Organic vs. Hydraulic Loadings On-site Treatment Systems J. R. (Jack) Harman, P.E. North Carolina Annual OnSite Wastewater Conference October 18, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Process Of Reverse Osmosis Plant
Advertisements

Sewage and Effluent Treatment 2-4 November 2002 Seán Moran -The first few slides.
Stone media TF design Example 1
Alternatives to Aboveground Effluent Disposal Mounds Overview of the NoMound ® System Technology.
Community Land-Based Wastewater Disposal in Pennsylvania Prepared by: Mr. Brian Oram, PG Wilkes University
Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works
Biological waste water treatment
Sustainable Management of Scarce Resources in the Coastal Zone SMART ICA3 – Kick-off Meeting CEDARE, Cairo, 5-6 January, 2003 Case Study Jordan.
Quantification of Spill Data from Domestic Facilities Andy Squires Pinellas County Environmental Management Keith Hackett Janicki Environmental, Inc.
LOADING RATES Sara Heger
Johkasou System (Advanced onsite wastewater treatment system)
Bliss Area Sewage System Groundwater Monitoring Pete Ganzel Washington County Department of Public Health & Environment.
Leachate Treatment at Virginia Landfills By: Bob Gardner, PE, BCEE Senior Vice President SWANA Old Dominion Conference Wintergreen, VA August 7, 2014.
Harris County Onsite Wastewater Reuse Program John Blount, P.E. Director of Planning & Operations.
TEXAS COMMISSION on ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PROPOSED STUCTURE FOR CHAPTER 217 < Subchapter A Administrative Provisions < Subchapter B Design Bases < Subchapter.
Decentralized Wastewater Workshop Greenville, South Carolina July 30, 2009.
Basic Installer Course. AOWA:Basic Installer Course Square foot.
Wastewater Treatment and Permit Compliance  Document Permit issue and expiration date  Document permit requirements  If discharge to city, review.
By: Audella Eid Advisor: Dr. R. Zurayk Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater treatment.
On-Site Leachate Management RM of Tache Pilot Study.
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Preliminary Seventh Power Plan Energy Efficiency Estimates October 14, 2014 West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Seattle.
Rule Change Update MPCA 1/13/ Mid-Sized ISTS (MSTS)
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Preliminary Seventh Power Plan Energy Efficiency Estimates November 18, 2014 West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Seattle.
Attached Growth Biological WW treatment Systems
7.1 Wastewater Treatment Process
Design Considerations for High Strength Wastewater
Unconventional Gas: Shale Gas Shale Gas  Unconventional gas (hydrocarbons) found in subsurface shale formations  Replacement to coal, oil, and natural.
Wastewater Management Why ?. Why are we concerned about wastewater? Public Health Protection Waterborne diseases Environmental Protection Our lands and.
Small Community Wastewater Alternatives Section V Advanced Treatment.
Water Biology What is the role of the water treatment facility? Elimination of biological activity in water Chlorination as a means of disinfecting water.
OutlineBackground Conventional on-site systems Advanced treatment systems.
LAND APPLICATION SYSTEMS
Massachusetts Public Health Inspector Training Wastewater Certificate Program (MA PHIT WW) Session 5: Design and Plan Review— Non-Conventional Systems.
Modular Biotreatment Systems Versus Oil-Water Separators
FGD MONITORING PROJECT ORSANCO Technical Committee Meeting June 4, 2013 Item 8a.
NC STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of SOIL SCIENCE NC STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of SOIL SCIENCE NC STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of SOIL SCIENCE NC STATE UNIVERSITY.
TREATMENT OF A DAIRY FARM WASTEWATER USING A PILOT SCALE UPFLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BLANKET (UASB) PROCESS By Ashveen Deerpaul & Arvinda Kumar RAGEN.
Wastewater Treatment Processes
TRICKLING FILTER DESIGN Bruce Lesikar Associate Professor Texas Cooperative Extension.
Rural, Community & Onsite Wastewater & Waste Management Role of Soil in Biological Treatment.
Unit 8: Waste Management Section 2: Wastewater Treatment.
“It is the Responsibility of the Manufacturer to Respond to the Needs of the Industry Not the Responsibility of the Industry to Respond to the Desires.
La. Food Processors Conference Facility Upgrade and Expansion Considerations for Treatment of Process Waste Todd Farrar, P.E.M. General Engineering & Environmental.
1 IV. Wastewater Treatment Technologies Topic IV. 10. Wastewater Treatment Facilities with Attached Biomass - Trickling Filters: Kinds, Structures, Basic.
Maximizing Water Supply Sustainability for the Goleta Valley Ryan Drake Water Supply and Conservation Manager 2015 Central Coast Sustainability Summit.
Review of Environmental Engineering II. Water quality management Water pollutants sources – Point sources – Nonpoint sources Water pollutants – Oxygen.
Wastewater Treatment 1 Water Treatment: Why? zHealthful to drink zClean enough to return to the environment......usually for others downstream to use again!
3 Councillors Greater Taree 3 Councillors Great Lakes MidCoast Water General Manager Design And Construction Strategic Planning OperationsCorporate.
PERFORMANCE MONITORING – DEMO SESSION
The Public Health and Safety Company™ NSF International Onsite Wastewater Treatment Unit Program Standards, Testing and Certification Update.
Engineered systems for wastewater treatment and disposal.
CTC 450 Review WW Collection Systems Types of pipes Installation.
Transitioning from the Percolation Test to Soils Evaluation
OWTS Design Considerations Under Reg. 43
Department of Environmental Quality
Wastewater Surcharge Reduction for Manufacturing Processes
Reduction of Accumulated Solids
An-Najah National University
“Alternate” wastewater treatment systems refers to
Massachusetts Environmental Health Association (MEHA)
Private Septic Systems
A low-pressure dosing system requires a pump tank and a network of small-diameter pipes (1 to 2 inches) placed in trenches. The pump tank stores the effluent,
An example of Finland's approach to wastewater treatment for households in rural areas Kimmo Tiilikainen Minister of the Environment Finland
Wastewater Management
Private Septic Systems
Wastewater Characteristic Post Anaerobic Treatment
Wastewater Treatment Secondary Treatment.
Wastewater Treatment Secondary Treatment.
Wastewater Treatment: Characteristics and Systems
Types of Trickling filters
Presentation transcript:

Organic vs. Hydraulic Loadings On-site Treatment Systems J. R. (Jack) Harman, P.E. North Carolina Annual OnSite Wastewater Conference October 18, 2010

Paradigm Shift World English Dictionary (n.) A radical change in an underlying belief or theory. There is a Paradigm Shift when there exists an acceptance by a majority of a changed belief, attitude, or way of perceiving things.

Perception WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR PERCEPTION OF HOW WE LOOK AT SIZING OF PRETREATMENT DEVICES USING ORGANIC LOADING SPECIFIC TO THE INTENDED WASTEWATER GENERATORS NOT RELYING ON HISTORICAL HYDRAULIC LOADING RATES COMMONLY REFERENCED TO DOMESTIC WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS

Typical Raw Domestic Wastewater

Typical Septic Effluent Quality

Comparison of Domestic Wastewater- Influent & Septic Tank Effluent

Suggested Media Filter Loading Rates

Example of Organic Examination Using the IWWS-97-1-Pressure Dosed Sand Filter NC Approval As An Example: BOD <300 mg/l; TSS < 200 mg/l…….TS-2 Effluent Quality For BOD Effluent < 10 mg/l Design Hydraulic Loading Rate: 2.5 to 5.0 gpd/s.f. Doses per Day: 24 to 48 Recirc. Ratio: 2:1 to 5:1; (Note: A 3:1 Recirc Ratio Returns 3 Parts (3/4) of the Sand Filter Effluent Back To The Recirc Tank While Discharging 1 Part (1/4) To The Drainfield. Therefore, A 3:1 Ratio Doses 4 Times The ADF To The Filter Per Day To Achieve A Discharge Of 1 ADF. EXAMPLE: A 480 gpd Facility Has BOD=300 mg/l Influent Treated By A Septic Tank & Pressure Dosed Recirc Sand Filter. RSF Size: 480 gpd / 5.0 gpd/s.f. = 96 sq.ft. # BOD/Day: mgd * 300 mg/l * 8.34 #/gal = 1.2 # BOD/Day From Previous EPA Table, BOD Reduction by Septic Tank: 120 mg/l / 250 mg/l = 48% Therefore, # BOD to RSF: 48% x 1.2 #/Day = 0.58 #/Day to RSF Organic Loading Rate To RSF: 0.58 #/Day / 96 s.f. = #/Day/ s.f. (< ; :. O.K.)

Example #2-Shopping Center

Example #2-Shopping Center Organic Loading Calculation

Example #2-Calculating Organic Load Estimated Total Organic Loading to RGF: Filter Size: 50’ x 50’ = 2500 Sq. Ft. Organic Load: 20.2 #/Day / 2500 Sq. Ft. = #/Day/Sq.Ft. At Upper Range of Suggested Loading, O.K. HOWEVER, NO ALLOWANCE WAS MADE FOR A STARBUCKS COFFEE SHOP MOVING IN.

Starbucks: 10/07 to 10/08 Effluent Data From Gravel Media Filter Indicated a Change in Values Around August to October, 2007 when Starbucks First Opened. Effluent Strength From Septic Tank Downstream From Starbucks had BOD value ranges of 1,900 mg/l to 2,100 mg/l. Effluent From Septic Tank was a “Latte” Color. Estimated Quantity of Milk/Cream Dumped to Drain Each Day = > 8 Gallons / Day.

RGF=FUBAR

RGF-POST MORTEM EXAM

A “Lactose” Intolerant Gravel Filter

Conclusions Characterize the Strength of the Organic Wasteload to be Treated by the Biological Filter. Properly Size It with Due Consideration For Including Perhaps a Factor of Safety. Do Not Reduce the Size of the Pretreatment Devices Relying Upon a Reduction in the Water Usage from the Facility. If You Cant Estimate The Organic Load (#/Day) Seek Out Reliable Reference Databases for Proper Determinations.