Improve trapping efficiency with a blue upgrade Go to "View | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

Improve trapping efficiency with a blue upgrade Trap, 714 nm 7s2 1S0 7p 3P1 420 ns 6 ns 6d 3D1 Pump #1 Slow & Trap, 714 nm 6d 1D2 430 ms 6d 3D2 Slow, 483 nm Pump #2 Pump #3 KVI barium trap S. De et al. PRA (2009) Improve trapping efficiency with a blue upgrade Scheme 1st slowing laser: 483 nm (strong) 2nd slowing laser: 714 nm 3 repumpers: 1428 nm, 1488 nm, 2.75 mm 171Yb as co-magnetometer * 225Ra and 171Yb trapped, < 50 mm apart Benefits 100 times more atoms in the trap Improved control on systematic uncertainties Go to "View | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"

225Ra Yields 229Th 7.3 kyr 225Ra 15 d 225Ac 10 d Fr, Rn,… ~4 hr b 233U Presently available National Isotope Development Center, ORNL Decay daughters of 229Th 225Ra: 108 /s Projected FRIB (B. Sherrill, MSU) Beam dump recovery with a 238U beam 6 x 109 /s Dedicated running with a 232Th beam 5 x 1010 /s ISOL@FRIB (I.C. Gomes and J. Nolen, Argonne) Deuterons on thorium target, 1 mA x 400 MeV = 400 kW 1013 /s MSU K1200 (R. Ronningen and J. Nolen, Argonne) Deuterons on thorium target, 10 uA x 400 MeV = 4 kW 1011 /s 19

Outlook 2014-2015 Implement STIRAP – more efficient way to detect spin; Longer trap lifetime; 2015-2018, blue upgrade – more efficient trap; Five-year goal (before FRIB): 10-26 e cm; 2020 and beyond (at FRIB): 3 x 10-28 e cm; Far future: search for EDM in diatomic molecules Effective E field is enhanced by a factor of 103; Reach the Standard Model value of 10-30 e cm.

“Cold” Atom Trappers Argonne: Kevin Bailey, Michael Bishof, John Greene, Roy Holt, Nathan Lemke, Zheng-Tian Lu, Peter Mueller, Tom O’Connor, Richard Parker; Kentucky: Mukut Kalita, Wolfgang Korsch; Michigan State: Jaideep Singh; Northwestern: Matt Dietrich. Go to ”Insert (View) | Header and Footer" to add your organization, sponsor, meeting name here; then, click "Apply to All"