Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning and use of funding instruments
Advertisements

Regional Policy e-Cohesion – new initiative within IT systems of Member States in Shared Fund Management Common IT System for programming.
SEA & ETC Strategic Environmental Assessment and European Territorial Cooperation programmes Annual meeting with the Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes.
Regional Policy Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities Ad hoc expert meeting 6 March
Performance Framework
Regional Policy Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities Ad hoc expert meeting 20 September
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Commissions proposal for incentives and conditionality in Open Days.
Regional Policy The future of EU funding - proposals from the Commission Guy Flament European Commission, DG REGIO Cardiff, 19 April 2013.
Regional Policy The future of EU funding - proposals from the Commission Ieva Zālīte European Commission, DG REGIO Glasgow, 22 February 2013.
Ad hoc expert group meeting on draft templates and guidance for the Partnership Agreement and operational programmes under cohesion policy
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal Marko Prijatelj Directorate General for Regional.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
An overview The EU Strategy for the Danube Region in the programming of ESIF for : state of play and next steps.
V4 Expert Group V4 Expert Group Result Orientation Challenges – 17 June 2014 Budapest.
Reformed Partnership and Multi-Level Governance Ana Maria Dobre Political Administrator General Council Secretariat
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
© Shutterstock - olly The European Social Fund In 2014 – 2020 & Social Inclusion Structured Dialogue – 23 April 2015 Andriana SUKOVA – TOSHEVA, Director,
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 Structural Funds Evaluation A VIEW FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Anna Burylo, DG Regional Policy, Evaluation.
Template and guidance for the content of the Partnership Agreement 24 May
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
Expert group meeting on draft delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) under cohesion policy
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Main elements of the templates for the Partnership Contract and the operational programme.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation ESF Technical Working Group Luxembourg, 2 December
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Results orientation: audit perspective Jiri Plecity, Head of Unit H1, Relations with Control Authorities, Legal Procedures, Audit of Direct Management.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 DG Regional Policy’s evaluation of the compliance assessment process for the programming period COCOF.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Workshop on Strategic Programming, Monitoring and evaluation Focusing on Performance and REsults Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,
Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities
Veronica Gaffey & Antonella Schulte-Braucks
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation
Performance Framework
Ex-ante conditionality
Draft Guidance Document (ERDF/ESF)
Guidance on ensuring the respect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the implementation of ESI Funds.
Performance framework review and reserve
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 8 February 2018
Ex-ante evaluation: major points and state of play
Ex-ante conditionality and macroeconomic conditionality
Ex ante conditionality and macroeconomic conditionality
Ex-ante conditionality test
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Amending the Performance Framework
Draft model for the progress report Expert group on 24 October 2013 First discussion Marko Prijatelj Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
State of play of OP negotiations
Progress of the negotiations on the CPR and ESF regulations
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
The Atlantic Forum Process and outcomes European Commission – DG MARE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Objective 3 Territorial Co-operation Workshop 4:Trans-national co-operation DG Regional Policy Brussels, 22.
Support Tools for ESF Evaluation
Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit DG EMPL Ines Hartwig
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
Management & Control, Designation of Authorities State of play
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
Evaluation of Youth Employment Initiative
Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid
Presentation transcript:

Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013

Overview of the presentation Introduction Main principles of ex-ante conditionality Assessment of ex-ante conditionalities: By Member States By Commission Suspension of interim payments Lifting of suspension of interim payments

Introduction

Types of conditionality proposed by the Commission Ex-ante conditionality: o Art. 17 CPR and Annex V CPR (Cohesion policy) Macroeconomic conditionality: o Art. 21 CPR Ex post conditionality (achievement of targets set in performance framework): o Art. 20 (4) CPR

Types of ex-ante conditionality Thematic ex-ante conditionalities are linked to investment priorities. Only those thematic ex-ante conditionalities need to be assessed which are linked to investment priorities selected by Member States. General ex-ante conditionalities are linked to horizontal aspects of programme implementation. They only apply to those programmes for which their fulfilment is relevant to the efficiency and effectiveness of investments in their programmes.

Main principles of ex- ante conditionality

How does it work: main principles (1) Ex-ante conditionalities are set out in the Fund-specific rules:  Cohesion policy: Annex V CPR Thematic ex-ante conditionalities are linked to investment priorities Applicability link to specific objective (SO) (see Art. 2 CPR for definition SO) introduction of definition of ‘applicable ex ante conditionality’: ‘A precisely predefined critical factor which is a necessary prerequisite for and has a direct and genuine link to and direct impact on the effective and efficient achievement of the specific objective for an investment priority or a Union priority’. Fulfilment limited to criteria for fulfilment in fund-specific rules

How does it work: main principles (2) Applicable ex-ante conditionalities: to be fulfilled before the start of the programming period If not fulfilled, to be fulfilled at the latest by  Action plan Non-fulfilment of ex-ante conditionalities may lead to the suspension of all or part of interim payments: o at the time of the adoption of the programmes in case of significant prejudice o by the deadline for fulfilment (action plan) Ex-ante conditionality does not apply to European Territorial Cooperation Programmes

Steps of Art. 17 CPR (for all ESI Funds) 1.Self-assessment by Member State on applicability and fulfilment + action plan in case applicable ex-ante conditionalities are not fulfilled 2.Commission assessment of adequacy and consistency of information provided by MS 3.Suspension of interim payments: 1.Upon adoption of the OP 2.In case of non-fulfilment of the actions by the deadline 4.Lifting of suspension

Self-assessment by Member States

Self-assessment by MS (Art. 17(2) CPR) When ? in the framework of establishment of PA and programmes  already in informal dialogue Who in MS ? Depending on the specific institutional arrangements: level that is responsible for fulfilment (national/regional) What ? Applicability and fulfilment. In case of non-fulfilment : action plan Important to start early, inform and involve the relevant Ministries

How to assess applicability ? For thematic ex-ante conditionalities: check Annex V CPR: conditionality linked to a selected IP ? For thematic and general ex-ante conditionalities: Art. 17 CPR: definition of applicability: check applicability in relation to specific objective

How to assess fulfilment? For thematic and general ex-ante conditionalities: limited to the criteria in fund- specific rules Need to assess fulfilment of each and every criterion  Provide reference to relevant documents demonstrating fulfilment

Action plan The action plan has to contain: Actions to be taken for each criterion that is not fulfilled Timetable for the actions: max. deadline Bodies responsible for fulfilment of the actions Need to report on fulfilment of actions not later than: Annual Implementation Report submitted in 2017 or Progress report submitted in 2017

Where to provide the information on self-assessment ? Partnership Agreement (Art. 14(1)(b)(iii) CPR) - Summary - Fulfilment of applicable ex-ante conditionalities at national level - Action plan Not: programmes to which they apply and priorities affected OP (Art. 87(6)(b) CPR - - Information to be in accordance with summary in PA - - Fulfilment of applicable ex-ante conditionalities of the OP (always in OP) - - Priorities which are affected - - Action Plan - - Quid information on applicability ?

Advice for self-assessment (based on test in ESF TWG) Start early Common understanding: share draft self- assessment and discuss on informal basis with the Geo Units Be short and to the point: do not include non- relevant information, but ensure that the (non) fulfilment of each criterion is motivated. Action plan: in case of applicable ex-ante conditionality which is not fulfilled: prepare action plan and start its implementation, possibly co- financed by the ESF.

Assessment by Commission

Assessment by Commission (Art. 17(4a) CPR) What ? Consistency and adequacy of the information provided by MS on applicability and fulfilment of applicable ex-ante conditionalities, i.e. self-assessment of MS, but also action plan When ? in the framework of assessment of PA and programmes  already in informal dialogue What if Commission disagrees with MS? Commission has burden of proof (Art. 17(4b) CPR)

Assessment of applicability by Commission Same as MS : check whether definition of applicability is fulfilled in relation to the specific objective.

Assessment of fulfilment by Commission Limited to the criteria for fulfilment Respect national and regional competences to decide on the specific and adequate policy measures including the content of strategies BUT need to assess fulfilment of criteria Basis for assessment: i.a. CSRs, SWD on NRP

Assessment of fulfilment by Commission – Preparatory action (to be) taken General guidance (forthcoming) Specific guidance on all ex-ante conditionalities (forthcoming) Discussion with MS in informal dialogue (cfr. position papers): come to mutual understanding

Assessment of action plan by Commission Adequacy of action plan: will it lead to fulfilment of the ex-ante conditionality criteria ? Deadline of : maximum Commission accepts proportionality for action plan  Important if not all criteria for fulfilment of an applicable ex-ante conditionality are ‘relevant’ for efficiency and effectiveness of achievement of the specific objective

Suspension of interim payments

Suspension of interim payments: upon adoption of the OP In which case? to avoid significant prejudice to the effectiveness and efficiency of the achievement of a specific objective What ? All or part of the interim payments related to the relevant priority axis  proportionality: actions to be taken and funds at risk Option for the Commission, no obligation

Suspension of interim payments: failure to complete the actions by the deadline What ? All or part of the interim payments related to the relevant priority axis  proportionality: actions to be taken and funds at risk Basis for suspending interim payments: no obligation Information on fulfilment to be provided at the latest in AIR in 2017 or Progress Report in 2017 Need for Commission observations within 60 days of submission of the report (Art. 17(5a) CPR)

Lifting of suspension of interim payments

o Upon completion of the actions to fulfil applicable ex-ante conditionalities o Upon OP amendment leading to non- applicability of ex-ante conditionalities

THANK YOU !