RESEARCH ESSAYS Structure, Argumentation, Originality, & Etiquette 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

How valuable is Source A as evidence of How useful is Source A as evidence of Assess the value of Source A as evidence of How useful is Xs account (Source.
EVALUATING, JUSTIFYING AND PRESENTING ARGUMENTS ENGLISH 1121: POPULAR MUSIC COLLABORATIVE PAPER.
Writing-Up Geoff Walsham Lecture 5 of Course on Interpretive Research in IS - Oslo University.
Dissertation Writing.
APPROACHING A QUESTION, STRUCTURE & OUTLINING ESSAYS.
Summary-Response Essay
Character Analysis Essay
Writing Academic Essays Andy McKay In-sessional programme English Language Centre Week 2: Structuring Arguments.
FEEDBACK ON CONTENT & STRUCTURE. OUTLINE How to understand feedback on: Introductions & Thesis Statements Paragraphing & Coherence in the body Academic.
Essays IACT 918 July 2004 Gene Awyzio SITACS University of Wollongong.
HOW TO EXCEL ON ESSAY EXAMS San José State University Writing Center Dr. Jim Lobdell.
Position Papers Drafting. Drafting n Developing Your Topic –Draw on personal experience. –Use secondary sources.
Argumentative essays.  Usually range from as little as five paragraphs to as many as necessary  Focus is mainly on your side  But there is also a discussion.
How to write a Historical Essay. Step 1: Understand the Question Read the question carefully. Make sure you understand the question. Underline key words.
Essay Writing What makes a good essay?. Essay Writing What is a good essay? Planning Essay structure Editing and proofreading Referencing and avoiding.
FRQ 101 AP US HISTORY.
Dr. MaLinda Hill Advanced English C1-A Designing Essays, Research Papers, Business Reports and Reflective Statements.
Scholarship Work Shop 2: Critical Thinking and Writing.
Approaching a Question & Research
Guidelines for the Final Papers ENG 5049: Studies in Critical Theory Prepared by: Dr. Caroline (Kay) Picart Associate Professor of English & Humanities.
Accelerated 10 English 1. Read 2. Details 3. Topic – Significant to the Text 4. Return to the details. o Details are combined/interpreted to determine.
To look at how to critically examine issues and how to effectively write essays in Physical Education studies.
Research Essays Research, Think, Write.
Writing a Book Review Danika Rockett University of Baltimore Summer 2009.
WEEK 3 THE TERM PAPER. WHAT IS A TERM PAPER? An academic essay that is rather lengthy, prepared by an academic writer Written in a concise and well documented.
Academic Essays & Report Writing
What Makes an Essay an Essay. Essay is defined as a short piece of composition written from a writer’s point of view that is most commonly linked to an.
RESEARCH ESSAYS Research, Think, Write 1. Lecture Outline 1. Research Proposal Feedback 2. Thinking, Planning, and Research 3. Thinking, Writing, and.
1 Term Paper Mohammad Alauddin MSS (Government &Politics) MPA(Governance& Public Policy) Deputy Secretary Welcome to the Presentation Special Foundation.
ToK ESSAY The instructions tell you to: Remember to centre your essay on knowledge issues and,where appropriate, refer to other parts of your IB programme.
Submission 3 March 4, Opportunities to discuss course content Today 10-2 Tuesday 11-2.
Writing a Response Paper English III. What is a response paper? Your reaction to a text that you have read.
Literature and Ourselves Writing About Literature: Introduction.
Choosing a topic is important and can be the hardest part of an essay. Here are a few helpful tips:  Understand your assignment This is step 1. If you.
Title and Abstract Description of paper Summarize the paper.
Essay on Education.
Dissertation Document?
Writing a Good Essay. Essays should be in third person. Do not talk to the reader: –If you think… –If that sounds familiar… –As you can imagine…. Do not.
RESEARCH ESSAYS Structure, Argumentation, Originality, & Etiquette 1.
Extended Essay.
IB Historical Investigation Summary of Evidence and Analysis.
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
English Language Services
Gasp! An Essay! What do I do now?. Attitude is Everything! Don't worry! If you feel overwhelmed by the assignment, think of it as a series of small, manageable.
Internal Assessment IB History.
Expository Writing Understanding Essay Writing. Expository Writing This is the basic form of writing assigned in most classes. Expository means “explaining”
Thoughtful research: Moving beyond the topic!. Research is a real-life skill Research projects are training grounds for adult problem-solving and decision-making.
Introductions and Conclusions CSCI102 - Systems ITCS905 - Systems MCS Systems.
Review Writing Opinión Writing.
ELA What is an essay? An essay is an extended piece of writing in which an author explores a subject in some detail. Skilled essayists do the following:
Writing an Essay. Reading a Primary Source: Step 1 Who wrote this document? In the first place, you need to know how this document came to be created.
Consciousness & Causality Revision Lecture. Questions (open or closed?) Is there good evidence for learning while sleeping? Describe and discuss dualist.
How to write an essay for Social Science Workshops for AID students Academic year 2010/11.
Issues of Social Justice Racism Gender bias Prison issues Bullying Gun regulation Poverty Abuse Abortion Child hunger Ageism Human trafficking War Voter.
Essay Writing Tips for Writing Essays POL No Simple Answers… Unfortunately there is no simple answer to how to write an essay. However, there are.
Academic Writing Fatima AlShaikh. A duty that you are assigned to perform or a task that is assigned or undertaken. For example: Research papers (most.
 Criterion D: Knowledge and Understanding of Topic Studied  Criterion E: Reasoned Argument  Criterion F: Application of Analytical and Evaluative skills.
PG-26765: Culture and People
Part 4 Reading Critically
Writing Scientific Research Paper
Research Skills.
APA Format What you need to know
CRITICAL ANALYSIS Purpose of a critical review The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review.
Paper 1 Exam Technique: How to structure your answers and use your time! Mr. Guiney’s Guide to success. As you only have 60 minutes, plus 5 minutes reading.
Writing the Persuasive/Argumentative Essay
Expository Essay Writing
The Historical Investigation
IB Historical Investigation
Managing People: Essay Guidance 2018/19
Presentation transcript:

RESEARCH ESSAYS Structure, Argumentation, Originality, & Etiquette 1

Lecture Outline 1. Structure and Weighting 2. Sources and Argumentation 3. Issue of Originality 4. Etiquette of Writing 2

Structure and Weighting are immensely important. Most essay questions ask you to do several things – what you need to do is figure out how many words to spend on each part. Structure and Weighting 3

Make an outline Looking at the well-known conflict between Gondor and Mordor (Tolkien, 1955) 4

Causes/Explanations  What was the impact of resource interests on the outbreak of the war between Middle Earth and Mordor?  Was religion the main reason behind conscientious objection among the Elfs during the Middle Earth- Mordor war? 5

What was the impact of resource interests on the outbreak of the war between Middle Earth and Mordor? - Intro - Historical background – Mordor-Middle Earth relations in the run-up to the war - Other factors: - Differences in ideology - Regime change and instability in Gondor - False diplomacy by Saruman and others - History of influence in the region - The resource crunch in Mordor - Conclusion 6

Actors/Roles  What is a fellowship and what was its role during the Mordor-Middle Earth conflict?  What is an ork and what role did they play in the termination of the Mordor-Middle Earth conflict? 7

What is a fellowship and what was its role during the early stages Mordor-Middle Earth conflict?  Intro  Define Fellowship  Theories on the roles of fellowships during conflict  The Fellowship of the Ring and its significance in the Mordor-Middle Earth conflict  Impact on the Conflict  Conclusion 8

Evaluations  What was the impact of general amnesty on the successes/failures of the Middle Earth TRC with regards to truth finding?  How successful was the Middle Earth TRC with regards to achieving restorative justice through reparations? 9

What was the impact of general amnesty on the successes/failures of the Middle Earth TRC with regards to truth finding?  Intro  Theoretical discussion of amnesty and its impact on transitional justice  What is a success in the context of a TRC in Middle Earth  Mandate  Other standards to judge it by  The impact of amnesty in Middle Earth  Perpetrator participation  Quality of the findings  Conclusion 10

The trick to writing a strong research paper is to know which of the numerous sources fit best with your argument and methodology. Sources and Argument 11

Sources  Sources are used to state ‘facts’:  Important facts describe the context  Provide evidence for your argument  Sources are used to assist your argument:  Show that other authors agree with you  Show that authors disagreeing with you make less sense than you 12

Argumentation  Given the length of this assignment, we want one main argument (maximum two).  This does not mean you ignore all current arguments within the literature. It merely means you don’t have to cover all of them in detail.  It’s okay to have sub-arguments, but they must be directly linked to your main argument. 13

Validity and Soundness  All toasters are items made of gold.  All items made of gold are time-travel devices.  Therefore, all toasters are time-travel devices.  Valid: The truth of the premises logically guarantee the truth of the conclusion.  Not Sound: The premises in this argument are not true. 14

Validity and Soundness  We look for both.  Sources should assist the validity of your argument (e.g. show that other authors have followed the line of reasoning used)  Sources should show your argument is sound, by illustrating facts that prove your premises/sub- arguments to be true. 15

Example – A C&H Style Argument Question: To what extent was the 1991 RUF invasion caused by Sierra Leone’s weak economy?  Thesis Statement: The greatest extent! Everything the RUF did was based around greed.  Sub-Argument 1 – The RUF had no real political ideology. (Refute political grievance)  Sub-Argument 2 – All recruited members of the RUF were poor and unemployed.  Sub-Argument 3 – The RUF made a habit of looting and raiding civilians, and diamond mines. (Refute political grievance)  Therefore: Economic issues far outweighed political issues. 16

Note  Here one cause is being examined (economic), but in doing so another cause is simultaneously refuted (political grievance).  ‘Other authors have discussed causes such as A, B, C, D, E etc. I will be concentrating on cause F and K, as they appear to be the most prominent in the literature.’ 17

Did the South African TRC succeed in establishing the truth?  Thesis Statement: No! The South African TRC sacrificed factual accuracy in favour of creating a feel good truth.  Argument : The truth established by the South African TRC was factually inaccurate.  List of reasons/evidence  A  B  C  Etc 18

Note  Just because you are arguing against the TRC’s truth telling does not mean you can merely state it is an entire failure, and ignore the literature.  E.g. The need to aware of your scope, “The South Africa TRC can be lauded for allowing victims the cathartic effects of telling their stories, and letting their pain be shared. One could even say that the TRC succeed in establishing a reconciliatory collective truth...” 19

The Issue of Originality 20

Originality (Impossible)  You are not expected to undertake original research  Why…? It is essentially impossible to do  The challenge is to place yourself in an existing literature or debate and contribute to it  How do you make a contribution or make your research valuable even if is not ‘new’? 21

Originality (Possible)  New analysis is possible with ‘old’ ideas  Criticism  Relating ideas  Comparing authors and their arguments  Testing theories against new cases  Unique comparisons 22

The Etiquette of Writing 23

The Etiquette of Writing  words Must include on cover page(s), or will receive 0%: 1. Word Count 2. Title: your research question 3. Table of contents 4. Full bibliography In addition to usual: name + student number + course + TUTOR’S NAME Signed plagiarism declaration 24

To What Extent has Mine Action in Mozambique Contributed to Peacebuilding? Plagiarism Declarationii Acronymsiii Introduction1 1. Peacebuilding3 2. Landmine Contamination in Mozambique4 3. Landmine Action in Mozambique6 4. Mine Action and Peacebuilding in Mozambique9 i. The Security Dimension9 ii. The Socio-Economic Dimension13 iii. The Political Dimension19 Concluding Remarks21 Endnotes24 Appendix 1, Figure 1 –The Provinces of Mozambique25 Appendix 2, Figure 2 – The spatial distribution and density of landmines in Mozambique 26 Appendix 3, Figure 3 – Suspected Mined Areas in Mozambique27 Appendix 4, Figure 4 – The Stages of a Mine Action Programme28 Bibliography29 25

Referencing and formatting  Must be a recognised and widely accepted referencing style within the discipline, e.g. Harvard in-text; Chicago footnotes  Formatting requests:  Page numbers  Double Space  Justify  Margins  Font: TNR; 12 26