LCPC RESEARCH ARM TO BE TRANSFORMED INTO A RESEARCH INCUBATOR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Co-Chair.
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre April 1, 2010.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
HARRINGTON d e p a r t m e n t of b I o e n g i n e e r i n g Eric J. Guilbeau, Ph.D. Olin Professor and Chair Bioengineering Seed Grant Program.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4
McLean Promotion to Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School Maureen T. Connelly, MD, MPH McLean Hospital February 3, 2010.
HRB Webinar Health Research Awards Content Objective of the call Scope and Panels Principal Investigator Response to peer-reviewers (rebuttal) Some.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
WELCOME! We will begin our webinar at the top of the hour As you log on, do not be surprised if you don’t hear anyone else; participants are placed on.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Grantwriting. Types of Grants Foundation Grants HancockREADS Grants Hancock Education Fund Grants.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
© 2003 IBM Corporation July 2004 Technology planning for not-for-profit organizations IBM volunteer name Title, organization.
The Union/ MSF Model for sustainable operational research The Union, Paris, France MSF, Brussels, Belgium.
Performance Measurement: A Brief Introduction For Kunuwanimano Child and Family Services.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Scott Loveridge Director, North Central Regional Center for Rural Development Professor, Dept. of Ag., Food & Res Econ Michigan State University Small.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
Active Aging: Supporting Individuals and Enhancing Community-based Care Through Health Information Technology Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Technical.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Presubmission Proposal Reviews at the College of Nursing (CON) Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor.
Maine SIM Evaluation Subcommittee April 2015 April 22, 2015.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
1 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Administrative Support for Large- Scale Funding Applications – Session.
The HMO Research Network (HMORN) is a well established alliance of 18 research departments in the United States and Israel. Since 1994, the HMORN has conducted.
Atlantic Innovation Fund Round VIII February 5, 2008.
Why Write A Grant? Elaine M. Hylek, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Director, Education and Training Division BU CTSI Section of General Internal.
2015/2016 PSIEE Seed Grant Information Session October 21, 2015.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Subsistence Management Federal Subsistence Board January 12-13, 2016 Work Session.
3CTN “Ask Me” Campaign Training Slides. Introduction 3CTN Ask Me Campaign Training Slides March CTN Objectives 1. To improve patient access to.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
©2012 THE ADVISORY BOARD COMPANY ADVISORY.COM Gaining Provider Feedback In February – March 2014, we administered a medical staff survey to employed &
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Developing a proposal Dónal O’Mathúna, PhD Senior Lecturer in Ethics, Decision-Making & Evidence
Nurse Education Practice Quality and Retention- Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Behavioral Health Integration (NEPQR-IPCP:BHI) Program FY 2016.
FYAP Grants Workshop College of Education Breakout Session Motoko Akiba Associate Professor ELPS 5/5/2016.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
Support National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) CARD/SPCU 1.
A Novel Faculty Development & Promotion Opportunity for Junior Clinical Track Physician Faculty Jean Malouin, M.D. M.P.H. James Peggs, M.D. Department.
Rigor and Transparency in Research
Title Investigators and sites. Clinical Trial Proposal Presentation Template for open forum at the 2017 ASM.
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
2017 Convening & Collaborating (C2) Awards
Information Session February 6, :00-4:45 pm
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
MUHC Innovation Model.
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Grant Writing Information Session
Information Session January 18, :00-1:45 pm
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Russell Center Small Research Grants Program
WCHRI Innovation Grants Application information session 2018
K R Investigator Research Question
Information Session October 13, 2016
Research funding application process
WCHRI Innovation Grants Application information session 2019
<PI’s Name & Institution>
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Presentation transcript:

LCPC RESEARCH ARM TO BE TRANSFORMED INTO A RESEARCH INCUBATOR

What is it? An attempt to jump-start and sustain high quality, innovative palliative care research projects in Singapore that are likely to have a real world impact –Recognizes the wealth of clinical and scientific talent in palliative care –Takes into account the high constraints and competing priorities faced by palliative care providers

Mission To foster an environment that generates high quality and highly collaborative palliative care research projects and researchers

What does it do? Overseen by Eric Finkelstein, Executive Director for LCPC with inputs by faculty of Duke-NUS, Singhealth, AMRI, and local and international experts in palliative care research Offers support in the following areas for those who qualify: –Direct funding –Manpower –Subject matter/research expertise –Budgeting –IRB submission –Project management –Data collection –Statistical analysis –Manuscript writing Provides an efficient model for busy clinicians

What are the research themes? Priority for funding will be given to the following four areas identified in National Strategy for Palliative Care as having significant gaps in the current knowledge base: 1.Understanding and meeting patient/caregiver preferences regarding end-of-life care 2.Communication at end-of-life 3.End-of-life care financing and delivery models 4.Pain and symptom management at the end of life

Are there any funding priorities? As LCPC has limited funding for research, funding priority will be given to projects that: Fall within the listed research priorities Are likely to impact end-of-life care in Singapore Are likely to generate high quality research outputs (publications in top field and/or high impact journals) Provide training opportunities for aspiring palliative care researchers Are likely to better position the PI for future research studies

Who is eligible? Any Singapore-based researcher in any field, with a primary appointment in a local public hospital/public health institution/public university/academic medical center and salaried by the institution Researchers external to Singapore who plan to conduct the research in Singapore and have at least one Singapore- based co-investigator on their research team

How does it work? Prospective PIs discuss potential research ideas with a Senior LCPC or AMRI research team member If the idea has potential, PI submits a two-page research proposal to LCPC for review Screening by senior LCPC research team member and feedback Proposal scheduled for presentation at LCPC forum; presentation first screened by LCPC research team member

LCPC Research forums Once every two weeks beginning in February/March 2013 Involves 1 or 2 presentations of 30 to 40 minutes each During lunch hours (12-1pm) or in evenings (5-6 pm) to encourage busy clinicians to attend these meetings To be held at Duke-NUS and National Cancer Center on a rotating basis May be held in conjunction with AMRI forums If the PI is based outside Singapore, a Singapore based co- investigator from the research team to present the proposal and the PI to participate in discussions by Skype /telephone call

Audience Members of the LCPC and AMRI research team (possibly including local research advisory board (LRAB) members) Key members from PI’s team Any PI who receives LCPC funding will be expected to attend the forums and/or send a designated co-investigator to encourage greater feedback in the ongoing research forums, and to continue to build capacity Anyone interested in palliative care research will be encouraged to attend

What happens after the presentation? The audience provides feedback to the PI (with the aim of improving the proposed research plan) Based on the feedback, the PI makes modifications or expands the research plan Additional forum presentation(s) if required After the first or second presentation, if the proposal fails to meet standards for scientific merit/funding priorities, it is rejected from further consideration for LCPC support in that round Proposals not approved for funding can be resubmitted to LCPC in subsequent rounds after taking into account the recommendations of LRAB/ ERAB

How are proposals assessed? If shortlisted for funding consideration (after the first or second presentation): The PI to submit a revised presentation/proposal and a project budget (with help from the business manager at LCPC) Review and scoring of the revised proposal by a local LCPC Research Advisory Board (LRAB) Proposals with total costs (direct plus indirect) above $150,000 to be sent to an external advisory board (ERAB) for review and comment On a quarterly basis, LCPC Director will decide which proposals to fund (based on feedback from the Research Director and advisory boards and on budget availability)

What happens after a proposal is approved for funding? The proposals will be funded and the PI will be responsible for carrying out the proposed work The PI will be strongly encouraged to take advantage of the LCPC resources rather than hiring his/her own staff LCPC will encourage the PI to include at least one LCPC researcher as a Co-investigator if that would strengthen the research

Proposals approved for funding The PI or a delegate will be expected to make regular updates on the project status at the research forums This will provide an opportunity to address any concerns that may arise with the research in a timely manner

PRESENTATION TEMPLATE

Research Proposal Presentation (Template with presentation guidelines) Note: All information is furnished to the Lien Centre for Palliative Care (LCPC) with the understanding that it shall be used or disclosed for evaluation, reference, and reporting purposes only. LCPC RESEARCH INCUBATOR MEETING (Date)

Presentation-Guidelines 30 to 40 minute presentation (with questions) – Roughly slides

Title Title of Research (Brief, include the variables included in the study, the type of relationship among the variables the population to which the results may be applied, Avoid single-word titles)

Research team Investigator name RolePositionDepartmentInstitution

Specific Aims & Hypotheses Explain the nature of the research project Primary aim/s – Hypotheses (primary outcome to be tested) Secondary aim/s – Hypotheses (secondary outcomes) Why/how is this project novel ?  1-2 slides

Significance Explain the context of the problem and why it is important to solve it – What is already known ? – What are the gaps in knowledge?-Discuss the prior work(literature) on the proposed problem, gaps identified, and how your proposed research will provide additional knowledge  1-2 slides

Research Design Methodological Overview Participant recruitment and data collection (if applicable) Inclusion/exclusion criteria (if applicable) Statistical analysis Plan including primary and secondary outcome variables Sample size and power calculation Timeline  3-4 slides

Preliminary work (if any)

How does this project meet funding criteria for LCPC Does this project fall within priority research criteria? What is the likely real world impact of this study on end-of-life care in Singapore? Will the research result in a grant submission to ? If so, who is the funding agency? Will it generate publications? If so, how many and what are the target journals? How will the research strengthen the credentials of the PI for future research opportunities? Will the research provide training opportunities for aspiring palliative care researchers Will there be other research outputs?  2-3 slides