Farmlands Office Of Environmental Services Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March questions to:
Advertisements

Regional Water Planning Senate Bill 1 Introduction and Status as of August 01, 1999.
Soil and Water Conservation in Georgia Helping people help the land.
How to Write Goals, Objectives and Policies EAR-Based Amendment Forum Presented by the Pinellas Planning Council September 14, 2006.
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
OTHER RESOURCES FARMLAND Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Residential Development in Rural Lands Study STEERING COMMITTEE 7 February 15, 2006.
NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.
Pennsylvania Farmland Preservation Programs and Initiatives IRWA – February 24, 2010.
11/21/2002Sustainable Agriculture. 11/21/2002Sustainable Agriculture Impacts of Sprawl -NRI vs Conversions up from  1.2 Million Acres per.
LAND USE CONFERENCE JANUARY 11, 2013 OSU 4-H CENTER Linking Economic Development & Agricultural Easements 1.
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS AGENTS OF CHANGE John Day Center for Environmental Farming Systems, NC State University.
Kings County as part of the San Joaquin Valley Blueprint County Planning & LAFCO engaging the COG’s Blueprint efforts to map out the County’s future. Greg.
Land Subdivision and Zoning Unit: Owning Property Lesson: Land Subdivision and Zoning.
1 Williamson Act Public Information Meeting March 6, 2006.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) – ROW Impacts Dianna Nausley, HQ RES Assistant Program Administrator Washington State Department.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
1 SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE: SANTA CLARA LAFCO’s EXPERIENCE August 31, 2007 CALAFCO CONFERENCE Sacramento.
PRESERVATION and PROGRESS IN THE DRAGON RUN SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS PRESERVATION and PROGRESS IN THE DRAGON RUN SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS PARADIGM.
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) in Yolo County Phil Hogan, District Conservationist USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 221 W. Court,
Larry Plumb Farm Service Agency Conservation Specialist.
Protecting Working Lands: Through USDA Conservation Programs Denise Coleman National Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program Manager USDA, Natural Resources.
Influence of the Natural Resources Conservation Service on Alabama Agriculture Robert N. Jones State Conservationist USDA-Natural Resources Conservation.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Zoning for Outdoor Advertising Purposes Or When is a cow pasture a commercial or industrial area?
Other Resources Farmland Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
Title II – Conservation Environmental Quality Incentives Program and other Conservation Programs 2002 Farm Bill Education Conference Kansas City, Missouri.
CONSERVATION MILESTONES A Brief History of SWCDs Angela P. White, Ph.D.
LESA: Land Evaluation and Site Assessment An Effective Way to Plan Champaign County Soil and Water Conservation District.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Land Use Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process.
Agricultural Preserves Program Uniform Rules Update Office of Long Range Planning Board of Supervisors Hearing September 25, 2007.
S.A.V.E. is a non-profit community organization whose aim is to sustain the southern Chester County region’s rural quality of life and community character.
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance Montgomery County, MD Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth at Preliminary Project.
Yolo LAFCO Agricultural Conservation Policy Yolo County Local Agency Formation Commission Commissioners  Public Member Olin Woods, Chair   County Member.
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
APPLYING CONSERVATION TO THE TEXAS LANDSCAPE Norman Bade, NRCS State Resource Conservationist Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill (Farm Security.
Highway Location Study CE 453 Lecture 4 See also lab 2 and lab 4 instructions, and EIS lecture notes See also 04 DOT development process.doc Refs:
Wisconsin’s Forests and the Comprehensive Planning Law Preserving forests in the wilderness of Smart Growth.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Farmland Preservation Partnership Opportunities with North Carolina Land Trusts J. Frank Parker Preserve, Pitt County North Carolina Agricultural Development.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption Hearing October 23,
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
Assessing Development Pressure on Agriculture Land 2009 Ohio GIS Conference September 16-18, 2009 Crowne Plaza North Hotel Columbus, Ohio 2009 Ohio GIS.
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County In Franklin-Simpson County 85% of the land area is devoted.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service “Helping people help the land"
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Identifying the Role of Government in Forest Management.
Helping You Care for the Land The Natural Resources Conservation Service—
Office of Real Estate 2045 Morse Road E2 Columbus Ohio /9/2016.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA): Program Overview and NRCS Responsibilities Michael Robotham Bob Dobos and Emmabelle Kenyon 1.
CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Ohio Department of Natural Resources
Local Government Priorities National League of Cities
City Council Hearing #2 April 18, 2017.
Farm/Ranch Conservation Issues: Conservation Compliance
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Prequalification Requirements
Farmland Preservation Partnership Opportunities With NC Land Trusts
Other Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Dane County Farmland Preservation Plan Planning Areas
Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI).
Indiana Mitigation Matching Web Applications
Presentation transcript:

Farmlands Office Of Environmental Services Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

2   Number one industry for Ohio’s economy   $107 billion annually   Nearly one million employees Why So Important? Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

 Effects water quality and ecological integrity  Development and growth contributes to Urban Sprawl  Consequences:  Rural character disrupted  Viewshed impacts  Job loss Farmland Loss In O-H-I-O 3 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

Farmland Loss In O-H-I-O  More than 7 million acres from  Equivalent to losing 23 counties  2 nd in the nation for loss of prime farmland from 1987 to 1997  Farmland conversion rate is occurring faster than population growth 4 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

Federal Law Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)   Subtitle of the 1981 Farm Bill   Federal programs required to be compatible with state, local and private efforts to protect farmland and consider adverse effects   Projects sponsored or financed in whole or part by the federal government   Highways, airports, dams, federal buildings 5 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

Federal Agency Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)   Formerly Soil Conservation Service   Established by Congress in 1935   Permanent agency within the USDA   Changed to NRCS in 1994 to reflect the broadened scope of the agency’s concerns 6 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

State Law Ohio Revised Code (ORC)   Ohio’s Farmland Preservation Act   Coordination with ODA required when 10% or 10 acres ( whichever is greater ) is acquired from any individual property within an Agricultural District   Utility or emergency repair projects exempt 7 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

State Agency   Ohio Department of Agriculture   Office of Farmland Preservation oversees and assists with preservation efforts   Three Preservation Programs: Clean Ohio Agriculture Easement Purchase Program Ohio Agricultural Easement Donation Program Agricultural Security Areas   40,000+ acres of farmland preserved 8 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

 NRCS/FWHA/ODOT  Executed December 15, 2011  Outlines responsibilities under FPPA and the implementing regulations of 7 CFR 658  Establishes a process to determine which federal projects require NRCS coordination Farmland MOU 9 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

Farmland Classification 10  Identifies farmland of state or local importance  Soil Maps  Land Classification Maps  Prime  Unique Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

  FPPA Screening Form no longer used   Integrated into Online CE   Farmland Conversion Impact Rating (FCIR)   For projects that exceed MOU criteria 11 Coordination Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

FCIR Form   Form AD-1006   Form NRCS-CPA-106   Corridor projects 12 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

FCIR Form   Part I - Project Description   Completed by ODOT/Project Sponsor   Part II – Farmland/Farm Characteristics   Completed by NRCS 13 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

FCIR Form   Part III - Conversion of Land   Completed by ODOT/Project Sponsor   Lines A & C Total new permanent ROW   Line B Always 0 unless secondary impacts are known and can be quantified 14 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

FCIR Form   Part IV - Land Evaluation Information   Completed by NRCS   Part V - Land Evaluation Criteria   Completed by NRCS 15 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

FCIR Form   Part VI - Site Assessment Criteria   Completed by ODOT/Project Sponsor   Based on criteria in 7 CFR   Follow FCIR Instructions 16 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

FCIR Form   Part VII – Score Compilation   Completed by ODOT/Project Sponsor 17 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

FCIR Form   Final score less than 160   Minimal consideration for protection   No alternative locations need evaluated   Final score 160 or greater   Justify reason for choosing higher scoring alternative   Consider other environmental concerns 18 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

CE Remarks 19  Use standard language provided by OES  If FCIR coordination required, discuss scoring results for each build alternative Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

CE Remarks   Acreage of agricultural land to be taken   Number of farms impacted   Include effects upon farm operations   Removal of farm structures   Current use of agricultural land impacted   Cropland, fallow land, pasture   Conservation Easements   Impacts to tile drainage, if applicable 20 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

CE Remarks   Permanent and/or temporary field access closures   Proposed mitigation, if applicable   Economic impacts   Agricultural District impacts   Number of farms which will have at least 10 acres or 10% acquired 21 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

 Secondary and/or Cumulative Impacts  Impact to regional farm economy  Resulting development  Conversion of farmland to other uses  Reduction of support services, which may adversely affect remaining farms CE Remarks 22 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

Part of CE/Project File   Locational mapping   Highlight impacted property   Highlight farms in Agricultural District   Plan sheets with ROW impacts to farmland   FCIR Form 23 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

Contacts   Doug App, Farmland Coordinator   Kevin E. Davis, OES Policy Supervisor Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation

QUESTIONS? 25 Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation