Lake Studies Impaired Waters Waters are classified as impaired when they fail to meet state water quality standards and have been placed on the federal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2005 Stream Phosphorus TMDLs to be proposed in July 5th NJR The NJDEPs Division of Watershed Management is seeking stakeholder input on proposed phosphorus.
Advertisements

Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Truckee River Water Quality: Current Conditions and Trends Relevant to TMDLs and WLAs Prepared for: Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility. City of.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Limnology 101 Dan Obrecht MU Limnology
What is a TMDL Project and Why Are We Conducting One on the Root River? Root River Turbidity TMDL Stakeholder’s Introduction Meeting November 20 th, 2008.
WISCONSIN RIVER TMDL Presentation for North Central Wisconsin Stormwater Coalition July 25, 2013.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Introduction to TMDLs for Nutrients Presented by: Dr. Scott Emery January 15, 2009.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Design for Water Quality CE 365K Hydraulic Engineering Design Spring 2015 David R. Maidment.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Cape Fear River Estuary TMDL Development Stakeholder’s Perspective Cape Fear Council of Governments TMDL Forum May 26, 2004 Kenneth L. Vogt, Jr. PE, DEE.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Background and Litigation Jon A. Mueller, Vice President For Litigation Chesapeake Bay Foundation William and Mary,
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
Brent Mason, Mackenzie Consoer, Rebekah Perkins BBE 5543 November 8, 2011.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Effects of Nutrient Enrichment on Rivers and Streams Ohio EPA 2006.
MEAD LAKE TMDL CRITIQUE Alicia Allen and Nick Grewe.
STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Water Quality Short Course April 11, 2007 Lake and Reservoir Dynamics Dan Obrecht – UMC
Characteristics of Phosphorus an essential nutrient for plants and animals in the form of ions PO 4 3- and HPO 4 2- part of DNA and RNA-molecules part.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
TMDLs: The Regulatory Transmogrification of Nuisance.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
Some Context behind the Implementation of Numeric Nutrient Criteria or Why do we have these Water Quality Regulations? Mark W. Clark and Thomas Obreza.
Reitz Lake TMDL. Goal Setting for Reitz Lake Reasonable Expectations 1 Phase II Adaptive Management MPCA Water Quality Standards 40 µg/L Natural Background.
Critique of North Branch of Sunrise River TMDL Nate Topie and Taylor Hoffman.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
Nutrient Criteria Development for Lakes: Minnesota’s Approach & Timeline Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Environmental.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
WATERSHEDS Concepts and Curriculum Review LAKE MONITORING AND ANALYSIS Tony Thorpe and Dan Obrecht Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program – Univ. of Missouri.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
Clark Fork River Metals TMDL Development
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Phosphorus and Suspended Solids TMDL For the Lower Fox River/Green Bay Area of Concern – Putting the Pieces Together Bud Harris, P. Sager, D. Scheberle,
Using GIS to Aid in TMDL Modeling
Total Maximum Daily Loads
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Lake Quassapaug Summary Report
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

Lake Studies Impaired Waters Waters are classified as impaired when they fail to meet state water quality standards and have been placed on the federal impaired waters list 303(d)

Lake Studies

Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) A Total Maximum Daily Load study must be conducted for lakes, streams and rivers that have been listed as impaired. Total Maximum Daily Load is the extent to which a body of water is able to assimilate or tolerate a pollutant and still maintain its water quality standards. Lake Studies

TMDL Analysis A TMDL is the sum of the individual waste loads from point sources, nonpoint sources and natural background, with an additional loading allowance for a margin of safety. This is generally described by the following equation… Lake Studies

TMDL (AC) = WLA+LA+MOS Where: AC = Assimilative Capacity of the water body to achieve/maintain standards WLA = Waste Load Allocation, quantification of pollutant loads from point sources discharging to the water body LA= Load Allocation, quantification of pollutant loads from nonpoint sources MOS = Margin of Safety, reflects uncertainty in the analysis, a desire to provide an extra margin of protection for beneficial uses, or an allowance for future growth Lake Studies

Impairments for Excess Nutrients Data must show exceedances of two of the following three standards 1. Total Phosphorus (causal factor) 2. Chlorophyll- a (response variable) 3. Secchi disk (response variable) Lake Studies

Northern Glaciated Plains Deep LakesShallow Lakes Lake Emily Phosphorus (ppb) < 65< Chlorophyll- a (ppb) < 22< 3040 Clarity (Secchi) (meters) WQ Standards (Northern Glaciated Plains)

Lake Studies Deep Lakes Shallow Lakes LevenGilchristAnneRenoMalmedalStrandnessPelican P (ppb) < 40< Chl- a (ppb) < 14< Clarity Secchi meters > 1.4> WQ Standards (North Central Hardwood Forest)

Lake Water Quality Lake Studies

Why require phosphorus control? Phosphorus is the limiting nutrient for algal growth in most Minnesota lakes and streams Other limiting factors such as sunlight and temperature cannot be controlled in a lake or stream Lake Studies

Phosphorus = Algae Lake Studies

P P P P P P Sources of phosphorous Lake Studies

Phosphorus Cycle Lake Studies

Phosphorus reductions needed to meet WQ standard

Lake Studies Lake Leven P Inventory

Lake Studies Gilchrist Lake P Inventory

Lake Studies Anne Lake External P Inventory

Lake Studies Reno P Inventory

Lake Studies Malmedal P Inventory

Lake Studies Strandness P Inventory

Lake Studies Pelican Lake P Inventory

Lake Studies Lake Emily External P Inventory

Impaired Waters Lake Studies Tim James Minnesota Pollution Control