2007 California Fire Siege MACS Operation Center October 21-31, 2007 AFTER ACTION REVIEW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of the Incident Command System
Advertisements

Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Task Force Task Force Southern CA MACS Orientation – 2010.
Airport Emergency Plan - Overview
National Incident Management System (NIMS)
Functional Areas & Positions
Module 16 Objectives 1. Describe the kinds of incident management problems that can occur due to a lack of multiagency coordination. 2. Define essential.
Incident Command System
Public Health Seattle & King County Incident Command System Overview May 2004.
SEMS/NIMS/ICS Combined Course ACTION PLANNING OVERVIEW.
WELCOME TO INNG EMERGENCY OPERATIONS LIAISON OFFICER OVERVIEW
National Incident Management System (NIMS)  Part of Homeland Security Presidential Directive-5, February 28,  Campuses must be NIMS compliant in.
Future Past, Present and Future Yesterday Tomorrow? Today.
Contra Costa County CERT Program Unit 6 – CERT Organization Released: 18 August 2010.
Connecticut Emergency Management and Response
Visual 3.1 Unified Command Unit 3: Unified Command.
Visual 3.1 Unified Command Unit 3: Unified Command.
IS 700.a NIMS An Introduction. The NIMS Mandate HSPD-5 requires all Federal departments and agencies to: Adopt and use NIMS in incident management programs.
Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Quick Reference Guide Mutual Aid Defined Authorities Mutual Aid Process Mutual Aid Considerations Mutual aid is the voluntary.
Last Update: 3/11/2015. When the complexity or magnitude of the incident(s) exceeds capacity of the local unit(s), Area Command will: Manage Type 1, 2,
IS-0700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Contractor Management and Accountability July :00 AM EUCOM and AFRICOM.
California Common Operating Picture (Cal COP) for Public Safety
Rapid Assessment A quick evaluation of a disaster/emergency impacted area.
Unit Introduction and Overview
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Part of a Broader Strategy
NIMS Command and Management IS-0700.A – October 2014 Visual 6.1 NIMS Command and Management Unit 6.
Incident Command System (ICS)
CITIZEN CORPS & CERT ORGANIZATIONS. What is Citizen Corps? Following the tragic events that occurred on September 11, 2001, state and local government.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Introduction to Incident Command System (IS 100b)
Principles and Practices
October 27, 2005 Contra Costa Operational Area Homeland Security Strategic and Tactical Planning and Hazardous Materials Response Assessment Project Overview.
Emergency Planning Steps 5 steps in emergency planning Step 1: Establish a team Step 2: Analyze capabilities and hazards Step 3: Conduct vulnerability.
Catastrophe Management for Executives: A Primer Catastrophe Management for Executives: A Primer.
Foundational Doctrine Guiding Fire Suppression in the Forest Service Product of the Pulaski Conference June 2005.
1 A Regional Approach to Research/Monitoring in Southern California Chris Crompton County of Orange National Monitoring Conference May 10, 2006.
Unit 6: Unified Command. Unit Objectives  Define Unified Command.  List the advantages of Unified Command.  Identify the primary features of Unified.
Incident Prioritization, Resource Mobilization & Allocation An Overview of NW MAC Operations And Resource Allocation Strategies February 18, 2015.
San Diego County Wildfires 2007 Student Support Services Student Services and Programs Division Randolph E. Ward, Ed.D, County Superintendent of Schools.
Lessons Learned From the Field: Southern California Wildfires and Hurricane Katrina Emergency Management for Schools June 4-5, 2008 ~ San Francisco, California.
“Smells Like Trouble!” The LEA Disaster Response.
Key Terms Business Continuity Plan (BCP) – A comprehensive written plan to maintain or resume business in the event of a disruption Critical Process –
Disaster Planning Workshop Hosted By: Pleasantview Fire Protection District.
What Is an Incident? An incident is an occurrence, caused by either human or natural phenomena, that requires response actions to prevent or minimize.
Unit 4: Operational Phases and Implementation. Unit 4 Objectives  Explain the four phases of continuity and relate their application to the continuity.
3 Unit 3. 3  Discuss the purpose of the National Incident Management System (NIMS).  Discuss the utility of NIMS at a fire incident.  Describe the.
Implementing Multiagency Coordination IS-701.A – February 2010 Visual 4.1 Unit 4: Implementing Multiagency Coordination.
Community Emergency Response Team
Authority: Who Does What?. Los Angeles – Long Beach Area Contingency Plan Marine Firefighting and Salvage Plan.
Unified Command “Working Together for a Common Goal” Kevin C. Easton, Captain Sarasota County Fire Department Kevin C. Easton, Captain Sarasota County.
Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response Division of Emergency Operations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
Incident Command System Nevada Department of Corrections.
Introduction to the Emergency Operations Center City of Santa Cruz 2011 EOC Training and Exercise.
B ASIC I NCIDENT C OMMAND S YSTEM A N I NTRODUCTION D AVID C HAPLIN, H OSPITAL P REPAREDNESS T RAINER.
Utilizing Your Business Continuity Plan.
California Deployment of the Next Generation Incident Command System (NICS) as Situation Awareness & Collaboration Tool (SCOUT) Firescope Brief.
Business Continuity / Recovery
Incident Command System
State EOC Operations in Agro Event
Emergency Planning Steps
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Introduction to: National Response Plan (NRP)
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Review of the Incident Command System
Organizational Flexibility
Unified Command Unit 1.2.
Unit 4: Area Command.
Presentation transcript:

2007 California Fire Siege MACS Operation Center October 21-31, 2007 AFTER ACTION REVIEW

2007 Southern California Fire Siege During the 2007 California Fire Siege, there were numerous emergency management successes, with nearly 1 million people successfully evacuated, and thousands of threatened homes and businesses saved. This catastrophic cascade of region- wide wildfire disasters resulted in approximately 518,000 acres burned, 10 lives lost, 116 persons injured, 4 commercial buildings and 2,008 residences destroyed.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege The Southern California fire siege began on October 20, During the first four days of this sustained wind event, firefighting agencies successfully suppressed 251 fires, or approximately 90 percent of the ignitions during the initial attack phase. Even though firefighters’ initial attack efforts on the numerous fires were highly successful in protecting life, property and resources, a number of these fires raged into large fire scenarios.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege At 0800 hours on October 22, 2007 the MAC Group convened at the Southern California Operations Coordination Center in Riverside (South Ops).

2007 Southern California Fire Siege  Establish priorities for response  Allocate critical resources based on established priorities  Communicate systems Integration  Coordinate Information  Intergovernmental decision coordination  Develop geographic strategies and contingency plans MAC Group Objectives

Each operational period, using the Incident Priority Rating Matrix (MACS Form 429), the MAC Group prioritized the incidents based on the most current available information, and subsequently directed South Ops to mobilize available critical resources. In a number of instances, when firefighting resources were scarce, firefighter safety became a consideration for the allocation of resources. The strength of the MAC Group was its ability to objectively prioritize incidents based on the information derived from the decision matrix and not on needs of the individual agencies Southern California Fire Siege

In the After Action Report there were 15 identified “successes” by the MAC Group. The following highlights a few of those:  MAC Group representatives maintained objective focus on priorities allowing for a consensus, decision-making processes.  The MAC Group relied on multiple sources of information.  The MAC Group was able to expedite filling critical resource needs based on information obtained directly from their communication centers.  The MAC Group was able to prioritize and recommend the assignment of available critical resources by kind and type.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege Identified “successes” (continued):  The development of the Decision Support Briefing document by the Planning and Operations Sections of the National Incident Management Organization (NIMO), who had been assigned upon request to the MAC Group, consolidated intelligence information into a simple format that improved the efficiency of the decision process  There was early recognition by the MAC Group that a Military Liaison was necessary to assist in the coordination of military assets used on the incidents.  The MAC Group exercised discipline and maintained team focus in a sequestered setting  The MAC Group requested executive level feedback to validate the group’s direction and effectiveness  The MAC Group recognized the need for improved intelligence for the fires occurring in San Diego County. CAL FIRE provided an operational area representative to the group to fill this need.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege During the MACS activation there were multiple “challenges” encountered by the MAC Group. The following outlines a few of these challenges:  Due to incident activity in their own jurisdictions some member agencies were unable to provide a representative upon initial activation.  The group used valuable time to review, discuss, and better define the criteria objectives identified in the MACS for the incident priority process. Although the objectives were posted for constant review, some interpretations remained vague on specific criteria definitions.  The rapidly escalating fire situation hampered intelligence gathering. Some Incident Status Summary Reports were not available to the MAC Group for review prior to conducting the priority process.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege Multiple “challenges” (continued):  Due to the number and frequency of new fire starts, the prioritization process was conducted twice a day. As the fire activity stabilized, the prioritization process was done once per day. The MAC Group determined that situation dynamics would dictate the frequency of the prioritization process.  The group encountered challenges with the MAC Center facility. Certain actions were taken to improve the process and more effectively perform the objectives. New technologies and systems exist that have not been institutionalized such as Google mapping, video conferencing, military imaging capabilities, and other cutting- edge technologies.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege The MAC group identified opportunities for future program enhancements:  Request a Planning Section Chief (PSC) to assist the MAC Group  Require that the agency representative within the MAC Group proactively acquire incident information from all available sources.  Verify that an alternate resource ordering process is in place in the event of system overload or failure  Maintain a simple, consistent “big picture” format for the Intel summary package.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege Identified opportunities for future program enhancements (continued):  Ensure that all MAC Group members are briefed on the process, objectives, meeting agendas, and member conduct.  Maintain consistency among group representation to provide continuity in the MAC process  Assignment to the MAC Group must be viewed as any other incident assignment and not as an ancillary duty.  Request that a dedicated Intelligence Officer (internal and/or external) be assigned to the MAC Group for the purpose of bringing consolidated, unified information back for review

2007 Southern California Fire Siege Identified opportunities for future program enhancements (continued):  Consider incorporating all-hazard MACS forms and processes.  Recognize the need for access to state-of-the-art tools.  Provide an environment that is free from disruption that allows for open discussion relative to the prioritization process.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege …with more than fifteen thousand fire and emergency personnel effectively mobilized from over 1100 assisting agencies. The MAC Group prioritized incidents and coordinated firefighting resource support for twenty-two large wildfires…

2007 Southern California Fire Siege Interagency cooperation and executive management oversight contributed greatly to the overall effectiveness of the MAC group.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege

Some 207,399 fewer acres burned in the 2007 siege, than burned in 2003—even though there were almost twice as many fires requiring large fire strategy and deployment—13 fires in 2003, and 22 fires in By comparison to 2003, more personnel and resources deployed faster, fewer acres burned, fewer lives were lost, and fewer structures burned in the Siege of 2007.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege The successes of the 2003 mobilization set the benchmark for excellence in the 2007 Southern California fire siege

2007 Southern California Fire Siege Complimenting the successful initial attack of nearly 90% of the wildfires ignited during the siege, the firefighting agencies’ well- organized extended attack effort kept the potential magnitude of this disaster comparatively small. These efforts saved many lives, thousands of homes, and damage to and natural resources.

2007 Southern California Fire Siege It is the intent of this MAC Group’s After Action Review that ongoing management enhancements remain a top priority.

Chief Jorge Camargo, Orange Co. Fire Authority* Chief Tom Drayer, CA-OES Fire* Chief Mark Sanchez, Ventura Co. Fire Department* Chief Mark Schmitt, Santa Barbara Co. Fire Department* Chief Lee Delap, CAL FIRE* Chief Nick Dunn, Kern Co. Fire Department* Chief Dave Stone, Los Angeles Co. Fire Department* Chief John Martinez, Los Angeles Fire Department* Chief Ralph Domanski, USFS* Chief Brad Harris, CAL FIRE/San Diego Op Area Rep. Chief Les Matarazzi, U.S. DOI* 2007 Southern California Fire Siege MAC Group Signators *FIRESCOPE Member Agency Representative