Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program University of Missouri-Columbia The Missouri’s Lakes and Reservoirs The Missouri Department of Natural Resources Region.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Advertisements

Nutrients and Ecosystems. Fertilizer Application Rates Lawns: kg N/ha/yr Athletic Fields: kg N/ha/yr Pastures (Dairy): kg N/ha/yr.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
Nutrient Loading in the Klamath Basin K.A. Rykbost B.A. Charlton Oregon State University Klamath Experiment Station.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Limnology 101 Dan Obrecht MU Limnology
Evaluation of Volunteer Data – The Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program Review Daniel V. Obrecht Anthony P. Thorpe John R. Jones Department of Fisheries.
David K. Paylor Director, Department of Environmental Quality May 27, 2014 VEDP Lunch & Learn Environmental Permitting 101.
©2010 Elsevier, Inc. Chapter 18 Trophic State and Eutrophication Dodds & Whiles.
Complexities of the Carters Lake TMDL Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech 26th Annual Alabama Water.
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Developing Nutrient Criteria – Divide and Conquer! Dan Obrecht, MU Limnology.
Every Acre Counts The Newfound Watershed Master Plan Land Conservation Priorities In the Newfound Lake Watershed January 23, 2015 Dan Sundquist GreenFire.
Best Hills Lake Remediation Recommendations Jordanne Holst, Nathan Rosenau, and Monique Crumb.
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Plan Mark Osborn October 20, 2005.
Nutrient Criteria Development for New Hampshire’s Estuaries P. Trowbridge, P.E. December 7, 2007.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division.
Jefferson High School Compton Creek Research Project UCLA and Los Angeles Waterkeeper Funded by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Chris M. Kapheim General Manager May 5, AID Groundwater Map.
Opener 4/30 In your foldable, answer the following questions: 1. What do you see? 2. Where is it? 3. What do the colors mean?
Concerns about the Current Approach to Nutrient Criteria.
Basin-scale assessment of transport of water and agricultural chemicals through the unsaturated zone Rick Webb, Randy Bayless, Tracy Hancock, Chuck Fisher,
Nutrient Criteria for the plains regions of Missouri.
Water Quality Short Course April 11, 2007 Lake and Reservoir Dynamics Dan Obrecht – UMC
Secondary Site Locations on Large Reservoirs Issue 1 – How to select tributary arms for criteria monitoring Missouri’s large reservoirs are highly dendritic.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
What are some ways to reduce the risks to public health in drinking water from Salinas Valley? Andrew Mims Nitrates In Groundwater Presentation ENSTU 300.
Barr-Milton Watershed Modeling Project - Workshop #4 David Pillard, Ph.D. – Project Manager, Ft. Collins, CO Ken Heim, Ph.D. – Lead Modeler, Westford,
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
Landscape Analysis: 1.Determine 1993 and 2001 Land Cover of the Sougahatchee Basin Sougahatchee Basin 2. Compare 2001 Land Cover to 1993 Land Cover 3.
Integrated Ecological Assessment February 28, 2006 Long-Term Plan Annual Update Carl Fitz Recovery Model Development and.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
An Overview of Air, Water & Soil in Agriculture Barbara McCarthy, Ph.D. Environmental Health Department Colorado State University.
Trends in Shallow Ground-Water Quality of the Delmarva Peninsula Results from regional and local studies Linda M. Debrewer Judith M. Denver U.S. Department.
Reservoir and Lake Nutrient Criteria A Different Approach D.V. Obrecht, J.R. Jones & M.K. Knowlton – MU Limnology.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
Waterbody Classification Project A project of the Lakes and Watershed Commission, Dane County Department of Planning and Development, and the Dane County.
 Areas affected by the California Water Project spread from Northern California to Southern Califronia.  750,000 acres of irrigated farmland.
How much water will be available in the upper Colorado River Basin under projected climatic changes? Abstract The upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), is.
Topics The Cart The Horse Answers to previously asked questions and comments on the comments to said questions Dan Obrecht – University of Missouri.
Valuing Water Quality Through Recreational Uses in Iowa Joseph Herriges and Catherine Kling Department of Economics Center for Agricultural and Rural Development.
DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SENSITIVE AREAS ON THE BASIS OF WATERSHED IN TURKEY MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
WATERSHEDS Concepts and Curriculum Review LAKE MONITORING AND ANALYSIS Tony Thorpe and Dan Obrecht Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program – Univ. of Missouri.
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
BeforeAfter Eutrophication. Eutrophication – nutrient enrichment of waters Major nutrients -phosphorus and nitrogen Consequences -increased plant growth.
Follow Up from the last Nutrient Criteria Meeting Dan Obrecht – UMC Limnology.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Nutrient Criteria for Reservoirs – A Review of Missouri’s Proposed Approach Daniel V. Obrecht Dept. of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences University of Missouri.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Nutrient Benchmark Development
ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT AND FUTURE DRINKING WATER QUALITY VULNERABILITY UNDER ANTICIPATED CLIMATE CHANGES ON A WATERSHED LEVEL Emiliya Velizarova1, Snezana.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin
“Keeping Water on the Land”
Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins
Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Development
Commissioned by Seattle Public Utilities, Seattle, WA
LARGE RESERVOIRS (and LMVP sites, in no particular order)
Lake Water Quality PLA Meeting August 17, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program University of Missouri-Columbia The Missouri’s Lakes and Reservoirs The Missouri Department of Natural Resources Region V11, US Environmental Protection Agency, through the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, has provided partial funding for this project under Section 319 of the Clean Water Act Tony Thorpe Dan Obrecht Jack Jones

405 Classified Lakes/Reservoirs ~108 are Drinking Water Supply (LC1) 14 are Major Reservoirs (LC2) Most are man-made reservoirs, with about oxbow lakes.

Of the 405 Classified Waterbodies, we have at least 4 years worth of data on 134 What follows is a summary of the physical features of those 134 waterbodies “A central paradigm of modern limnology is that external nutrient loading, modified by morphology and hydrology, determines the trophic state of a lake.” Jones et al. 2005

Lake Morphology Surface Area Depth Volume Lake Hydrology Watershed Area Residence Time External Loading Land Use

Surface Area Ranges from 6 to 53,814 acres in size, with a median of 103 acres.

Break down by size 30% of classified lakes are 20 acres or less in size. 10% are greater than 300 acres in size.

Average Depth Ranges from 3.7 feet to 62 feet, with a median of 11.6 feet.

Lake Volume Ranges from 48 to 2,700,000 acre-feet, with a median of 1,675 acre-feet. 1 acre-foot = 325,851 gallons 1 acre 1 foot

Lake Hydrology

Watershed Area Ranges from 83 to > 4,000,000 acres, with a median of 2,516 acres.

Residence Time Ranges from 2.6 days to 9 years, with a median of 10.5 months.

External Loading

Land Cover within watersheds Forest = 0 – 95% Grass = 0 – 78% Crop = 0 – 74% Urban = 0 – 96% Using the 134 classified lakes for which we have >= 4 years worth of data

Land Cover and Water Quality: Row Crop Data points based on summertime averages near the dam

Land Cover and Water Quality: Forest Data points based on summertime averages near the dam

Trophic Classification Oligo Meso Eutro Hyper TP TN CHLa

Distributions based on long-term averages

Phosphorus (micrograms per liter) # of waterbodies IX – 20 ug/L XI – 8 ug/L (EPA recommendations as of July 2002)

Nitrogen (micrograms per liter) # of waterbodies IX – 360 ug/L XI – 460 ug/L (EPA recommendations as of July 2002)

Chlorophyll (micrograms per liter) # of waterbodies IX – 4.9 ug/L XI – 2.8 ug/L (EPA recommendations as of July 2002)

Break down by size “Small” Reservoirs: less than 2000 acres “Large” Reservoirs: more than 2000 acres

“Large” Reservoirs 2004 LMVP Data

“Small” Reservoirs Inset is to scale 2004 LMVP Data

Types of Variability Temporal Spatial

Temporal Variability

Little Dixie Lake – Seasonal Patterns 2004 LMVP Data Phosphorus (ug/L)

Little Dixie Lake – Seasonal Patterns Phosphorus (ug/L)

Range = 37 – 95 ug/L

Spatial Variability

Phosphorus Concentrations: Lake of the Ozarks Variability within a lake 2002 LMVP Data

Phosphorus Concentrations: Table Rock Lake Variability within a lake 2002 LMVP Data

930 acres Approximately 1 mile between the two sites Phosphorus Concentrations: Longview Lake Variability within a lake