Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Anura Karuna-Muni, P.E., Lee County Roland Ottolini, P.E., Lee County Tim Denison, Johnson Engineering,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Sun Ag Water Quality Study Report for Total Phosphorus Marc von Canal, Regulatory Scientist Mark Crosby, Engineer Victor McDaniel, Supervising Professional.

Advertisements

Still River Study Sponsored by Friends of the Lake Presented by Curtis Read November 17th, 2005.

Presented by Melanie Williams. Plan Schedule Water Quality Status Trends Chain of Lakes Basinwide Issues Recommendations & goals Public Review Comments.

Drainage Management to Improve Water Quality and Enhanced Agricultural Production Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL by.

Burandt Lake TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) Water quality in an urban lake 2/7/2008.

Management Plan: An Overview

Economics of Nitrogen and Water Quality Anthony Dvarskas Stony Brook University May 19,

Prepared by WMC Consulting Engineers Inc. John A. Wengell.

Quantification of Spill Data from Domestic Facilities Andy Squires Pinellas County Environmental Management Keith Hackett Janicki Environmental, Inc.

Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality

Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,

Nutrient Loading in the Klamath Basin K.A. Rykbost B.A. Charlton Oregon State University Klamath Experiment Station.

Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program University of Missouri-Columbia The Missouri’s Lakes and Reservoirs The Missouri Department of Natural Resources Region.

North St. Paul Resilient Communities Reduction in Total Phosphorus to Silver Lake Prepared by: Matthew Bonnema, Gwyneth Perry, Nathan Warner and Christopher.

The Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District in 2013 Claire Bleser September 20, 2012.

Lake County Water Authority Nutrient Reduction Facility (NuRF) Lance Lumbard Water Resources Project Manager.

It’s the Water Workshop An Industry Approach Sept. 13, 2005 Dan Froehlich US Agronomy Manager Nitrogen Management.

Aquascaping November 14, 2006 Country Creek HOA Manatee County.

Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.

Lee County Government Division of Natural Resources TMDL/BMAP Update TMDL/BMAP Update November 30, 2010 Roland Ottolini, Director Lee County Division of.

Muskegon Wastewater Treatment Facility

Center for Watershed Protection Illicit Sewage Discharges in the Chesapeake Bay 2012 Chesapeake Bay Stormwater Retreat Lori Lilly Watershed Ecologist/Planner.

North Spreader Ecosystem Management Agreement Net Ecosystem Benefit Projects (July 2007 Photo)

Brad Kalb Tyson Fehringer Marie Pengilly Kristen Pilcher Montana Skovlin John Schisel Tim Barbier.

Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES

UTSW Thermal Energy Plants, Power Generation and Electrical System What do we do to meet the Emission Reduction, Energy usage Reduction and Electrical.

Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.

Methods for the Estimation of Mine Infiltration Bruce Leavitt PE PG, Consulting Hydrogeologist Washington, Pennsylvania.

Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.

Senior Associate Florida Successes of Polymer Enhanced Best Management Practices (PEBMPs) Steven R. Iwinski Environmental Scientist March 16 th, 2007.

Electricity Part 4: Power Plants, Distribution and Cooling,

Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.

ICE PLUG MONITORING SYSTEM Ice plug is an efficient method of providing isolation on liquid filled (water, heavy water) pipes to perform maintenance and.

Town of Hamilton Community Information Meeting For Well Harmony Intermediate School May 13, 2010.

Arsenic Trioxide and the Summitville Mine Superfund Sites Frances L. Costanzi, P.E - EPA RPM.

How do Wetlands Factor into New Infiltration Policies?

Grand Haven Pond Study: An Investigation to Reduce Nutrient Loads and Evaluate Alternative Management Practices in Stormwater Ponds Mark Clark Wetlands.

A combination of warm weather grasses, terrestrial and aquatic plants in and around the spring Stormwater Management Plan for College Springs Park Benjamin.

Blind Pass Project Update Bayous Preservation Assoc. February 9, 2011.

Ed Dunne, Ph.D, Division of Environmental Sciences, SJRWMD P.O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL 32178; ph:

Lower South ForkClearwater River Lower South Fork Clearwater River Nez Perce Tribe DFRM Watershed Division Mark Johnson-Project Leader

STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.

WRAC Issues Workshop EAA/STA-2 Expansion Cell 4 April 11, 2005 Acceler8 Overview.

Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.

Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.

ECOLOGICAL PYRAMIDS.

Figure 2. Decrease in K and NO 3 over time in (a) AN1, (b) AN2, (c) CA2. Best fit determined by moving average. Potential for using anaerobic settling.

 Nutrient Limitation What’s happening in the Chesapeake Bay and how does it compare to our results?

Effects of Teak Plantations on Water Supply at KVTC HJ van Hensbergen for Dave Scott.

Integrated Ecological Assessment February 28, 2006 Long-Term Plan Annual Update Carl Fitz Recovery Model Development and.

Comparison of Phosphorus Retention Capacity between Floodplain Sediments and Streambed Sediments in an Agricultural Drainage Ditch L. M. Ahiablame and.

Revisions to the Long-Term Plan for Achieving Everglades Water Quality Goals November 18, 2004 Gary Goforth Chief Consulting Engineer South Florida Water.

1 Lake Ballinger and McAleer Creek Watershed Strategic Action Plan Forum Briefing #2 January 27, 2009.

Birnamwood LID Project Update Nick Russo Team Leader-Environmental Services Architecture & Engineering Division Harris County Public Infrastructure.

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program (MsCIP) “Comprehensive Barrier Island Restoration Plan” PIANC 2012.

Solving Water Pollution Problems in the Wakulla Springshed The City of Tallahassee’s Efforts to Reduce Stormwater Pollution Hydrogeology Workshop May 12-13,

Basin-Specific Feasibility Studies, ECP Basins Evaluation of Alternatives Basin-Specific Feasibility Studies, ECP Basins Evaluation of Alternatives August.

Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.

Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.

Electricity Part 4: Power Plants, Distribution and Cooling,

1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.

Lake Tarpon Drainage Basin Management Plan Update Pinellas County Department of Environmental Management Water Resources Management Section.

Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District DRAFT Water Resource Management Plan Review

Methods for the Estimation of Mine Infiltration

Klamath ADR Hydrology Report

STA-1E Structures, Flow, & Long Term Enhancements*

LEAN ORGANIZATION SUMMARY

Case Study: Evaluating Retrofit Urban Best Management Practice Performance and Lessons Learned Nick Muenks, Marc Leisenring, Mark Willobee – Geosyntec.

By: Lucas Hendrickson, Ian Strasburg, John Koets, and Shenquan Li

CONSERVATION 20/20 MANAGEMENT AND MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND OVERVIEW

Presentation transcript:

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Anura Karuna-Muni, P.E., Lee County Roland Ottolini, P.E., Lee County Tim Denison, Johnson Engineering, Inc. Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources Presentation Outline: Layout of the filter marsh Monitoring of water quality and flow Data analysis and trends, assuming the filter marsh as a blackbox Maintenance of the marsh Summary

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Ten Mile and Six Mile Watersheds (approximate area = 43,000 acres) Ten Mile Canal Watershed (Approx. 13 square miles)

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Filter Marsh Cell Orientation and Operation North Settling Cell/ Filter Marsh North Filter Marsh South Settling Cell/ Filter Marsh South Filter Marsh Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Water Quality Monitoring Locations Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Water Level Monitoring Locations Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources Water Quality and Level Monitoring Equipments Avalanche® Multi-bottle, Multi-function Sampler

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources 2008 Total Load Reduction = 68% (1920 kg)

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources 2008 Total Load Reduction = 82% (78.9 kg)

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources Maintenance Activities 4/15/2008Aquatic Plant Removal7 cy mixed 4/15/2008Aquatic Plant Removal1 cy chara 5/15/2008Harvest Cell No. 48 cy native 8/6/2008Aquatic Plant Removal45 cy mixed 11/17/2008Aquatic Plant Removal40 cy mixed

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources 2008 Filter Marsh Performance Summary: Upper limit (considering the filter marsh as a blackbox) Total Nitrogen Removed 1920 kg Nitrogen Removal Efficiency 68% Total Phosphorus Removed 78.9 kg Phosphorus Removal Efficiency 82%

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources 2008 Filter Marsh Performance Summary: Upper limit (considering the filter marsh as a blackbox) Lower limit (considering the inflow to be equal to discharge – no losses) Total Nitrogen Removed 1920 kg 506 kg Nitrogen Removal Efficiency 68%36% Total Phosphorus Removed 78.9 kg 33 kg Phosphorus Removal Efficiency 82%65%

Performance of Ten Mile Canal Filter Marsh Project Lee County Division of Natural Resources Observations and Recommendations: The efficiency can be determined in different ways. This study focuses on efficiency based on load in the water column. Efficiency and load reduction depends on a number of factors such as loading rate, amount of discharge, residence time, maintenance, volume loss due to seepage, ET, leaks, etc. Focus on removing nutrient loads during the wet season Coordinate monitoring of water quality and flow Stay on top of maintenance schedule Develop a simple design that is easy to operate and maintain Make aware of factors influencing the efficiency

Web Site : Contact Information Questions & Comments