DEDUCTIVE REASONING We reason deductively when we draw a conclusion from a set of given facts using the laws of logic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deductive Validity In this tutorial you will learn how to determine whether deductive arguments are valid or invalid. Go to next slide.
Advertisements

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
Chapter 1 Section 1.1 Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning.
Deductive Validity In this tutorial you will learn how to determine whether deductive arguments are valid or invalid. Chapter 3.b.
Deductive and Inductive Arguments. All bats are mammals. All mammals are warm-blooded. So, all bats are warm-blooded. All arguments are deductive or.
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-08: 1 Critical Issues in Information Systems BUSS 951 Seminar 8 Arguments.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Statements and Quantifiers
Part 2 Module 3 Arguments and deductive reasoning Logic is a formal study of the process of reasoning, or using common sense. Deductive reasoning involves.
Basic Argumentation.
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
FALSE PREMISE.
Introduction to Geometric Proof Logical Reasoning and Conditional Statements.
LOOKING FOR CLUES DEDUCTIVE REASONING. DEDUCTIVE LOGIC “The process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain.
Logic in Everyday Life.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Deductive Reasoning.  Conditional Statements can be written using symbolic notation  p represents hypothesis  q represents conclusion  is read as.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Logic. What is logic? Logic (from the Ancient Greek: λογική, logike) is the use and study of valid reasoning. The study of logic features most prominently.
Ways of Knowing: Reason Reason. Cogito ergo sum Reasoning Deductive Inductive.
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Thinking Mathematically Arguments and Truth Tables.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
Chapter 1 Mathematical Reasoning Section 1.2 Deductive Reasoning.
Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing Part 2 Ed McCorduck CPN 101—Academic Writing II on Computer SUNY Cortland
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Deductive s. Inductive Reasoning
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
METHODS IN ANTHROPOLOGY SCIENCE AND INTERPRETATION.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive reasoning.
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
FALSE PREMISE.
Logic & Reasoning.
Chapter 1: Good and Bad Reasoning
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
2-1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning
Win Every Argument Every Time
Truth Tables How to build them
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning
2.4 Deductive Reasoning.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE REASONING Forensic Science.
Five step procedure for drawing conclusions.
Drill: Tuesday, 10/18 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
Inductive and Deductive Logic
TRUTH TABLE TO DETERMINE
2-1 Inductive Reasoning.
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
To solve problems by looking for a pattern
2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning: Using facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment: A form.
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

DEDUCTIVE REASONING We reason deductively when we draw a conclusion from a set of given facts using the laws of logic

Inspector Garble

DEDUCTIVE REASONING If the butler murdered Uncle Alfred then there are fingerprints on the gun. The butler murdered Uncle Alfred or the maid did it. There are not fingerprints on the gun. Therefore the maid did it.

The collection of statements below is called an ARGUMENT- a vehicle for reasoning consisting of If the butler murdered Uncle Alfred then there are fingerprints on the gun. The butler murdered Uncle Alfred or the maid did it. There are not fingerprints on the gun. Therefore the maid did it. A set of statements called PREMISES - the given facts or clues Followed by a final statement called the CONCLUSION which is said to be drawn from the given facts.

An argument is either VALID or INVALID. VALID does NOT mean TRUE The sky is blue. Zebras have stripes. We are sitting in class. Therefore George W. Bush is president of the United States. Everything I say is true but the process of reasoning is not valid. The premises and the conclusion are not related. To examine the relationship that determines validity, we must first consider the STRUCTURE of the argument.

WHODUNNIT? If the butler murdered Uncle Alfred then there are fingerprints on the gun. The butler murdered Uncle Alfred or the maid did it. There are not fingerprints on the gun. Therefore the maid did it.

The STRUCTURE of the Argument If then or Not Therefore

If b then f b or m Not f Therefore m

This argument has the same structure as the previous example If Herman lives in Cleveland then Herman lives in Ohio. Herman lives in Cleveland or Herman lives in Philadelphia. Herman does not live in Ohio. Therefore Herman lives in Philadelphia.

The STRUCTURE of the Argument If then or It is not true that Therefore

The STRUCTURE of the Argument If then or It is not true that Therefore The butler murdered Uncle Alfred The maid did it There are fingerprints on the gun

The STRUCTURE of the Argument If then or It is not true that Therefore

The STRUCTURE of the Argument If then or It is not true that Therefore Herman lives in Cleveland Herman lives in Phila Herman lives in Ohio

When we reason inductively we can never be certain that the conclusion is true. When we reason deductively we can be certain that the conclusion is true as long as the premises are true. It is difficult to separate these two modes of reasoning, because we often use them together - for example, in deductive reasoning, the premises are likely to be the conclusions of inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is uncertain - but it is our only way to know anything about the real world. Deductive reasoning is certain - but very artificial. However these artificial patterns govern the way we think, reason and communicate.

Albert Einstein compares the two modes of reasoning - inductive and deductive - and outlines the great paradox in our ability to “know” things: “As far as mathematics is certain, it does not pertain to reality, and as far as it pertains to reality, it is not certain.” Logical reasoning