Implementing First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the AIA By: Scott D. Malpede, Seth Boeshore and Chitra Kalyanaraman USPTO Rules Effective March 16, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparing for Changes in the Treatment of US Patents Chinh H. Pham Greenberg Traurig Thomas A. Turano K&L Gates MassMedic March 6, 2008.
Advertisements

Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
P ROFESSOR R UTH O KEDIJI First to File Patent Systems How the New U.S. System Compares to other Systems Around the World.
AIA Final Rules Submission of Certified Foreign Priority Documents and Translations Under the AIA March 20, 2013.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
MELISSA ASFAHANI Patent Attorney El Paso, TX
William Boshnick Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
Incorporation by Reference
AIA Final Rules AIA Transition Applications March 20, 2013.
FITF Overview and Tips on Responding to Prior Art Rejections Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting United States Patent and.
Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
Patent Strategy Under the AIA Washington in the West January 29, 2013.
Accelerating Patent Prosecution Thursday, October 18, 2012.
Joint Meeting of PIPLA and NJIPLA February 7, 2012 Kenneth N. Nigon RatnerPrestia 1.
April 24, 2012 Benoît Castel Young & Thompson U.S. Patent Law Reform Summary of H.R. 1249, “Leahy-Smith America Invents Act”
Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
The America Invents Act: Approaching the Finish Line January 29, 2013 Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:
U.S. ARMY ARMAMENT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING CENTER (ARDEC) Presented to: Federal Laboratory Consortium Northeast Region 25 Feb 2014 Mr. Tim.
America Invents Act (AIA) Changes in Patent Law That Impact Companies May Mowzoon: Mowzoon Law Office, PLLC 1.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Patents August Proposed First-To-File Rules Add definitions in AIA to Rules Declarations for removing references based.
1 Implementation of the American Inventors Protection Act of 1999 (Public Law ) and the Patent Business Goals Hiram H. Bernstein Senior Legal Advisor.
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act Teresa Stanek Rea Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the.
The U.S. Patent System is Changing – A Summary of the New Patent Reform Law.
1 35 U.S.C. § 102(e): The Legislative Fix (S.320) and Serial Abandonment of Provisional Applications Stephen G. Kunin Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination.
AIA Strategies.
The America Invents Act: Eighteen Months Post-Enactment Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator March 27, 2013.
Information Disclosure Statements
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
0 Charles R. Macedo, Esq. Partner. 1 Brief Overview of Priority Under AIA Implications for Public Disclosures and Private Disclosures Role of Provisional.
Anthony Venturino MILANO 10 February 2012 SELECTED PROVISIONS OF THE LEAHY Smith AMERICA INVENTS ACT OF 2011 AIPPI - AIPLA 1 © AIPLA
FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2011 | 1 ACI's Maximizing Pharmaceutical Patent Life Cycles Conference PTE-PTA Boot Camp.
1 John Calvert Supervisory Patent Examiner
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C. | 600 Atlantic Avenue | Boston, Massachusetts | | fax | wolfgreenfield.com Prior Art Changes.
Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.
A Practical Guide For Prosecutors Patent Prosecution Under The AIA William R. Childs, Ph.D., J.D. August 22, 2013.
2011 US Patent Law Reform & A Global Prosecution Strategy by Lowe Hauptman Ham & Berner LLP Suite Diagonal St Alexandria VA Tel. (703)
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update regarding PCT and PPH at the USPTO Yuichi Watanabe Joint Meeting of AIPLA and.
Post Grant Challenges: Strategy and Considerations after the America Invents Act of 2011 IP Law & Management Institute November 7, 2011 Justin J. Oliver.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Prosecution Lunch Patents January Reminder: USPTO Fee Changes- Jan. 1, 2014 Issue Fee Decrease- delay paying if you can –Issue Fee: from $1,780.
Claims and Continuations Final Rule Overview Briefing for Examiners 1.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
America Invents Act. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2011 | 2 First-to-File  U.S. will switch to a first-inventor-to-file.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Imminent Changes to the US Patent Law Pre-Grant Patent Practice Under the AIA Alan J.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
James Toupin – General Counsel February 1, Summary of Proposed Rule Changes to Continuations, Double Patenting, and Claims.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Andrew B. Freistein Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. Learning the ABC’s of Patent Term Adjustment 1 © AIPLA 2015.
January 25, Notice of Proposed Rule Making Proposed Changes to Practice for Continuing Applications, Requests for Continued Examination Practice,
The Impact of Patent Reform on Independent Inventors and Start-up Companies Mark Nowotarski (Patent Agent)
Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.
Pre-Issuance (Third-Party) Submissions
America Invents Act: Litigation Related Provisions
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Speeding It Up at the USPTO
Recognizing an AIA Patent
What are the types of intellectual property?
Filing of a U.S. Patent Application
Presentation transcript:

Implementing First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the AIA By: Scott D. Malpede, Seth Boeshore and Chitra Kalyanaraman USPTO Rules Effective March 16, 2013

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 2 Claim for Foreign Priority  Domestic nonprovisional applications— – Must be filed within 12 months of foreign filing – Priority claim, including submission of certified copy of foreign application, must be made by later of: 1.four months of domestic filing date, or 2.sixteen months from foreign filing date  PCT applications—current rules do not change – PCT regulations require priority claim and certified copy of foreign application in international application within 16 months of foreign filing 37 C.F.R. § 1.55(b)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 3 Delayed Claim for Foreign Priority  May be accepted if Applicant files petition that includes:  application data sheet containing priority claim  certified copy of foreign application  petition fee  statement that entire delay was unintentional  Priority claims that do not comply will be waived 37 C.F.R. § 1.55(e)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 4 Late Filing of Certified Foreign Application  May be accepted if Applicant files petition that includes: – certified copy – showing of good and sufficient cause for delay – petition fee 37 C.F.R. § 1.55(f)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 5 Claim for Foreign Priority  Issue date is absolute deadline for perfecting claim to foreign priority  Patent will not be printed with priority claim if perfected after payment of issue fee – Certificate of correction available 37 C.F.R. § 1.55(g)(1)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 6 Claim for Foreign Priority—Early Deadlines  Applicant may be required to perfect foreign priority claim earlier than normal deadline if: – application is in interference or derivation proceeding, – priority date needed to overcome art rejection, or – specifically requested by Examiner  English translation may be required 37 C.F.R. § 1.55(g)(2)-(3)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 7 Claim for Foreign Priority—Document Exchange  PTO will obtain certified copy of foreign patent application from foreign patent office if: – foreign patent office participates in document exchange agreement – priority claim includes information necessary for PTO to access foreign application  If foreign application initially filed in non-participating country but subsequently filed in participating country, Applicant may file request that PTO obtain certified copy from participating country’s patent office  Absolute deadline for certified copy still applies—PTO must receive certified copy from foreign patent office during pendency of application 37 C.F.R. § 1.55(h)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 8 Claim for Foreign Priority—Interim Copy  PTO will accept uncertified copy of foreign application during application pendency if: – copy marked “Interim Copy” is timely filed, including statement that copy is a true copy – certified copy is filed prior to date of issuance 37 C.F.R. § 1.55(i)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 9 Claim for Foreign Priority—Statement in Transitional Application  When nonprovisional application: – is filed on or after March 16, 2013, and – has foreign priority date before March 16, 2013, but – includes claim with effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013, Applicant must file statement notifying PTO of these facts  Statement due by later of: – four months of domestic filing date, – sixteen months from foreign filing date, or – presentation of claim (if newly added) 37 C.F.R. § 1.55(j)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 10 Claiming Benefit of Earlier Filing Date  Nonprovisional application can claim benefit of: – earlier provisional application, if nonprovisional filed within one year of provisional – earlier nonprovisional or international application, if filed during pendency of earlier application 37 C.F.R. § 1.78(a), (c)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 11 Claiming Benefit of Earlier Filing Date  Benefit claim requires that application: – name at least one inventor of earlier application – contain reference to earlier application  Reference in nonprovisional must be in ADS  If reference not included in filed application, it must be added during application’s pendency and by later of: – four months of filing date, or – sixteen months from earlier application’s filing date 37 C.F.R. § 1.78 (a), (c)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 12 Claiming Benefit of Earlier Filing Date—Delayed Reference  Delayed benefit claim may be accepted if Applicant files petition that includes: – amendment containing reference to earlier application – petition fee, and – statement that entire delay after due date was unintentional  Late benefit claims that do not comply will be waived 37 C.F.R. § 1.78(b), (d)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 13 Claiming Benefit of Earlier Filing Date—Statement in Transitional Application  When nonprovisional application: – is filed on or after March 16, 2013, and – claims benefit of application filed prior to March 16, 2013, but – has claim with effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013 Applicant must file statement notifying PTO of these facts  Statement must be filed by later of: – four months from filing date, – sixteen months from filing date of earlier application, or – presentation of claim (if newly added) 37 C.F.R. § 1.78(a)(6), (c)(6)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 14 Nature of Examination—Common Ownership of Claimed Subject Matter and Asserted Prior Art  AIA-examined applications—earlier-filed U.S. patent or application can be removed from prior art (under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)(2)(C)) if, as of effective filing date, subject matter disclosed in reference and subject matter claimed were: – owned by same person (or obliged to be assigned to same person), or – developed under joint research agreement, so long as parties to agreement are named in application  Pre-AIA-examined applications—§ 102(e)-(g) prior art can be removed, for purposes of § 103(c), by making either above showing, but with reference to date of claimed invention 37 C.F.R. § 1.104(c)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 15 Effective Filing Date of Claimed Invention Under AIA  Effective filing date is earlier of: – actual filing date of application containing claim, and – filing date of earliest priority application that discloses subject matter of claim  Effective filing date in a reissue patent or application is determined by deeming the claim to the invention to have been contained in the patent for which reissue is sought 37 C.F.R. § 1.109

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 16 Inventorship and Ownership of Subject Matter of Individual Claims  When joint inventors are named in application, PTO can require Applicant to identify inventorship and ownership of each claim in application, as of effective filing date  PTO can further require Applicant to identify invention dates of each claim 37 C.F.R. § 1.110

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 17 Affidavit of Attribution or Prior Public Disclosure Under AIA  Applications examined under first-inventor-to-file rules are provided grace period of one year preceding effective filing date – Certain disclosures that occur during grace period can be disqualified as prior art  Disclosures made more than one year before effective filing date are not eligible for disqualification 37 C.F.R. § 1.130

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 18 Affidavit of Attribution  Grace period disclosure can be disqualified as prior art if it is attributed to inventor  Affidavit of attribution must establish that grace period disclosure was made by: – inventor/joint inventor, or – someone who obtained subject matter of grace period disclosure from inventor/joint inventor 37 C.F.R. § 1.130(a)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 19 Affidavit of Prior Public Disclosure  Grace period disclosure can be disqualified if it occurred after earlier public disclosure attributable to inventor  Affidavit of public disclosure must establish that: – public disclosure was made prior to date of grace period disclosure – earlier public disclosure contained same subject matter as grace period disclosure – earlier public disclosure was made by  inventor/joint inventor, or  someone who obtained subject matter disclosed from inventor/joint inventor 37 C.F.R. § 1.130(b)

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 20 Other Changes  Rule 9 (definitions)—revised to incorporate terms used by AIA  Rule 117 (fees)—revised to add new fees  Rule 131 (disqualification of prior art by prior invention)— revised to include old Rule 130 (disqualification of prior art by common ownership) for pre-AIA-examined applications  Rules (statutory invention registration)—removed to comply with AIA’s elimination of invention registrations  Rule 321 (filing of terminal disclaimers)—revised to be consistent with changes to §§ 102 and 103 with respect to joint research activities 37 C.F.R. §§ 9, 17, 131, , 321

© 2013 FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO | 21 NEW YORK 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY WASHINGTON 975 F Street, NW Washington, DC CALIFORNIA 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1600 Costa Mesa, CA