Management of New York City’s Watershed Michael A. Principe, Ph.D. Deputy Commissioner New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
NPDES Phase II in Wake County: Forging A Collaborative Approach to Stormwater Management APWA Conference September 19, 2005.
Regional Coordination for Implementation of Source Water Protection Projects October 24 th, 2013 Kelly Anderson Philadelphia Water Department’s Source.
Environmental Advisory Council Network, A Project of the PA Environmental Council SOURCE WATER PROTECTION IN BERKS COUNTY.
Essex Region Conservation Authority Brad Arsenault & Kaylyn Boyd.
Floyd County Board of Commissioners Special Town Hall Meeting Topic: Update on status of Georgetown WWTP.
MS4 Stormwater Permit Program and Great Bay. Brief Overview – EPA’s Stormwater Management Program Clean Water Act – NPDES Stormwater amendments.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Funding for Municipal Infrastructure Ruth Noemí Colón Acting Secretary of State George Stafford Deputy Secretary of State Public Finance and Management.
The New York City Watershed Agreement “A commitment to Partnership”
District of Columbia Stormwater Fees October 27, 2008 Apartment and Office Building Association of Metropolitan Washington Brendan Shane DDOE Office of.
Stormwater, Wellhead Protection and Drainage Issues Public Hearing.
A Tale of Three WWTPs (Frangel, Town of Kent, Kent Manor ) NYC Watershed/Tifft Science and Technical Symposium September 19, 2013 Thayer Hotel, West Point,
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
Photo Courtesy of the Vermont Land Trust The Berlin Pond Watershed Conservation Project.
Expedited Projects + Innovative Teamwork = Measurable Improvements to the Health of Lake Okeechobee and the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee Estuaries.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Mitigation Plan Public Meeting November 2, 2006.
Protecting Water Resources: The U.S. Legal Framework Babette J. Neuberger, JD, MPH Associate Dean for Academic Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago.
The NYC Watershed Agreement The Watershed Protection and Partnership Council June 9, 2009 CLGCS Management Meeting.
Water Resources In the United States: Perspectives and Challenges by Dr. Jerome Delli Priscoli Institute for Water Resources US Army Corps of Engineers.
National Investment in Water and Waste Water Infrastructure, Funding & Pricing Mid-West Regional Authority Annual Conference 2009.
NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation
Water & Waste Disposal Loans and Grants The funding purpose is to construct, enlarge, extend or improve water, wastewater and solid waste systems in rural.
Rick Swanson USDA Forest Service U.S. Forest Service: C&I’s for: The World’s Largest Water Company U.S. Forest Service: C&I’s for: The World’s Largest.
Preservation, Conservation and Restoration of North Carolina’s Water Resources CWMTF March 7, 2008.
Improving Lives, Communities and the Environment Through Natural Resources Conservation.
Environmental Funding Opportunities George Stafford Deputy Secretary of State Dede Scozzafava Deputy Secretary of State.
Sediment & Nutrient Management in the L’Anguille River Watershed St. Francis County Cost Share Project Patricia Perry St. Francis County Conservation.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Mitigation Plan Public Meeting November 2, 2006.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
Adaptive Natural Resource Management: Incorporating Ecological, Social and Economic Values in New York City’s Catskill/Delaware Watershed Valerie A. Luzadis.
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
Neuse River Basin Provided by Dr. D. Monreau to Dr. G
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
Reducing Nutrient Loads from the Opequon Creek Watershed Project Team Meeting Oct 19, 2007 Chesapeake Bay Targeted Watersheds Grant Program.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
An Overview of our Community’s Stormwater Management Program
Road Map to the Future: The Consolidation of Sewer Infrastructure in Rutherford County, NC November 16 th, 2015.
Combined Sewer Systems Vs Not. Deep Tunnel Projects Chicago miles bl/gal Atlanta miles ml/gal Milwaukee miles ml/gal.
Missoula County Commissioners and City Council formed the Missoula Valley Water Quality District (MVWQD) Missoula County Commissioners.
GEFA Loan Programs CDBG Applicants Workshop Michael Roberts Program Manager Water Resources Division December 4, 2015.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
The Highlands Region: Partnerships to Conserve Forests & Watersheds Ramapo Mountains, NJ.
DC Water 的项目合作与职业 发展机会 Chein-Chi Chang ( 張建祺 ), Ph. D., P. E. D. C. Water and Sewer Authority, USA University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA Environmental.
FY 2016 Water & Sewer Rates Presented by: The Department of Public Works Works.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Climate Change Threat Drought 1. Potential Impacts from Drought How might our community be impacted by drought? 2.
Climate Change Threat Reduced Snowpack 1. Potential Impacts Related to Reduced Snowpack How might our community be impacted by reduced snowpack? 2.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
Watershed Management for Urban Water Supply. Why use NYC as a case study? Comprehensive, long-range watershed protection program Illustrates a multifaceted.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Partners in Conservation
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
MACo Winter Conference
City of Forest Lake MS4 Program
Water Quality Improvement Projects and Engineering Planning Grant
Water Infrastructure Funding and Update on the Amendment I Lawsuit
Washington State Infrastructure Financing
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Water Supply Planning for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
Presentation transcript:

Management of New York City’s Watershed Michael A. Principe, Ph.D. Deputy Commissioner New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply October 10, 2005

Presentation Outline  Development of NYC’s Watershed Protection Program  Costs and Funding  Contractual Mechanisms Supporting Watershed Protection  Major Program Elements

 Primarily a surface water supply  19 reservoirs & 3 controlled lakes  System Capacity: 550 billion gallons (over 2 billion kiloliters )  Serves 9 million people (1/2 of population of New York State)  Delivers approx. 1.2 billion gallons (4.5 million kiloliters) per day to the City  Source of water is a 2,000 square mile (5,180 square kilometer) watershed in parts of 8 upstate counties  Operated and maintained by NYCDEP

 Located primarily West of the Hudson River  Rural, mountainous watershed  70% forested, low population, significant agricultural uses  Shallow soils and porous rock produce high quality water  City has Filtration Avoidance Determination for these supplies CATSKILL AND DELAWARE SUPPLIES

Governmental Agencies Involved in Watershed Protection  Program involves agencies from: Federal (USEPA) State New York City 8 upstate counties 60+ towns and villages  Crosses multiple jurisdictions, all outside of NYC  New York has strong “home rule” tradition

Issues Driving City to Watershed Protection  The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1986 and the Surface Water Treatment Rule of 1989 established objective and subjective criteria for avoidance  Concern over whether City could meet subjective criteria City owned less than 8% of watershed City regulations outmoded  City alarmed by potential cost of filtration plant (originally estimated at $4-8 billion)  Firm belief by NYC that reliance on end-of-pipe solutions alone is not prudent; best approach is to protect quality of water at its source

Development of Watershed Protection Program  DEP received first filtration waiver from EPA in 1993  Waiver conditioned on implementation of protection programs  DEP designed comprehensive monitoring program to assess threats to water quality  Based on assessment of threats, management programs designed and implemented

Watershed Memorandum of Agreement  MOA established collaborative approach between City, State, watershed residents, environmental groups and regulators  Signed in 1997  Allowed City to proceed with Watershed Regulations, Land Acquisition and Partnership Programs  City had to agree to fund programs

Contractual Arrangements  DEP contracted with local public, private and non-profit entities to use City ratepayer funding to implement programs  Groups include Catskill Watershed Corporation, Agricultural Council and county agencies  All contracts subject to City procurement rules

Catskill Watershed Corporation  MOA created the Catskill Watershed Corporation (CWC)  CWC comprised of local representatives  Voting rights apportioned based on percent of land in watershed  CWC provided with $160+ million of City funding for wastewater, stormwater and economic development programs

How is Watershed Protection Funded?  DEP is funded by water and sewer rates  Revenues and expenses are managed by the New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, an independent entity established in 1984  Revenues collected by the Water Finance Authority are independent from other NYC funding and cannot be diverted to other NYC programs  The Water Finance Authority collected $1.7 billion in $900 million of this was used for water supply operations and debt service

Water & Sewer Rate Structure  Water rate = $1.65 per 100 cubic feet  Average single-family house pays about $220/year for water  Sewer rate = $2.62 per 100 cubic feet  Consumption decreased by nearly one-third since 1980s due to conservation  NYC rates are lower than most major US cities including Dallas, Los Angeles, Washington, Boston and Atlanta

Watershed Protection Program

Types of Watershed Protection Programs  Protection Programs – Designed to prevent future degradation of water quality; large scale and evaluated over the long-term.  Remediation Programs – Designed to address specific problems and are expected to result in measurable decreases in pollutants; small scale and evaluated over the short-term.

Watershed Protection Programs Remedial Protective  Stormwater Controls  WWTP Upgrades  Sewer Extensions  Septic System Rehabilitation  Salt & Sand Storage  Stream Corridor Protection  Watershed Rules & Regulations  Land Acquisition  Agricultural Programs  Forestry Management

Major Watershed Protection Program Elements  Land Acquisition Program More than 385,000 acres (156,000+ hectares) solicited 68,000+ acres (27,660+ hectares) acquired/under contract 21,000+ acres (8,565+ hectares) under contract for Agricultural Easements

 Partnership Programs 2,000+ failing septic systems remediated Nearly 50 stormwater retrofits funded 44 stormwater BMPs installed Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) being upgraded to tertiary treatment (25 WOH, ~70 EOH) 7 new WWTPs being constructed  Watershed Agricultural Program Best Management Practices (BMPs) implemented 1,775 miles (2,857 km) of stream buffers protected through Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program New initiatives on small farms and EOH farms Major Watershed Protection Program Elements

Grommeck Farm During Construction

Following Best Management Practice (BMP) Implementation

One year after BMP Implementation

 Watershed Rules and Regulations Updated in 1997 to address WWTPs, septic systems and stormwater runoff Designed to protect sensitive areas: streams, wetlands, reservoirs and steep slopes 1,000s of projects reviewed to date Coordinated field inspection and patrol with Engineering and NYCDEP Police City funds most costs of compliance Major Watershed Protection Program Elements

 Heavy agricultural uses  4 large wastewater treatment plants  Excessive nutrient loading to reservoir led to eutrophication DELAWARE RESERVOIR BASIN

Watershed Protection Provides Results

What does watershed protection cost? ProgramCost New Infrastructure Program (1st 7 communities)$96,664,016 Community Wastewater Program (5 communities)$10,000,000 Septic Rehabilitation & Maintenance Programs$30,100,000 Sewer Extension Program$10,000,000 Wastewater Plant Upgrades (non-City-owned)$272,000,000 Wastewater Plant Upgrades (City-owned)$271,000,000 Alternate Design Septic System Program$3,000,000 Stormwater Retrofits$15,175,000 Future Stormwater Controls$31,700,000 Farms & Forestry$91,000,000 Land Acquisition (includes farm easements)$295,000,000 Stream Management Program$28,000,000 Kensico Water Quality Protection Program$43,000,000 East of Hudson Non-Point Source Control Program$68,000,000 Miscellaneous Programs - CFF, Good Neighbor, etc.$97,300,000 Catskill/Delaware UV Plant$670,000,000 Total$2,031,939,016

Thank You