Abstract: Leafy spurge Euphorbia esula is an invasive forb that is rapidly spreading along roadsides and in pastures and prairies throughout the Midwest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecological Succession: (Important info in blue)
Advertisements

Ecological Succession
Module #6 Forage Selection Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast.
Beneficial Management Practices for Saskatchewan Species at Risk: Western Spiderwort Threatened.
Prairie Restoration: Increasing Warm-Season Native Grasses with Fire, Herbicide, and Nitrogen Application Shauna Waughtel, S.A. Clay, A. Smart, D.E. Clay,
Community Design and Workshop February 18,2014 Sacred Keepers Sustainability Lab 6-8:30pm.
Carol Kim, Matthew Jurysta, Kathryn Szramek, David Courard-Hauri; Environmental Science & Policy Program, College of Arts & Sciences Introduction References.
10/12/071 Managing succession in rangelands Optional Reading: Westoby et al., 1989, Opportunistic Management for Rangelands not at Equilibrium, J Range.
The Effect of Black Walnut on the Germination of Tomato Seeds
Internode Morphology in Common Blackberry. INTRODUCTION Observations: Blackberry is common in the Jewel Moore Nature Reserve Blackberry can be an invasive.
Effects of Eastern Redcedar and its removal on invertebrate abundance and richness in two relict prairies Erin Brogan, Jacob Gaster, Jenna Noble, Heidi.
Michelle Trogdon GEOG 4401/5401 Soils Geography Fall 2007 – Univ of Colorado, Boulder.
Introduction Cole crop are mainly grown in cold weather during winter season in India. Cole crops are grown by transplanting seedlings grown in nurseries.
Trophic Levels & Ecological Pyramids June 9, 2015 Energy Flow in Ecosystems 1.
What are the main factors that determine Earth’s climate?
Clermont College Ecology Michelle Beebe Ashley Callahan Kati O'Rourke Professor Janet Stein-Carter.
Piedmont Region of Georgia
Potential for pH to Limit Oriental Bittersweet Invasion in MN Celastrus orbiculatus Heather Pagelkopf August 14, 2013.
By: Courtney Thrams.  An Invasive Species is an alien species whose introduction causes or is likely to cause harm to the economy, environment, or human.
Competition. What a wondrous problem it is, what a play of forces, determining the kind and proportion of each plant in a square yard of turf!!
INVASIVE PLANTS What are they and how can we pull together to win the war on weeds!
Succession Science 1206.
Plant Ecology - Chapter 13
Spring Quarter 2009 Jessica Lawson Amanda Holland.
Biomes FIELD BIOLOGY & METHODOLOGY Fall 2014 Althoff Lecture 04.
Effects of Intraspecific Competition on Varying Groups of Marigolds Tiffany Landis Microbiology Major Tennessee Technological University Cookeville, TN.
Kim Tarde Vegetation Ecology Summer 2014 Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder.
The Biosphere: An Introduction to Biomes. Earths Biomes Ecology Organization Population Community Ecosystem -scientific study of the interactions between.
Savannah Grassland Biome By: Mia, Leo, Nadim, and Anna.
Chapter 10 Ecological Restoration. The Balance of Nature –An environmental myth that states that the natural environment, when not influenced by human.
Biology Unit - Ecology 4.1 Notes.
An important product of Weathering.
1 Ecology: Ecology: an introduction. 2 Ecology: The study of the interactions that take place among organisms and their environment.
Regeneration of Natural Pasture in Enclosures for Parthenium Weed Management in the Rangeland of Jigjiga, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia B Y Lisanework.
Effects of Red Cedar on Invertebrate Abundance and Morphospecies Richness Jenna Noble, Todd Tracy, Jesse Nieuwenhuis, and Jonathan Gesink Northwestern.
Ecological Succession.  Ecological succession is the observed process of change in the species structure of an ecological community over time.
Ecological Succession Ecosystems are constantly changing in response to natural and human disturbances.
Forest Floor Invasion Results BIO 205F, 2003 Objectives: 1.To determine whether plant species from the natural forest floor will reestablish if the invading.
Effects of simulated climate change on the abundance of an exotic weevil, Cyrtepistomus castaneus Bryan Marbert (ASU ) and Paul Hanson (ORNL) Contact Information:
Changes in a community Ecological succession Unit 3 Topic 6.
Introduction Effect of temperature on germination behaviour and early growth of Pinus halepensis M. seeds. Thekla Tsitsoni 1, Aimilia Kontogianni 1, Marianthi.
Effect of Compaction of Soil Surface to Increase Herbicide Effect in Upland Rice Cultivation By THAN TOE DEPUTY SUPERVISOR MYANMAR AGRICULTURE SERVICE.
Global Change and Southern California Ecosystems Rebecca Aicher UCI GK-12 March 7, 2009.
Ecosystems and Communities. What is Climate? Weather is the day-to-day condition of Earth’s atmosphere at a particular time and place Weather is the day-to-day.
End Show Slide 1 of 39 Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall 4-2 What Shapes an Ecosystem?
How Do Changes to Habitats Affect Living Things?
Succession A process of ecological change in which a series of natural communities are established and then replaced over time is called_______________________.
Stand Development. Site Capability The ability of a forest to grow is related directly to physical site factors. Favourable physical factors create better.
The Road to Recovery at NATL Unhealthy Effects of Fire Suppression Back to a Healthy State Role of Native Americans in setting fires? Fire at NATL: Mother.
Succession. A process by which communities of plants and animals colonise an area and then, over time, are replaced by other, more varied organisms.
Printed by How climate effects the growth of corn LeanaJean & Sam Corn predominantly grown in Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana. Average.
Biodiversity total number of species within an ecosystem and the resulting complexities of interactions among them Biomes all of the life-supporting regions.
Ecological Succession
Unit 1 Lesson 1 Introduction to Ecology
Ecological Succession
Establishment of Milkweed Seeds under Different Conditions
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Problem Results Introduction Hypothesis Conclusion Materials Tables
Unit 1 Lesson 1 Introduction to Ecology
4-2 What Shapes an Ecosystem?
Does the type of light affect the height of rye plants?
Ecological Succession
History and Management Practices
5-3 How Do Communities and Ecosystems Respond to Changing Environmental Conditions? Concept 5-3 The structure and species composition of communities and.
Wildfire and Invasive Species
What is ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION?
B-6.3: Illustrate the processes of succession in ecosystems.
Piedmont Habitat of Georgia
Forage Selection Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast 4/5/
Presentation transcript:

Abstract: Leafy spurge Euphorbia esula is an invasive forb that is rapidly spreading along roadsides and in pastures and prairies throughout the Midwest. Eastern redcedar Juniperus virginiana is another invasive creating problems in the region, and efforts have become commonplace to eradicate redcedar shrubs by cutting them at the base. The purpose of our study was twofold: 1) to learn more about seed dormancy and germination requirements of leafy spurge; and 2) to determine whether the bare soil surrounding newly cut redcedar trees contain chemicals from the redcedar that would significantly inhibit or enhance the germination and growth of leafy spurge. We found no difference in germination among leafy spurge seeds that were left at room temperature, those that were frozen for 42 and 96 days, and those that were refrigerated for 42 and 96 days. We found significantly higher germination rates for leafy spurge in cedar soil than in soil collected in nearby non-cedar areas; however, we found no difference in seedling growth rates between cedar and non-cedar treatments. A similar study performed on poppy and black-eyed Susan seeds showed no differences in germination rates or growth between cedar and noncedar soils. We posit that the removal of redcedars may create optimal colonization conditions for leafy spurge and that steps such as planting native grasses and forbs should be taken when removing redcedars in areas that have been invaded by leafy spurge. Abstract: Leafy spurge Euphorbia esula is an invasive forb that is rapidly spreading along roadsides and in pastures and prairies throughout the Midwest. Eastern redcedar Juniperus virginiana is another invasive creating problems in the region, and efforts have become commonplace to eradicate redcedar shrubs by cutting them at the base. The purpose of our study was twofold: 1) to learn more about seed dormancy and germination requirements of leafy spurge; and 2) to determine whether the bare soil surrounding newly cut redcedar trees contain chemicals from the redcedar that would significantly inhibit or enhance the germination and growth of leafy spurge. We found no difference in germination among leafy spurge seeds that were left at room temperature, those that were frozen for 42 and 96 days, and those that were refrigerated for 42 and 96 days. We found significantly higher germination rates for leafy spurge in cedar soil than in soil collected in nearby non-cedar areas; however, we found no difference in seedling growth rates between cedar and non-cedar treatments. A similar study performed on poppy and black-eyed Susan seeds showed no differences in germination rates or growth between cedar and noncedar soils. We posit that the removal of redcedars may create optimal colonization conditions for leafy spurge and that steps such as planting native grasses and forbs should be taken when removing redcedars in areas that have been invaded by leafy spurge. Discussion: After conducting this experiment, we found that leafy spurge seeds do not need to be refrigerated or frozen for a length of time before they germinate. We found no significant difference in the amount of time seeds were either refrigerated or frozen. Leafy spurge seeds thus, do not need to overwinter in order to germinate. We did find that leafy spurge seeds germinate better in cedar soil vs. non-cedar soil. We also found that cedar soil contains more organic material than non-cedar soil. Since more leafy spurge in the cedar soil than the non-cedar soil, this result can provide us with some insight as to a possible allopathic and inhibitor relationship between cedars and leafy spurge. In fact, cedar soil has been known to contain a chemical which suppresses the growth of other plants around it (Stowe 1979). However, leafy spurge seems to be able to grow in the allopathic soil anyway. Nonetheless, if cedar trees are removed from an area, its absence could create an environment for leafy spurge to invade and cause other problems. The restoration of natural prairies and the disturbance of habitat by removal of the eastern red cedar could cause a different invasive species to succeed the cedars (Sheley, Mangold, and Anderson, 2006). The cedar soil contains more organic matter, which would allow it to retain more moisture and possibly enhance seed germination. A similar study performed at Northwestern College in spring 2009 on poppy and black-eyed Susan seeds showed no differences in germination rates or growth between cedar and non- cedar soils, suggesting that leafy spurge may differentially benefit from redcedar removal. We posit that the removal of redcedars may create optimal colonization conditions for leafy spurge and that steps such as planting native grasses and forbs should be taken when removing redcedars in areas that have been invaded by leafy spurge. So, removing one invasive species could create a prime habitat for another invasive species to take over. Discussion: After conducting this experiment, we found that leafy spurge seeds do not need to be refrigerated or frozen for a length of time before they germinate. We found no significant difference in the amount of time seeds were either refrigerated or frozen. Leafy spurge seeds thus, do not need to overwinter in order to germinate. We did find that leafy spurge seeds germinate better in cedar soil vs. non-cedar soil. We also found that cedar soil contains more organic material than non-cedar soil. Since more leafy spurge in the cedar soil than the non-cedar soil, this result can provide us with some insight as to a possible allopathic and inhibitor relationship between cedars and leafy spurge. In fact, cedar soil has been known to contain a chemical which suppresses the growth of other plants around it (Stowe 1979). However, leafy spurge seems to be able to grow in the allopathic soil anyway. Nonetheless, if cedar trees are removed from an area, its absence could create an environment for leafy spurge to invade and cause other problems. The restoration of natural prairies and the disturbance of habitat by removal of the eastern red cedar could cause a different invasive species to succeed the cedars (Sheley, Mangold, and Anderson, 2006). The cedar soil contains more organic matter, which would allow it to retain more moisture and possibly enhance seed germination. A similar study performed at Northwestern College in spring 2009 on poppy and black-eyed Susan seeds showed no differences in germination rates or growth between cedar and non- cedar soils, suggesting that leafy spurge may differentially benefit from redcedar removal. We posit that the removal of redcedars may create optimal colonization conditions for leafy spurge and that steps such as planting native grasses and forbs should be taken when removing redcedars in areas that have been invaded by leafy spurge. So, removing one invasive species could create a prime habitat for another invasive species to take over. Materials and Methods: Our research was conducted in fall 2009 on the campus of Northwestern College (Orange City, IA) in Van Peursem Hall, Room 221. First, we obtained leafy spurge seeds from Oak Grove County Park (Sioux County) on July 20, After collecting the seeds, we placed them at different temperatures for varying amounts of time as a precursor for later determining the conditions that would produce the highest germination rates. We placed ~200 seeds in each of several unsealed Ziploc baggies. We placed several bags at room temperature (20 – 25 °C). We placed others in a freezer (approximately -18 o C) from August 2 nd to November 6 th (96 days total) and from September 25 th to November 6 th (42 days total). We placed the remaining groups in a refrigerator (~2°C) from August 2 nd to November 6 th (96 days total) and from September 25 th to November 6 th (42 days total). To test the effect of eastern red-cedar on the germination of leafy spurge seeds, we collected cedar and non-cedar soil from Oak Grove on November 4, The soil was found beneath two cedar trees approximately 10 meters away from open grassland where downy brome was dominant. The non-cedar soil was obtained from this grassy area. Leafy spurge was seen on-site, but not in the vicinity of where the soil was collected. We created six 10x20 cm trays of cedar soil and six of non-cedar soil. Each tray was filled with soil to a depth of approximately 5 cm. In three of the cedar trays, we created three rows (room temperature=RT, frozen for 42 days=FZ 42), and refrigerated for 42 days =FG 42) of 6 seeds each. In the other three cedar trays, we created 3 rows (RT, FZ 96 days, and FG 96 days) of 6 seeds each. Likewise, we created 3 non-cedar trays with RT seeds and seeds from 42 days and 3 with RT seeds and seeds from 96 days. For each set of three trays, the rows were arranged as follows: RT – FZ – FG; FG – RT – FZ; FZ – FG – RT. After watering and covering the trays with cellophane, we placed them all under a growth light with a 12L:12D timer for 14 days. Every day the trays were rotated to ensure uniform lighting for all seeds. After 4 days, the cellophane was removed. For each of the next 10 days, we poured 20 ml of water in each tray. At the end of 14 days, we noted the germination in each of the trays and measured growth (cm) of those seeds that did germinate. We conducted a chi-square analysis to determine if the proportion of seeds that germinated differed between cedar vs. non-cedar soil. To determine the organic content of the cedar versus non-cedar soil, we weighed six samples (14 – 19g) of each soil type and placed them in individual aluminum foil boats. We also weighed six empty aluminum boats as controls to ensure that the weight of the boats would not change significantly after drying and heating. After drying the samples at 70 o C for 4 days, we weighed them again to determine the moisture content of cedar vs. non-cedar soil. Next, we heated the samples and the control boats at 500 o C for 20 hours to burn away all organic material. We weighed the boats one final time in order to determine the organic content of each soil type. We conducted independent-sample t-tests to see if the organic content and moisture content of the cedar soil were significantly different from the non-cedar soil. Materials and Methods: Our research was conducted in fall 2009 on the campus of Northwestern College (Orange City, IA) in Van Peursem Hall, Room 221. First, we obtained leafy spurge seeds from Oak Grove County Park (Sioux County) on July 20, After collecting the seeds, we placed them at different temperatures for varying amounts of time as a precursor for later determining the conditions that would produce the highest germination rates. We placed ~200 seeds in each of several unsealed Ziploc baggies. We placed several bags at room temperature (20 – 25 °C). We placed others in a freezer (approximately -18 o C) from August 2 nd to November 6 th (96 days total) and from September 25 th to November 6 th (42 days total). We placed the remaining groups in a refrigerator (~2°C) from August 2 nd to November 6 th (96 days total) and from September 25 th to November 6 th (42 days total). To test the effect of eastern red-cedar on the germination of leafy spurge seeds, we collected cedar and non-cedar soil from Oak Grove on November 4, The soil was found beneath two cedar trees approximately 10 meters away from open grassland where downy brome was dominant. The non-cedar soil was obtained from this grassy area. Leafy spurge was seen on-site, but not in the vicinity of where the soil was collected. We created six 10x20 cm trays of cedar soil and six of non-cedar soil. Each tray was filled with soil to a depth of approximately 5 cm. In three of the cedar trays, we created three rows (room temperature=RT, frozen for 42 days=FZ 42), and refrigerated for 42 days =FG 42) of 6 seeds each. In the other three cedar trays, we created 3 rows (RT, FZ 96 days, and FG 96 days) of 6 seeds each. Likewise, we created 3 non-cedar trays with RT seeds and seeds from 42 days and 3 with RT seeds and seeds from 96 days. For each set of three trays, the rows were arranged as follows: RT – FZ – FG; FG – RT – FZ; FZ – FG – RT. After watering and covering the trays with cellophane, we placed them all under a growth light with a 12L:12D timer for 14 days. Every day the trays were rotated to ensure uniform lighting for all seeds. After 4 days, the cellophane was removed. For each of the next 10 days, we poured 20 ml of water in each tray. At the end of 14 days, we noted the germination in each of the trays and measured growth (cm) of those seeds that did germinate. We conducted a chi-square analysis to determine if the proportion of seeds that germinated differed between cedar vs. non-cedar soil. To determine the organic content of the cedar versus non-cedar soil, we weighed six samples (14 – 19g) of each soil type and placed them in individual aluminum foil boats. We also weighed six empty aluminum boats as controls to ensure that the weight of the boats would not change significantly after drying and heating. After drying the samples at 70 o C for 4 days, we weighed them again to determine the moisture content of cedar vs. non-cedar soil. Next, we heated the samples and the control boats at 500 o C for 20 hours to burn away all organic material. We weighed the boats one final time in order to determine the organic content of each soil type. We conducted independent-sample t-tests to see if the organic content and moisture content of the cedar soil were significantly different from the non-cedar soil. Results: Although we had low germination rates, we conducted a chi-square analysis on the proportion of germinated seeds that were refrigerated and frozen for 42 days and 96 days for both the cedar and non-cedar soil (Fig. 2). We found no difference in germination in cedar soil for seeds that were either refrigerated or frozen for 42 days (chi-square=3.704) or for 96 days (chi-square=0.468; chi-square crit.=3.84). We found no difference in germination in non-cedar soil for seeds that were either refrigerated or frozen for 42 days (chi-square=3.2) or for 96 days (chi-square=0.8; crit.=3.84). We then combined the data into seeds that were kept at room temperature, put into the refrigerator, or into the freezer and compared them based on the soil type they were grown in (cedar vs. non-cedar soil; Fig. 2). Seeds grown in cedar soil germinated significantly more than seeds grown in non-cedar soil (chi-sq=4.461, crit.=3.84). While growing the seeds we measured the growth of the leafy spurge, we found no difference in seedling growth after germination. Seeds refrigerated for 42 vs. 96 days showed no significant growth difference (t=3.182, p=0.304) in cedar soil, and seeds that were frozen for 42 vs. 96 days showed no significant growth difference (t=2.179, p=0.213) in cedar soil either. Also, the seeds grown in non-cedar soil showed no significant difference in germination when they were refrigerated (t=2.571, p=0.869). No p value could be calculated for the seeds that were frozen for 42 days vs. 96 days because only one seed that was frozen for 42 days germinated in the non-cedar soil. Since we had low germination rates, we combined the data and ran a t-test on the growth of the seeds grown in cedar vs. non-cedar soil. The test showed no significance (t=2.030, p=0.206) on the effects of seed growth in cedar vs. non-cedar soil. We also compared the amount of organic material and moisture in the cedar vs. non- cedar soil. We found that the cedar soil had significantly more organic material than the non-cedar soil (t=2.45; p=0.0003; Fig. 3), and that the cedar soil also had a significantly higher moisture content (30.3% vs. 19.2%; p=0.004). Results: Although we had low germination rates, we conducted a chi-square analysis on the proportion of germinated seeds that were refrigerated and frozen for 42 days and 96 days for both the cedar and non-cedar soil (Fig. 2). We found no difference in germination in cedar soil for seeds that were either refrigerated or frozen for 42 days (chi-square=3.704) or for 96 days (chi-square=0.468; chi-square crit.=3.84). We found no difference in germination in non-cedar soil for seeds that were either refrigerated or frozen for 42 days (chi-square=3.2) or for 96 days (chi-square=0.8; crit.=3.84). We then combined the data into seeds that were kept at room temperature, put into the refrigerator, or into the freezer and compared them based on the soil type they were grown in (cedar vs. non-cedar soil; Fig. 2). Seeds grown in cedar soil germinated significantly more than seeds grown in non-cedar soil (chi-sq=4.461, crit.=3.84). While growing the seeds we measured the growth of the leafy spurge, we found no difference in seedling growth after germination. Seeds refrigerated for 42 vs. 96 days showed no significant growth difference (t=3.182, p=0.304) in cedar soil, and seeds that were frozen for 42 vs. 96 days showed no significant growth difference (t=2.179, p=0.213) in cedar soil either. Also, the seeds grown in non-cedar soil showed no significant difference in germination when they were refrigerated (t=2.571, p=0.869). No p value could be calculated for the seeds that were frozen for 42 days vs. 96 days because only one seed that was frozen for 42 days germinated in the non-cedar soil. Since we had low germination rates, we combined the data and ran a t-test on the growth of the seeds grown in cedar vs. non-cedar soil. The test showed no significance (t=2.030, p=0.206) on the effects of seed growth in cedar vs. non-cedar soil. We also compared the amount of organic material and moisture in the cedar vs. non- cedar soil. We found that the cedar soil had significantly more organic material than the non-cedar soil (t=2.45; p=0.0003; Fig. 3), and that the cedar soil also had a significantly higher moisture content (30.3% vs. 19.2%; p=0.004). Introduction: Leafy spurge Euphorbia esula is an invasive species that originated from Europe and temperate Asia. Habitats invaded by this species are woodlands, savannahs, and prairies. Leafy spurge prefers high sunlight areas with dry soil and can survive with little moisture due to its extensive root system, which allows spurge to outcompete native species for soil moisture. Leafy spurge is usually found in large clusters. The clusters coming from each plant produce an average of 200 seeds per year. These seeds, unless spread by animals, will only fall as far as 1-2 meters away from the mother plant (ISSG/NBII). Little is known about the germination of leafy spurge. In part, we conducted our study to determine what temperature conditions facilitate the highest germination rates for the seeds of this noxious weed. This information was important to obtain in order to use seeds that would be more likely to germinate when we later tested germination and growth rates in cedar and noncedar soils. Our primary motivation for this experiment was to determine whether the presence of cedar soil (i.e., soil that had been beneath the invasive eastern redcedar Juniperus virginiana) enhances the germination and growth of leafy spurge. Because the ranges of these two species overlap (Fig. 1), and because these two invasives often inhabit the same areas, knowledge of how they affect each other could potentially help us develop new ways to control their invasion. For our temperature experiment, we predicted that the leafy spurge seeds must be frozen or chilled to have the best germination rate. For germination and growth of leafy spurge in cedar and noncedar soil, we predicted that the cedar soil would provide enhanced conditions for the germination and growth of leafy spurge. Introduction: Leafy spurge Euphorbia esula is an invasive species that originated from Europe and temperate Asia. Habitats invaded by this species are woodlands, savannahs, and prairies. Leafy spurge prefers high sunlight areas with dry soil and can survive with little moisture due to its extensive root system, which allows spurge to outcompete native species for soil moisture. Leafy spurge is usually found in large clusters. The clusters coming from each plant produce an average of 200 seeds per year. These seeds, unless spread by animals, will only fall as far as 1-2 meters away from the mother plant (ISSG/NBII). Little is known about the germination of leafy spurge. In part, we conducted our study to determine what temperature conditions facilitate the highest germination rates for the seeds of this noxious weed. This information was important to obtain in order to use seeds that would be more likely to germinate when we later tested germination and growth rates in cedar and noncedar soils. Our primary motivation for this experiment was to determine whether the presence of cedar soil (i.e., soil that had been beneath the invasive eastern redcedar Juniperus virginiana) enhances the germination and growth of leafy spurge. Because the ranges of these two species overlap (Fig. 1), and because these two invasives often inhabit the same areas, knowledge of how they affect each other could potentially help us develop new ways to control their invasion. For our temperature experiment, we predicted that the leafy spurge seeds must be frozen or chilled to have the best germination rate. For germination and growth of leafy spurge in cedar and noncedar soil, we predicted that the cedar soil would provide enhanced conditions for the germination and growth of leafy spurge. References: "Euphorbia Esula (herb)." Global Invasive Species Database. National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) and Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG), 26 June Web. 13 Dec Sheley, R. L., Mangold, J. M., Anderson, J. L. (2006). Potential for Successional Theory to Guide Restoration of Invasive-Plant-Dominated Rangeland. Ecology, Vol. 76, No. 3, Retrieved February 12, 2009, from JSTOR. Stowe, Lawrence G. (1979). Allelopathy and its influence on the Distribution of Plants in an Illinois Old-Field. Ecology, Vol. 67, No. 3, Retrieved February 12, 2009, from JSTOR. References: "Euphorbia Esula (herb)." Global Invasive Species Database. National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) and Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG), 26 June Web. 13 Dec Sheley, R. L., Mangold, J. M., Anderson, J. L. (2006). Potential for Successional Theory to Guide Restoration of Invasive-Plant-Dominated Rangeland. Ecology, Vol. 76, No. 3, Retrieved February 12, 2009, from JSTOR. Stowe, Lawrence G. (1979). Allelopathy and its influence on the Distribution of Plants in an Illinois Old-Field. Ecology, Vol. 67, No. 3, Retrieved February 12, 2009, from JSTOR. Fig. 3 After drying both soil types and burning away all organic material, we found that the cedar soil had significantly more organic material in it than the non-cedar soil (p<0.001). Bars represent standard deviation. Fig. 1 Range of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) and Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana) Blue = range of leafy spurge only Salmon = range of red cedar only Purple = range of overlap where both leafy spurge and red cedar are found Fig. 1 Range of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) and Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana) Blue = range of leafy spurge only Salmon = range of red cedar only Purple = range of overlap where both leafy spurge and red cedar are found Fig. 2 After planting the seeds from 42 and 96 day treatments in cedar and non-cedar soils, we found that in both soil types, the proportion of seeds that germinated after 42 days was not significantly different from those that germinated after 96 days. Therefore, the germination data from both 42 and 96 days were combined. We found that seeds were more likely to germinate in cedar soils (31/108) than non-cedar (18/108; Chi-square = 4.46; Chi- square critical = 3.84), but found no significant difference in the temperature treatment of leafy spurge seeds on the success of their germination.