Nutrient Loading in the Klamath Basin K.A. Rykbost B.A. Charlton Oregon State University Klamath Experiment Station.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sun Ag Water Quality Study Report for Total Phosphorus Marc von Canal, Regulatory Scientist Mark Crosby, Engineer Victor McDaniel, Supervising Professional.
Advertisements

Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Agricultural and Biological Engineering SWFREC, UF/IFAS Immokalee.
Truckee River Water Quality: Current Conditions and Trends Relevant to TMDLs and WLAs Prepared for: Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility. City of.
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
The Chemical Water Quality of Lake Nipissing Andrew Paterson Dorset Environmental Science Centre Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
KEEPING WATER ON THE LAND Brandon Workshop March 20, 2013.
In the early 1900’s man began to change this delicate system. It started with a series of canals and levees that were built to provide flood control and.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Long-Term Volunteer Lake Monitoring in the Upper Woonasquatucket Watershed Linda Green URI Watershed Watch ,
Abstract Degrading water quality in the Klamath Basin is due to the destruction of wetland and riparian zones. Wetland reclamation and elimination of riparian.
Klamath Watershed in Perspective A Review of Historical Hydrology of Major Features of the Klamath River Watershed and Evaluation of Hardy Iron Gate Flow.
Nutrient Monitoring on the Ohio River: Balancing Information Needs.
Presented at the 9 th Stakeholder Meeting Mike Herrmann, NCEEP Central Watershed Planner April 20th, 2010 Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Intake Stessor.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
The Salton Sea By: Christine Yafuso. Background Located in Southeastern California Located in Southeastern California About 1000 km 2 in size About 1000.
Cyanobacteria Blooms in Upper Klamath Lake
Abstract Environmental problems have existed in the Klamath Basin since the late 1980s, when select fish species were listed as endangered species. Fisheries.
History of Dam Building in the Klamath Basin Originating in Southern Oregon and extending through Northern California, the Klamath River Basin represents.
Introduction: Nestled between the foothills of the Cascade Range and the Great Basin Desert of eastern Oregon, the Upper Klamath Basin includes the upper.
Water in California: Self-induced Scarcity Waterscape International Group.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Dylan Castle Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon
Visual Environmental Education Guide Eutrophication Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek.
2007 State of the Watershed Barr Lake & Milton Reservoir Watershed Association Q & A.
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
Grand Haven Pond Study: An Investigation to Reduce Nutrient Loads and Evaluate Alternative Management Practices in Stormwater Ponds Mark Clark Wetlands.
Mississippi River Water Quality: Implications for Freshwater Diversions Coastal Wetland Planning, Preservation, and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) Outreach Committee.
Flow Estimation in the Wood River Sub-Basin. Study Motivation To estimate an historical record at the mouth of the Wood River. –Enables comparison of.
Effects of Nutrient Enrichment on Rivers and Streams Ohio EPA 2006.
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
USDA is an Equal Opportunity Employer & Provider.
Ed Dunne, Ph.D, Division of Environmental Sciences, SJRWMD P.O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL 32178; ph:
Highlights A Study of Phosphorus Loading of Ballston Lake by Tributary Inflow Presentation to BLIA Annual Meeting June 16, 2014 Scott Miller, Bob Duncan,
Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological.
Watershed Symposium Black Creek and Oatka Creek 28 October 2010 Joseph Makarewicz Department of Environmental Science and Biology State University of New.
2010 Water Quality Implementation Report Water Quality Management Plan for 2009 Water Year Provo River and Jordanelle & Deer Creek Reservoirs.
HearneNWQMCMay06 1 A Review of Water Management Institutions in The Red River of the North Basin Robert R. Hearne Department of Agribusiness and Applied.
Dam Removal as a Solution to Increase Water Quality Matthew Nechvatal, Tim Granata Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
Lesson 1.5 Pg
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
Watershed Restoration Overview for the Klamath Basin.
Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August
Water Temperature Management in River Restoration Tom Dunne River Restoration Spring 2010.
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
Minnesota BMP CHALLENGE SM Workshop WELCOME!. THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED All or portions of 38 MN counties 13 major watershed management units ~90%
The Bear Creek Watershed Association protects & restores water & environmental quality within the Bear Creek Watershed from the effects of land use. Bear.
BMW Association 2006 Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir Watershed Management Plan ~ Brief History of the Reservoirs ~ Overview of the BMW Association ~ Outline.
St. Johns County Water Quality Program Update March 15,
Eli Asarian Riverbend Sciences Jacob Kann Aquatic Ecosystem Sciences, LLC. Ann St. Amand PhycoTech, Inc. Standardization and Long-term Trends in a Multi-Decadal.
Arbor Lake Water Quality External & Internal Nutrient Loading.
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
Mulberry River Watershed
Reducing sediment & nutrient losses from intensive agriculture Restoring eutrophic shallow lakes Pastoral agriculture is the dominant land use in New.
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Using Multiple Lines of Evidence to Assess Biostimulatory.
Updates 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference
Presentation transcript:

Nutrient Loading in the Klamath Basin K.A. Rykbost B.A. Charlton Oregon State University Klamath Experiment Station

Source: USGS --- Snyder & Morace

U.S. Department of Interior --- Bureau of Reclamation

Environmental Issues are Driven by Political/Regulatory Forces Federal Clean Water Act °303D Lists of Water Quality Impairments °TMDL Process --- Oregon DEQ Oregon Senate Bill 1010 °Private Property Agriculture Management Plans °Local Advisory Committees --- Oregon D.A. Endangered Species Act °Listed Species --- Suckers and Salmon

Water Quality Concerns in Upper Klamath Lake Phosphorous Enrichment supporting Blue-Green Algae (Aphanizomenon flos-aqaue) pH > 9.0 (following algae bloom crashes) Dissolved Oxygen below 4.0 mg/l High Ammonia concentration (up to 0.9 ppm) High chlorophyll – a High temperature (up to 23C)

Sucker Springs, Upper Klamath Lake --- USGS BRD Klamath

Source: USGS --- Snyder & Morace

Lake-Wide Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Upper Klamath Lake Source: Klamath Tribes --- Kann & Walker

Major Studies of Nutrient Loading of Klamath/Agency Lakes Miller & Tash: USGS °Ag. Drainage contributes 26% of TP Inflow °Top 1” of sediment = 60 years of Inflow P °Springs in lake contribute 25% of TP Inflow °Canals contribute 5% of TP Inflow °Major rivers contribute 43% of TP Inflow

Major Studies of Nutrient Loading of Klamath/Agency Lakes Snyder & Morace: USGS °Estimated 80 tons N/year, 15 tons P/year °Monitored drainage from Ag. Lands °Noted potential for natural sources °Reported high P in artesian wells °Suggested conversions to wetlands based on loading data

Major Studies of Nutrient Loading of Klamath/Agency Lakes Kann & Walker: Klamath Tribes °Modeled Loading Data from: °Miller and Tash; Snyder and Morace °Monitored Lake-wide Nutrient Concentrations °Reported Sediment P = 61% of Load °Suggested data used as basis for retiring Ag. Land to Wetlands

Source: Klamath Tribes --- Kann & Walker

Objectives of Klamath Experiment Station Studies Determine nutrient content in background sources °Major Springs and Artesian Wells Determine nutrient content in water flooded onto and drained from Ag. Lands Determine nutrient loading to Klamath Irrigation Project from Klamath Lake and Klamath River

KES Water Quality Analysis Methods All samples were grab samples -- duplicate Samples frozen & stored for batch delivery Kjeldahl digestion -- analyzed for: °Total P and Total Kjeldahl N OSU Dept. of Crop and Soil Science °Central Analytical Laboratory

Phosphorus Concentration in Major Springs Wood River Source [P] = 0.06 and 0.07 ppm Spring Creek Source [P] = 0.08, 0.09, and 0.09 ppm Fort Creek Source [P] = 0.06 and 0.09 ppm Crystal Creek Source [P] = 0.07 and 0.11 ppm Barkley Spring [P] = 0.08 ppm Malone Spring [P] = 0.06 ppm

P and N Concentration Artesian Wells Wood River Ranch Well #1 Snyder & Morace 3 samples °Total P = 6.7 ppm °Total N = 6.2 ppm Klamath Experiment Station 4 samples °Total P = 5.3 ppm °Total N = 6.2 ppm Well #2 Snyder & Morace 1 sample 1995 °Total P = 2.0 ppm °Total N = 8.7 ppm Klamath Experiment Station 4 samples °Total P = 2.4 ppm °Total N = 8.1 ppm

P and N Concentration Artesian Wells Fort Klamath Area foot aquifer °#1 (2 samples) [P] = 0.31 ppm, [TKN] = 0.25 ppm °#2 (2 samples) [P] = 0.70 ppm, [TKN] = 0.50 ppm °#3 (2 samples) [P] = 0.74 ppm, [TKN] = 0.55 ppm °#4 (3 samples) [P] = 0.75 ppm, [TKN] = 0.50 ppm °#5 (2 samples) [P] = 1.17 ppm, [TKN] = 1.13 ppm °#6 (1 samples) [P] = 1.56 ppm, [TKN] = 1.90 ppm

Source: USGS --- Snyder & Morace

Nutrient Content of Inflow and Drainage from Agricultural Lands Wocus Snyder & Morace (9 samples) °Drainage: TP = 0.21 ppm and TN = 4.2 ppm KES (19 inflow, 24 drainage) °Drainage: TP = 0.18 ppm and TKN = 3.8 ppm °Inflow: TP = 0.13 ppm and TKN = 2.8 ppm

Nutrient Content of Inflow and Drainage from Agricultural Lands Caledonia Snyder & Morace (3 samples) °Drainage: TP = 0.24 ppm and TN = 4.2 ppm KES (10 inflow, 16 drainage) °Drainage: TP = 0.24 ppm and TKN = 3.7 ppm °Inflow: TP = 0.06 ppm and TKN = 1.1 ppm

Nutrient Content of Inflow and Drainage from Agricultural/Wetlands Wood River Ranch Snyder & Morace (12 samples) °Drainage: TP = 0.96 ppm and TN = 3.0 ppm KES (52 inflow and 32 drainage) °Drainage: TP = 0.78 ppm and TKN = 3.25 ppm °Inflow: TP = 0.17 ppm and TKN = 1.25 ppm * Note: Cattle removed in 1995

U.S. Department of Interior --- Bureau of Reclamation

Klamath Project Plumbing Diversions into the Klamath Project °A Canal – Out of Klamath Lake °North and ADY Canal – Out of Klamath River °Lost River from Gerber and Clear Lake Reservoirs Klamath Irrigation Project Drain °Straits Drain from Lower Klamath Wildlife Refuge

Methods for Estimating Nutrient Loading to Klamath Irrigation Project Sample at diversions - 2 week intervals °grab samples - usually duplicate BOR flows for midway between samples Load = volume x concentration

Nutrient Concentrations at A Canal Diversion

Nutrient Concentrations at A Canal Diversion

Total Phosphorus Loading at A, North, and ADY Canals

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Loading at A, North, and ADY Canals

Total Phosphorus Loading at A, North, and ADY Canals

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Loading at A, North, and ADY Canals

Seasonal Mean Nutrient Concentrations at A, North, and ADY Diversions A Canal °1999TP = ppmTKN = 2.11 ppm °2000TP = ppmTKN = 2.23 ppm North Canal °1999TP = ppmTKN = 1.72 ppm °2000TP = ppmTKN = 1.82 ppm ADY Canal °1999TP = ppmTKN = 1.95 ppm °2000TP = ppmTKN = 1.93 ppm

Nutrient Loading Summary KES data were well within range of observations from previous studies Natural background sources are not limiting in Phosphorus for blue-green algae Loading from Ag. Drainage must consider nutrients in floodwater

Nutrient Loading Summary Nutrient concentration in Wood River Ranch drainage 80% of value, 5 years after cattle removed Total nutrient loading in Irrigation Project from Klamath Lake and Klamath River °Approximately 180,000 Total P and 2,000,000 Total N P increases from Klamath Lake to ADY Canal

Nutrient Loading Summary Monitoring Nutrient Loading at Straits Drain °UC Davis Study °Preliminary Analysis shows P discharge = 100,000 lb Klamath Irrigation Project °Net sink for Phosphorus including affects of municipalities and wildlife refuges

Wetland/Storage Restoration Projects Wood River Ranch – 3,000 Ac - Wetlands Goose Bay Farms – 2,187 Ac - Wetlands Agency Lake Ranch – 7,123 Ac – Storage, Wetland Tulana Farms – 4,600 acres Wetlands Caledonia Marsh – 550 acres - Wetlands Barnes Ranch – 2,700 Ac – Storage – Refuge?

Nutrient Loading in The Klamath Basin: Agricultural and Natural Sources Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Special Report 1023 K.A. Rykbost and B.A. Charlton Available at:

Questions?? Oregon State University Klamath Experiment Station