PARISH SURVEY 2005 SYNOPSIS. 700 COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES WERE RECEIVED, REPRESENTED BY ( Bold figures represent the West Berks percentages) MALES 0-45-1112-1718-2425-4445-5960-6465-7475-8485+

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Glasgow Community Planning Partnership Neighbourhood Management Update Newlands/Auldburn Multi Member Ward.
Advertisements

Citizen Survey and Neighborhood Feedback City of Wichita District IV Spring/Summer 2013.
Worcestershire Viewpoint survey November 2011 results Cherrie Mansfield.
G L A S G O W M A N C H E S T E R S H E F F I E L D E X E T E R Evaluation of the Impact and Implementation of Community Wardens Keith Hayton and Vincent.
Annual Neighbourhood Survey Leith Results for 2007 to 2009 North N E I G H B O U R H O O D researchresource.
The Gateway Area Forum Hugh Wignall Head of Neighbourhood Services October 2012.
Protecting society and helping keep people safe RESTRICTEDSlide 1RESTRICTED Thefts.
Questionnaire Analysis Steve Copeland. Coleorton Parish Plan Committee – Brief Established to develop a Parish Plan. The Plan was to represent the wishes.
Youth Engagement Project YOU Project Launch & Road Show Merton Stop & Search Online Youth Survey Youth consultation project with Uptown UK.
What Matters to our Communities
Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
Customer Satisfaction Surveys 2005/06 7 th August 2006.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
Does Botley have an anti-social behaviour problem? Botley Conservatives Autumn 2010.
ARTSA Improving Heavy Vehicle Safety Summit Chain of Responsibility and its potential to improve safety Marcus Burke National Transport Commission 16 April.
A Statistical Analysis Crime & Public Safety Chilliwack Healthier Community Strategic Action Plan.
Tiddington 4 Village Plan Survey Results – Roads Two thirds of respondents wanted a controlled crossing of the A418 in Tiddington, with the very large.
Community Planning Event for North and West 1 Output from workshop held on Tuesday 9 th February 2010 at John Clare Primary School, Helpston.
Showcasing Local NHW Achievements. Our Brief  Review all nomination forms  Select case studies  Conduct fieldwork  Write up case studies  Develop.
Hertfordshire County Council’s Relationship with Town and Parish Councils Background Briefing Jan Hayes-Griffin Assistant Director.
GRAFFITI HOTSPOTS PROJECT. THE PROBLEM  Increased reports of graffiti and antisocial behaviour around the municipality received through Council’s Graffiti.
Appleton with Eaton Community Plan 2009 Questionnaire responses.
2011 "COMMITTED TO OUR COMMUNITY“ Citizen Survey Howey-in-the-Hills Police Department 1.
Merton ALG Residents Survey 2006/07 NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION LONDON DATA UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 8 th JANUARY 2007.
Reigate and Banstead Borough Council Residents survey October 2014 Ania Janz Danielle Collins.
Huntingdonshire District Council Place Survey 2008 Presentation by Sofia Vartsaki mruk research ltd 9 Northburgh Street London EC1V 0AH Tel :
Dog Control Orders Clean Neighbourhoods & Environment Act 2005.
Kimball Area Community Survey Results. Methodology Mail survey Sample included Kimball, Banner and western Cheyenne Counties  Random sample of 649 households.
Public Comment Mobility Vision Plan 2035 MVP Website 2035 MVP Brochure and Survey. Provides specific information on the Plan Update. Survey – your opinion.
Phase 1 Consultation Results 23 rd September 2014.
2012 CITY OF MIDDLETON SATISFACTION SURVEY WORKING DRAFT - PROPOSAL.
Prepared for: Vancouver Police Department Resident and Business Survey Prepared by: NRG Research Group April 4, 2007.
City of Sarasota 2008 National Citizen Survey Conducted by the National Research Center (NRC) for the City of Sarasota.
Parklands Area Forum Hugh Wignall Head of Neighbourhood Services October 2012.
Protecting our communities together South Forum Date: 4 th July 2013.
Merton Residents Survey 2008/09 LONDON BOROUGH OF MERTON RESIDENTS SURVEY 2008/09 TNS Social November 2008 © 2008 TNS UK Limited. All rights reserved.
Theale’s Future making it happen together Village Questionnaire -Analysis.
Other Activities (
Community Priorities Feedback to Hamstead Hall Neighbourhood Forum 26 July 2012.
Mike Welsh Communities Officer North East Ward Dundee City Council.
1 NEWFIELDS POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SURVEY December 2011.
Theale’s Future - making it happen together Public Meeting 21 October 2008.
© NewEdge August 2010 City of West Richland Survey Analysis.
Blaby South Community Forum Leicestershire County Council Thursday 22 nd November 2007.
1 SAFER STOCKTON PARTNERSHIP Anti-Social Behaviour Agenda Item No: 8 Safer Stockton Partnership 14 February 2012.
OPP COMMUNITY SATISFACTION SURVEY 2009 Huronia West Detachment.
Community Regeneration and Tackling Poverty Network Event Working together for a Better Govanhill John Goldie SE Glasgow CHCP.
Merton Residents Survey 2008/09 Draft Presentation Presented by TNS Social September 2008.
Dealing with ASB in Stockton Steven Hume Community Safety and Security Manager.
Community Safety Connect Steven Hume Community Safety and Security Manager.
Police and Crime Plan Consultation Feedback Marc Hole.
District 5 Town Hall Neighborhood Safety June 14th, :00 NW Area Command Substation.
Tackling Anti Social Behaviour Bill Blackett ASB Strategy Manager.
RESPONSIVE LOCAL SERVICES Phase 2 Bill Blackett – West Area Response Manager JULY 2012.
Suffolk Strategic Partnership Safer Suffolk Delivery Partnership Board Babergh Community Safety Partnership Safer Suffolk Delivery Partnership Executive.
FERNHURST NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Results of Questionnaire James Cottam Chairman Fernhurst Parish Council.
Community Safety Overview for Community and Partnerships Committee Colleen Martin Senior Policy Officer – Community Safety 22 June 2006.
CRIME AND SAFETY SURVEY TOPLINE RESULTS MAY 2013.
Anti-Social Behaviour Area 1 Committee- Wednesday 20 th November 2013.
1 Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire Results May 2016.
Communities Partnership
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Inverkip Community Initiative Listening Matters Survey 2014
Ewelme Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire September 2017
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Presentation transcript:

PARISH SURVEY 2005 SYNOPSIS

700 COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES WERE RECEIVED, REPRESENTED BY ( Bold figures represent the West Berks percentages) MALES %8%7%9%29%25%6%6%1%- 6%7%13%5%31%20%5%9%3%1% FEMALES %5%9%8%29%27%6%5%2%1% 6%7%13%5%31%20%4%8%5%1%

MAIN PLACE OF WORK 70% of those working had their place of work in Reading and the next largest group was those working from home about 8% 70% of those working had their place of work in Reading and the next largest group was those working from home about 8%

PUBLIC TRANSPORT 13% of respondents never use public transport to Reading and 74% never use public transport to Newbury. As bus services to Newbury and Theale and rail services from Theale do not have significant use, is it because they are not required or because they are not easily accessible? Why do not people use the services – is this a focus for the Transport Group? Those using the bus services to Reading rate them good/reasonable.

MAJOR DANGER SPOTS 360 of the respondents (51%) identified major danger spots in their neighbourhood. Significantly 55% stated that they would support a reduction in the speed limit and 67% the enforcement of the speed limit. 360 of the respondents (51%) identified major danger spots in their neighbourhood. Significantly 55% stated that they would support a reduction in the speed limit and 67% the enforcement of the speed limit. 350 respondents (50%) would like to see more warning signs. Conversely 45% would not support more traffic calming measures such as speed humps and chicanes. 350 respondents (50%) would like to see more warning signs. Conversely 45% would not support more traffic calming measures such as speed humps and chicanes.

ANTI SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR 23% of people have been affected by litter 23% have been affected by vandalism 19% have been affected by theft 19% have been affected by dog fouling 11% have been affected by graffiti 3% have been affected by drugs 2% have been affected by muggings 24% of respondents felt that a greater police presence was needed 18% felt that there ought to be more CCTV coverage 18% want better consultation between police and local people 12% want more community activities 10% requested improved street lighting 10% requested more drink/drug education/prevention 8% wanted wider use of neighbourhood watch

AMENITIES Just over 50% of respondents had no opinions on local amenities for the under 5’s. Poor ratings were given for amenities for 6-11 year olds, 12-17, and 60+. Just over 50% of respondents had no opinions on local amenities for the under 5’s. Poor ratings were given for amenities for 6-11 year olds, 12-17, and % did not know where the Linear Park is and 90% would like to see Linear Park made into a nature reserve. It is good to know that 77% feel safe in the park but of the remainder who said that they did not feel safe we would like to know why. 26% did not know where the Linear Park is and 90% would like to see Linear Park made into a nature reserve. It is good to know that 77% feel safe in the park but of the remainder who said that they did not feel safe we would like to know why. 50% of respondents use the park just for pleasure. 50% of respondents use the park just for pleasure.

INFORMATION Our respondents stated that most information came from free/local papers. These are significantly the highest rated methods and community groups should note this when advertising events. Our respondents stated that most information came from free/local papers. These are significantly the highest rated methods and community groups should note this when advertising events.

LOCAL SERVICES Local services are generally rated good to reasonable when and where used. Local services are generally rated good to reasonable when and where used. 47% expressed no opinion on local schools 47% expressed no opinion on local schools 39% had no opinion on public libraries 39% had no opinion on public libraries 74% had no opinion on social services 74% had no opinion on social services 70% had no opinion on youth services 70% had no opinion on youth services 51% had no opinion on planning 51% had no opinion on planning

INFORMATION PROVIDED The most important and useful information provided by the survey was from open questions/comments:- The most important and useful information provided by the survey was from open questions/comments:- Identification of danger spots Identification of danger spots What would you like to see happen at Underwood Road What would you like to see happen at Underwood Road Protection of our local environment Protection of our local environment What you like most What you like most What you like least which has had a significant influence and has informed the proposed projects What you like least which has had a significant influence and has informed the proposed projects