Post harvest losses in Promising Sugarcane Genotypes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit D: Production of Field Crops
Advertisements

INDIA: END OF THE SUGAR CYCLE? PRESENTED BY: ABINASH VERMA, DG, ISMA
Geography Graduation Project.
Phosphorus and Potassium. How is P managed? Key to managing soil and fertilizer P: Knowledge of whether or not the level of soil solution P is adequate.
Matiari Sugar mill Visit The visit of Matiari Sugar mill had started from the morning of Saturday 15th January, After reaching the Matiari.
Industrial Processing Integration of alcohol and sugar production, Cogeneration of electricity Brazil’s Ethanol Experience and its Transferability World.
Renewable Biomass Fuel As “Green Power” Alternative for Sugarcane Milling in the Philippines T.C. Mendoza, University of the Philippines at Los Baños,
1 Biomass to Energy Assessment St. Kitts & Nevis Mark Lambrides (OAS/DSD) Kevin de Cuba (OAS/DSD) Pre-conclusions December, 2006.
Assessment of Sugarcane Maturity for Optimum Sugar Yield Khin Myint Kywe.
CPF-246 – A HOPE FOR CANE GROWERS & SUGAR INDUSTRY A medium maturing, high yielding, good ratooning and erect cane variety for Punjab SHAFIQ AHMAD Director,
Dominic Deichert.  Ford Model T designed to use pure ethanol  Today, a fuel additive to decrease gaseous emissions  An AKI octane number of to.
1 Sawasdee Welcome toThailand 1 OCSB: Office of the Cane and Sugar Board.
SUGAR INDUSTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE SUGAR INDUSTRY AUTHORITY OF JAMAICA DEVELOPING AND INTRODUCING AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO DETERMINE DEXTRAN IN SUGARCANE.
Indian Sugar Industry Meeting with Food Secretary, 6 th August, 2012.
Planned Projects for the 2007/08 Grinding Season Vadim Kochergin Presentation at the Audubon Sugar Institute Annual Operations Seminar April 17, 2007,
TOWARDS A MARKETABLE SIZED SWEET POTATO (Ipomoea batatas)
Spent wash Treatment to Reduce Pollution and to earn profits to help sugar industry & in particular fermentation industry to totally avoid Pollution By.
INFLUENCE OF PHC PRODUCTS ON POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD PT Summary Across Studies - WA Only PRE-HARVEST APPLICATION EFFECTS ON POST-HARVEST STORAGE.
Impact of Subfreezing Temperatures on the 2006 Louisiana Sugarcane Crop Benjamin L. Legendre Interim Director/Professor Audubon Sugar Institute St. Gabriel,
Microbiological Control of a Milling Tandem Milling Seminar - May 11, 2005.
Tobacco Production Update Bob Pearce, Gary Palmer, Andy Bailey Extension Tobacco Specialists Kenny Seebold Extension Plant Pathologist.
Nitrogen Fertilization for Ethanol Production with Sweet Sorghum and Corn G. Stevens, R. Holou, M. Rhine and D. Dunn University of Missouri-Delta Center.
Development of tillering pattern under transplanting and direct sowing methods in spring planted sugarcane M. O. A. Galal *, A. M. Abou-Salama **, E. A.
Jirawan Niemsakul Sripatum University Chonburi Campus Chonburi, Thailand, Problems Analysis and Truck Allocation in Sugarcane.
Partnership Report Vietnam Taskforce Fruits and Vegetable Group 11 April 2014 Page 1.
Bagasse in Mauritius Source: NovatorNovator. Sugar Industry in Mauritius Important economic sector 25% of export earnings European Union.
ACP SUGAR RESEARCH PROGRAMME Steering Committee April 2012 Increasing Sugarcane Yields For Smallholder Farmers Through Improvements In Irrigation Scheduling.
pH 7.0 color at Sugar pH 8.5 / pH 7.0 Lot #PolWhole Affined 1x Affined 2x , , , ,
New Frontiers in Biofuel Production Fernando Robelo Daniel Bowser.
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
An Application of Field Monitoring Data in Estimating Optimal Planting Dates of Cassava in Upper Paddy Field in Northeast Thailand Meeting Notes.
Rice harvesting. When to harvest Harvest at the right time is important because; 1.maximize grain yield, and 2.minimize grain damage and quality deterioration.
Lesson 4 Identifying and Using Macroeconomics and Microeconomics.
With news reports, rampant pollution and who can forget the Gulf oil spill, we must beg the question “What’s in the water?”
Kurt M. Guidry Gilbert Durbin Professor LSU AgCenter Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness 2010 LSU AgCenter’s Outlook Conference Outlook.
Economically Raising Nitrogen Use Efficiency By: Paul Hodgen.
Maize trials in Denmark -from design to result Janne Aalborg Nielsen M.Sc.,Teamleader.
M icro S oil ® Biomassters, Inc. Founded 1996 © Copyright All rights reserved by Biomassters, Inc. Copyright ©January 2006.
Regulation sours sugar output. Introduction India was among the world’s big sugar suppliers Until 2 years ago, India sugar production dropped from 26.
WATER_A NATURAL RESOURCE. Sources of water Forms of water Evaporation of water Pollution of water Potable water Water management Rainwater harvesting.
Sugar AGRICULTURAL CROP & AGRO-BASED INDUSTRY
HARVESTED FORAGES Silage
Ch 14: Agricultural Methods and Pest Management. Outline 14.1 The Development of Agriculture 14.2 Fertilizer and Agriculture 14.3 Agricultural Chemical.
CSIR – CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN-HOUSE REVIEW AND RESEARCH PLANING ( 2012 ) SETH O. EKYEM HORTICULTURE IMPROVEMENT DIVISION.
© British Sugar 2010 Chemical reactions Learning objectives: Identify the chemical reactions used in sugar production, both in industry and in the laboratory.
Sugar Manufacturing Process:
Will cover following points
Clean Technology (PB386) Click to edit Master title style Numfon Eaktasang, Ph.D.
BOT 423 PART B.
RASOOL NAWAZ SUGAR MILLS PVT LTD.,
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
TRANSMARA JOURNEY Started in 2011 with the crushing capacity of 1250 TCD In June Crushing capacity increased from 1250 to 2000 TCD In Nov
Haseeb Waqas Sugar Mills Ltd EFFICIENCY OF JUICE CLARIFIER
By Muhammad Akhlaq Mudassir Assistant Research Officer
NZOIA SUGAR COMPANY LTD
2nd – 3rd March 2017 Kakamega Golf Hotel © MUSCO 2017
The effect of dry period irrigation on yield of three cassava cultivar
Associate Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Enzymes: The Protein Catalyst
Clean Technology (PB386) Click to edit Master title style Numfon Eaktasang, Ph.D.
Maize trials in Denmark -from design to result
Sugar Industry T.Y.B.Sc Sub:Environmental chemistry
Forage Situation and Outlook
Commodity Market Outlook
Olives for oils.
Experiences with B- heavy molasses Diversion for Ethanol Production
Industrial Processing Integration of alcohol and sugar production, Cogeneration of electricity Brazil’s Ethanol Experience and its Transferability World.
Chapter 15: Human Populations
1. Outlines 2  Crop insurance  History of crop insurance  Types of crop insurance  Objectives of crop insurance  Steps of crop insurance process.
Geography Graduation Project.
Presentation transcript:

Post harvest losses in Promising Sugarcane Genotypes By   Ghulam Abbas Assistant Agri. Chemist Sugarcane Research Institute, Faisalabad

Significance Identification of cane genotypes to post harvest deterioration is needed to device scientific supply and crushing schedule with minimal loss of recover able sugar.

Objectives To indentify the promising sugarcane genotypes with better juice quality maintenance during post harvest period in order to select the varieties most resistant to the post harvest inversion by the breeders for crossing program to develop the desirable genotypes.

Causes Sugarcane has poor post harvest as well as post maturity keeping quality due to which sugar deterioration of harvested canes starts immediately. The sucrose decreases while the invert sugars increase which in turn hinder the normal sugar recovery. During post harvest period sugarcane is subjected to many physical and chemical changes. The most important physical change is the loss in cane weight due the evaporation of water from the cut portion of the cane and chemical change due to loss in sugar through inversion.

Methology Sugarcane genotypes = HSF-240, S-2003-US-633, S-2003-US-694, S-2003-US- 247, S-2003-US-165 and S-2003-US-704 Location = SRI, Faisalabad. Year of study = 2009-10 Design = RCBD split plot Replications = 3

Magnitude of losses in 8 days In Pakistan and other Asian countries, payment to the farmers is made on weight basis so the delay in supply of harvested cane to the sugar industries could lead to major economic loss to cane growers. At the prevailing cane payment price in Districts of the Punjab province, monetary losses to cane growers (calculation based on 8th day) are estimated to be around Rs. 522 (US$ 6.00) per tonne of cane supplied to the sugar mills.

Direct losses Inversion leads to 1.07-1.25 unit loss in recovery; for a 5000 TCD mill we may lose 1070-1250 cane sugar bags which amounts to Rs. 3905500 -45622500 lac per day.

Indirect losses Dextran sucrase enzyme (of Leuconostoc mesenteroides bacteria) produces dextran and fructose. Fructose is oxidized to organic acids and pH of the juice is lowered. As a result, more lime is required and scaling increases. Dextran production increases juice viscosity, filtration becomes difficult, more energy is needed for processing and due to c-axis elongation needle shaped sugar crystals are produced which lead to poor quality of sugar.

% Loss in cane weight during 8 days Results Effect of staling on % loss in cane weight a. 9th month old crop (November- 2009) Variety/Days % Loss in cane weight during 8 days Average% weight loss 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HSF-240 0.0 1.32 2.98 4.11 5.50 6.80 7.96 8.92 9.68 5.90 S-2003-US-633 2.13 3.24 4.54 5.56 6.79 7.76 9.67 6.07 S-2003-US-694 1.93 3.28 4.57 5.88 6.90 7.91 9.09 10.81 6.29 S-2003-US-247 1.85 3.20 4.29 5.59 6.78 7.84 9.47 10.27 6.16 S-2003-US-165 1.70 3.10 4.40 5.53 6.83 7.89 9.36 10.08 6.11 S-2003-US-704 1.90 3.05 4.34 5.51 6.75 7.88 9.29 10.30 6.12 Average 6.11 B

% Loss in cane weight during 8 days Effect of staling on % loss in cane weight b. 11th month old crop (January- 2010) Variety/Days % Loss in cane weight during 8 days Average% weight loss 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HSF-240 0.0 1.22 2.12 3.39 4.53 5.80 6.97 8.07 8.96 5.13 S-2003-US-633 1.50 2.90 3.95 4.92 6.01 6.98 7.92 9.03 5.40 S-2003-US-694 1.29 2.21 3.22 4.49 5.46 6.39 7.62 8.68 S-2003-US-247 1.25 2.72 3.73 4.45 5.69 6.95 8.22 9.24 5.28 S-2003-US-165 2.56 3.64 4.55 5.51 6.61 7.91 8.85 5.11 S-2003-US-704 1.36 2.54 3.63 4.56 5.58 6.77 8.09 8.99 5.19 Average 5.17 C

% Loss in cane weight during 8 days Effect of staling on % loss in cane weight c. 13th month old crop (March- 2010) Variety/Days % Loss in cane weight during 8 days Average% weight loss 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HSF-240 0.0 1.73 3.23 4.38 5.87 7.03 8.49 9.83 11.27 6.48 S-2003-US-633 2.30 3.97 5.62 7.21 8.69 10.01 11.30 12.61 7.71 S-2003-US-694 2.34 4.11 5.79 7.48 8.89 10.30 11.75 13.17 7.98 S-2003-US-247 2.45 4.19 5.95 7.56 9.10 10.64 12.00 13.44 8.17 S-2003-US-165 1.88 3.53 4.76 6.00 7.41 8.76 10.00 11.20 6.69 S-2003-US-704 2.01 3.61 5.02 6.49 8.08 9.45 11.03 12.37 7.26 Average 7.38 A

% Loss in cane weight during 8 days Average of three months (Season) Variety/Days % Loss in cane weight during 8 days Average% weight loss 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HSF-240 0.0 1.42 2.78 3.96 5.30 6.54 7.80 8.94 9.97 5.84 C S-2003-US-633 1.98 3.37 4.70 5.89 7.16 8.25 9.38 10.43 6.39 AB S-2003-US-694 1.85 3.20 4.52 5.95 7.08 8.20 9.48 10.68 6.36 AB S-2003-US-247 4.65 5.86 7.19 8.48 9.90 10.98 6.54 A S-2003-US-165 1.62 3.06 4.26 5.36 6.58 7.75 9.09 10.04 5.97 C S-2003-US-704 1.76 3.07 4.33 5.52 6.80 8.03 9.47 10.55 6.19 B Average 6.22 LSD value @ alpha = 0.05 Month = 0.1199 , Variety = 0.1695 , Days = 0.195, Month x variety = 0.4794 , Month x days = 0.3390, Days x variety = 0.2936

% loss in CCS (%) on 8th day Effect of staling on % loss in CCS (%) a. 9th month old crop (November- 2010) Variety/Days % Loss CCS during 8 days % loss in CCS (%) on 8th day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HSF-240 11.92 12.00 12.08 12.06 11.84 11.50 11.14 10.87 8.81 S-2003-US-633 13.08 13.06 13.01 12.85 12.72 12.33 11.69 10.63 S-2003-US-694 12.79 12.78 12.76 12.65 12.25 12.11 11.75 11.55 9.69 S-2003-US-247 12.71 12.73 12.67 12.18 11.94 11.83 11.45 11.36 10.97 S-2003-US-165 12.70 12.57 12.49 12.12 11.98 11.64 11.49 9.95 S-2003-US-704 12.64 12.61 12.59 12.39 12.14 11.88 11.68 11.54 11.33 10.36 Average 12.21 C 10.07

% Loss in CCS during 8 days % loss in CCS (%) on 8th day Effect of staling on % loss in CCS (%) b. 11th month old crop (January- 2010) Variety/Days % Loss in CCS during 8 days % loss in CCS (%) on 8th day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HSF-240 12.99 13.02 13.03 12.95 12.85 12.78 12.48 12.25 11.89 8.46 S-2003-US-633 13.22 13.26 13.20 13.13 13.00 12.93 12.82 12.61 12.22 7.56 S-2003-US-694 13.08 13.06 12.96 12.90 12.83 12.70 12.38 12.21 7.00 S-2003-US-247 12.81 12.80 12.79 12.63 12.47 12.28 12.11 11.95 6.71 S-2003-US-165 13.07 12.94 12.65 12.45 6.12 S-2003-US-704 12.77 12.75 12.52 12.19 12.06 11.79 7.89 Average 12.70 B 7.29

% Loss in CCS during 8 days % loss in CCS (%) on 8th day Effect of staling on % loss in CCS (%) c. 13th month old crop (March- 2010) Variety/Days % Loss in CCS during 8 days % loss in CCS (%) on 8th day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HSF-240 13.62 13.59 13.40 13.34 13.06 12.78 12.40 12.34 12.19 10.49 S-2003-US-633 13.90 13.92 13.72 13.52 13.20 12.80 12.44 12.30 11.51 S-2003-US-694 13.51 13.44 13.24 13.01 12.79 12.48 12.25 12.13 11.98 11.32 S-2003-US-247 13.05 13.02 12.95 12.82 12.49 12.23 12.08 11.96 11.85 9.19 S-2003-US-165 13.35 13.18 13.04 12.76 12.66 12.32 11.88 11.01 S-2003-US-704 13.22 13.26 13.12 13.03 12.86 12.69 12.47 12.12 8.32 Average 12.84 A 10.31

% Loss in CCS during 8 days d. Average of three months (Season) Variety/Days % Loss in CCS during 8 days Average% weight loss 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HSF-240 12.84 12.87 12.78 12.64 12.47 12.13 11.91 11.65 9.25 S-2003-US-633 13.40 13.41 13.31 13.24 13.02 12.90 12.65 12.35 12.07 9.90 S-2003-US-694 13.14 13.10 12.52 12.09 9.34 S-2003-US-247 12.86 12.85 12.80 12.72 12.43 12.21 12.06 11.84 11.72 8.96 S-2003-US-165 13.06 13.04 12.98 12.70 12.32 11.88 9.03 S-2003-US-704 12.89 12.88 12.71 12.56 12.40 12.19 12.02 11.75 8.86 Average 9.22 LSD value @ alpha = 0.05 Month = 0.02492, Variety = 0.03525 , Days = 0.04317, Month x variety = 0.06105 , Month x days = 0.07477, Days x variety = 0.1057

Magnitude of Weight and Sugar Losses on 8th Day Sr.No. Variety Loss of Farmer By Weight(Per Ton) Loss of Sugar(per 5000 TCD) Av. % Wt. Loss Wt. loss in Kg per ton Monetary Loss Rs.(US$) Loss in Sugar Recovery (%) Loss of Sugar in Tons Loss By Sugar Bags Valuation(Rs.) of Loss per Day 1. HSF-240 9.97 99.7 498.5(US$ 5.73) 1.11 55.5 1110 4051500 2. S-2003-US-633 10.43 104.3 521.5(US $ 6.00) 1.25 62.5 1250 4562500 3. S-2003-US-694 10.68 106.8 534.0(US$ 6.14) 1.16 58.0 1160 4234000 4. S-2003-US-247 10.98 109.8 549.0(US$ 6.31) 1.07 53.5 1070 3905500 5. S-2003-US-165 10.04 100.4 502.0(US$ 5.77) 1.10 55.0 1100 4015000 6. S-2003-US-704 10.55 105.5 527.5(US$ 6.07) Market Price of Sugar Bag on 11-09-2011 = Rs.3650/- per Bag Currency Rate of US dollar on 23-08-2011 = Rs. 86.90/-per Dollar

Loss per acre Variety Average yield (Mounds per acre) Loss per acre(Rs) HSF-240 600 11964 S-2003-US-633 700 14602 S-2003-US-694 750 16020 S-2003-US-247 850 18666 S-2003-US-165 900 18072 S-2003-US-704 1000 21100

Conclusions & Suggestions How to overcome post harvest losses. In view of high post harvest weight and sugar losses with consequently lower recovery in many sugar units in Punjab. It is suggested that the time between cut-to- crush should be reduced to 72 hours for manually harvested whole-stalk

Reducing the heat load Reduce heat load by keeping cane in shaded place, spraying water (10 L/tone cane), or by covering with trash and sprinkling water on it. Killing the bacteria producing dextran, by using bactericides (Bactrinol-200 ppm, Actin ID 0.15 % solution, Leukokil -1% solution) dipping cut ends in it for 5 minutes Preventing inversion by using inhibitors for invertase enzyme activity. Spray of 25 mM KMnO4 + 25 mM Sodium metasilicate on the canes.

Thanks