Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Radiation Protection Division formerly the National Radiological Protection Board EMRAS II – Working.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.
Advertisements

Nick Beresford (CEH) & David Copplestone (Stirling Univ.)
David Copplestone (University of Stirling). Whats the issue? Obtaining air concentrations for noble gases Estimating doses to wildlife from noble gases.
Juan Carlos Mora, Beatriz Robles, David Cancio Departamento de Medio Ambiente, CIEMAT, Avenida Complutense 22, Madrid CROM CODE Código de cRiba para.
The Need for Requirements and Guidance for Protection of Biota: Basis for DOE’s Biota Dose Limits and Guidance Biota Dose Assessment Committee Meeting.
WSC Radioecology Research Group A new methodology for the assessment of radiation doses to biota under non-equilibrium conditions J. Vives i Batlle, R.C.
David Copplestone CEH Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
PROTECTFP Screening tier comparisons ERICA, RESRAD-BIOTA & EA R&D128 Follow-up actions from Vienna workshop.
PUBLIC DOSES ESTIMATION BASED ON EFFLUENTS DATA AND DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF TRITIUM IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES AT CERNAVODA E. Bobric, I. Popescu, V. Simionov.
Modeling Atmospheric Releases of Molecular Tritium 2005 RETS/REMP Workshop Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc.
Dose Assessments for Wildlife in England & Wales.
RESRAD Program Manager Environmental Science Division
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
PROTECTFP Terrestrial Assessment Comparison of human and non human dose assessments for prospective new nuclear power stations.
 Progress with the revision and consolidation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive Stefan Mundigl European Commission DG Energy and Transport.
RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES CONTROL JE Jan Horyna State Office for Nuclear Safety Czech Republic September 2009 Vienna.
PROTECTFP Radioprotection of the environment in France: IRSN current views and workplan K. Beaugelin-Seiller, IRSN Vienna IC, June 2007.
The UK Approach - the Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Laura Newsome Scientist – Environment Agency September 2009.
Experiences from testing the ERICA Integrated Approach Case study application of the ERICA Tool and D-ERICA.
Environmental Health XIV. Standards and Monitoring Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
Gauges and well logging
“to provide and apply an integrated approach of addressing scientific, managerial and societal issues surrounding environmental effects of ionising.
Trinity Engineering Associates | United States Environmental Protection Agency CAP88-PC V4 T RAINING Module 1.1 Introduction to CAP88-PC.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Environmental Protection Waste Safety Section, Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Radionuclide dispersion modelling
Trinity Engineering Associates | United States Environmental Protection Agency CAP88-PC V4 T RAINING Module 1.3 Downloading, Installing, and Running the.
Public Access to Environmental Information in Serbia Filip Radović Environmental Protection Agency Geneva, December
Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
S. MAURAU, P. CIFFROY, EDF R&D National Hydraulics and Environment Laboratory, Chatou, France J. BIERKENS, VITO Research Group Exposure and Risk Assessment.
College of Engineering Oregon State University DOE’s Graded Approach for Evaluating Radiation Doses to Biota: Derivation of Screening and Analysis Methodologies.
Radiation in Your Environment. Radiation Around You Nature –Cosmic (direct and cosmic-produced radioactivity –Terrestrial (including radon) Medical Consumer.
Workshop on Tritium and Carbon - EMRASBucharest May 2007 TRITIUM MODEL IN RODOS SYSTEM Dan Slavnicu D.Galeriu, D.Gheorghiu, A.Melintescu National Institute.
Dose Assessment for Population around New NPP in Belarus
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” RADIATION PROTECTION SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
BIOPROTA Biosphere modelling for waste repositories This presentation Objectives Participation and management What it has done and publications Projects.
Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 GENII Version 2.0 Overview and.
From Chernobyl to Fukushima: introduction Conveners of GI1.4 session M. Yamauchi (Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Sweden) Oleg Voitsekhovych (Ukrainian.
PROTECTFP PROTECT recommendations – application in practice.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
Information System on Occupational Exposure The ISOE Occupational Exposure Database Brian Ahier (OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, ISOE Joint Secretariat) Caroline.
Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Radiation Protection Division formerly the National Radiological Protection Board Environmental.
Dale Holden Duke Energy.  Programs established in 1970’s and 1980’s  Required for licensee  Preoperational and Operational  “check” on effluent releases.
Regulation of Discharges of Nuclear Facilities in Ukraine Iurii Bonchuk Radiation Protection Institute Kiev, Ukraine EMRAS II - Reference.
Comparison of the AEOLUS3 Atmospheric Dispersion Computer Code with NRC Codes PAVAN and XOQDOQ 13th NUMUG Conference, October 2009, San Francisco, CA.
HELCOM MORS-PRO Radioactivity in the Baltic Sea Erkki Ilus STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Finland.
Nick Beresford & David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Modelling noble gases Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on the Demonstration of Operational and Long Term Safety of Predisposal Management Facilities.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 1.3. The role.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
EAN NORM Workshop European ALARA Network for NORM November Dresden Effluents in some Italian NORM industries Flavio Trotti, Elena Caldognetto.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Stakeholder Views on the Implementation of Food and Agricultural Protective Actions in Ireland following a Nuclear Accident Abroad Veronica Smith, Catherine.
Radiological Analysis of Ground Water
Modeling Iodine Released During a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Radiological Habits Survey and Food Monitoring Results
Experience in the UK in implementing E-PRTR and Data Validation
SAFETY AND SITTING ASSESSMENT FOR NPPs DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA
Vanda Nunes de Lima 18th June 2009
Radiological Habits Survey and Food Monitoring Results
Sellafield Discharges and Environmental Monitoring 2017
Brian Ahier (OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, ISOE Joint Secretariat)
INPUT DATA REQUIREMENTS
Presentation for TRANSSC 20 meeting – June 2010
Presentation transcript:

Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Radiation Protection Division formerly the National Radiological Protection Board EMRAS II – Working Group 1 Reference Methodologies for Controlled Discharges Justin Smith

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Response to questions 1 )Nuclear context: what types of facilities does your methodology cover? –Almost any type of facility where discharges occur to atmosphere, sea (European waters) or rivers and can be considered as continuous and constant. 2) National Organisation: who is the authority in your country? What types of manufactures do you have? Who are the experts? –Environment Agency, SEPA. –Nuclear industry activities, NORM activities, radiopharmaceuticals. –Advice on Radiation Protection from HPA, EA, SEPA, FSA and NDAWG

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Response to questions 3) Do you use critical group concept? Or the new ICRP version of it? –We consider them to be the same in practice and we believe ICRP description is equivalent. However, because critical group terminology is still used in UK legislation we are still using it. We will move to representative person in due course so in state of transition. 4) What are the regulatory limit values? Are they doses? Are they concentrations? Or other units? –Annual dose limit 1mSv from all sources, annual dose constraint 0.3 mSv for a single source, annual site constraint 0.5 mSv for a number of operations on a single site. –< 20 uSv annual (~ 1 e6 per year) is EA (Cm 2919 white paper) threshold of optimisation ie if BPM no further reduction need be sought. –Operator will seek an authorisation (under RSA 93) from EA or SEPA and discharge limits will be set on the basis that the practice has been optimised and no dose constraints or limits exceeded.

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Response to questions 5) What modelling approaches do you use? –Equilibrium models, compartmental models (marine, river, terrestrial food), Gaussian plume model (finite and semi-infinite cloud gamma models), empirical models for external exposure and resuspension. –Designed for continuous and constant discharges. 5a) Do you transfer coefficients? (if so which ones?). –Yes. –Terrestrial activity concentration ratios between soil and plant, and between feed and meat, liver and milk. –For river and marine environments activity concentration ratios between filtered water and sediments and biota. –Sources include IAEA (Safety Series No 19, 2001 and TRS 364), NCRP (Screening models for releases of radionuclides to atmosphere, surface water, and ground. NCRP Report No 123I, 1996) and Coughtrey (Radionuclide distribution and transport in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. A compendium of data. 1985)

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Response to questions 5b) What type of atmospheric modelling do you use? –Gaussian plume model. –(Investigating use of NAME III) 5c) Do you use site specific data? –Yes, but depends on the type and extent of the assessment eg for a large study looking at many sites generic habit data may be used. Other issues: Collective dose, short term planned releases

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency PC-CREAM 08 CEC report ‘Methodology for evaluating the radiological consequences of radioactive effluents release in normal operations’ (1979) EC report ‘Methodology for assessing the radiological consequences of routine releases of radionuclides to the environment’ (1995) + PC-CREAM 98 New methodology + PC-CREAM 08

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Typical applications Prospective assessments: –discharges from a single site at a constant annual release rate –for comparison of annual dose in e.g. 50th year, with dose limit and constraint Retrospective assessments: –past or current doses from a single site if discharges can be approximated to a constant annual release rate Calculation of collective doses for comparative purposes

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Typical applications Atmospheric –Inhalation of plume –External gamma and beta from cloud –External gamma and beta from ground –Inhalation of resuspended material –Ingestion of cow meat, cow liver, cow milk, sheep meat, sheep liver, green vegetables, root vegetables, fruit # and grain Marine –Inhalation of seaspray # –External gamma and beta from sediments –External gamma and beta from fishing gear # –Ingestion of seaweed #, fish, molluscs and crustaceans River # –External gamma and beta from sediments –Ingestion of fish and drinking water # Not available for collective dose assessments

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Typical applications Source of Radionuclides Transfer in in Environment Doses to people and populations Dose Coefficients Habit data, Population and Agricultural production distributions Exposure pathways Discharge to atmosphere PastureCowMilkHuman

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Typical applications PC CREAM uses effective dose –as defined in ICRP Publication 60 –dose coefficients from ICRP Publication 72 –committed to age 70 –3 age groups 1 year old infants 10 year old children Adults (For fetus advice given in Methodology report)

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency System structure Database User input GUI Results Input summary Fortran DLLs

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Models Plume Cloud beta Ground beta FarmlandGranisResus ModelsDatasets Assessor – atmospheric individual and collective

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Models Plume – Gaussian plume model (R91): activity concentrations in air, deposition rates and cloud gamma dose rates for specified release rate. Farmland – Compartmental model for soil, vegetation and animals: activity concentrations in foods per unit deposition rate. Granis – Compartmental model for soil and gamma dose from infinite plane: time integrated ground gamma dose per unit deposition rate over one year. Resus – Garland model for resuspension: time integrated activity concentration in air per unit deposition rate over one year. Datasets – Cloud beta dose rates per unit air concentration (DOE/EH-0070) and ground beta dose rates per unit deposition (Holford 1989 Supplement…)

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Models Doris – Compartmental model for north European waters and Mediterranean Sea: activity concentrations in marine foods, water and sediments Doris Assessor – marine individual and collective

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Models Rivers – Screening dilution model or dynamic compartmental model: activity concentrations in fish, water and sediments River screening Assessor – river individual only River dynamic

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Improvements and new features Implementation of an extensive database to hold all data related to the dose assessment calculation. Development of an improved graphical user interface. The database includes an increased number of default sites A comprehensive list of radionuclides. Better treatment of progeny radionuclides.

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Improvements and new features PLUME – deposition of progeny which have a different deposition velocity to that of the parent; change the meteorological parameters; run for several stack heights at once. GRANIS –It is easier to define the materials that comprise each soil layer and these can be stored for later use. RESUS – includes contribution to the resuspended activity concentration in air from the first day after the initial deposition. FARMLAND – includes review of model parameters and a revised fruit model.

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Improvements and new features Dynamic river model – revised to include transfer from filtered water to bed sediment. Includes default data describing some major European rivers. Review of water treatment values, Kd and CF values DORIS – revised following the MARINA II study (EC, 2003); increases the extent of the region modelled; better represents the remobilisation process.

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Improvements and new features ASSESSOR, has been updated to make it easier to select the model results that will be used in the assessment and to provide greater flexibility when defining the habits of individuals. Radionuclide and pathway breakdowns are provided for all dose estimates including marine collective doses.

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Progeny in models In general the first radioactive progeny not in secular equilibrium (SE) on the timescales of interest is modelled although some parts of the system model the full radioactive decay chain. Plume - first progeny not in SE over 3 minutes Farmland – first progeny not in SE over 1 year Granis – full chain Resus – first progeny not in SE over 1 year Doris – full chain Rivers – no progeny

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Progeny in Assessor Aquatic external exposures –Fishing gear: uses mean gamma and beta energies which take account of progeny in SE –Ground shine from sediments: uses mean gamma energies and beta dose coefficients which take account of progeny in SE Atmospheric external exposures –Cloud shine: uses binned gamma energies and beta dose coefficients for individual nuclides (exception where +d notation is used) –Ground shine: binned gamma energies for individual nuclides dose coefficients for deposited beta which include progeny Inhalation dose coefficients include progeny, (progeny in SE in seaspray ignored) Ingestion dose coefficients include progeny, (progeny in SE in food ignored)

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency Current status Current version of PC-CREAM 08 ( /1.0.2) is complete Updated version of methodology report (RP 72) to be published Dedicated website under development Training courses planned –Oct –provisionally Mar 2-3, Jun and Oct

Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency The future Future development to the system may include: Ability to use output from other atmospheric dispersion models Inclusion of collective dose calculations for discharges to rivers Inclusion of a sewers model Revised population and agricultural production grids