Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Nutrient Trading in the Great Miami River Watershed Douglas “Dusty” Hall The Miami Conservancy District Dayton,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
Advertisements

Agricultural and Biological Engineering SWFREC, UF/IFAS Immokalee.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Management of New York City’s Watershed Michael A. Principe, Ph.D. Deputy Commissioner New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water.
Why Trading? The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has developed some experience with water quality trading which has led us to believe that it can be.
Gulf Hypoxia and its Impact on Ohio Municipalities.
Agriculture Best Management Practices Overview LEAD Workshop October 19, 2011 Darrell Smith.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
General Ag. Compliance & Chesapeake Bay Update. PA Clean Streams Law & General AG Compliance Prevent discharge of pollutants & water quality impairment.
2014 Federal Farm Bill Overview 3/14/14. Conservation Compliance 2 “Recoupling” federal crop insurance premium support benefits to HEL and wetland conservation.
In The Beginning —Public Law 46 was passed by Congress: Established soil and water conservation and wise land use as a national policy Created the.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Illinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy IFB Commodities Conference July 30, 2014 Lauren.
Agroforestry Assistance §History §Technical §Financial.
Lake Springfield Watershed Nutrient Management Project February 11, 2015.
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources Christopher Gale Bill Taft.
Loudoun Watershed Watch “ Restoring Loudoun Streams” LCSA Water Forum Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy.
United States Department of Agriculture Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative Illinois River and Eucha-Spavinaw Watershed Initiative Bayou.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Ohio River Basin Water Quality Trading Project Agenda Item 12.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.
Improving Lives, Communities and the Environment Through Natural Resources Conservation.
La Moine River Ecosystem Partnership: Organizing for Success Dan Moorehouse & Jeff Boeckler.
Anatomy of Iowa Floods: Preparing for the Future “How urban and rural Iowans work together to reduce flood impacts.” Wayne Peterson, Division of Soil Conservation.
_____?____ Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) *Insert District Logo if available.
LOWER L’ANGUILLE WATERSHED COST SHARE PATRICIA PERRY ST. FRANCIS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
Sediment & Nutrient Management in the L’Anguille River Watershed St. Francis County Cost Share Project Patricia Perry St. Francis County Conservation.
Great Bay Municipal Coalition New Hampshire Water Pollution Control Association June 13, 2013 Dean Peschel Peschel Consulting
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
Price Creek Watershed Project A joint project of the Iowa & Benton County Soil and Water Conservation Districts IOWATER Meeting – November 13, 2007.
Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
Reducing Nutrient Loads from the Opequon Creek Watershed Project Team Meeting Oct 19, 2007 Chesapeake Bay Targeted Watersheds Grant Program.
Agenda Item 13b Update: Ohio River Basin Water Quality Trading Project.
James A. Klang, PE Senior Project Engineer Kieser & Associates, LLC 536 E. Michigan Ave., Suite 300 Kalamazoo, MI America’s Ag Water Management Summit.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
_____?____ Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) *Insert District Logo if available.
CENTRAL MUSCATATUCK WATERSHED. BMPs Cost-Shared by Central Muscatatuck Watershed Project.
Mason’s Stormwater Utility Program Kathleen Wade-Dorman, P.E. City of Mason.
1 United Water Delaware “Cut the Crypto” Watershed Control Plan 1 Nancy Trushell, P.E. Director of Engineering United Water Delaware.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
Technology-Driven Public-Private Partnership Programs: How Can Emerging Technologies Help to Support Sustainable Stormwater Infrastructure Investments.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
Lower L’Anguille Watershed Cost Share – Phase III Patricia Perry, St. Francis County Conservation District.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
“ To provide leadership to help people conserve, improve, and sustain the natural resources and environment of Highlands County”
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Environmental Quality Improvement Program (EQIP) Edwards Aquifer State Resource Concern (EA SRC) Jim.
> Las Vegas Valley Watershed Advisory Committee Regional Water Quality Plan.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Chesapeake Bay Program
Current VA Ag Initiatives
Markets and Regulation: Alternative or Complements?
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Presentation transcript:

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Nutrient Trading in the Great Miami River Watershed Douglas “Dusty” Hall The Miami Conservancy District Dayton, Ohio OWEA Nutrient Removal Webinar April 28, 2011

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Presentation overview The Miami Conservancy District Great Miami River Watershed Water Quality Credit Trading Program –Drivers –Program description –Program status Projects Funding

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed The Miami Conservancy District Great flood of 1913 Ohio Conservancy Act –Signed into law in 1914 –Watershed-based political subdivision –Broad authority primarily for water-related purposes MCD established 1915

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed The Miami Conservancy District Protecting people and property from flooding √ Five dry dams and levees √ Floodplain preservation Preserving the quantity and quality of water √ Aquifer protection √ Stormwater collaboration √ Water quality credit trading Promoting the enjoyment of waterways √ Land and water trails √ Parks and preserves

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Great Miami River Watershed 4,000 mi² Major tributaries: –Stillwater River –Mad River 1.5 million residents Dayton is largest city Agriculture is dominant land use

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Great Miami River Watershed Rural - upstream Urban – downstream More than 6,000 miles “blue line” streams –Nearly 19 miles tribs and headwaters per mainstem mile 70% agricultural land use

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Ohio’s Great Corridor “Vibrant city waterfronts …land & water trails… picturesque farmland… exquisite natural areas.” Annual River Summit

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Near-field…Are we meeting water quality goals? Of our monitored streams: Yes = 58.8% Almost = 19.8% No = 21.4% Excess nutrients contribute to impairment

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Far-field Ohio among “dirty” nine From:

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed USGS rankings WatershedTotal NitrogenTotal Phosphorus Upper Great Miami27th289th Lower Great Miami31st58th For 818 subwatersheds (HUC8s) of the Gulf of Mexico From: Supplement to Robertson et. al., 2009 Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed What is “water quality credit trading?” …A process by which a wastewater treatment plant substitutes “credits” from agricultural practices for pollutant reductions the plant would otherwise be required to achieve through a plant upgrade.

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Trading Program driver – regulations? Dan Dudley, Ohio EPA OWEA Webinar February 2011

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Trading Program driver – regulations? Florida Wisconsin - NOI Nancy Stoner memo – March 2011 Clean Water Protection Guidance - Dec 2010

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Trading Program driver - economics Kieser and Associates analysis 20-year projection Customers save Better results

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Trading Program driver – better results WWTP UpgradeAg. Practices Pollutant of concernYes Other pollutants reduced?Yes Habitat createdNoYes Canopy/shade/cooling providedNoYes Stream bank stability enhancedNoYes Flow velocity decreasedNoYes Wetlands createdNoYes Floodplains protectedNoYes Assimilative capacity increasedNoYes Energy/GHG benefitedNoYes

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Trading Program driver – GHG reductions 72 mgd WWTP Trading –CO 2 reductions from diesel saved 2,424 tons –CO 2 equivalent of C sequestered 92,130 tons Subtotal 94,554 tons –BNR (power only) CO 2 emissions 11,240 tons Net annual CO 2 benefit 105,794 tons

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Partners in Trading Program development More than 100 meetings – 2003/2005 –Cities/counties with WWTPs –County soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs) –Agricultural producers –Ohio EPA and USEPA –Ohio Department of Natural Resources –Ohio Farm Bureau Federation –Chambers of commerce –USDA’s Natural Resource Conservation Service –Ohio Environmental Council

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Gaining support Be careful what you wish for! Joe Koncelik Former Director Ohio EPA

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Trading Program overview County SWCDs

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Credit generators New agricultural practices funded by the Trading Program - YES Agricultural practices under contract with state & federal conservation incentive programs - NO Any other required agricultural practice - NO

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Early buyer incentives Incentive for pre-compliance participation Earn perpetual “discount” of 33-50% Grant funds

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Credit buyers City of Dayton Butler County Tri-Cities (Huber Heights, Vandalia, and Tipp City) Englewood Union

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Credit assurance Insurance pool –Provides “back-up” credits for WWTPs if an agricultural project fails

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Building on strengths Minimum new bureaucracy SWCD/NRCS staff –Identify and submit projects through SWCD –Quantify nutrient reductions –Annually inspect project –Identify “failed” practices

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Program process Capitalize Project Fund RFP Project selection Contract & implement projects Inventory & allocate credits Adapt Collect data WWTPs USDA USEPA SWCDs apply Inspect & report

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Subwatershed flow and nutrient monitoring Field-scale monitoring Water quality monitoring

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Water quality monitoring “Rich” data sets –Flow –Concentration –Load Regulatory “agreement” essential - program performance

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Project status Nine reverse auctions (“rounds”) –Projects = 345 –Nutrient reductions > 500 tons –Payment total about $1.5 million Cost about $1.53 per lb. of nutrient reduction (credit)

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed BMPs on-the-ground Cover crops Tillage Rotation Milk house/cow lot Pasture seeding/prescribed grazing Sod Hayland Manure storage Filter strips Grid sampling/VRT

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed Funding status Years 1-3 initial pilot $1,200,000 WWTPs $ 937,000 USDA/NRCS $2,137,000 Years 4-6 $ 251,300 Non-Federal $ 753,900 USEPA $1,005,200

Stewards of the Great Miami River Watershed MCD’s vision Thriving communities, a healthy watershed, and a higher quality of life, sustained by well-managed water resources throughout the watershed. Andy Snow Photo by Kendall Draeger