Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course Introduction to virtual engineering Óbuda University John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering Systems Lecture.
Advertisements

AP Physics B Units.
FEA Reference Guide See additional material herehere.
Magnetic Drug Targeting, Ferrofluidics. Magnetic Drug Targeting: Ferrofluidics.
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses
Thermal Analysis of Two Braze Alloys to Improve the Performance of a Contactor During the Temperature Rise Test G. Contreras 1, E. Gutierrez-Miravete 2.
1 Design of Gridded-Tube Structures for the 805 MHz RF Cavity Department of Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering M. Alsharoa (PhD candidate)
EEE340Lecture : Magnetic Circuits Analysis of magnetic circuits is based on Or where V m =NI is called a magnetomotive force (mmf) Also Or (6.83)
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
Identified Company (CompositeX) to manufacture Custom Composite Pressure Vessel ● Working pressure 1000psi ● Holds 8 kg Nitrous Oxide ● 700 cubic inch.
Al 2 O 3 Post Combustion Chamber Post Combustion Chamber ANSYS Thermal Model (Embedded Fuel Grain Concept) Outer radius: 1.25” ( m) Inner radius:
Status of the Coil Structure Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray PPPL: H.M. Fan.
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
Electro Mechanical System
Chapter 1 Introduction. Training Manual Electromagnetic Analysis in Workbench March 4, 2005 Inventory # A. Feature Overview Workbench EMAG features.
Thermal Analysis of Two Braze Alloys to Improve the Performance of a Contactor During the Temperature Rise Test G. Contreras 1, E. Gutierrez-Miravete 2.
K L University 1. 2 MAGNETOSTATICS 3 Introduction to Magneto statics – Magnetic field, Magnetic force, Magnetic flux Biot-Savat’s law -- Applications.
PIPE FEA USING ANSYS.
MODELING OF INDUCTION HARDENING PROCESS PART 1: INDUCTION HEATING
Physics of Fusion power Lecture4 : Quasi-neutrality Force on the plasma.
LARP QXF 150mm Structure Mike Anerella / John Cozzolino / Jesse Schmalzle November 15, nd Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting.
1 Strong and Weak Formulations of Electromagnetic Problems Patrick Dular, University of Liège - FNRS, Belgium.
University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy Department of Material Science and Engineering FINITEELEMENT METHOD By eng. Veselin Paunov Prof. Veselin.
Non stationary heat transfer at ceramic pots firing Janna Mateeva, MP 0053 Department Of Material Science And Engineering Finite Element Method.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY EKT 241/4: ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY PREPARED BY: NORDIANA MOHAMAD SAAID CHAPTER 4 – MAGNETOSTATICS.
1 Magnetostatics. 2 If charges are moving with constant velocity, a static magnetic (or magnetostatic) field is produced. Thus, magnetostatic fields originate.
1 Magnetostatics The Basics. 2 Stationary charge: Stationary charge: v q = 0 E  0B = 0 Moving charge:Moving charge: v q  0 and v q = constant E  0B.
NSTXU-CALC Vessel Port Rework for NB and Thomson Scattering
Micro-Resistor Beam.
NSTXU-CALC TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
1 Numerical study of the thermal behavior of an Nb 3 Sn high field magnet in He II Slawomir PIETROWICZ, Bertrand BAUDOUY CEA Saclay Irfu, SACM Gif-sur-Yvette.
APPLIED MECHANICS Lecture 13 Slovak University of Technology
ANSYS for MEMS by Manjula1 FEM of MEMS on ANSYS MEMS Summer 2007 Why FEM for MEMS? Features in ANSYS Basic Procedures Examples.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
First calculation of the antenna heating for HFS reflectometry system Yu.S. Shpanskiy, N.N. Vasiliev RRC KURCHATOV INSTITUTE April 10, 2006.
Results of Linear Stress Analyses for Modular Coils and Coil structure For 2T High Beta Currents at 0 Seconds and Initial Coil Shrinkage of in/in.
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 3.
1 MAGNETOSTATIC FIELD (MAGNETIC FORCE, MAGNETIC MATERIAL AND INDUCTANCE) CHAPTER FORCE ON A MOVING POINT CHARGE 8.2 FORCE ON A FILAMENTARY CURRENT.
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
Chapter 6 Overview. Maxwell’s Equations In this chapter, we will examine Faraday’s and Ampère’s laws.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
6. Maxwell’s Equations In Time-Varying Fields
General Analysis Procedure Chapter 4. Training Manual October 30, 2001 Inventory # Chapter 4 - General Analysis Procedure Overview The objective.
Andrew Biehl.  The objective of this project is to develop a method for determining the nut factor of a bolted joint using the finite element method.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4
AWB NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review April 10, 2003 Art Brooks.
COUPLED ANALYSES Chapter 7. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Fluid-Structure Analysis “One Way” Analysis –Structural deformation effect.
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
Finite element mesh and load definition
Measurements SI base unit.
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS K SIVA RAMA KRISHNA Y LOKESWARA RAO R MANI KANTA
ELEC 3105 Basic EM and Power Engineering
Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics
Peter Uzunov Associate professor , PhD Bulgaria, Gabrovo , 5300 , Stramnina str. 2 s:
First Internal LHC Dipole Diode Insulation Consolidation Review
Date of download: 11/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
5. Conductors and dielectrics
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Electromagnetic Theory
Chapter 6 Thermal Analysis
Comparison between Serrated & Notched Serrated Heat Exchanger Fin Performance Presented by NABILA RUBAIYA.
L1: Force Learning Objectives: Describe what a force is.
Realistic multiphysics analysis
Bicycle Wrench Analysis
Kelvin Scale Absolute temperature § 17.3.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4

Figure 2 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly Solid Model: Version 4

Figure 3 – ANSYS Multiphysics Analysis Block Diagram

Figure 4 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly FEA Model: Mesh

Figure 5 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly Electric Model Results: Voltage

Fig. 6 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly Electric Model Results: Current Density

Figure 7 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly Electric Model Results: Joule Heat

Fig. 8 – Single Segment 3-Strap Assembly Thermal Model Results: Temperature

Study: Determine Current Best-Practice to Perform Magnetostatic Analysis in ANSYS 12.0 WorkBench New SOLID236/237 magnetic analysis elements –Have both Magnetic Vector Potential (MVP) and Line Edge method capability. Replaces SOLID97 and SOLID117. –Compatible with WB generated Electric, Thermal, and Static Structural analyses meshes. No 3D MVP or Line Edge contact elements –Requires conformal mesh with shared nodes across the joints, which makes modeling assemblies including frictional and pressure-dependent electric and thermal contact impossible, or –Non-conformal/ dissimilar mesh, with duplicate nodes across the joint. Magnetic coupling using CPINTF command requires nearly-matched meshing, which is difficult to achieve in a large assembly. Above problems are greatly reduced if modeling the air enclosure, and modeling the magnetic coupling across the joints, are not necessary –May be valid for materials with a relative magnetic permeablity = 1. –Goal: Prove with a comparison study.

Outer-most Lamination Arch Segment with Air Enclosure: Solid Model Merged Volumes

Outer-most Lamination Arch Segment with Air Enclosure: Mesh Conformal Mesh: Nodes shared at Interface (perfect magnetic coupling)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Current Density (A/m^2)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Joule Heat

SOLID236: LINE EDGE METHOD Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Metal +Air)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Metal Only)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Current Density

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Lorentz Forces (N)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Metal Only)

Arch Segment w/ Air Magnetostatic Model Results: Lorentz Forces (N)

Arch Segment w/ Air Static Structural Model Results: von Mises Stress (Pa) SOLID186 Stress and reaction force results closely agree with hand-calculated values.

SOLID236 LINE EDGE METHOD Arch Segment _No Air - Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Tesla)

Arch Segment _No Air - Magnetostatic Model Results: Current Density (A/m^2)

Arch Segment _No Air - Magnetostatic Model Results: Lorentz forces (N)

Arch Segment _No Air - Magnetostatic Model Results: Magnetic Flux (Tesla)

Arch Segment _No Air - Magnetostatic Model Results: Lorentz Forces (N)

SOLID186 Stress and reaction force results closely agree with hand-calculated values. Arch Segment _ No Air - Static Structural Model Results: von Mises Stress (Pa)

Conclusion SOLID117 results are not valid, but SOLID236 results using line edge method agree with hand-calculated classic solution values. No difference between results with air enclosure modeled and without. Note: Modeling without air enclosure is valid only for cases where all materials have a relative magnetic permeability = 1.