8. Axial Capacity of Single Piles

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pile foundations.
Advertisements

Shallow Foundations Bearing Capacity
PILE FOUNDATION.
9. Axial Capacity of Pile Groups
JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
SUB-STRUCTURE foundations.
Wave Equation Applications 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
LRFD Design of Shallow Foundations
Course : S0705 – Soil Mechanic
SOFT SOIL (PROBLEMS & STABILISATION METHOD) Session 2 - 7
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
PILES  there are two categories of piles according to the method of installation: A. Driven Piles 1.t imber, steel, precast concrete, piles formed by.
Chapter (1) Geotechnical Properties of Soil
Foundation System Design for Al Nimmer Commercial Building
Session 25 – 26 DRILLED SHAFT And CAISSON FOUNDATION
AASHTO LRFD Section and 10
USING THE RAPID LOAD TESTER TO PROVIDE PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL.
OUTLINE SPATIAL VARIABILITY FRAGILITY CURVES MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS CONCLUSIONS EFFECTS DESIGN RECOMMEND BEARING CAPACITY OF HETEROGENEOUS SOILS APPENDIXOUTLINE.
In Situ Testing CPT & SPT.
STUDENT EXERCISE #2 Use the α-Method described in Section a and the Nordlund Method described in Section c to calculate the ultimate pile.
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS Spread footings Mat (Raft) foundations Square
Priyantha Jayawickrama, Ph.D. Associate Professor
INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS
Bearing Capacity Theory
PILE FOUNDATION BY-.
Pile Foundations پي هاي شمعي.
Session 17 – 18 PILE FOUNDATIONS
GEO-MECHANICS (CE2204) Shear Strength of Soils
Direct Shear Test CEP 701 PG Lab.
TOPIC 2: TYPES OF FOUNDATION
ECGD 4122 – Foundation Engineering
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
Soil-Pile Interaction in FB-MultiPier
Reference Manual Chapter 9
PILE FOUNDATION Session 17 – 26
Settlement Criteria  f f f for clays, silty clays, plastic silts: Chapter 5 (short term) Chapter 7 (long term, i.e., consolidation)  i i i in this.
OMAE 2009 Honolulu, HI - May 31 to June
Wave Equation Applications 2009 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
CE 482 Examples.
Session 19 – 20 PILE FOUNDATIONS
1 Pile Groups Most pile foundations contain group of piles instead of single pileThe supporting capacity of a group of ‘n’similar piles in many cases (not.
BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL Session 3 – 4
Course : S0484/Foundation Engineering Year : 2007 Version : 1/0
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Case History Evaluation of the Axial Behaviour of Bored Pile from SPT Aung Naing Moe August 2014.
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Bearing Capacity of Shallow Footings
LUKHDHIRJI ENGINEERING COLLEGE MORBI SUBJECT :- “BOX SHEAR TEST” 1.Mepani Kiran ( ) 2.Pavasiya Jaydeep ( ) 3.Pindoriya Jenti( )
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Chapter 15 Soil-Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundations
Pile Foundation Reason for Piles Types of Piles
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-III (CE 434)
Prepared by:- Barham Jalal
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Direct Shear Test.
PILING TECHNIQUES.
The Engineering of Foundations
Outline Introduction Test section details Axial load test results
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS BY, Babariya Ashish Gondaliya Ronak Gondaliya akshay Javiya hardik
DARSHAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
Aspek Geoteknik.
Pertemuan 06 Daya Dukung Tanah
Pile Group
S S SUBMITTED BY:- CHARU BHARDWAJ civil engineering
Aspek Geoteknik.
DEEP FOUNDATIONS PILES.
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
Discussers (alphabetical order):
Graduation Project Bracing system for deep excavation.
Presentation transcript:

8. Axial Capacity of Single Piles CIV4249 ©1998 Dr. J.P. Seidel Modified by J.K. Kodikara, 2001

Methods Pile driving formulae Static load test Dynamic or Statnamic load test Static formulae

Pile driving formulae e.g. Hiley formula (Energy balance) Q = e.W.h . F (set + tc / 2) Ru= working load, W=weight of the hammer, h= height of the hammer drop (stroke), F=factor of safety tc= elastic (temporary) compression  = efficiency F D s tc Ru

Static Load Test Load Deflection What is the failure load? Plunging failure Load to specified contract requirement Davisson’s Method Butler and Hoy Chin’s Method Brinch Hanson etc. etc. What is the distribution of resistance? Approximate methods Instrumentation Deflection

Dynamic and Statnamic Testing Methods Rapid alternatives to static testing Cheaper Separate dynamic resistance Correlation

Pu Axial Capacity W Qs Pu = Qb + Qs - W Qb

Base Resistance Qb Qb = Ab [cbNc + P’ob(Nq-1) + 0.5gBNg + Pob] minus weight of pile, Wp but Wp » Ab.Pob Qb and as L >>B, 0.5gBNg << Wp and for f > 0, Nq - 1 » Nq Qb = Ab [cbNc + P’obNq]

Shaft Resistance As Due to cohesion or friction Cohesive component : Qsc = As . a . cs Frictional component : Qsf = As .K P’ostan d P’os K.P’os Qs = Qsc + Qsf = As [ a .cs + K P’ostan d ]

Total Pile Resistance Qu = Qb + Qs Qu = Ab [cbNc+P’obNq] + As [ a .cs+K P’otan d ] How do we compute Qu when shaft resistance along the pile is varying?

Mobilization 10 - 20% diam 2 - 5mm Load Total Base Shaft Settlement

Piles in Clay Qu = Ab [cbNc+P’obNq] + As [ a .cs+K P’otan d ] Qu = AbcbNc + Asa .cs Undrained Qu = Ab [cbNc+P’obNq] + As [ a .cs+K P’otan d ] Qu = Ab [cbNc+P’obNq] + As [ a .cs+K P’otan d ] Qu = Ab P’obNq + AsK P’ostan d Drained / Effective Qu = Ab P’obNq + AsK P’otan d Qu = AbcbNc + Asa .cs

Driven Piles in Clay

Driven Piles in Clay

Nc Parameter Nc Compare Skempton’s Nc for shallow foundations Nc= 5(1+0.2B/L)(1+0.2D/ B)

Adhesion Factor,  Aust. Piling Code, AS159 (1978)

Bored Piles in Clay Skempton’s recommendations for side resistance  =0.45 for cu <215 kPa cu =100 kPa for cu>215 kPa Nc is limited to 9. A reduction factor is applied to account for likely fissuring (I.e., Qb = Ab  cb Nc)

Soil disturbance sampling attempts to establish in-situ strength values soil is failed/remoulded by driving or drilling pile installation causes substantial disturbance bored piles : potential loosening driven piles : probable densification

Scale effects Laboratory samples or in-situ tests involve small volumes of soil Failure of soil around piles involves much larger soil volumes If soil is fissured, the sample may not be representative

Piles in Sand Qu = Ab [cbNc+P’obNq] + As [ a .cs+K P’ostan d ] Qu = Ab P’obNq] + AsK P’ostan d ]

Overburden Stress P’ob Qu = Ab P’obNq] + AsK P’ostan d ] Meyerhof Method : P’ob = g’z Vesic Method : critical depth, zc for z < zc : P’ob = g’z for z > zc : P’ob = g’zc zc/d is a function of f after installation - see graph p. 24

Critical Depth (zc)

Bearing Factor, Nq Qu = Ab P’obNq] + AsK P’ostan d ] Nq is a function of : Nq is a function of : friction angle, f Total end bearing may also be limited: Layered soils : Nq may be reduced if penetration insufficient. e.g. Meyerhof (p 21) What affects f ? In-situ density Particle properties Installation procedure Meyerhof : Qb < Ab50Nqtanf Beware if f is pre- or post-installation: Nq determined from graphs appropriate to each particular method

Nq factor (Berezantzev’s Method) If D/B <4 reduce proportionately to Terzaghi and Peck values

Overburden Stress P’os Qu = Ab P’obNq] + AsK P’ostan d ] Meyerhof Method : P’os = g’zmid Vesic Method : critical depth, zc for zmid < zc : P’ob = g’z for zmid > zc : P’ob = g’zc zc/d is a function of f after installation - see graph p. 24

Lateral stress parameter, K A function of Ko normally consolidated or overconsolidated - see Kulhawy properties manual see recommendations by Das, Kulhawy (p26) A function of installation driven piles (full, partial displacement) bored piles augercast piles screwed piles

K.tand The K and tand values are often combined into a single function see p 28 for Vesic values from Poulos and Davis

Pile-soil friction angle, d A function of f See values by Broms and Kulhawy (p26) A function of pile material steel, concrete, timber A function of pile roughness precast concrete Cast-in-place concrete

Pile-soil friction angle

Example Driven precast concrete pile 350mm square Uniform dense sand (f = 40o ; g = 21kN/m3) Water table at 1m Pile length 15m Check end bearing with Vesic and Meyerhof Methods Pile is driven on 2m further into a very dense layer f = 44o ; g = 21.7 kN/m3 Compute modified capacity using Meyerhof

Example Bored pile 900mm diameter Uniform medium dense sand (f = 35o ; g = 19.5kN/m3) Water table at 1m Pile length 20m Check shaft capacity with Vesic and Meyerhof Methods By comparsion, check capacity of 550mm diameter screwed pile

Lateral load on single pile Calculation of ultimate lateral resistance (refer website/handouts for details) Lateral pile deflection (use use subgrade reaction method, p-y analysis) Rock socketed pile (use rocket, Carter et al. 1992 method)