Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Water discharge rate is monitored continually. 2 Sampling of stream and drainage water is made automatically or by grab sampling weekly while groundwater.
Advertisements

City of Edmonton Water Quality Monitoring Locations.
AUTAUGA CREEK BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT, 2009 Will S. Mooty USGS.
Water Quality Reductions in Hawk Creek Watershed and Land Retirement In Renville County Joe M. Stangel - Renville SWCD Patrick Baskfield - MPCA.
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Rogers High School Outdoor Education Env. Science/PE
UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.
Center for Watershed Protection Illicit Sewage Discharges in the Chesapeake Bay 2012 Chesapeake Bay Stormwater Retreat Lori Lilly Watershed Ecologist/Planner.
A Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring Network for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques David K. Stevens 1, Jeffery.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND EXAMINATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROCHEMICAL RESPONSE IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER OBSERVATORY TEST BED Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
Impact of Sampling Frequency on Annual Load Estimation Amber Spackman Jones Utah Water Research Lab Nancy Mesner Watershed Science Jeff Horsburgh Utah.
“E. coli, Enterococci and Protozoan Transport in New Mexico Watersheds” G. M. Huey 1 & Meyer, M. L 2 New Mexico Environment Department – Santa Fe, NM New.
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
Nutrient Loading in Coastal Streams, Variation with Land Use in the Carpinteria Valley Timothy H. Robinson Bren School of Environmental Science and Management.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Beneficial Use Monitoring Program Streams A Collection of Stream and Work Photographs 2004 to 2009.
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Water Quality Trends across 319 Monitoring Sites Brian E. Haggard Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC.
Castro Valley Creek Stormwater Quality Monitoring Brake Pad Partnership Meeting June 22, 2005.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Surface coal mining impacts on concentration-discharge relationships: Identifying spatial and temporal changes in the New River, TN Jenny Murphy Vanderbilt.
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
The Mississippi River Basin Initiative (MRBI) Watershed Water Quality Monitoring of Bayou Chene an Lacassine Bayou Presented to: NPS Project Review Meeting.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Collaborative Water-Quality Monitoring in the Big Thompson Watershed Juliane B. Brown USGS-BTWF Liaison Colorado District Rob R. Buirgy BTWF Coordinator.
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Blue Creek -- SR 124 WQ Duration Curve (2004 Monitoring Data) Site: LES Dry Conditions Low Flows High Flows Mid-range Flows Moist Conditions ---
Cache River Monitoring Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
West Fork Whitewater River E. coli Water Quality Duration Curve (all sites) IDEM Water Quality Data & USGS Gage Stream Flow Data Upstream Drainage.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Non-tidal network monitoring update for calendar year 2011 Non-tidal Monitoring Workgroup 8 February 2011 Bill Romano MD Dept. of Natural Resources Photograph.
2013 Water Quality Implementation Report Water Quality Management Plan for 2012 Water Year Provo River and Jordanelle & Deer Creek Reservoirs.
Dam Removal as a Solution to Increase Water Quality Matthew Nechvatal, Tim Granata Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
Shingle Creek Chloride TMDL Abby Morrisette and Josh Kuhn 9/10/11.
Implementation of KiWQM Eavan O’Connor and Sara Rawski Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority November 26, 2015 Credit Valley Conservation Authority.
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
Water quality sensors provide insight into the suspended solids dynamics during high flow events in the Lamprey River, NH Nicholas K. Shonka and William.
Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas.
Water Quality Monitoring on Larkin Creek St. Francis County, AR JL Bouldin RA Warby Arkansas State University.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Brian Haggard Director Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC through Beaver Water District.
S O U T H F L O R I D A W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T D I S T R I C T Request for Changes to Settlement Agreement Monitoring Pete Rawlik, SFWMD TOC Meeting,
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Herb Garn. Pheasant Branch watershed and monitoring locations USGS recording station Citizen Stream Monitoring site
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Loading of Phosphorus and Sediment to the South End of Cayuga Lake
Continuous Surrogate Monitoring for Pollutant Load Estimation in Urban Water Systems Anthony A. Melcher, USU Civil and Environmental.
Cache River Monitoring
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Water Quality Monitoring Update – Summary August 15, 2017.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project
Jim McClelland Rae Mooney University of Texas at Austin
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring Project S
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering

Funding provided by: Arkansas Natural Resources Commission, EPA 319 Grant Program To : Northwest Arkansas Conservation Authority - Osage City Of Fayetteville - West Fork Beaver Water District - White Kings River Watershed Partnership - Kings

Summarize Water Quality Assessment Four watersheds NWA 2008 and first half of 2009 results Phosphorus Trends Watershed comparisons

Osage Creek West Fork of White River White 45 Bridge Kings River Northwest Arkansas Water Quality Monitoring Sites

Water Quality Sampling Grab samples every two weeks Auto-sampler samples all storm events > trigger level Flow-weighted composite samples (except White) SO 4, Cl -, NH 4, NO 3/ NO 2, T-N, T-P, sPO 4, and TSS Concentrations assigned to all times USGS discharge for all times Loads calculated by multiplying and summing for the year Sondes reading turbidity, conductivity and temp (except Kings River)

Kings River near Berryville 2008 Loads and Mean Concentrations ParameterTotal Discharge Total Load (m 3 /yr)(kg/yr) 796,964,238 SO 4 3,680,000 Cl - 2,265,835 NO 3 /NO 2 -N 524,321 TP 217,473 NH 4 -N 49,313 TN 1,048,175 sPO 4 -P 28,059 TSS 166,344,864

Kings River near Berryville 2008 Loads and Mean Concentrations ParameterTotal Discharge Total LoadAverage Discharge Mean (m 3 /yr)(kg/yr)(m 3 /s)Concentrations (mg/l) 796,964, SO 4 3,680, Cl - 2,265, NO 3 /NO 2 -N 524, TP 217, NH 4 -N 49, TN 1,048, sPO 4 -P 28, TSS 166,344,

Kings River near Berryville 2008 Storm and Base-flow Loads and Mean Concentrations Parameter Storm LoadsBase Loads Storm Concentrations (mg/l) Base Concentrations (mg/l) (kg) Discharge (m 3 )510,695,939286,268,299 SO 4 1,976,6921,703, Cl - 1,083,4261,182, NO 3 /NO 2 -N318,395205, TP203,84113, NH 4 -N44,0405, TN780,366267, sPO 4 -P18,5429, TSS165,148,9111,195,

Kings River near Berryville First Half of 2009 Storm and Base-flow Loads and Mean Concentrations Parameter Storm LoadsBase Loads Storm Concentrations (mg/l) Base Concentrations (mg/l) (kg) Discharge (m 3 )283,881,933216,878,594 SO 4 1,220,1221,062, Cl - 689,341674, NO 3 /NO 2 -N160,241133, TP39,3558, NH 4 -N5,1033, TN418,119175, sPO 4 -P5,7165, TSS31,103,4911,603,

Kings River P trends

Parameter Storm LoadsBase Loads Storm Concentrations (mg/l) Base Concentrations (mg/l) (kg) Discharge (M3)352,003,22775,214,118 SO 4 2,412,067883, Cl - 783,554373, NO3/NO2- N130,16754, T-P256,0025, NH4-N53,8752, T-N403,79374, sPO 4 -P11, TSS168,910,0691,324, White River near Goshen 2008 Storm and Base-flow Loads and Mean Concentrations

White River near Goshen

Storm LoadsBase Loads Storm Concentr ations (mg/l) Base Concentr ations (mg/l) (kg) Discharge (M3)148,229,762119,349,947 SO 4 1,806,8112,485, Cl - 1,520,0402,433, NO3/NO2 -N460,819507, T-P65,66516, NH4-N12,3572, T-N566,285530, sPO 4 -P16,70611, TSS42,376,0562,130, Osage Creek near Elm Springs 2008 Storm and Base-flow Loads and Mean Concentrations

Osage Creek near Elm Springs

West Fork near Baldwin 2008 Storm and Base-flow Loads and Mean Concentrations Parameter Storm LoadsBase Loads Storm Concentrations (mg/l) Base Concentrations (mg/l) (kg) Discharge (M3)199,282,24944,218,901 SO 4 2,528,2361,162, Cl - 559,928214, NO3/NO2- N83,99522, T-P89,2941, NH4-N40,3221, T-N198,83429, sPO 4 -P5, TSS46,775,101573,

West Fork near Elm Springs

Watershed comparison

Questions?