Continuous Alcohol Monitoring and the SCRAM System Greater Littleton Youth Initiative September 11, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ignition Interlock Devices: An Overview John M. Priester NHTSA/ABA Judicial Fellow Administrative Law Judge Iowa Dept. of Inspections & Appeals.
Advertisements

Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
13 Principles of Effective Addictions Treatment
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
September 25, 2008 PROBATION ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY (PANJ) Separate alcohol from the offender... and your job will get much easier.
 Comprehensive review of DWI administrative license sanctions  Project Goal – Recommend effective sanctions that: › Reduce alcohol-related fatalities.
SCRAMx: The Story of Continuous Alcohol Monitoring Presenter Name and Date Making a Difference.
DUI AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY ART LUSSE JUNE 30, 2010 LAW & JUSTICE INTERIM COMMITTEE.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Community-Oriented Defense Performance Indicators A Conceptual Overview Michael Rempel Center for Court Innovation Presented at the Community-Oriented.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008 How Drug Court Practices Impact Recidivism and Costs Shannon Carey, Ph.D. August 2014.
SENTENCING FOR CRIME CONTROL Mark Kleiman National Association of Sentencing Commissions Chicago August 7, 2012.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Bernard Warner, Secretary.  Over 7 million people in the US are under community supervision.  More than 50% of parolees and 37% of probationers fail.
Misdemeanor Sanctions
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Judicial Department Presentation to the DU Strategic Issues Panel on the Future of State Government October 7, 2010 Honorable Mary J. MullarkeyHonorable.
An approach for the judicial system to reduce the influence of drug and alcohol abuse on crime.
THE 24/7 SOBRIETY PROJECT. Origins Created by South Dakota Created by South Dakota Has existed since 2005 Has existed since 2005 Now in use in 57 of 66.
WISP Assessing Implementation and Early Outcomes Seattle City Council Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD December 12, 2011.
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Mentally Ill Offenders and Sex Offenders. The Problem Mental illness and the lack of sufficient mental health care have driven offenders into the CJ system.
Make/Revise a Law Summative. LEARNING GOAL (Cause and Consequence) You will identify and explain the relationship between societal problems and the creation.
Sociology 3322a. “…the systematic assessment of the operation and/or outcomes of a program or policy, compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
PREPARED BY NPC RESEARCH PORTLAND, OR MAY 2013 Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Results.
New Jersey Department of Human Services Division of Addiction Services Substance Abuse Treatment Services Provider Performance Report Substance Abuse Treatment.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
Drug Related Issues Questions and Curiosities?. Looking at SAMHSA Site Observations? Observations? What does this site tell you about the government’s.
 Performance assessments can:  help identify potential problems in the program  help identify areas where streamlining the process could be useful.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
SENTENCE:  punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.
Justice Alternatives for Wisconsin: Reducing the Costs of the Criminal Justice System Presentation to the Wisconsin Joint Legislative Council May 9, 2007.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Legal Consequences Illegal Drug Possession And Underage Drinking Presented by Mrs. Noël.
DUI and other Drug Treatment Dockets Facts and Figures.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Richard Rawson, Ph.D. Rachel Gonzales, Ph.D. Funded by: California Alcohol and Drug Programs CalOMS Training for.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
Reclassifying Nonviolent, Small Quantity Possession Potential Impact on Alaska’s Budget and Society.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
 First drug court opened in Miami-Dade, FL in 1989  Goal is to reduce recidivism by using graduated sanctions and incentives combined with treatment.
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
Copyright 2011 Curriculum Technology, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
The Transdermal Alcohol Sensor Macro (TASMAC): A Rapid Data Processing Tool for Use with the SCRAMx Alcohol Sensor Nancy P. Barnett, Timothy Souza, Tiffany.
FY17: Briefing on Jail Bed Contingency Funds
Summit County Probation Services
Sentencing Reform in CA
A MULTI-TRACK DUI COURT SYSTEM FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS
Maureen Perkins Impaired Driving Division
Misdemeanors Matter.
Why You Need a DUI Court and How to Get Started
Developing an Effective Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program
Beyond the referral Presented by:
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
The Impact of incarceration on the risk of violent recidivism
Presentation transcript:

Continuous Alcohol Monitoring and the SCRAM System Greater Littleton Youth Initiative September 11, 2009

Agenda  AMS Overview  SCRAM System Overview  Differentiating Consumed Alcohol from Interfering Substances  TAC to BAC Correlation  False Positives and False Negatives  How Can the Criminal Justice System Approach Alcohol Misuse and Crime  South Dakota 24/7 Program  Colorado Applications and Program Development Considerations  Questions and Answers

Alcohol – A Difficult Problem for the Criminal Justice System Colorado– Local Perspective  34% of all traffic fatalities are alcohol related (179)  18% of Insurance costs are due to impaired driving  $76 Per Day to Incarcerate Prisoner in Colorado  3,000 DOC offenders to be released in 2009  800 Offenders currently monitored on any given day in Colorado SCRAM Program National Recidivism  Alcohol is fueling the criminal behavior  36% of all crime/caseloads  75% of cases of domestic violence  33% of all DUI offenders will re-offend

The SCRAM System

SCRAM System Overview  The SCRAM System is Semi-Quantitative TAC results enable a technician to reliably determine whether a person consumed alcohol TAC results are highly correlated with, but not predictive of, BAC  SCRAM “flags” a drinking event when there are 3 or more consecutive readings of TAC or greater Most people will require at least 2 standard drinks to achieve a TAC  SCRAM is designed to be tamper resistant and also “flags” potential tampers. Security features include: Secured strap with tamper-evident securing clip Temperature sensor Obstruction sensors  All “flagged” events (both drinking and tamper) are reviewed by trained technicians in the AMS monitoring center prior to “confirmation.”

SCRAM System Overview  Example: TAC Curve vs. BAC Curve

TAC to BAC Correlation  Percent of events “flagged” for 60+ Self-Reported Community Drinking Events

False Positives & False Negatives  Results from Community Testing Consisting of 120 Self-Reported Drinking Events and 420 Days of Alcohol Abstinence Testing A “true negative” event is any 12 hour period where there was NO drinking and where a drinking event was NOT confirmed. Drinking episodes ranged from 2 standard-drinks to over 10 standard drinks Note that most Commercially Available Drug Kits have a False Positive Rate of 5.0% Actual Event PositiveNegative SCRAM System Result Positive True Positive 62 False Positive 1 Negative False Negative 58 True Negative 718

SCRAM System Overview  Example: Compliant Subject

Drinking Event on SCRAM Confirmable detections include at least two of the following three indicators: Presence of an absorption curve Presence of a burn-off curve Obstruction in place of the absorption curve Burn-off Curve Absorption Curve

SCRAM System Overview  Example: Non-Compliant Subject Absorption Rate = 0.011% Per Hour Elimination Rate = 0.010% Per Hour Subject consumed: 4 Tropical Margaritas in 2 hours From 4:15 PM – 6:15 PM

Tampers and Obstructions SCRAM detected an obstruction or an attempt to defeat the technology obstructions

Interfering Substances  Interfering substances are contaminants that may cause an elevated alcohol concentration reading in the SCRAM bracelet  AMS provides users with a list of interfering substances to avoid Users sign agreements promising to avoid these substances  Detecting interfering substances is relatively easy for trained technicians Consumed alcohol and the overwhelming majority of interfering substances produce distinctly different alcohol curves Technicians can distinguish consumed alcohol from interfering substances by examining absorption and elimination rates

Interfering Substances  Example: Band-Aide Anti-Itch Gel Results: Peak TAC = 0.229%Absorption Rate = 0.573% per hour Duration: > 31 HoursElimination Rate = 0.009% per hour Applied Band Aide anti itch 1:44 PM 8/29/06

Interfering Substances  Example: “Awesome” Floor Cleaner Followed by Drinking Episode Applied “Awesome” floor 3:30 PM on 2/8/05 Consumed alcohol beginning 7:00 PM on 2/8/05 Results: “Awesome” Floor CleanerDrinking Episode Absorption Rate TAC per hour TAC per hour Elimination Rate TAC per hour TAC per hour

Excuses and Excuses

OK! But does this thing work?

University of Colorado Study (2006)  Ethanol excreted in sufficient quantities to measure  Transdermal peak values are delayed 30 to 180 minutes behind breath peak values  No false positives occurred in test subjects

NHTSA Study (2007)  Performed by the Pacific Institute of Research and Evaluation  Combined laboratory and field trials – 96 total weeks of wear  Results No false positives “of any note” Tamper system performed well SCRAMNET system exceptionally innovative Moisture build-up can affect performance of older versions

Approaches to Alcohol Misuse  Judicial Focuses on the crime itself Addresses alcohol as an element of a charged offense Tries to treat everyone the same Favors punishment Bases decisions on statutes and precedent  Medical Focuses on the alcohol misuse problem Addresses alcohol as a cause or contributing cause of behavior Treats people as individuals Favors rehabilitation Bases decisions on scientific evidence

Which approach works best?

Why Do People Routinely Ask That Question? The solutions are NOT mutually exclusive……… In fact, comprehensive approaches are the MOST effective!

A Lack of National Standards  With the exception of Drug and DWI Courts, there are no national standards for: Identifying offenders with alcohol misuse issues (no standards for screening, assessment and evaluation) Providing necessary and adequate treatment for offenders Appropriately sanctioning offenders, particularly with regard to relapse We can’t expect different results if we keep relying on the same strategies

What’s been missing for alcohol offenders? Source: NADCP

Key Components of Drug Courts (NADCP and OJP 1997) Key Component #5: Abstinence is monitored by frequent alcohol and other drug testing And it all starts with monitoring...

Saving Lives: The Award-Winning South Dakota 24/7 Sobriety Program

State of South Dakota – 24/7 Sobriety The Situation  DUI-related offenses resulted in 20% of all felony convictions in the state between 2001 and 2005  12.5 % of state prison population for DUI felonies  Current methods of supervision were not working −24/7 project was created utilizing N.H.T.S.A. Impaired Driving Program Funds Scram Program Results  SCRAM an integral component of 24/7 Program  1,600 clients completed or currently under SCRAM supervision  Total monitored days – 199,097  Average monitoring period – 124 days  Confirmed drinking events – 141 clients had 193 drinking events (12%)  Confirmed obstructions or tampers 295 clients had 571 tampers (18%)

Alcohol-Impaired MV Fatalities and 24/7 Participation

What is the South Dakota 24/7 Sobriety Program? A statewide program that provides unprecedented levels of supervision  Twice-daily breath testing  Continuous alcohol monitoring (SCRAM) to monitor sobriety  Random urine testing to monitor drug use

Violation Comparison - DUI Offenders

Violation Comparison - Drug/DUI Court

Violation Comparison - 24/7 Program

Violation Comparison

So What Does The Data Tell Us?  Continuous Alcohol Monitoring is an Effective Deterrent Most of the offenders that are being monitored have spent years consuming alcohol on a daily basis At least 85% of the offenders being monitored for 120 to 180 days have gone 4 to 6 months without any alcohol  Swift and certain court imposed consequences for any violation improve the outcomes Specialty courts have fewer people that violate and those that do violate less frequently The 24/7 model also yields improved outcomes

SCRAM in Colorado

City & County of Denver – Direct Agency  The Situation Jail overcrowding led major metropolitan city to seek alternative monitoring methods SCRAM Program provides intense supervision Emphasis on treatment and letting offenders maintain employment Program self-sustaining to City and County Offenders pay full cost of monitoring SCRAM is most secure form of supervision other than jail  Scram Program Results SCRAM used in DUI, domestic violence, and other misdemeanor cases 3,298 clients supervised by SCRAM Average monitoring period –64 days Fully compliant offenders – 2,484 (80%) Confirmed drinking events –264 clients (9%) Confirmed tampers – 492 clients (16%) Overall non-compliance – 20%

Greeley, CO – Underage Drinking Problem  The Situation College town with substantial underage drinking problem Entire community impacted by students’ drinking  SCRAM Program Results Municipal Court worked with university to develop underage alcohol program that includes SCRAM Program targets year-olds Minimum monitoring period – 2 weeks Students pay for own SCRAM monitoring Less than 3% of students commit repeat drinking offenses 70% reduction in student transports to either the hospital or detox Significant reduction in citations for minor possession of alcohol

SCRAM Usage in the Criminal Justice System DUI Offenses Domestic Violence Family Court / Human Services

SCRAM Program Objectives  Ensure participants maintain sobriety  Increase accountability of participants through continuous monitoring  Provide alternatives to court system  Reduce recidivism by addressing root cause of the problem and modifying behavior  Decrease impact of alcohol related cases on the system  Provide evidence-based program statistics

SCRAM Program Development  Develop a systems approach that defines primary goals and agency sponsor  Define target population  Indentify funding streams and start up costs  Establish implementation timelines  Launch program / collect data  Review program objectives and goals

SCRAM Program Development Offender Pay Model Agency Direct vs. Service Provider Model  Agency Direct enables broad system wide support and specific program criteria development  Agency can offset initial startup costs via offender pay model  Service Provider transfers responsibility to private companies  SCRAM program responsibilities transferred to service provider Modeled successfully across the country Average cost across the country $10-12/day Daily fee is cheaper than drinking 85% of participants pay with no collection issues

Questions and Answers