Effects of Conservation Tillage Systems on Dissolved Phosphorus Dr. David Baker Heidelberg University Tiffin, Ohio 44883 November 15, 2012 Davenport, IA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
Advertisements

Management of Drainage Water in Illinois
Phosphorus As A Stressor Alexandra Arntsen, Alison Foster, Scott Ritter April 2011.
Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
Project collaborators: Laura Ward Good, Katie Songer, Matt Diebel, John Panuska, Jeff Maxted, Pete Nowak, John Norman, K.G. Karthikeyan, Tom Cox, Water.
Summary of soil P levels and stratification GLPF Grant- Team meeting #5 July 23-24, 2013.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
Scenario Analysis costs per acre for various practices estimate each fully applied practice for N or P then combine for N or P to reach 20 or 45% finally,
Team Meeting #5, Great Lakes Protection Fund Grant A Phosphorus Soil Test Metric To Reduce Dissolved Phosphorus Loading to Lake Erie Heidelberg University.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Paul Bireta December 4, 2012 The Impact of Large Storm Events on Nutrient Loadings in Texas Rivers 1.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Water Quality Concerns in Ohio Waters What has been Happening in Lake Erie? Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems.
Agricultural BMPs An Educator’s Guide. What are Agricultural BMPs? Best Management Practices An approach to help farmers reduce or eliminate agricultural.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Developing a Nutrient Management Plan for the Napa River Watershed Group Members Vinod Kella  Rebecca Kwaan  Luke Montague Linsey Shariq  Peng Wang.
OHIO SEA GRANT AND STONE LABORATORY Phosphorus reductions from POINT sources (29,000 metric tons to 11,000) ‐Somewhat aided by agriculture practices Late.
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
Water Pollution. Watershed A watershed is an area of land from which all the water drains to the same location, such as a stream, pond, lake, river, wetland.
The Canadian Approach to P Indexes (or, at least, my approach) D. Keith Reid Presentation to Soil Test P Stratification Working Group 24 July, 2013.
Influence of Catchment Characteristics on Stream Nitrogen Transport to the Hood Canal Osborne, S.N.; Brett, M.T.; Richey, J.E.; Steinberg, P.D.; Newton,
Regression Analysis of Phosphorous Loading Data for the Maumee River, Water Years Charlie Piette David Dolan Pete Richards Department of Natural.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Lake Springfield Watershed Nutrient Management Project February 11, 2015.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico 07/03/2002.  Eutrophication is a natural process taking place in water- characterized by a development towards an environment.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources Christopher Gale Bill Taft.
Water Quality. Indicators of Water Quality 1) Nitrates a) Eutrophication b) Algae Blooms 2) pH 3) Turbidity 4) Temperature 5) Dissolved Oxygen 6) Bioindicators.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Bill Jokela, Jason Cavadini, and Mike Bertram
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Update on Lake Erie Nutrient and Algal Issues Gail Hesse Ohio Lake Erie Commission March 30, 2012.
Results of Long-Term Experiments With Conservation Tillage in Austria Introduction On-site and off-site damages of soil erosion cause serious problems.
Agenda Item 2. A review of basic concepts and terminology related to phosphorus movement from cropland to streams and rivers. Great Lakes Protections Fund.
Chemical Assessment Most complicated, but easiest to do. Extreme natural variations What is normal?
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
Summary of supplementary data GLPF Grant- Team meeting #5 July 23, 2013.
Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River
Private Lands Voluntary Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin Vicki Anderson Great Lakes Coordinator.
Modeling of Critical Areas for DRP Runoff and Targeting Strategies
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
Blanchard Watershed Modeling Laura Weintraub, Amanda Flynn, Joe DePinto Great Lakes Tributary Modeling Program 516(e) Meeting May 18, 2011.
Team Meeting #5, Great Lakes Protection Fund Grant A Phosphorus Soil Test Metric To Reduce Dissolved Phosphorus Loading to Lake Erie Heidelberg University.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell August 8,
Effect of Potential Future Climate Change on Cost-Effective Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction Strategies in the UMRB Manoj Jha, Philip Gassman, Gene.
Priority Agricultural Areas Locally designated areas targeted for continued, expanded, and/or intensified agricultural activities Designated Farmland Preservation.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,
Willow Lake Cobb Gauge site Sample site Mesonet site For more information: We gratefully acknowledge.
WATERSHEDS Concepts and Curriculum Review LAKE MONITORING AND ANALYSIS Tony Thorpe and Dan Obrecht Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program – Univ. of Missouri.
Human Impacts Part 2- Watersheds. What’s a Watershed? An area of land that drains into a common body of water.
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
Water pollution Chapter 11.
Reducing sediment & nutrient losses from intensive agriculture Restoring eutrophic shallow lakes Pastoral agriculture is the dominant land use in New.
Topics BMP Recommendations Direct Conduit Recommendations
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Retaining Water (In A Good Way).
2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference
The Effect of Improved Manure Management on Water Quality
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Watershed Assessment of Detroit River Loads to Lake Erie
Presentation transcript:

Effects of Conservation Tillage Systems on Dissolved Phosphorus Dr. David Baker Heidelberg University Tiffin, Ohio November 15, 2012 Davenport, IA Building Science Assessments for State-Level Nutrient Reduction Stategies

This talk -- Lessons learned from agricultural phosphorus control programs in the Lake Erie Basin The teacher has been: 1.Detailed, long-term monitoring data for several major watersheds draining into Lake Erie. 2.Information on changing crop production practices in those watersheds. This research was supported by state and federal agencies, foundations, agribusinesses and the fertilizer industry. Special thanks to the EPA’s Great Lakes National Program Office and the Great Lakes Protection Fund for recent support for bioavailability studies and phosphorus stratification studies.

15 stations All at USGS Stream Gages Today’s data from three rivers: Maumee – 6,330 sq.mile Sandusky – 1,250 sq. mile Cuyahoga sq. mile

1.Suspended solids 2.Total phosphorus 3.Dissolved reactive phosphorus 4.Nitrate 5.Nitrite 6.Ammonia 7.Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 8.Chloride 9.Sulfate 10.Silica 11.Fluoride 12.Conductivity Seasonally pesticides Selected metals Bioavailable Phosphorus Analytical Program at the NCWQR Program started in 1975 ~ 500 samples analyzed per station per year Annual loads calculated by integration with corrections for final USGS daily discharge Data available at Heidelberg’s web site: /academiclife/distinctive/nc wqr/data Program Characteristics:

Total Phosphorus Load Total Particulate Phosphorus Load Total Dissolved Phosphorus Load += Total Bioavailable Phosphorus Load += Bioavailable Particulate Phosphorus Load Bioavailable Dissolved Phosphorus Load Management Options for Phosphorus Load Reduction Focus of reduction programs

Nonpoint phosphorus control programs were planned in the 1980s and initiated in the 1990s. Particulate Phosphorus 82% Dissolved Phosphorus 18% Forms of phosphorus transported in northwestern Ohio rivers, Phosphorus reduction programs focused on reducing erosion and particulate phosphorus loading through fostering adoption of no-till and reduced till crop protection methods. Particulate phosphorus during storm runoff is attached to soil particles.

1. What does the water quality monitoring data look like? 2. What changes in agricultural practices could explain the loading changes? 3.What changes in hydrology could help explain the loading changes?

Trends in annual loads and flow weighted mean concentrations of particulate phosphorus in the Maumee and Sandusky rivers

Note the close relationship between variations in annual discharge and variations in TP load. Discharge increased by 41% while TP load increased by 31%. Weather and hydrology drive nonpoint pollution from cropland.

Trends in annual loads and flow weighted mean concentrations of dissolved reactive phosphorus in the Maumee and Sandusky rivers

Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus 50% decrease from Total Phosphorus 24% decrease from

From here To here With some very good years in between!

Phosphorus reduction programs in the Lake Erie Basin have been driven by the lake’s eutrophication problems. Point source control problems were initiated first and quickly resulted in substantial reductions in phosphorus loading.

Maumee and Sandusky 26% of land area 51% of total phos. load Export rate 3x higher than average for rest of drainage area How does nutrient export from the Northwestern Ohio rivers compare with the export from other areas?

Land use in study watersheds, as percent Watershed Agricul -ture Forest Grass_ Hay_ Pasture Open Water UrbanWetlandOther Maumee Sandusky Cuyahoga Average annual nutrient export rates,

Data for Water Years Watershed Point source Phosphorus Non-Point Phosphorus Maumee5%95% Sandusky3%97%

Trends in tillage practices in northwestern Ohio:

Tillage PracticesCorn, (1142 fields) Soybeans (1147 fields) Wheat (945 fields) Hay (52 fields) 1Moldboard plow, < 5% cover 5%1% 4% 2Reduced tillage, soil heavily mixed, < 30% cover 72%9%3%48% 3Mulch tillage, soil lightly mixed, > 30% cover 15%17%12%13% 4No till, strip till 8%73%84%35% Tillage Practices in the Sandusky Watershed: “Rotational no till”

Phosphorus fertilizer sales in Ohio, Heidelberg Monitoring started

Start of Heidelberg monitoring Long-term trend in average phosphorus soil tests in Northwest Ohio

Fertilizer application method # of fields % of fields 1Broadcast and unincorporated21120% 2Broadcast and incorporated within one week 21221% 3Broadcast and incorporated after one week or more 11511% 4Banded with corn planter49646% 5Banded more than 2 inches deep with a coulter/knife injection tool 232% Total number of reported fields 1, % How will the majority of phosphorus fertilizer be applied to this field? Sandusky Watershed Soil Stratification Studies

Timing of fertilizer application# of fields % of fields 1In spring (April to June), prior to planting % 2In spring (April to June), at planting % 3 In late summer or fall (August – November) after wheat or hay harvest % 4 In fall (September – November) after soybean harvest % 5 In fall, (September – November) after corn harvest % 6 In winter (December – March) 40.4% 7 In winter (December – March) on snow covered or frozen soils % Total Responses1,026 When will the majority of phosphorus fertilizer be applied?

Total Phosphorus Loading Total Bioavailable Phosphorus Loading

A bottom line … 1.After 20+ years of efforts to reduce phosphorus loading to Lake Erie from cropland, we now have more bioavailable phosphorus entering Lake Erie from cropland than ever. 2. The increases in bioavailable phosphorus loading are due to increases in dissolved phosphorus runoff. 3. The increases in dissolved phosphorus loading appear to be contributing increased harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie.

Characteristics of average annual export of phosphorus from the Sandusky River, Total Phosphorus (594 metric tons/year) 73% particulate phosphorus 27% dissolved phosphorus Bioavailable Phosphorus (275 metric tons/year) 46% particulate phosphorus 54% dissolved phosphorus Management choice impacts-- Trading TMDLs BMP selection 93% bioavailable 29% bioavailable

Why has the dissolved phosphorus loading from the Sandusky and Maumee rivers dropped and then increased so much? Potential causes of the increasing dissolved phosphorus export 1.increasing fall and winter broadcasting of phosphorus fertilizers, often without timely incorporation. 5. changes in rainfall patterns that have resulted in increases in winter rainstorms and resulting stream flows, especially in December and January. 2.phosphorus stratification in the soil associated with widespread adoption of no-till and reduced-till production and the accompanying lack of inversion tillage. 3.increased tile drainage coupled with macropore flow that carries surface water to tile drains and increases total discharge. 4.increasing trends in flashiness of northwestern Ohio streams.

Phosphorus stratification in cropland of the Sandusky Watershed

Analysis of dilute aqueous soil suspensions

Questions?

NCWQR Phosphorus Analyses Sample Pretreatment Portion Analyzed acid added oxidant added auto- clave Dissolved Phosphorus (DP) (filter sample through 0.45 micron filter) Total Phosphorus (TP)whole sample xxx NaOH Extractable PP (extract residue on filter with NaOH and analyze as DRP) Particulate Phosphorus (PP)calculated as TP - TDP Dissolved Organic P (DOP)calculated as TDP - DHP Total Dissolved P (TDP) x xx filtrate Dissolved Hydrolyzable P (DHP) xx filtrate --- Dissolved Reactive P (DRP)filtrate --- all samples extra analyses for bioavailability studies Bioavailable Forms