Formation of quark stars J.E. Horvath IAG – USP São Paulo, Brazil.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Survey of Issues Misak Sargsian Florida International University.
Advertisements

QCD phase transition in neutron stars and gamma-ray bursts Wu, K. 1, Menezes, D. P. 2,3, Melrose, D. B. 3 and Providencia, C. 4 1 Mullard Space Science.
An Astrophysical Application of Crystalline Color Superconductivity Roberto Anglani Physics Department - U Bari Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare,
Questions and Probems. Matter inside protoneutron stars Hydrostatic equilibrium in the protoneutron star: Rough estimate of the central pressure is: Note.
Toshiki Maruyama (JAEA) Nobutoshi Yasutake (Chiba Inst. of Tech.) Minoru Okamoto (Univ. of Tsukuba & JAEA ) Toshitaka Tatsumi (Kyoto Univ.) Structures.
J.E. Horvath, IAG – USP São Paulo, Brazil with O. Benvenuto & M.A. De Vito (La Plata) Measurements and theory of neutron stars masses.
Prethermalization. Heavy ion collision Heavy ion collision.
Hyperon Suppression in Hadron- Quark Mixed Phase T. Maruyama (JAEA), S. Chiba (JAEA), H.-J. Schhulze (INFN-Catania), T. Tatsumi (Kyoto U.) 1 Property of.
Hyperon-Quark Mixed Phase in Compact Stars T. Maruyama* (JAEA), T. Tatsumi (Kyoto U), H.-J. Schulze (INFN), S. Chiba (JAEA)‏ *supported by Tsukuba Univ.
Upper limits on the effect of pasta on potential neutron star observables William Newton Michael Gearheart, Josh Hooker, Bao-An Li.
Internal structure of Neutron Stars. Artistic view.
Chiral symmetry breaking and structure of quark droplets
Thermodynamic relations for dielectrics in an electric field Section 10.
Cooling of Compact Stars with Color Superconducting Quark Matter Tsuneo Noda (Kurume Institute of Technology) Collaboration with N. Yasutake (Chiba Institute.
Thomas Klähn D. Blaschke R. Łastowiecki F. Sandin Thomas Klähn – Three Days on Quarkyonic Island.
Neutron Star Formation and the Supernova Engine Bounce Masses Mass at Explosion Fallback.
Metastability of Hadronic Compact Stars I. Vidaña & I. Bombaci, P. K. Panda, C. Providência “The Complex Physics of Compact Stars” Ladek Zdroj, Poland,
Thermal Evolution of Rotating neutron Stars and Signal of Quark Deconfinement Henan University, Kaifeng, China Miao Kang.
Universality in ultra-cold fermionic atom gases. with S. Diehl, H.Gies, J.Pawlowski S. Diehl, H.Gies, J.Pawlowski.
A Crust with Nuggets Sanjay Reddy Los Alamos National Laboratory Jaikumar, Reddy & Steiner, PRL 96, (2006) SQM, UCLA, March (2006)
Has the critical temperature of the QCD phase transition been measured ?
Modern Physics LECTURE II.
Constraining neutron star properties with perturbative QCD Aleksi Vuorinen University of Helsinki University of Oxford Main reference: Kurkela,
New States of Matter and RHIC Outstanding questions about strongly interacting matter: How does matter behave at very high temperature and/or density?
1 On the importance of nucleation for the formation of quark cores inside compact stars Bruno Werneck Mintz* Eduardo Souza Fraga Universidade Federal do.
Dense Stellar Matter Strange Quark Matter driven by Kaon Condensation Hyun Kyu Lee Hanyang University Kyungmin Kim HKL and Mannque Rho arXiv:
Neutron stars swollen under strong magnetic fields Chung-Yeol Ryu Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea Vela pulsar.
QUARK MATTER SYMMETRY ENERGY AND QUARK STARS Peng-cheng Chu ( 初鹏程 ) (INPAC and Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
The three flavor LOFF phase of QCD N. D. Ippolito University and INFN, Bari, Italy HISS : Dense Matter in HIC and Astrophysics, Dubna, 2006.
THIN ACCRETION DISCS AROUND NEUTRON AND QUARK STARS T. Harko K. S. Cheng Z. Kovacs DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS, THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG, POK FU LAM ROAD,
Inhomogeneous seeding of quark bubbles in neutron stars M Ángeles Pérez-García Department of Fundamental Physics University of Salamanca, Spain 1.
Chiral phase transition and chemical freeze out Chiral phase transition and chemical freeze out.
J.E. Horvath, IAG – USP São Paulo, Brazil with O. Benvenuto & M.A. De Vito (La Plata) Why "black widow" pulsar systems are important for the quest of neutron.
Hadron-Quark phase transition in high-mass neutron stars Gustavo Contrera (IFLP-CONICET & FCAGLP, La Plata, Argentina) Milva Orsaria (FCAGLP, CONICET,
Thermal phase transitions in realistic dense quark matter
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and Ultra-Dense Matter.
IRGAC 2006 COLOR SUPERCONDUCTIVITY and MAGNETIC FIELD: Strange Bed Fellows in the Core of Neutron Stars? Vivian de la Incera Western Illinois University.
Neutron star core-quakes caused by a transition to the mixed-phase EOS mixed-phase linear response theory stellar models M. Bejger, collaboration with.
Color Superconductivity: Recent developments Qun Wang Department of Modern Physics China University of Science and Technology Quark Matter 2006, Shanghai.
Many-body theory of Nuclear Matter and the Hyperon matter puzzle M. Baldo, INFN Catania.
J.E. Horvath, IAG – USP São Paulo, Brazil Concluding Remarks to the 6 th IWARA.
Effect of curvature on confinement-deconfinement phase transition By Ashok Goyal & Deepak Chandra * Department of Physics & Astrophysics University of.
A Way of Approach to Ultra Dense Matter and Neutron Stars with Quark Matter Core T. Takatsuka (Iwate Univ.) In collaboration with T. Hatsuda (Univ. Tokyo/
Hybrid proto-neutron stars within a static approach. O. E. Nicotra Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Università di Catania and INFN.
1 Nontopological Soliton in the Polyakov Quark Meson Model Hong Mao ( 毛鸿 ) Department of Physics, Hangzhou Normal University With: Jinshuang Jin ( HZNU.
Clustered Quark Model Calculation of Strange Quark Matter Xuesen Na Department of Astronomy, School of Physics, PKU CSQCD II.
Compact Stars With a Dyson- Schwinger Quark Model 1 陈 欢 Collaborate with 魏金标( CUG ), M. Baldo, F. Burgio and H.-J. Schulze ( INFN ). 2015“ 中子星与核天体物理 ”
高密度クォーク物質における カイラル凝縮とカラー超伝導の競 合 M. Kitazawa,T. Koide,Y. Nemoto and T.K. Prog. of Theor. Phys., 108, 929(2002) 国広 悌二 ( 京大基研) 東大特別講義 2005 年 12 月 5-7 日 Ref.
Crossover Workshop ( , 名大) T.Takatsuka (Iwate Univ.) □ Motivations □ New way of approach □ Some results and remarks Equation of state for hadron-quark.
1 NJL model at finite temperature and chemical potential in dimensional regularization T. Fujihara, T. Inagaki, D. Kimura : Hiroshima Univ.. Alexander.
Color Superconductivity in High Density QCD
The nuclear EoS at high density
Correspondence of Many-flavor Limit and Kaluza-Klein Degrees of Freedom in the Description of Compact Stars Szilvia KARSAI Wigner Research Centre for Physics.
Quark deconfinement in compact stars:
Quark deconfinement in compact stars: University of Ferrara, Italy
EOS discussion.
A few observations on strangeness production at SPS and RHIC
The quark-deconfinement model of Gamma-Ray-Bursts
Fermi Gas Distinguishable Indistinguishable Classical degenerate depend on density. If the wavelength.
Aspects of the QCD phase diagram
Color Superconductivity in High Density QCD
INFN Sezione di Catania
Phase transitions in neutron stars with BHF
Color Superconductivity in High Density QCD
Department of physics and ITPA, G.X.Peng(GUCAS/IHEP,Beijing)
Symmetry energy with non-nucleonic degrees of freedom
Compact objects. Neutron stars: matter under extreme conditions.
Yong-Feng Huang (黄永锋) Collaborators: Jin-Jun Geng, Yong-Bo Yu
A possible approach to the CEP location
Effects of the φ-meson on the hyperon production in the hyperon star
Presentation transcript:

Formation of quark stars J.E. Horvath IAG – USP São Paulo, Brazil

Two important variants: When: Prompt (~ ms to s) or late (Myr) ? Which: Stable at high pressure or self-bound (SQM) ?

Quarks inside stars ? High-density QCD : equilibrium (Maxwell) transitions calculated in the `70s (Collins & Perry 1975, Baym & Chin ) Drop of pressure across the transition, shrinking of stellar structure Global conservation vs. local conservation (Glendenning) Boundary layer (dielectric) counterexample

Work on hypothetical self-bound QCD phases (Bodmer 1971, Terazawa 1979, Witten 1984) : E/A < 939 MeV even at P=0 !!! Non-equilibrium transition !!! Gibbs free energy per particle

SQM : Nucleation classical quantum Alcock & Olinto 1989 Horvath, Benvenuto & Vucetich 1992 Horvath 1994 Olesen & Madsen 1993 Slominski 1990 Grassi 1997 Iida & Sato 1997 ( ) Nucleation rate

* Probably dominated by thermal effects at T > 1 MeV, quantum fluctuations important afterwards if early nucleation is not achieved * Curvature term and chemical state VERY important, neutrinos must go to easy the first bubble *New work by Bombaci, Lugones et al. (out of chemical equilibrium Including pairing energy etc.) Nucleation rate Available time Nucleation volume

Sample compiled by Lattimer et al 2011 Much wider range of masses “one mass” gone Bimodal distribution (Valentim, Rangel & Horvath MNRAS 2011) “new” view

Important news in NS physics Measurements of masses and radii: bursters Apparent area Eddington flux Ozel, Güver et al.

Demorest et al. Nature, 2010 Limits to a quark core Alford et al, Rodrigues et al

Pairing in quark matter (Barrois 1979, Bailin & Love ) small gaps  ~ 1 MeV, considerable uncertainty New round of calculations: pairing stronger and richer structure large gaps up to  ~ 100 MeV Is there still room for “pure” SS ? SQM vs. CFL Strange Matter The quest for the ground state

SQM vs. CFL Strange Matter difference of equilibria Chemical equilibrium (equal Fermi energies) Electrical neutrality Chemical equilibrium (equal Fermi momenta) Electrical neutrality is automatic (no electrons) The CFL case

Absolute stability condition Boundary of the stable region Parabolic approx.: dashed line

Applies to a quark core, not to a self-bound star

We could start from the same free energy parametrization (Alford & Reddy), changing only the Beff but... Parametrizations may lead to signifitant errors ~ 5-10 %. Example (Benvenuto & Horvath, 1989) Dependent on in general, and also correlated CFL case

“Brute force” approach, without parametrization and self-bound matter with Very linear still EoS, but contains all the dependence

What happens if all the points (Ozel+Demorest) are required to be explained simultaneously ? ONE point in parameter space

Steiner, Lattimer & Brown: R >> R photo star Now, a much large set of values is allowed

Quark matter EoS are not soft, even with free quarks Vacuum is very relevant, and pairing interactions too The question should be shifted to the latter: Which are their minimum values? Are they realistic?

Role of hyperons in hadronic matter : included in some NR form, they tend to soften the EOS. Threshold at 2-3 Interactions of hyperons with p,n still uncertain Generally H-n and H-p interactions are not included in the calculations Existing EOS which behave quite stiffly either a)Do not include hyperons b)Include hyperons but use mean-field theories (e.g. Walecka-type) instead of a microscopic approach (M.Baldo, F. Bugio & co-workers…) Why care about self-bound models ?

Why mass determinations around and well below are so important ? 4U Rawls et al PSR J Demorest et al Two examples:

EOS with Hyperons Mmax<1.8 “Exotic” self-bound EOS w/appropiate vacuum value What do these determinations mean and how are these objects formed?

Mean Field Theory of QCD (Navarra, Franzon, Fogaça & Horvath) soft gluons  condensates order 2nd and 4th  soften EoS hard gluons  large occupation numbers: classical  harden EoS

Dynamical gluon mass Stability window Quark matter EoS are not soft at all

Appearance of quarks on dynamical timescales Again two possibilities: ~ ms (prompt) or ~s (delayed) and of course, two versions of quarks: plain or self-bound

Appearance of the (mixed) quark phase at ~ 3 (“normal” version, no SQM)

A second shock 300 ms after bounce, helps ejection T. Fischer et al 2011 Takahara & Sato Gentile et al. Janka et al....

What about SQM? Unlikely to appear that soon (prompt nucleation disfavored) Neutrinos should go for SQM to appear (Lugones & Benvenuto) This means ~ seconds after bounce (diffusion timescale) Once a seed of SQM is present, the propagation is akin to a combustion n  uds + energy, analogue to SNI at high density

Attempts to calculate laminar velocities (Baym et al. 1985, Olinto 1988, Madsen & Olesen 1991, Heiselberg & Baym 1991) Too centered in laminar diffusive physics, conversion takes ~ 1 minute

Early stages of the n  SQM combustion Landau-Darrieus (small λ) and Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities (large λ) Wrinkling of the flame, cellular structure and acceleration Minimum scale still deforming the front (Gibson)

Numerical simulations (Herzog & Ropke 2011) MIT Bag EoS for the SQM, “large eddy” simulations, no cooling Eddies do not disturb the flame front (flamelet) Geometrical enhancement of the speed, even below resolved Flame front always sharp, even considering an average ~ 1 m width Alternative to the fractal expression

Reactive Euler equations !!!

The distributed regime and detonations (DDT?) Mixed regions interact with turbulence, necessary To “jump” (Zel´dovich gradient) mixed burning should de synchronized inside a macroscopic region, perhaps not larger than ~1 cm or so (?). May not occur or start at “t=0”

Possible effects of a SQM energy source Direct action on the stalled shock, detonation “desirable” Benvenuto & Horvath 1989 Indirect revival of the shock (fresh neutrinos) Benvenuto & Lugones 1995 “Photon-driven” SN by radiation of the SS surface Xu, 2003 Within the SQM hypothesis, all compact star formation events would release this extra energy (propagation affected by B) yielding

Bayesian analysis suggests “two bursts” always preferred to “one burst” (even with more parameters deleptonization gap From the “latest” events of SN1987A neutrino burst (Benvenuto & Horvath, 1989)

* * * OBRIGADO Shoichi & colleagues!