1 Developing an effective system of service user and carer involvement in research School of Health and Social Care University of the West of England Jane.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making it work: co-producing impact evaluation. Professor Imogen Taylor Department of Social Work and Social Care.
Advertisements

Developing Substance Misuse Education in the Borders.
Public Involvement in Research: Results of a Local Scoping Study Rosie Davies & David Evans UWE Bristol – on behalf of 14 Research Organisations.
Amanda Rawlings Director of Human Resources and Organisational Development Skills Pledge.
Strategies for Employer Engagement
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
Experiences of Patient and Public involvement in the Research Process Roma Maguire Senior Research Fellow Cancer Care Research Team School of Nursing and.
Morag Ferguson and Susan Shandley Educational Projects Managers
Hospital Discharge The Carers Journey Developed On Behalf Of Action For Carers (Surrey) And Surrey County Council.
Cathy Magowan Carer Support Developments Western Health and Social Care Trust (MARCH 2014)
Carer Participation in England, Wales and Northern Ireland Carers Conference June ICC Birmingham Prof. Alan Roulstone,University of Sunderland.
Vanessa Pinfold and Terry Hammond Developing a carer strategy for the UK Mental Health Research Network.
Strengthening Parent Carer Participation
Health Improvement Strategy for People with a Learning Disability Julie Burza Health Improvement Officer NHS Fife.
CCPS event Edinburgh Thursday 26 th March 2009 Getting it Right for Carers.
Assessment and eligibility
Parent carers and their role in the SEND reforms.
A Research Active Hospice
School of Medicine & Health Partnership Working and the Implications for Governance David Hunter.
Self directed support and personal budgets: enabling risk, ensuring safety.
School for Social Care Research Improving the evidence base for adult social care practice Balancing Service User and Carer Needs and Interests in Personalisation:
Facilitators: Janet Lange and Bob Munn
Reflective Practice Leadership Development Tool. Context recognised that a key differentiator between places where people wanted to work and places where.
Report to Council Staff Opinion Survey HR Director 6 March 2009.
Executive Report to Council
Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation invoNET 21 February 2012 David Evans, Vito Laterza & Rosie Davies on behalf.
Effectiveness Day : Multi-professional vision and action planning Friday 29 th November 2013 Where People Matter Most.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Access to Clinical Expertise Steve Bain David Powell Jemma Hughes Paula Jeffries.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
Dawne Gurbutt, Discipline Lead, Health Related Studies 11 th July 2013 Enhancing the student learning experience through Patient & Public Involvement Practice,
Building Research Capacity in social care: An untapped potential? Jo Cooke &Linsay Halladay University of Sheffield Others in the research team: Ruth Bacigalupo.
Stuart Hollis Where are we now? An exploration of the provision of teacher training programmes for the Learning and Skills Sector following the 2007 Workforce.
Disability Federation of Ireland National Conference November nd 2007 Working together for the future Ger Reaney Local Health Manager.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
Needs Assessment: Young People’s Drug and Alcohol Services in Edinburgh City EADP Children, Young People and Families Network Event 7 th March 2012 Joanne.
Notions of involvement in North East research networks Dr Tina Cook & Dr Anna Jones, School of Health, Community and Education Studies, Northumbria University.
Genuine user involvement: what does it look like? Alison Faulkner Mental health researcher & service user.
Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
Education, Training & Workforce Update FSP Training for Small Counties June 29, 2007 By Toni Tullys, MPA, Project Director, Regional Workforce Development,
Critical Factors for Referral and Case Management between Social Services and Primary Care.
Analysis of 2007 BOD Assessment Checklists Prepared by: Cambria Tidwell.
Curriculum planning Proposed Collaborative working modules.
Service users at the heart of service evaluation USER FOCUSED MONITORING.
Program Co-Development in CME: Where have we been? Where are we going? Workshop Facilitators: Dr. Craig Campbell Dr. Jamie Meuser September 21,
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
1 An introductory workshop for new governors 2005 Becoming a governor.
Shaping the Future: A Vision for Learning Disability Nursing United Kingdom Learning Disability Consultant Nurse Network.
Our Strategic Priorities & Work Programme Sandie Smith, CEO 10 th July 2013.
Housing with Care and Support. Workforce challenges and solutions.
Race Equality Project Framework for developing an Impact Assessment Steering Group.
Working with Families and Carers Gemma Stacey. Group discussion  In the care that you have observed how have families and carers : Helped ? Hindered.
WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES  To describe a research study designed to promote the involvement of older people and carers in strategic planning processes  To.
Name of presentation Improving health in Greenwich: Linking integrated health & social care with primary care.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
© Dr Sue Pavitt 2014 Clinical Trials and the Benefits of Patient Public Involvement Professor Sue Pavitt Professor in Translational and Applied Health.
A view on implications of the White Paper and Draft Bill for local voluntary Organisations Jon Burke, NAVCA 1/10/12.
Stuart Murray Age Concern Wigan Borough Elaine Jones & Joan Brogden Volunteer Researchers Wigan Borough.
Cochrane Agenda and Priority Setting Methods Group (CAPSMG)
The United Kingdom experience in data collection and statistics on disability Ian Dale Head of Disability Analysis Department for Work and Pensions Steel.
Country-led Joint Evaluation Dutch ORET/MILIEV Programme in China NCSTE Country-led Joint Evaluation Dutch ORET/MILIEV Programme in China Chen Zhaoying.
Research and Development Dr Julie Hankin Medical Director.
Coaching model for Person Centred Care “Person to Partner model”
Research for all Sharing good practice in research management
Strategy
The practicalities of PPI
Presentation transcript:

1 Developing an effective system of service user and carer involvement in research School of Health and Social Care University of the West of England Jane Dalrymple, David Evans, Ruth Sayers, Pat Taylor, Julian Wood July 2008

2 Background Service user and carer involvement now central to research and development strategy in health and social care nationally Service user and carer involvement now central to research and development strategy in health and social care nationally Requirement by health and social care research funders, but evidence that NHS researchers still struggle on involvement Requirement by health and social care research funders, but evidence that NHS researchers still struggle on involvement Growing community of service users and carers involved in research Growing community of service users and carers involved in research Growing evidence that user involvement / collaboration improves quality, depth and utility of research Growing evidence that user involvement / collaboration improves quality, depth and utility of research Increasing service user and carer involvement in School of Health and Social Care research but not systematic, or supported effectively Increasing service user and carer involvement in School of Health and Social Care research but not systematic, or supported effectively Timely to review and develop our Faculty strategy for involvement Timely to review and develop our Faculty strategy for involvement Funded by Faculty small research grant scheme Funded by Faculty small research grant scheme

3 Aim of project To contribute to developing an effective research culture in the School of Health and Social Care where service users and carers are involved as valued partners in the research process To contribute to developing an effective research culture in the School of Health and Social Care where service users and carers are involved as valued partners in the research process

4 Project team Initiated by two academic researchers Initiated by two academic researchers Two service user researchers recruited, one experienced and one novice Two service user researchers recruited, one experienced and one novice One additional academic researcher joined team One additional academic researcher joined team

5 Methods Literature review Literature review Two focus groups: academics / users Two focus groups: academics / users survey of faculty research staff survey of faculty research staff Reflective diaries and discussion Reflective diaries and discussion Workshop for staff developement attended by user researchers Workshop for staff developement attended by user researchers

6 Literature review Substantial literature on the involvement of service users and carers in research Substantial literature on the involvement of service users and carers in research Several published guidelines on best practice for involving service users in research (e.g. SURGE) Several published guidelines on best practice for involving service users in research (e.g. SURGE) Dilemmas regarding terminology (e.g. “users”) Dilemmas regarding terminology (e.g. “users”) Many different levels of involvement Many different levels of involvement Number of factors that help and hinder research Number of factors that help and hinder research Issues about how to involve service users/carers and who to involve Issues about how to involve service users/carers and who to involve Key factors for successful involvement include support and training Key factors for successful involvement include support and training The issue of payment is significant The issue of payment is significant

7 Focus groups Great diversity in understanding of nature and meaning of service user and carer involvement in research Great diversity in understanding of nature and meaning of service user and carer involvement in research Recognition of different levels of involvement Recognition of different levels of involvement Importance of understanding the process of involvement Importance of understanding the process of involvement The early process of engagement is particularly critical as the research is being formulated The early process of engagement is particularly critical as the research is being formulated Key factors for successful involvement Key factors for successful involvement How research process itself (i.e. NHS ethical review) influences involvement How research process itself (i.e. NHS ethical review) influences involvement

8 Staff survey Low level of response (25%) but high levels of significant involvement by those who did respond Low level of response (25%) but high levels of significant involvement by those who did respond 21% (n=17) involved service users and carers in project teams 21% (n=17) involved service users and carers in project teams 15% (n=12) involved service users and cares as co-authors 15% (n=12) involved service users and cares as co-authors Most common barrier identified was ethical requirements (38%, n=30) Most common barrier identified was ethical requirements (38%, n=30) 13% (n=10) had experienced no barriers 13% (n=10) had experienced no barriers Policy guidance from Faculty most common support need identified (50%, n=40) Policy guidance from Faculty most common support need identified (50%, n=40) Qualitative comments emphasised value and utility of service user and carer involvement Qualitative comments emphasised value and utility of service user and carer involvement

9 Reflexive process - barriers Service users were not part of the initial application for funding – so felt that they were not part of the process from the beginning Service users were not part of the initial application for funding – so felt that they were not part of the process from the beginning University structures did not easily accommodate service user involvement (applying for funding, the ethics process) University structures did not easily accommodate service user involvement (applying for funding, the ethics process) Aims of the project may have been too ambitious for the level of funding Aims of the project may have been too ambitious for the level of funding Lack of induction and/or initial team building had serious consequences & led to misunderstandings Lack of induction and/or initial team building had serious consequences & led to misunderstandings The service user researchers were unclear about their role The service user researchers were unclear about their role Short deadlines were not helpful, no contingency plans Short deadlines were not helpful, no contingency plans Effective communication channels were not established Effective communication channels were not established Inadequate preparation for working with service user researchers Inadequate preparation for working with service user researchers Insufficient support for users available during the process Insufficient support for users available during the process

10 Reflexive process – facilitating factors Regular meetings of the research team enabled assessment/re-assessment of the project as an ongoing process Regular meetings of the research team enabled assessment/re-assessment of the project as an ongoing process All the researchers were flexible and accommodating to changing availability & focus All the researchers were flexible and accommodating to changing availability & focus The service user researchers felt able to ask questions, and felt valued The service user researchers felt able to ask questions, and felt valued The views and input of service user researchers were valued by the academic researchers The views and input of service user researchers were valued by the academic researchers The academic researchers were honest about the shortcomings of the project and prepared to discuss issues as they arose throughout the course of the research process The academic researchers were honest about the shortcomings of the project and prepared to discuss issues as they arose throughout the course of the research process Everyone valued the project as a chance to learn. Everyone valued the project as a chance to learn.

11 Learning from reflection If the service user researchers had been involved in the process from the beginning, we would have been able to develop constructive working relations much more quickly If the service user researchers had been involved in the process from the beginning, we would have been able to develop constructive working relations much more quickly We should have prioritised building our team so that all of us could explore and clarify roles and expectations, and feel more comfortable about working with each other We should have prioritised building our team so that all of us could explore and clarify roles and expectations, and feel more comfortable about working with each other All members of the team needed to be able to negotiate their own levels of involvement in the project, and to allow for contingencies All members of the team needed to be able to negotiate their own levels of involvement in the project, and to allow for contingencies We were unrealistic about working as ‘equals’- given different cultural starting points & power We were unrealistic about working as ‘equals’- given different cultural starting points & power

12 Key factors for successful involvement Strategic policy and personal commitment Strategic policy and personal commitment Accessible guidance and support available Accessible guidance and support available Early and continued engagement crucial Early and continued engagement crucial Clarity on the project and roles, time commitments, etc Clarity on the project and roles, time commitments, etc Accessibility of project/materials Accessibility of project/materials Recognising diversity of service users Recognising diversity of service users Need to sort practicalities – access, payment, benefits, etc Need to sort practicalities – access, payment, benefits, etc Training, support, team building for both academic and service user researchers Training, support, team building for both academic and service user researchers

13 Recommendations Form a steering group of academic and service user / carer researchers to take project forward Form a steering group of academic and service user / carer researchers to take project forward Establish Faculty Panel of service users and carers interested in becoming partners in research Establish Faculty Panel of service users and carers interested in becoming partners in research Develop a database of interests and expertise of panel members Develop a database of interests and expertise of panel members Identify benefits in kind and levels of payment for service users and carer involvement Identify benefits in kind and levels of payment for service users and carer involvement Develop & publicise a programme of opportunities for academic and service user\carer researchers to meet and establish working relationships (e.g. at Faculty Research Seminars) Develop & publicise a programme of opportunities for academic and service user\carer researchers to meet and establish working relationships (e.g. at Faculty Research Seminars) Build SU & C Involvement into research budgets : Credit union system established to fund service user and carer involvement while developing new research proposals Build SU & C Involvement into research budgets : Credit union system established to fund service user and carer involvement while developing new research proposals Establish a Co-ordinator post to promote & support plan Establish a Co-ordinator post to promote & support plan

14 Next steps Report and recommendations have been discussed and supported by the Faculty Research & Knowledge Exchange Committee Report and recommendations have been discussed and supported by the Faculty Research & Knowledge Exchange Committee The team have been given 15K towards the development of the recommendations The team have been given 15K towards the development of the recommendations Action plan agreed to develop User / Carer Panel within next 12 months Action plan agreed to develop User / Carer Panel within next 12 months Initial steps taken to form a Steering Group with representatives from four main research centres, the research team plus four service user\carer researchers, and Dean of Research Initial steps taken to form a Steering Group with representatives from four main research centres, the research team plus four service user\carer researchers, and Dean of Research

15 Contact details Pat Taylor Pat Taylor Ruth Sayers Ruth Sayers If you want a copy of the main report please contact Pat If you want a copy of the main report please contact Pat