ANTIDEGRADATON and NITROGEN IN GREAT BAY Paul Currier, P.E., P.G. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services NHEP Technical Advisory Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
Advertisements

1 Stormwater Program Videoconference April 23, 2013 Bill Cole, Water Quality Standards Unit.
Presented to: Minnesota Chamber of Commerce October 1, 2012.
Watershed Staff Videoconference October 17, 2012.
A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012.
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
Notebook Ref 6.3. Questions Tier 3 discussion has been addressed separately... How is Tier 1 / Tier 2 protection applied? ALL waterbodies are protected.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
Using multiple data streams to develop eelgrass-based nutrient criteria for New Hampshire’s Great Bay Estuary J. Ru Morrison (NERACOOS), Paul Currier (NHDES),
Using multiple data streams to develop eelgrass-based nutrient criteria for New Hampshire’s Great Bay Estuary J. Ru Morrison (NERACOOS), Paul Currier (NHDES),
Proposed Revisions to the State’s Surface Water Classification System February 22, 2010 Public Workshop Daryll Joyner Bureau of Assessment and Restoration.
Nutrient Criteria for New Hampshire’s Estuaries Background Information Phil Trowbridge NH DES / NHEP September 30, 2005.
Nutrient Criteria Development for New Hampshire’s Estuaries P. Trowbridge, P.E. December 7, 2007.
Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team.
ENVE 4505 Surface Water Quality Engineering Dr. Martin T. Auer.
Notebook Ref Summary of the Issue ADEC policy states: “If the quality of a water exceeds levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish,
JT Petty: WMAN 445 Lecture Notes Lecture 5.2: STATE POLICY.
Implementation of Antidegradation Policies for Indiana Waters.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) NPDES in effect on November 1, 2011 Presentation by : Tom Janousek, Pest Consulting Services, Omaha,
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
1 IDEM Overview of March 14, 2008 Draft Antidegradation Rule Presented at the April 29, 2008 Antidegradation Stakeholder Meeting.
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Brock Tabor Nancy Sonafrank Alaska Forum on the Environment 2013.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
Mountain Watershed Association Home of the Youghiogheny Riverkeeper Protecting Water Quality.
Antidegradation Standards and Implementation Procedures Overview of Third Notice Comments and Responses March 14,
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
September 2014 Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61 Tom Corbett, Governor E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Antidegradation Implementation: Federal Framework and Indiana Process Presented March 7, 2008.
Proposed Nutrient Criteria for NH’s Estuaries Philip Trowbridge, P.E. NH Estuaries Project / NH DES November 17, 2008.
Designing De Minimis Indiana Antidegradation Workshop April 29, 2008 Brad Klein -- Environmental Law & Policy Center.
Overview of Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Recycled Water Policy Requirement.
Our main charge should be to identify indicators of progress toward CCMP goals and objectives, and to organize the indicators into a score card, and produce.
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Antidegradation and Alternatives Analysis Mary E. Gardner Regulatory Programs Administrator Littleton/Englewood WWTP Colorado.
ANTIDEGRADATION and THE BENEFITS OF PUMP LOGS FOR BATCH DISCHARGES Given by: Dan Murray, Terrell Hendren and Josh Frazier.
Nutrient Criteria Development for Rhode Island Estuarine Waters CHRP/Managers Meeting October 8, 2009.
Water Resources Workshop Standards, Use Attainability, Impairments and TMDLS Richard Eskin Maryland Department of the Environment February 20, 2004.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
Jennifer Fordyce State Water Resources Control Board – Office of Chief Counsel.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
The Fish and Game Commission has designated the states portion of the South Bay Salt Ponds an Ecological Reserve. Planning for the management of Ecological.
Citizen’s Advisory Committee / Local Government Advisory Committee Joint Meeting December 5, 2013 Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA)
1 Water Quality Standards - CWA and Porter-Cologne An Overview.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards TR17 Updated Scope, Recommendations, and Timeline Water Resources Advisory Committee March 24, 2016 John Quigley,
Canal Restoration Regulatory Background The Clean Water Act, an introduction: Basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into U.S. waters,
Wetlands Focus Group. Responsibilities and Goals   Growth Managements Act (Chapter 163, FS) of 1985   Included the adoption of the State Comprehensive.
Environmental Specialist
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
U.S. Clean Water Act: Water Quality Standards Overview
Module 2 Overview of EPA, the Clean Water Act, and Water Quality Standards - What will we we learn in this Academy? - Who plays what roles in.
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
ENV 400 STUDY Education for Service- -env400study.com.
8 million new pounds of nitrogen (10% of the TMDL) $28 billion in offsets Map courtesy of Peter Claggett, USGS.
CS at Regulatory agencies
Request for Approval to Proceed to Public Hearing on the Triennial Review of Surface Water Quality Standards.
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

ANTIDEGRADATON and NITROGEN IN GREAT BAY Paul Currier, P.E., P.G. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services NHEP Technical Advisory Committee December 7, 2007

WATER QUALITY STANDARDS Clean Water Act PL92-500, sections 303, Essential elements –Designated Uses –Criteria to support the uses –ANTIDEGRADATION POLICY CFR title 40, Sec Env-Ws 1708 Antidegradation

ANTIDEGRADATION Three Tiers –TIER 1: Maintain existing uses, support designated uses –TIER 2: High Quality Waters High quality shall be maintained and protected unless there is social and economic justification –TIER 3: Outstanding Resource Waters Administrative tier – not based on existing WQ Quality shall be maintained and protected Short term, temporary degradation allowed in specific cases

Tier 2 High Quality Waters Water quality shall be maintained and protected (except for insignificant degradation) unless there is social and economic justification. Tier 1 Degradation of water quality is not allowed to provide for “buffer.” Impaired Degradation of water quality not allowed. (Separate requirement for TMDL study) Worse Better Water Quality WQ Standard

OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATER (TIER 3) Administrative tier DES can adopt by rule Applies to all parameters, not just nutrient- related May be too restrictive for a large watershed (3) Where high quality waters constitute an outstanding National resource, such as waters of National and State parks and wildlife refuges and waters of exceptional recreational or ecological significance, that water quality shall be maintained and protected.

POSSIBLE TIER 1 DETERMINATION FOR GREAT BAY Antidegradation status may be a moot issue if an interim N standard is adopted soon Use a “Weight of Evidence” approach Ask the question “has 90% or more of the assimilative capacity been used” for N or a parameter that is a function of N