Reprocessing NUCP 2311 Radioactive waste Disposal and MAnagement 1

Reprocessing Concepts Break down the spent nuclear fuel to separate the useful actinides (U, Pu, etc.) from the fission product and waste elements. Many actinides have half lives on the order of 100,000 to 1,000,000,000 years. – Contain useful energy content. Most fission products have half lives on the order of 10, 50, 100, or 1000 years (exceptions include Tc-99 and a few others). – Some are useful for medical applications (e.g., Mo-99). 2

Process Chemistry 3 Highest Level Flowsheet SNF Reprocessing Spent Nuclear Fuel (metal or oxide) U as U, UO x, or UF 6 Pu as nitrate, PuO 2, or ? TRU (Waste?) Gaseous Waste (Kr, Xe, I, and Ru?) Fission Product HLW (Cs, Sr, Zr, Ni, La,...) Solid Waste (Cladding and other hardware) (LLW?)

Reprocessed fuel wastes Uranium- can be used as fuel Plutonium- can be used as fuel Other transuranics- waste stream Waste Gasses- unknown, waste or vent to atmosphere Fision products (Cs, Co, Sr)- Cs-Co can be used in irradiators(food or medical) Sr- can be used for electro- or thermal generators Liquid waste- waste stream Will be different forms of waste from original spent fuel but will be less volume

Processing Options Aqueous Processing – Dissolve the spent fuel in acid. – Water-based acid solvents (e.g., HNO 3 ) and water-insoluble organic solvents (e.g., Tributyl Phosphate - TBP) to extract and exchange the chemicals. – PUREX, UREX, THOREX, Bismuth Phosphate, and others. Pyrochemical Processing – Molten Salts, “high” temperatures (~500ºC), and electrochemistry. – Uses electrons as the reducing agent! – Small-scale compact process. 5

General Fuel Cycle Operations 6 Spent Nuclear Fuel (metal or oxide) Chemical Separations Chemical Pretreatment Product Treatment Chopping/DecladdingPhysical Separations Waste Treatment Gas release Powder/Particulate Control Contamination Control Gas release Powder/Particulate Control Contamination Control Process Specific Fuel type specific Fission product release (more gas) Chemistry, corrosion, and containment issues Process Specific Fuel type specific Fission product management (may have more gas) Chemistry, corrosion, and containment issues Element Distributions Phase Separations Aqueous Processing Definitions Product = Effluent Waste = Raffinate Storage forms or fuels for advanced burning Waste forms to storage or geologic repository

Chopping/Decladding Some Design Questions – Do you remove the cladding before or after chopping? – How do you recover “all” of the fuel? How do you define “all”? What about fine particles? – What is the decontamination spec for the cladding? (is it LLW or HLW?) – Do you want/need to recover the fuel from the FCCI reaction zone? FCCI = Fuel-Clad Chemical Interaction 7

Example: Roller-Straitener (Preliminary work in Japan/US, perhaps others... Not known to be planned for implementation) Option designed to recover oxide powder. – Avoid acid dissolution. Bend cladding and crush ceramic. – Single or multiple pass. – Must remove assembly hardware first. – Shake powder out after runs. Technical Barriers – Radiation embrittlement concerns at high burnup. – Powder flowability concerns for oxide removal (agglomerates and bridging). – 100% recovery is a challenge (acid wash to get FCCI residue?) 8

Example: Chopping Option designed to expose fuel for further processing. – Increase material surface area to enhance processing rates. Simple chopping operation. – Multiple pins at a time. – Must remove assembly hardware first. – Shake powder out after runs. Technical Issues to Manage (not barriers) – Possible dispersion of fine radioactive particles (esp. for oxide fuel). – Handling of liquid metal bond (Na, NaK or Pb-Bi) in advanced fuels. 9

Example: Voloxidation Designed to convert UO 2 to fluffy yellow powder – Scroll, pierce, or chop cladding to expose fuel – Heat in a flowing oxygen-rich environment (not 100% O 2 ) – Density change causes swelling of fuel and rupture of cladding. – Powder ready for further treatment. – Rate controlled by temperature, surface area, and O 2 feed rate. UO 2 :  = g/cm 3 T m = 2878ºC Color = brown/black U 3 O 8  = 8.30 g/cm 3 T d = ~1300ºC Color = yellow/green 10

Other decladding options that have been discussed Direct Chlorination or Fluorination Electrolysis: anodic dissolution of cladding into salt Others are being investigated 11

Chemical Pretreatment Highly process specific. – The chemical form of the “soup” is defined by the separation method selected. Phase options: Solid–Solid  Liquid–Liquid Vapor–Vapor Solid–Liquid ? -- Solid–Vapor ? Liquid–Vapor - 12 Reaction Rate Speculation  = Prohibitively slow rates ? = Potentially slow rates = Reasonably fast rates = Rapid reaction rates

Chemical Pretreatment: Aqueous Dissolve collected fuel materials in nitric acid solution. Precursor to liquid-liquid solvent extraction separations. Accomplished by the manipulation of Pu and U valence state. Rates and chemical species depend on the dissolver temperature. 13 Uranium Valence: UO 2 = U +4 (insoluble) UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 = U +6 (soluble)

Chemical Pretreatment: Pyrochemical 14 Molten salt processing  Halides: Cl -, F -,I -, and Br - Molten Metal Solvents (historical)  Zn, Cd, Cu, Mg, alloys Tend to focus on metallic and intermetallic chemistry. Pretreatment by chemical or electrochemical reduction Solubility is still a critical issue. Example: a) UO 2 pellets and b) uranium metal electrochemically reduced from UO 2 (ANL) a) b)

Chemical Separations - Overview 15 Question: How do you separate the Pu from the U? – Answer: Chemistry 1.Take advantage of the considerable differences in the rates of oxidation- reduction of the ions of Pu and U. 2.Pu(IV) is much less stable and requires more powerful oxidants to form than either U(IV) or Np(IV). 3.Pu(III) is more stable and easily formed by mild reducing agents than U(III) or Np(III). 4.Np(V) is very stable. – It is feasible to form situation containing: U(VI) as UO 2 +2 in aqueous solution Np(V) as NpO + in aqueous solution Pu(III) or Pu(IV) in an insoluble inorganic complex

Chemical Separations - Overview Issue: Fission products with similar valence states in solution may (and do) follow Pu(III) and Pu(IV) into the organic phase? – Decontamination is possible through re-oxidizing to Pu(VI) and kicking it into a clean aqueous solution? Based on these Ideas, a number of processing techniques have been designed and implemented. – Early work reviewed by J. Rydberg and L.G. Sillen, Acta Chem. Scand., v9 (1955)

Four Basic Separation Families Co-Precipitation – Adjust solution chemistry to precipitate a solid Pu compound (salt) for Solid-Liquid separation. – Lanthanum Fluoride Cycle, Bismuth Phosphate (BiPO 4 ) Cycle, and Double Sulphate Precipitation. Solvent Extraction – Selective extraction of Pu from an aqueous solution into an immiscible organic liquid. – REDOX, PUREX, Chelation, BUTEX, TLA (tertiary amines), and many more. – Modern methods are PUREX and portions of UREX. – Note: PUREX and UREX do not normally use reduction-oxidation reactions. Non-Aqueous Methods – Separation through inorganic chemistry. – Molten metals, molten salts, pyrometallurgical slagging, fluoride volatility, electrometallurgical processing, and combinations of all of the above. Ion Exchange Separation – Selective cation exchange for Solid-Liquid extraction. – Often used for higher actinide separations (e.g., Am and Cm) 17

Bismuth Phosphate/Lanthanum Fluoride Carrier Precipitation Used from 1945 to ? to produce plutonium. Precipitates Pu metal leaving U in solution with the fission products. Fission products removed in a subsequent cycle. Lack the ability to extract uranium. 18

Pu production Lanthanum Fluoride Process Start with uranyl nitrate solution containing Pu and FPs from dissolver. – Speciation: Pu(IV), Np(V), and U(VI). Results: – Solid LaF 3 with most of the fission products. – Liquid with nearly pure PuO 2 +2 Bismuth Phosphate Process Start with uranyl nitrate solution containing Pu and FPs from dissolver – Speciation: Pu(IV), Np(V), and U(VI). Results – BiPO 4 is very selective of Pu and insoluble in HNO 3. – Direct precipitation of PuO 2 19

Solvent Extraction Aqueous solution of a metallic component is brought into equilibrium with an immiscible organic solvent for the component The two phases are separated The component will be found distributed between the two phases Characterized by the distribution coefficient 20

21

22 From:Joseph J. Katz, Glen T. Seaborg, and Lester R. Morss, “The Chemistry of the Actinide Elements, Second Edition,” Volume 1, p. 519 (Chapman and Hall, 1986).

23 James J. Laidler (Argonne National Laboratory)

24 James J. Laidler (Argonne National Laboratory)