REDD+ A sub-national pilot project in CHIAPAS, MEXICO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADDRESSING FOREST GOVERNANCE THROUGH REDD+
Advertisements

REDD+ Methodologies for Regional and Local Land- cover Thelma Krug Co-Chair of the IPCC Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Head of INPE´s.
INDONESIA: UN-REDD PROGRESS Montreaux, Switzerland 15 June 2009.
The UN-REDD Programme Measurement, Assessment, Reporting and Verification (MARV) Issues and Options for REDD 10 March 2009 Peter Holmgren.
Trend of international discussions on the UNFCCC
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Climate change initiatives Capacity Challenges.
CAMPECHE REDD+ State Strategy GCF task force – Palangka Raya, September 2011 Jorge Mendoza, Evelia Rivera, Ben de Jong, Victor Ku, El Colegio de la Frontera.
INTRODUCTION Organogram of DoF My role In the Department of Forestry
The status of science to support REDD+ based mitigation policies of Mexico Bernardus de Jong, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur Fernando Paz, Colegio de Postgraduados.
1ECOTOURISM - Rural and Adventure Tourism -. 2 STRENGTHS Wide difussion of the State worldwide (Chiapas as a selling icon) Natural and cultural biodiversity.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Component 3: Climate resilience and low carbon strategies developed Activity Progress and Component Strategy.
OpportunitiesChallengesNeeds Already have 217 recognized FLMMA sites. Not ecologically representativeMaps of reef habitats to help optimize design Organizations.
Capacity Enhancement for Air Quality Management John E. Hay Senior Advisor UNEP ROAP & IETC.
Katoomba Group Training Initiative Climate Change, Markets and Services Welcome and Introduction Course Introduction and Guidelines Participant Introduction:
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
GEF and Environmental & Conservation Funds Presentation for the Workshop on “Management of Environmental Funds for the Financial Sustainability of Biodiversity.
GEF SPA-UNDP Project Implementing Pilot Climate Change Adaptation Measures in Coastal Areas of U R U G U A Y Warsaw, November 16, 2013.
The TNA Process in Costa Rica Experiences and lessons learned Francisco Sancho Advisor TNA
Module 1.1 UNFCCC context and requirements and introduction to IPCC guidelines REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank.
Presentation by Alfred N. Gichu Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness.
Module 1.1 UNFCCC context and requirements and introduction to IPCC guidelines REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank.
National Demonstrators Summit 07 February 2011, Roma - Italy 07 February 2011, Roma - Italy.
Francisco Sancho.  C-Neutrality (vision) should become a conductive strategy (action): Roadmap for the different sectors  Several development and CC.
Cross-cutting areas of Capacity Building and Adaptation UNDP Workshop for NIS Environmental Focal Points June 2004.
Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza Results of the e-consultation: What Steps has South America Taken on REDD? Consuelo Espinosa.
Bhola Bhattarai General Secretary, FECOFUN 25 September, 2009 Bangkok Community Perspective in REDD Mechanism.
SDCG-4, Caltech, CA, USA 4 th -6 th September 2013 Author/Presenter MRV & Reporting Status & Related Space Data.
GLOBAL DIRECTION IN REDD APPROACHES AND METHODOLOGY DEVELOPMENT SINCE COP-14 UNFCCC Nur Masripatin Regional Coordinator of ARKN-FCC
CCIAM Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation in Tanzania Maliondo, S.M.S. Programme Coordinator CCIAM Programme SUA, Tanzania
Update from the International Blue Carbon Policy Working Group 1 st workshop July, 2011 J. Tamelander.
REDD+ After Cancun: Moving from Negotiation to Implementation
National Forest Monitoring Systems: M & MRV in the context of REDD+ Activities MJ Sanz, FAO REDD MRV Workshop for developing a roadmap to establish an.
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM & FORESTRY CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM & FORESTRY OPPORTUNITIES FOR CAMBODIAN FORESTERS AND CONSERVATIONISTS by Thanakvaro.
European capacity building initiativeecbi Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries Fellows´ Recommendations, Oxford Seminar 2007 european.
Governors’ Climate & Forests Task Force Overview of Activities & Objectives William Boyd GCF Secretariat Chiapas, Mexico March 22, 2011.
Guidance for Implementation of National Forests Monitoring Systems KENYA MGD Session Sydney, Australia March 4 th – 6 th 2015.
REDD+ Guiana Plateau project First Steering Committee Meeting Paramaribo, 6 August 2013 Rene Somopawiro SBB, Suriname.
R-PLAN and REDD activities Review Lao PDR Flag of your country.
Global Forest Observations Initiative Simon Eggleston GFOI SDCG 5, Rome, Italy, 25 Feb 2014,
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
ECOTOURISM Southeastern Mexico Program Otavalo, Ecuador. April Mónica G. Morales Mendoza.
NATIONAL REDD+ STRATEGY MEXICO GCF task force – Palangka Raya, September 2011 Jorge Mendoza, Ben de Jong, Victor Ku, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur.
Where and how can REDD+ deliver most benefits? Lera Miles, UNEP-WCMC 7 December 2015.
Towards a comprehensive Monitoring Framework for REDD+ Peter Holmgren FAO 5 December 2010.
Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting Globally-important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project Rome, 7-9 June 2004 Components and Processes.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop July 6 – 9, 2011 Dakar, Senegal.
REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat.
EXPERIENCE IN DEVELOPING APPROACHES TO REDD-PLUS SAFEGUARDS UN-REDD SEPC WORKSHOP Geneva, Switzerland February 2012 FORESTER MARLEA P. MUÑEZ WISE.
Monitoring and MRV context of the Country National Forest Inventory (NFI): the previous NFI has not covered some forest type (the sampling strategy did.
3. Salvaguardas para REDD+ REDD+ Safeguards. Activity Identification of REDD+ risks and opportunities RisksOpportunities.
Support to National REDD+ Action: Global Programme Framework (SNA) Work Plan and Budget 2015 Information and Knowledge Sharing Sessions Twelfth.
Social impacts, integrity and MRV for REDD+ in Bangladesh Estelle Fach, UNDP Mariam Akhter, FAO Dhaka, Bangladesh, 7 April 2013.
Duncan Marsh The Nature Conservancy Inter-American Development Bank June 7, 2007 Reducing Deforestation in Developing Countries: Critical Issues and Directions.
UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries FAO-UNDP-UNEP April 2008.
PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH A REGIONAL AMAZONIAN BIODIVERSITY NODE Ambassador Mauricio Dorfler – ACTO Executive Director Amazonian Biodiversity Workshop Quito,
Implementing REDD+ Sarah Marlay, US Forest Service, May 9, 2016.
REDD+ and biodiversity
MINISTRY OF ENERGY, NATURAL RESOURCES, THE ENVIRONMENT AND MINES (SERNAM) The UN-REDD Programme July
Country needs assessment Madagascar: Progress and next steps
Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness Activities
Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity
Technical support/capacity building to:
REDD+ INDONESIA through REDDCompass Platform
QUANTIFYING TROPICAL WETLAND BIOMASS AND CARBON STOCKS
Safeguards and Co-benefits in a REDD+ Mechanism Garanties et co-bénéfices liés au mécanisme REDD+ With support from the Norwegian Development Agency.
‘From REDD+ readiness to implementation’
Global Meeting of the DS-SLM Project
ecbi european capacity building initiative
NDC GLOBAL CONFERENCE How transformational change promotes ambitious NDCs - assessing the potential of policies Government Secretariat of Climate Change.
Presentation transcript:

REDD+ A sub-national pilot project in CHIAPAS, MEXICO

Mexico introduced the R-PIN to the World Bank and its was adopted in July At national level, a multi-agency group begun to work on REDD+ national strategy (R-PP approved). This group promoted the initiative to implement pilot projects for resolving the challenges of the process. Una REDD+ para Chiapas

The Chiapas state was selected based on: – Diversity of forest ecosystems (mangrove forest, temperate forest); – Has social and cultural diversity (coexistence of different indigenous groups) with a complexity of social relations and high vulnerability to climate change. – Existence of priority ecosystems (Rainforest), high biodiversity and emblematic Mesoamerican species( the quetzal, the peacock, the jaguar, etc.). For this reason the implementation of REDD + in such a complex environment is challenging the scientific, technical, social and political issues. Chiapas as Sub-national Pilot project

Una REDD+ para Chiapas Chiapas State Government: – Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Vivienda e Historia Natural del Estado de Chiapas (SEMAVIHN) Mexico Federal Government: – Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP) – Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR) – Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano en México (CBMM) Research institutes – El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR) – El Colegio de Posgraduados (COLPOS) – Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) NGO – AMBIO – Pronatura Sur – MASCAFE – Conservación Internacional (CI)

The great value of the initiative of the group “UNA REDD+ para Chiapas” is the effort and the ability to make decisions by consensus among different levels and sectors of government, local and international organizations for developing a more comprehensive and participatory process, as its evolve.

REDD+ strategies Safeguards: The success depends on increasing the quality of life in communities as well as conserve biodiversity and the ecosystems services. And of full recognition of property rights Include the "+“: conservation of carbon stocks of forests, sustainable management of forests and increase carbon stocks of forests. Is a tool: REDD+ is a tool to promote sustainable development and conservation of biodiversity and not only to reduce carbon emissions into the atmosphere.

Strategy components To strengthen and promote recognition of the knowledge and experiences on resources management developed by Ejidos and communities in Chiapas. To promote communities full participation in the REDD+. To build capacity and empower local organizations and institutions. To inform specific recommendations to public policy design and to adapt current frameworks. To design a monitor, report and verification (MRV) system robust, reliable and cost-effective

Bottom up Strategy

Bottom up MRV At local level, the minimum scale of application for REDD + is going to be the community. Each community would has its own baseline. This is possible because: – Mexico have many satellite images. – and have database of measurements of C in different ecosystems.

Clase de Cobertura Type Forest Cover

Densidad de Cobertura Density Forest Cover

Tipo de Estrato Type Forest Layer

Estado de Cobertura Status Forest Cover

Concept Model “Una REDD para CHIAPAS”

Transition Matrix (ton C/ha) (biomass and soil)

Conclusions Chiapas Sub-national Pilot Project is going to provide lessons learned and methodologies to the National Level. In Chiapas it has been developed a community monitoring methodology that considers all of the IPCC carbon stocks (tree biomass, herbaceous biomass, litter, dead matter and soil), associated with the methodologies used in national inventories of forests and soils. The monitoring process will be conducted by community technicians. They will quantify their carbon in the sampling sites.

Conclusion The community monitoring will help to: – 1) reduce the uncertainty of the estimation via the spectral interpretation of images, and calibrate algorithms – 2) will build capacity in communities to enable them to quantify and monitor data in real time the carbon stored and captured in their fields, on a reliable way. This initiative will enable community participation in the REDD + from the starting point and allow them to take control of monitoring their own resources. They will also be owners of the information generated and therefore will have elements for local decision- making to manage their production systems within a policy to REDD +.

THANK YOU