VICE – Catch the hookers! (Plus new rootkit techniques)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Processes and Threads Chapter 3 and 4 Operating Systems: Internals and Design Principles, 6/E William Stallings Patricia Roy Manatee Community College,
Advertisements

Part IV: Memory Management
CS 4284 Systems Capstone Godmar Back Processes and Threads.
Secure In-VM Monitoring Using Hardware Virtualization Monirul Sharif, Wenke Lee, Weidong Cui, and Andrea Lanzi Presented by Tyler Bletsch.
Ensuring Operating System Kernel Integrity with OSck By Owen S. Hofmann Alan M. Dunn Sangman Kim Indrajit Roy Emmett Witchel Kent State University College.
OS/2 Warp Chris Ashworth Cameron Davis John Weatherley.
Operating System Security : David Phillips A Study of Windows Rootkits.
Chap 2 System Structures.
Windows Rootkits – Userland API Hooking Robert Vinson – IT Security Analyst – University of Iowa 09/06/06.
1 Future Technologies Group Shane Canon, canon at nersc dot govSummer Linux Kernel Class Root Kit Protection and Detection Shane Canon October
ROOTKIT VIRUS by Himanshu Mishra Points to be covered Introduction History Uses Classification Installation and Cloaking Detection Removal.
Slide 6-1 Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 6 Implementing Processes, Threads, and Resources.
Windows Security and Rootkits Mike Willard January 2007.
INTRODUCTION OS/2 was initially designed to extend the capabilities of DOS by IBM and Microsoft Corporations. To create a single industry-standard operating.
CSE 451: Operating Systems Winter 2009 Module 4 Processes Mark Zbikowski Gary Kimura.
Home: Phones OFF Please Unix Kernel Parminder Singh Kang Home:
Threads. Processes and Threads  Two characteristics of “processes” as considered so far: Unit of resource allocation Unit of dispatch  Characteristics.
1 Process Description and Control Chapter 3 = Why process? = What is a process? = How to represent processes? = How to control processes?
ROOT KITS. Overview History What is a rootkit? Rootkit capabilities Rootkits on windows OS Rootkit demo Detection methodologies Good tools for detection.
Process Description and Control A process is sometimes called a task, it is a program in execution.
Copyright John “Four” Flynn This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial,
CSE 451: Operating Systems Winter 2012 Processes Mark Zbikowski Gary Kimura.
Rootkits in Windows XP  What they are and how they work.
Monnappa KA  Info Security Cisco  Member of SecurityXploded  Reverse Engineering, Malware Analysis, Memory Forensics 
Processes and Threads CS550 Operating Systems. Processes and Threads These exist only at execution time They have fast state changes -> in memory and.
Black Hat Briefings Las Vegas July 25th, 2000 Getting rooted and never knowing it The importance of kernel integrity Job de Haas.
Windows 2000 System Mechanisms Computing Department, Lancaster University, UK.
CE Operating Systems Lecture 11 Windows – Object manager and process management.
Hardware process When the computer is powered up, it begins to execute fetch-execute cycle for the program that is stored in memory at the boot strap entry.
Threads G.Anuradha (Reference : William Stallings)
Hidden Processes: The Implication for Intrusion Detection
Rootkits, Backdoors, and Trojans ECE 4112 – Lab 5 Summary – Spring 2006 Group 9 Greg Sheridan Terry Harvey Group 10 Matthew Bowman Laura Silaghi Michael.
CNIT 127: Exploit Development Ch 8: Windows Overflows Part 2.
Processes, Threads, and Process States. Programs and Processes  Program: an executable file (before/after compilation)  Process: an instance of a program.
Hardware process When the computer is powered up, it begins to execute fetch-execute cycle for the program that is stored in memory at the boot strap entry.
Privilege Escalation Two case studies. Privilege Escalation To better understand how privilege escalation can work, we will look at two relatively recent.
Lecture 7 Rootkits Hoglund/Butler (Chapter 5-6). Avoiding detection Two ways rootkits can avoid detection –Modify execution path of operating system to.
What is a Process ? A program in execution.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2011 Operating System Concepts Essentials – 8 th Edition Chapter 2: The Linux System Part 2.
Lecture 5 Rootkits Hoglund/Butler (Chapters 1-3).
Introduction Contain two or more CPU share common memory and peripherals. Provide greater system throughput. Multiple processor executing simultaneous.
Lecture 8 Rootkits Hoglund/Butler (Chapter 7-8). Avoiding detection Two ways rootkits can avoid detection –Modify execution path of operating system to.
Embedded Real-Time Systems Processing interrupts Lecturer Department University.
Introduction to Operating Systems Concepts
Computer System Structures
Chapter 4 – Thread Concepts
Chapter 4: Threads Modified by Dr. Neerja Mhaskar for CS 3SH3.
Seminar On Ethical Hacking Submitted To: Submitted By:
CS 3214 Computer Systems Lecture 9 Godmar Back.
Introduction to Kernel
Day 12 Threads.
Chapter 4 – Thread Concepts
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 6
Unit OS2: Operating System Principles
Hidden Processes: The Implication for Intrusion Detection
Chapter 3: Windows7 Part 2.
Windows Internals Brown-Bag Seminar Chapter 1 – Concepts and Tools
Chapter 4: Threads.
Chapter 2: The Linux System Part 2
Chapter 3: Windows7 Part 2.
CSE 451: Operating Systems Winter 2011 Processes
CSE 451: Operating Systems Winter 2010 Module 4 Processes
Rootkits Jonathan Hobbs.
Hiding Malware Rootkits
CHAPTER 4:THreads Bashair Al-harthi OPERATING SYSTEM
Operating Systems Lecture 3.
Implementing Processes, Threads, and Resources
Process Description and Control in Unix
In Today’s Class.. General Kernel Responsibilities Kernel Organization
Presentation transcript:

VICE – Catch the hookers! (Plus new rootkit techniques) Jamie Butler Greg Hoglund

Agenda Introduction to Rootkits Where to Hook VICE detection Direct Kernel Object Manipulation (DKOM) No hooking required! Demonstration of FU rootkit

Operating System Design User Land Operating system provides common API for developers to use Kernel32.dll Ntdll.dll Kernel Mode The low level kernel functions that implement the services needed in user land Protected memory containing objects such as those for processes, tokens, ports, etc.

Attack Scenario Attacker gains elevated access to computer system Attacker installs a Rootkit Rootkit’s functions Hide processes Hide files Hide network connections Install a backdoor for future access to the system Rootkits act as a part of the operating system so they have access to kernel functions.

State of Current Rootkits Until recently, rootkits were nothing more than Trojan programs such as ps, ls, top, du, and netstat Advanced rootkits filter data Hook the Import Address Table (IAT) in processes Hook the System Call Table of the operating system (the functions exported by the kernel) Hook the Interrupt Descriptor Table (IDT) Interrupts are used to signal to the kernel that it has work to perform. By hooking one interrupt, a clever rootkit can filter all exported kernel functions.

IAT Hooks Import Address Table FunctionName or Ordinal 0x11223344 Table Entry

IAT Hooks CODE Some DLL FunctionName or Ordinal 0x11223344 CODE Table Entry

IAT Hooks CODE Some DLL BAD CODE CODE Some Rootkit

IAT Hooks CODE Some DLL BAD CODE CODE Some Rootkit

System Call KiSystemService Call Number 0x11223344 Table Entry System Service Descriptor Table USER MODE KERNEL MODE

System Call Kernel or module Call Number 0x11223344 Table Entry System Service Descriptor Table USER MODE KERNEL MODE

Kernel or module System Call Some rootkit System Service Descriptor Table USER MODE KERNEL MODE

Kernel or module System Call Some rootkit System Service Descriptor Table USER MODE KERNEL MODE

Kernel or module System Call Some rootkit USER MODE KERNEL MODE

Control Flow … aka Places to Hook Kernel32 CreateFileW NTDLL NtCreateFile User Land Kernel

Control Flow … aka Places to Hook IDT System Call Table NtCreateFile { push ebp mov ebp, esp xor eax, eax push eax … } &NtCreateFile 2E User Land Kernel

VICE VICE is a tool to detect rootkits Designed originally to detect hooks Kernel System Call Hooks Win32 API Hooks In-line function patching VICE has an API so other it can be easily incorporated into other tools

VICE Demonstrations

VICE vs hxdef rootkit

VICE vs Vanquish rootkit

Consumers demand more… Corporations and many private consumers see the need for more security Personal firewalls Host based intrusion prevention systems

Current HIDS/HIPS Functions To detect or prevent: Processes running Files that are created/deleted/modified Network connections made Privilege escalation Trusts the operating system to report these activities. If the underlying operating system is compromised, the HIDS/HIPS fails.

What Makes HIDS/HIPS Possible? Querying kernel reporting functions Hooking user land API functions Kernel32.dll Ntdll.dll Hooking the System Call Table Registering OS provided call-back functions

Problems with HIPS Design Required to be on the execution path of the attacker to allow/deny actions Looks just like the hooks rootkits use (dual technology) … who said an attacker has to use an API

Operating System Design Intel has four privilege levels or rings Microsoft and many other OS vendors use only two rings

Operating System Design By only using two privilege levels, there is no separation between the kernel itself and third party drivers or loadable kernel modules (LKM’s) Drivers can modify the memory associated with kernel objects such as those that represent a process’s token

Next Generation Rootkit Techniques Direct Kernel Object Manipulation (DKOM) in memory A device driver or loadable kernel module has access to kernel memory A sophisticated rootkit can modify the objects directly in memory in a relatively reliable fashion to hide. Recall the goal of rootkits is to hide things: processes, files, and network connections.

DKOM Uses Hide Processes Add Privileges to Tokens Add Groups to Tokens Manipulate the Token to Fool the Windows Event Viewer Hide Ports

The Implication of Hidden Processes The intruder has full control of the system. Defeats a Host Based IDS/IPS that depends upon the underlying operating system. Will skew the results of forensic examinations.

Hiding Processes - Windows KPRCB *CurrentThread *NextThread *IdleThread ETHREAD KTHREAD ApcState EPROCESS EPROCESS EPROCESS KPROCESS KPROCESS KPROCESS LIST_ENTRY { LIST_ENTRY { LIST_ENTRY { FLINK FLINK FLINK BLINK } BLINK } BLINK }

Hiding Processes - Windows Locate the Processor Control Block (KPRCB) Located at 0xffdff120 fs register in kernel mode points to 0xffdff000 Within the KPRCB is a pointer to the Current Thread block (ETHREAD) Located at fs:[124] or 0xffdff124 An ETHREAD contains a KTHREAD structure

Hiding Processes - Windows The KTHREAD structure contains a pointer to the EPROCESS block of the current process The EPROCESS block contains a LIST structure, which has a forward and backward pointer to active processes This creates the doubly linked list of active processes in Windows

Hiding Processes - Windows To hide a process Locate the EPROCESS block of the process to hide Change the process behind it to point to the process after the process you are hiding Change the process after it to point to the process before the one you are trying to hide Essentially, the list of active now processes points “around” the hidden process

Hiding Processes - Windows

Hiding Processes - Windows Why does the process continue to run? Scheduling in the Windows kernel is thread based and not process based. Although scheduling code to run is based upon threads, when the kernel reports what is running on the system, it reports based upon EPROCESS blocks which can be modified with no adverse affect. This is what current tools (IDS/IPS’s) rely upon to discover what is running on the system.

Hiding Processes – LINUX The LINUX kernel contains an array of task_struct’s. A task_struct is similar to an EPROCESS block in Windows task_struct contains pointers to the prev_task and next_task task_struct also contains pointers to the prev_run and next_run for the running processes

Hiding Processes – LINUX To hide a process, remove the process from the list of prev_task and next_task Leave next_run and prev_run alone

Hiding Processes - LINUX

Hiding Processes – LINUX

Hiding Processes - LINUX To prevent the process from freezing The LINUX scheduler walks the list of task_struct’s to calculate the goodness value of the process to decide rather to schedule it or not. The LINUX scheduler must be modified to allocate time quantums to the parent of process of PID 0

Synchronization Issues Modifying shared objects such as the active process list is not completely safe. Rootkit could be swapped out Multiprocessor issues In Windows, the list of active processes is protected by PspActiveProcessMutex. PsLoadedModuleResource guards the list of device drivers.

Synchronization Issues Problem: These symbols are not exported by the operating system Need a way to find these and other symbols Hardcoding addresses – very unreliable Search for patterns in memory Functions within the kernel use PspActiveProcessMutex Find the mutex’s use within functions with a relatively consistent pattern. Synchronization Research and Code done by Sherri Sparks from the University of Central Florida.

Token Manipulation Add Privileges to Token Add Groups to Token Make the Owner of the Token Any User Make Any Actions Taken by the Process Appear to be Someone else such as System Makes forensics difficult Totally fakes out the Windows Event Viewer

Tokens Static Part TOKEN SOURCE TokenId AuthenticationId ParentTokenId ExpirationTime TokenLock ModifiedId SessionId UserAndGroupCount RestrictedSidCount PrivilegeCount VariableLength Etc…

Tokens Variable Part Privileges User and Groups Pointer to SID LUID Attribute User and Groups Pointer to SID Restricted SID’s

Manipulating Tokens Difficult to just grow the token because you are not sure what is after the variable part in memory Although static portion has pointers to the privileges and groups, just changing these to point to newly allocated memory does not work due to crazy math in a SepDuplicateToken() function

Manipulating Tokens There are a lot of Privileges in a token that are disabled We can discard these since they are disabled anyway and free up space for new privileges and groups The “in-line” method

Adding Privileges to Tokens with DKOM Typedef struct _LUID_AND_ATTRIBUTES{ DWORD Luid; DWORD Attributes; }

Adding Privileges to Tokens with DKOM Static Portion 0x00000001 LUID LUID 0x00000000 0x00000001 LUID 0x00000001 LUID 0x00000001 LUID Disabled Priv’s SID’s Enabled Priv’s Added Priv’s Restricted SID’s

Adding Groups to Tokens with DKOM Typedef struct _SID_AND_ATTRIBUTES { DWORD pSID; DWORD Attributes; }

Adding Groups to Tokens with DKOM Static Portion 0x00000001 LUID LUID 0x00000000 0x00000001 LUID pSID 0x00000007 pSID 0x00000007 SID Disabled Priv’s SID’s SID Enabled Priv’s Added SID’s Restricted SID’s

Faking Out the Windows Event Viewer using DKOM Change one DWORD in Static Portion of Token SYSTEM_LUID = 0x000003E7 Make FIRST SID in Token the System SID All logging of the Process now appears as System Useful if Detailed Process Tracking is Enabled

Detecting Hidden Processes in Windows Methodology: Examine each thread to ensure its corresponding process descriptor (EPROCESS) is appropriately linked. This requires patching the kernel in memory, in particular the SwapContext function. Hunt and Brubacher introduced Detours for intercepting Win32 binary functions.

Detours Overwrite beginning of target function (SwapContext) with an unconditional jump to a Detour function Detour function eventually calls a Trampoline function The Trampoline function contains the overwritten bytes of the target (SwapContext) function and calls the target (SwapContext) function The Target function returns to the Detour function The Detour function returns to the source caller (kernel dispatcher)

Detours

Patching the Windows kernel SwapContext function does context switching between threads in Windows Overwrite the first seven bytes of SwapContext with a jump to our Detour function The EDI register points to the KTHREAD of the thread to be scheduled to run Our Detour function follows the KTHREAD to the EPROCESS block and determines if it is still appropriately linked in the list of active processes.

Other Ways to Detect Hidden Processes Klister by Joanna Rutkowska Presented at Black Hat Las Vegas 2003 Looks at Thread Queues since threads must be in one of four queues to be scheduled Problem: Queue addresses are not exported so the addresses must be hard coded for each version of the OS

Detecting Hidden Processes in LINUX Injectso is a library similar to Detours except for LINUX When process state is Task_Running and it is placed in the LINUX run queue by setting the prev_run and next_run pointers appropriately, make sure it is properly linked by testing the next_task and prev_task of its neighbors.

Tool Demonstration: Process Hiding

Tool Demonstration: Gaining System Privilege

Conclusion We have shown the evolution of rootkit technology and detection No longer trojanized programs No longer just hooking, which VICE detects Now act as a part of the Trusted Computing Base (TCB) DKOM … what will it be used for next?

Questions?

Email: james.butler@hbgary.com Thank you. Email: james.butler@hbgary.com Attend the Black Hat Training “Aspects of Offensive Root-kit Technology”