STEP 5 & 6. Objectives -To be able to use the MATRIX and MONITOR to prioritize problems and/or districts requiring action. -To be able to select appropriate.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.

Advertisements

ClimDev-Africa Program & African Climate Policy Center (ACPC)

Gender and Safe Motherhood

Local Immigration Partnerships: Systems Planning to Help People.

Alan Edwards European Commission 5 th GEO Project Workshop London, UK 8-9 February 2011 * The views expressed in these slides may not in any circumstances.

STEP 1. Objectives -To stress that it is essential to build partnerships with various stakeholders as early as possible in the Urban HEART process -To.

IPDET, 27/06/20031 Workgroup I/1 "Infrastructure" Mr. John Byaruhanga / Uganda Mr. Javier Guarnizo / Peru Ms. Annette Ittig / Canada Mr. Sadedin Limani.

© 2005 The Finance Project Module II: Developing a Vision and Results Orientation Oregon 21 st Century Community Learning Center Programs October 2011.

Roles and Functions of the Community and Public Health Nurse

STEP 2 & 3. Objectives -To review how health, social, and economic indicators can reveal health inequities -To understand the necessity of adopting all.

Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.

Health Equity 101 An Introduction to Health Equity June 26, 2013.

PPA 503 – The Public Policy Making Process

Lecture 1: Introduction Health inequality monitoring: with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries.

Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.

What is advocacy?. Session objectives Distinguish advocacy from other activities Work with participants to recognise opportunities for advocacy in our.

AGENDA ITEM 4: FOLLOW-UP ON THE DECISIONS OF THE WORLD METEOROLOGICAL CONGRESS ON THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL BOARD ON CLIMATE SERVICES AGENDA ITEM 4.1.2: INITIAL.

Opioid Misuse Prevention Program “OMPP” Strategic Planning Workshop

Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.

5 th International Academic Conference on Environmental and Occupational Medicine Dujiangyan, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China, 7-10 April |1.

Evidence-Based Advocacy Workshop on Evidence-Based Advocacy to Improve MNCHN Aug 08 Agra.

Objectives -To understand the steps in generating the MATRIX and MONITOR. -To show that the MATRIX and MONITOR can reveal the types of health equity problems.

Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,

Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.

Course on Data Analysis and Interpretation P Presented by B. Unmar Sponsored by GGSU PART 2 Date: 5 July

1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.

MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.

Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.

Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.

MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?

Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.

Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.

CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.

1 Second Regional Workshop on gender and Poverty Reduction Strategies, September 2003, Siem Reap Gender responsive costing and budgeting Nalini Burn.

Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.

Millennium Development Goals Carla AbouZahr Coordinator, Statistics, Monitoring and Analysis Department of Health Statistics and Informatics World Health.

THE EVIDENCE SANDWICH MODEL Dr. Soumyadeep Bhaumik BioMedical Genomics Centre, Kolkata Research priority setting exercises:

JIM Process 5 years after signing:, Achievements & Challenges ahead Zagreb, 22 May 2012 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.

The P Process Strategic Design

Riga’s AC Baseline Review Säästva Eesti Institute Heidi Tuhkanen, SEI-Tallinn Centre

Writing a literature review, Stewart McKinney,2008.

Healthy Schools. The Strategic Aims of the Healthy Schools Programme: To support children and young people in developing healthy behaviours To help raise.

Introduction to policy briefs What is a policy brief? What should be included in a policy brief? How can policy briefs be used? Getting started.

Facts and Figuring it Out How to Complete the Healthy School Report Card.

Evaluation design and implementation Puja Myles

Developing SEA Change’s Evaluation Plan

Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.

ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.

John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.

Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.

Power walk Copyright(creative commons license): RLCD at

Training on Safe Hospitals in Disasters Module 3: Action Planning for “Safe Hospitals”

ORGANIZATION CAPACITY ASSESSMENT (2013) Produced in April 2013.

Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.

Community Action Research to Improve Nutrition and Growth in rural India CARING Delhi, March 2013.

1 Health Needs Assessment Workshop Sue Cavanagh Keith Chadwick.

Vision 21 a shared vision for Hygiene, Sanitation and Water Supply Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council.

GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!

Selection of interventions Facilitators’ Workshop on District Health Performance Improvement Lilongwe, 25 th – 27 th March 2015.

DHPI Approach at a Glance Facilitators’ Workshop on District Health Performance Improvement Lilongwe, 25 th – 27 th March 2015.

What works? A review of actions addressing the social and economic determinants of Indigenous health Katy Osborne Fran Baum Presentation to Closing the.

Evaluation What is evaluation?

Mitigation, Enhancement and Monitoring Session 9 Health in SEA.

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.

Policy Brief: Maternal Mortality Case Of LESOTHO By M Ramathebane M Thoothe.

Policy Brief: Maternal Mortality Case Of LESOTHO

What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.

Dr Timothy Armstrong Coordinator

What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.

Presentation transcript:

STEP 5 & 6

Objectives -To be able to use the MATRIX and MONITOR to prioritize problems and/or districts requiring action. -To be able to select appropriate interventions that address the priority health inequities selected. Objectives for Session

Interpreting the Urban HEART MATRIX and MONITOR Now that you have produced strong evidence of health inequities in your city/region, the next step is to raise awareness of equity gaps and prioritize the problems requiring action. Schedule priority-setting workshops and meetings with stakeholders. Teach participants how to read the MATRIX and MONITOR. Facilitate discussion around 3 main topics: – Seeing trends or pockets of health inequities – Understanding the causes and effects of the inequities – Prioritizing problems or districts requiring action Rank-order stakeholders’ equity priorities.

Activity: Prioritizing Health Equity Issues

Prioritizing Health Equity Issues In your groups, review the MATRIX on the following slide and answer the following questions: 1.Is there general consensus among the stakeholders (i.e. group members) for the priority areas identified? 2.How would you propose resolving conflicts between stakeholders? 3.Are there any immediate concerns in the city which should be addressed first?

Mock matrix (data for 2009) Policy DomainIndicatorDistrict ADistrict BDistrict CDistrict DDistrict EDistrict FBenchmarkTarget Health outcomes: Summary indicatorInfant mortality Health outcomes: disease-specific indicators Diabetes Prevalence (per 100,000) Tuberculosis prevalence (per 100,000) Physical infrastructure & environment Access to safe water Access to improved sanitation Social and human development Skilled birth attendance Fully immunized children Prevalence of tobacco smoking Economics Unemployment Poverty rate

Documenting Areas of Health Inequity After reaching consensus within your group, identify 2-3 priority areas and/or districts for which intervention plans should be developed. List the priority areas/districts and provide brief explanations for your choices in the following table.

Prioritize policy domain or district? IndicatorDistrict? City-wide implementation? Reason for this being a priority health inequity issue

Identifying the Best Response

Developing an Intervention Plan Criteria for selecting an appropriate intervention plan: Reduces health inequities Available local resources Acceptable by affected communities and other key players Achievable within timeframe Likely to be effective and efficient Complies with national priorities

How to use the Urban HEART response menu Review your MATRIX to confirm the policy domain responsible for your problem indicator District ADistrict BDistrict CDistrict D City average National targets Health outcomes Infant mortality (per 1000 live births) Physical infrastructure & environment Access to safe water (%) Social & human development Completion of primary education (%) n.a.8485 Fully immunized children (%)

How to use the Urban HEART response menu Go to Annex VII of User Manual Choose the strategy package that is most relevant to the problem you want to address Review the list of interventions in the strategy package Select the intervention that is most appropriate for your city

Activity: Selecting Interventions In your stakeholder group analyse the MATRIX and select recommendations for an intervention proposal. Fill in the “Intervention proposal” slides. The proposal will later be presented to the Mayor for his/her consideration. Be prepared to justify your choices and explain why you have focused on certain aspects of the MATRIX.

Revisiting the Matrix Policy DomainIndicatorDistrict ADistrict BDistrict CDistrict DDistrict EDistrict FBenchmarkTarget Health outcomes: Summary indicatorInfant mortality Health outcomes: disease-specific indicators Diabetes Prevalence (per 100,000) Tuberculosis prevalence (per 100,000) Physical infrastructure & environment Access to safe water Access to improved sanitation Social and human development Skilled birth attendance Fully immunized children Prevalence of tobacco smoking Economics Unemployment Poverty rate

Intervention Proposal Stakeholder: Priority issue(s): Focus on a specific district or indicator?

Intervention Proposal Proposed interventions: Reasons?

Intervention Proposal Discuss how the interventions will meet the criteria of evaluation (in slide 10)?

Activity: Pitch your response to a Mayor -Engage the “city Mayor” with your group’s Urban HEART plan of action. -Remember to try to connect interventions as much as possible to the Mayor’s agenda and existing initiatives. -Try to propose a long term strategy, but focus on short term deliverables.