Chapter 5: Negligence, Professional Liability, and Insurance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q3 LAW NOTES 1 TORTS.
Advertisements

What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 4 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 4 Torts and Professional Liability.
Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited CANADIAN BUSINESS AND THE LAW Second Edition by Dorothy Duplessis Steven Enman Shannon.
Torts and Legal Liability Craig A. Wallace, P.Eng
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Negligence and Strict Liability Litigation and Procedure Negligence.
{ Chapter 10 TORTS: Negligence and Strict Liability.
HI5018 Introduction to Business Law Week 4 Law of Torts (2)
Chapter 18: Torts A Civil Wrong
Law I Chapter 18.
Tort Law Part 2 Negligence and Liability. Negligence Most common tort Accidental or Unintentional Tort Failure to show a degree of care that a “reasonable”
Chapter 18 Torts.
Chapter 3 Tort Law.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. © 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 5 Negligence Chapter.
Private Wrongs: Torts Negligence and Strict Liability Chapter 14.
Tort Law – Unintentional torts
Tort Law – Unintentional Torts. Negligence Action was unintentional Action was unintentional It is planned It is planned Injury occurs Injury occurs anyone.
Negligence and Unintentional Torts
14 The Law of Negligence and Liability for Negligent Professional Advice © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved.
By Monika, Max, Vanja, Nicole KEY PRINCIPLES OF NEGLIGENCE.
Negligence Chapter 8. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Define and identify elements of negligence. Explain concepts: –Duty –Standard.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. © 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 5 Intentional Torts.
Chapter 18.  Criminal Law: crime against the state  Civil Law: person commits a wrong, not always a violation of law  Plaintiff-the harmed individual,
 1. Duty-The accused wrongdoer owed a duty of care to the injured person  2. Breach of Duty- the defendant’s conduct breached that duty  3. Causation-defendant’s.
Chapter 14 Negligence and Unintentional Torts LAW 120.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada13-1 Chapter 13: Agency and Partnership.
Liability in Athletics. “Deep Pockets” The plaintiff’s lawyer will name everybody—the coach, the athletic trainer, the physician, the school or other.
NEGLIGENCE (Unintentional Torts). The elements of negligence: * Negligence * Duty of Care * Standard of Care * Foreseeability * “reasonable person” *
Part 2 – The Law of Torts Chapter 5 – Negligence and Unintentional Torts Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 5-1.
Unit 6 – Civil Law.
Chapter 6 Liability Insurance. What is Liability Insurance? There are many different types of insurance policies available, but liability insurance is.
Part 2 – The Law of Torts Chapter 6 – Special Tort Liabilities of Business Professionals Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
CHAPTER 7 Negligence And Strict Liability.
Foundations of Australian Law Fourth Edition Copyright © 2013 Tilde Publishing and Distribution Chapter 6 The tort of negligence.
7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Jentz Miller.
Prepared by Douglas Peterson, University of Alberta 6-1 Part 2 – The Law of Torts Chapter 6 Special Tort Liabilities of Business Professionals.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
Chapter 6 Torts and Strict Liability. Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.6-2 Three Kinds of Torts A tort is a wrong.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd. PPTs t/a Fundamentals of Business Law 4e by Barron & Fletcher. Slides prepared by Kay Fanning. Copyright.
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
Law in Action – Ch. 14. Tort = a civil wrong; damage to property or a personal injury caused by another person Unintentional Torts = injuries that are.
LAW OF TORT.
Defences for Negligence. The best defence is Negligence did not exist, or the defendant didn’t owe the plaintiff a duty of care. The best defence is Negligence.
TYPES OF LIABILITY CLU3M: Civil Law. Special Types of Liability Negligence is the broad term for any type of tort law Within negligence are various types.
CHAPTER 12: NEGLIGENCE THE BASICS Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
Chapter 20. Conduct that falls below the standard established by law for protecting others against unreasonable risks of harm Surgeon forgets to remove.
Torts: A Civil Wrong Chapter 18. The Idea of Liability Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
CHAPTER 18 PART I Torts: A Civil Wrong. A Civil Wrong In criminal law, when someone commits a wrong, we call it a crime. In civil law, when someone commits.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
Understanding Business and Personal Law Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2 The Law of Torts A person can commit an unintentional tort, when he.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Negligence Tort law establishes standards for the care that people must show to one another. Negligence is the conduct that falls below this standard.
Negligence SLO: I can understand the three types of torts, including negligence, intentional torts, and strict liability. I can identify relevant facts.
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
Law-Related Ch Notes I. Torts: 1. A tort is a civil wrong.
Section 4.2.
Negligence Mr. Lugo.
Legal Issues in Athletic Training
Defences for Negligence
Explain the nature of liability insurance
Negligence.
Section Outline Unintentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
CIVIL LAW Unintentional Torts.
Defences for Negligence
CIVIL LAW Unintentional Torts.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 5: Negligence, Professional Liability, and Insurance Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Negligence Inadvertent, careless conduct that causes injury to another Important area of tort liability for professionals Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Negligence A - D Essential Elements: A: A duty to exercise care B: Breach of the standard of care C: Causation – The act caused the injury D: Damages – Victim suffered a loss Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Reasonable Person Test Reasonable person is a prudent person, in possession of all the facts, exercising care Not the average person Not the perfect person Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Is a Duty Owed? Reasonable Foreseeability Test If it would be apparent to a prudent person that the conduct was likely to cause injury - duty is owed. We owe a duty to anyone we can reasonably anticipate might be harmed by our conduct Is there any reason to reduce or eliminate this duty? (Anns case) Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Case Summary Donoghue v Stevenson set several precedents in the law of negligence The test to determine the existence of a duty Product liability - manufacturer owes a duty to customer Privity of contract will not defeat an action for negligence in product liability cases Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada A - Duty of Care Misfeasance An act that causes harm to another Court will provide remedy Nonfeasance A failure to prevent an injury Courts reluctant to provide remedy If a person attempts to help there is a duty to exercise reasonable care Courts reluctant to provide remedy without special relationship Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

B – Breach of a Standard of Conduct What would a reasonable person have done in the circumstances? Actions that fall below socially acceptable standards create liability for damages Risk - The greater the risk of injury the higher the standard Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Liability of Children Children liable for their torts standard is that of a reasonable child of that age Parents not generally responsible for their children’s torts except where there is obvious failure to control, instruct or supervise or a statute imposed duty Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada C - Causation The injury must be a direct result of the careless conduct But for test - but for the conduct of the plaintiff no injury would have resulted Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada D – Damages Plaintiff must show injury to self or loss of property as a result of defendant’s negligence – Physical Causation Remoteness Test Whether the specific type of injury suffered was reasonably foreseeable - Legal Causation Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Judicial Remedies Courts will compensate for: Mental disorder, but not simply mental distress Economic loss Court attempts to restore victim to original position Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Defences Contributory negligence Plaintiff partially responsible for own loss Last clear chance doctrine Negligence Act now allows court to apportion responsibility Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Defences/2 Voluntarily assuming the risk A person who volunteers to enter a situation where the risk of injury is obvious cannot recover damages Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Special Situations An occupier of property owes a duty to people who come onto the property as licensees trespassers invitees The obligation is on the tenant not the landlord Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Special Situations/2 Duties of Innkeepers Safeguard property of guests Post appropriate section of Innkeepers Act Prevent guests from becoming intoxicated Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Legislation Statutes may impose obligations not found in common law No-fault insurance Statutory thresholds for claims Duty of care to unborn child in Alberta Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Question For Discussion Social Host Liability The courts have found both commercial establishments and private hosts liable for injuries sustained by their guests when they have consumed alcohol on their premises. What is the standard of care expected of a social host and do you think the courts have gone too far in assessing this kind of liability? Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Negligent Misstatement People who suffer economic loss because of a professional’s negligent statements may recover damages Whether a duty was owed is determined by reasonable foreseeability test This test has been modified by the Anns case Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Case for Discussion Haig v. Bamford This case established the legal principle that: Liability is restricted to situations where the plaintiff knew or should have known that the information provided would be relied on by a limited group. Is this restriction appropriate? Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Strict Liability Liability when there is no fault When a dangerous situation is created by an unusual use of property, the owner/occupier is liable for all damages when it escapes E.g., water, animals Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Vicarious Liability A form of strict liability—or liability without fault Imposed on employers when they are held liable for torts committed by employees during the course of their employment Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Product Liability Manufacturers are liable for injuries caused by defective products Plaintiff must establish that the manufacturer was negligent Breach of manufacturer’s duty can be implied from circumstances Manufacturers must warn of dangers associated with product Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Liability of Experts Professionals and experts held to a high standard Require skills and abilities expected of a professional in that field Must exercise skill with degree of care expected from a reasonable person in that profession Inexperience does not excuse incompetence Common practice that is dangerous or careless is not an excuse. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Professional Liability Duty often set out in contract But tort liability requires adherence to a reasonable standard of performance Courts may extend liability to parties outside of the contract Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Negligence Standard of care expected of professionals Reasonable member of the profession Common practice may not measure up to reasonable standard Courts will examine the circumstances to determine if the conduct was reasonable Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Case for Discussion The Hercules Case In Haig v Bamford, the SCC determined that accountants owed a duty of care to those they knew would rely on the statements they prepared. In the Hercules case the SCC applied the Anns test and limited the range of liability to only those they knew would rely on the statements they prepared and who used them as intended. Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Risk Avoidance Professionals should be aware of the standard of care expected of them Adapt practices to avoid risk Professionals owe a fiduciary duty to clients Must act with loyalty and good faith Must disclose pertinent information Must use extreme care with funds entrusted to them Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Professional Insurance Often a condition of practice for professionals Protects against damages resulting from errors and omissions Premiums can be a significant business expense May cover legal costs when professional is sued Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Professional Disciplinary Bodies Some exercise significant control over their members With membership required With power to levy penalties and suspend Activities regulated by administrative law Charter rights may apply Compliance with human rights legislation required Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Insurance Provides compensation for damaged, lost, or stolen property death, illness or disability liability business interruption Purpose: to reduce the cost of loss by spreading the risk Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Types of Insurance Liability - covers injuries caused by negligence of self or employees applies only when insured is at fault Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Types of Insurance/2 Property - Primarily fire insurance Coverage should correspond to actual value of the property Otherwise owner may become co-insurer Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Types of Insurance/3 Business Interruption Insurance An unforeseen event causes a business to cease operation for a time Covers lost profits and expenses of bringing business back into operation Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Types of Insurance/4 Life - provides for dependants and/or business associates after death of insured Health - medical and disability insurance covers health care expenses provides income for disabled worker Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Insurable Interest Insured must have personal stake or interest in whatever is being insured Can only claim on the insurance to the extent of the value of that interest Life insurance policies are for the amount stipulated in the contract Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Insurance Industry Insurance agents – duty to insurance company Insurance broker – independent business Both have duty of good faith to customer Adjusters – investigate on behalf of insurance companies Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Insurance Contracts Contra Preferentum Utmost good faith Subrogation Salvage Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Question for Discussion An insurance company can step into the shoes of the insured once it has paid out on the loss and pursue a claim against the person who caused the loss. No-fault insurance eliminates this possibility. What are the benefits and limitations of no-fault insurance? Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Bonding A form of insurance that protects employers from the wrongful acts of their employees fidelity bond - employer pays a fee to cover employee so that if he commits a wrong the victim will be compensated surety bond - provides assurance that the party to a contract will perform its part of the contract Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada