PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS Requirements, Modifications, and Additions to the MiExcel Statewide System of Supports.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Focus Schools Presented by: Michigan Department of Education Webinar Presentation by: Joann Neuroth, Office of Education Improvement and Innovation (OEII)
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.
Presented by Lawrence Dennis Education Consultant for the Office for Exceptional Children October 23, 2014 OCTA Fall Conference.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Monitoring Local GSRPs Linda Stachowiak Preschool Services Supervisor.
State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Providence School Board September 10, 2012 Introductory Briefing Providence Public School District Comprehensive Information Technology Blueprint Center.
The Role of Program Specialists in Oklahoma Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Statewide System of Support Services and Programs Greg Alexander, Director.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Enhancing Education through Technology Grant: Improving Instruction Through Regional Data Initiatives.
Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Kathleen Smith, Director Lynn Sodat, School Improvement Specialist Jo Ann Burkholder, Student.
GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT COLLEGE AND CAREER READY FOR ALL Guidance and Counseling Fall 2011.
Statewide System of Support 9/11/20151 ESEA Flexibility Waiver March 22, 2012.
Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 4 January 7, 2014 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
1 Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 August 11, 2009 State Board of Education.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September 1, 2009 Webinar Fred Balcom, Director, District.
IMPLEMENTING TITLE I IN BARROW COUNTY SCHOOLS ANNUAL PARENT MEETING Haymon-Morris Middle School
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Macomb County Support for Priority & Focus Schools Judith P. Pritchett, PhD Chief Academic Officer Macomb Intermediate School District
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
Supporting the Improvement of Washington Districts and Schools.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY REQUEST September 26, 2012 Educational Service District 113 Andy Kelly, Assistant Superintendent, Travis Campbell, Director K12 Office.
Case Facilitators: A Best Practice Model for Evaluation, Due Process and Coordination.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
MAS/FPS Fall Directors’ Workshop MDE OFS Updates October 2014 Office of Field Services.
Sol C. Johnson High School Wednesday September 23, 2015 (11:00am and 5:30pm) Auditorium.
EXPECTATIONS FOR MICHIGAN’S FOCUS SCHOOLS 11/12/20151 FOCUS SCHOOL WEBINAR Office of Education Improvement and Innovation School Support Unit August 27,
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Edit the text with your own short phrases. To change the sample image, select the picture and delete it. Now click the Pictures icon in the placeholder.
Title I Updates Donna Brown, Director North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Federal Program Monitoring and Support September 29,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Little Mill Middle School Title I Parent Involvement We can’t do it without you! Presenters: Kimberly DeRose, Parent Coordinator Kari Shepherd, Lead Title.
Scaling Up: Responding to Financial Constraints Through the Lens of Implementation North Santiam School District Fall Conference 2010.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Take One! ™ Jumpstarting Your National Board Teaching Certification Process.
AYP Regional Meetings Minnesota Department of Education School Improvement Division Southeast Service Cooperative August 18, 2010.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
The Statewide System of Support & Regional Roundtables.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Focus Schools 1. How are Focus Schools identified?  Title I schools with in-school gaps between the highest- achieving.
MDE Office of Special Education Teri L. Chapman, Ed.S., Director February 17, 2016 MAASE.
IMPLEMENTING TITLE I IN BARROW COUNTY SCHOOLS ANNUAL PARENT MEETING
Oregon Department of Education Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Field Services Presenter:Bob Siewert, Associate Superintendent Presentation to the.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS ADVISORY TEAM MEETING WELCOME Brenda B. Blackburn, Superintendent Berkeley County School District November 17, 2015, 5:30 pm.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
MI Excel Collaborative Partner Meeting
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Next Steps for Oregon’s Focus Schools Summer 2013
TRUMBULL COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Presentation transcript:

PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS Requirements, Modifications, and Additions to the MiExcel Statewide System of Supports

INGHAM’S VISION Districts/Schools will receive individualized and customized supports that meet existing needs and expectations. Ingham motto for supporting Priority and Focus schools is the same as for all schools : Standardized research practice customize implementation. It is our belief that our districts have the knowledge and know-how needed to improve student achievement, but lack the time needed to rapidly implement substantive change. Our goal is to provide expertise and resources to support the time and energy needed to promote improvement.

PRIORITY SCHOOLS: 12 SCHOOLS IN INGHAM COUNTY What are Priority Schools? Schools in the bottom 5% of the Top-to-Bottom rankings How are Priority Schools determined? Based on the Top-to-Bottom ranking methodology which includes data from achievement, improvement, and achievement gap standardized scores. All schools with two years of data for 30 or more students in two or more tested subjects are included in the ranking. *Mandatory 4-year Cohort

PRIORITY SCHOOLS: 12 SCHOOLS IN INGHAM COUNTY Annual Requirements: Service Plan Data Dialogues Reform Plan Development and Implementation Unpacking Tool Superintendents Drop Out Challenge District Level Resource Alignment Survey School Level Resource Alignment Survey Survey of Enacted Curriculum Instructional Learning Cycles 4 (quarterly) School Board Reports *Reporting on Assist, MEGS+, and SRO Monitor Visits

FOCUS SCHOOLS: 22 SCHOOLS IN INGHAM COUNTY What are Focus Schools? Focus Schools are schools with the largest achievement gaps, defined as the difference between the average scale score for the top 30% of students and the bottom 30% of students. These schools are derived from the achievement gap component within the Top-to-Bottom ranking. How are they determined? Focus Schools are based on the Top-to-Bottom ranking methodology which includes data from achievement, improvement, and achievement gaps in standardized scores. Included in the ranking are all open schools with two years of data for 30 or more students in two or more tested subjects. *Mandatory 4-year Cohort

FOCUS SCHOOLS : 22 SCHOOLS IN INGHAM COUNTY Annual Requirements: Data Dialogues Focus Plan Development and Implementation Teaching and Learning Priorities Diagnostic Revise District Improvement Plan Superintendents Drop Out Challenge District Level Resource Alignment Survey School Level Resource Alignment Survey 4 (quarterly) School Board Reports Year 3 begins Tittle I set-asides *Reporting on Assist and MEGS+

Priority and Focus schools requirements Priority school required activities Service Plan Data Dialogues Reform Plan Development and Implementation Unpacking Tool Superintendents Drop Out Challenge District Level Resource Alignment Survey School Level Resource Alignment Survey Survey of Enacted Curriculum Instructional Learning Cycles 4 (quarterly) School Board Reports *Reporting on Assist, MEGS+, and SRO Monitor Visits Focus school required activities Data Dialogues Focus Plan Development and Implementation Teaching and Learning Priorities Diagnostic Revise District Improvement Plan Superintendents Drop Out Challenge District Level Resource Alignment Survey School Level Resource Alignment Survey 4 (quarterly) School Board Reports Year 3 begins Tittle I set-asides *Reporting on Assist and MEGS+

PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS : WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR YOU? Transition: Districts/Schools that were supported by Steve Hecker or Nora Evers from MSU will transition over to our ISD Team completely after December 31 st. Districts supported by Sean Williams will continue with Sean. Between now and then MSU and Ingham ISD will coordinated activities and communications regarding the current work going on in all of your schools to create a smooth transition.

PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS : WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR YOU? District Level Priority: Laura Colligan Cell: Elementary Priority Schools: Dot Blackwell Cell: (517) Secondary Priority Schools: Sean Williams Cell: Director of Student Instructional Services ( Supervision Roberta Perconti Cell: (269) Priority Schools: While Laura, Dot, Sean and Roberta will all support Priority schools, below are the point of contacts for each level.

State-Wide System of Supports New Director: Grant Chandler

For information regarding MI Excel Statewide System of Support for Priority Schools, contact: District Level Support (IS) (DIF) Building Level Support (SIF) Beth Brophy School Support Team Coordinator (269) Calhoun ISD provides coordination for Intermediate School Districts and Regional Educational Service Agencies who provide School Improvement Facilitators to work directly with Title 1 Priority Schools as outlined in the ESEA Flexibility Waiver of This work is funded by a grant awarded by the Michigan Association of Intermediate School Administrators on behalf of the Michigan Department of Education. This project is currently being coordinated for Calhoun ISD by Beth Brophy. Role is to provide Statewide training for ISD/District Staff

PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS : HOW WILL WE SUPPORT YOU. We commit to supporting the following: Assist in meeting MDE guidelines and expectations Communicating with MDE for clarity as needed Support the efforts of school leadership in plan implementation Coordinate/provide additional resources as requested by school leadership.

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES Michigan State University’s program involvement ends on December 31, 2014 MSU was responsible for providing and monitoring the work of Instructional Specialist (ISs) for Priority Schools and District Improvement Facilitators (DIFs) for Focus Schools Starting January 1, 2015 the ISs and DIFs duties and tasks assigned by MDE become the responsibility of the ISDs via Regional Assistance Grants (RAGs)

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES The RAG allocation for all Year 1 Priority schools is $20,000, for years 2-4 see below. EnrollmentFunding per School Fewer than 350$65,000 From $80,000 From $100,000 From $130, or more$155,000 RAG FUNDING FORMULA (PRIORITY)

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES One Intervention Specialist per district: $37,000 (50 days, includes $1000 travel and $1000 technology and office support) $33,375 for 2014/15 RAG FUNDING FORMULA (PRIORITY)

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES RAG FUNDING FORMULA (FOCUS) One District Improvement Facilitator per district and every ISD will get a RAG for this service: $6500 (40 hours, includes $500 travel and $1000 technology and office support) $5688 for 2014/15

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES How these changes impact the roles of IDSs: From 2012 to 2014 the ISDs were responsible for providing School Improvement Facilitators (SIFs) to Priority Schools. As of January 1 st the ISDs are required to also provide the district- level support formerly provided through MSU

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES Ingham’s Response: To strengthen MiExcel program coherence, Ingham ISD has restructured the School Improvement Facilitator’s position and responsibilities to focus on both district and school level requirements to support the alignment of goals, resources, and efforts.

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES Ingham’s Response: The ISD has also expanded the SIF support positions from 1 to 2.5 FTE and will continue to provide supervision to directly coordinate the work.

HOW THIS IMPACTS THE WORK OF INGHAM DISTRICTS AND SCHOOLS The ISD will be providing significantly more support. Our team has been trained and directed to: Support the meeting of MDE requirements and expectations Support the work you already have underway Support the use of data throughout all levels Coordinate districts and school level request for additional support when needed

Questions you may have ….