ERP/SAP in Public Administration Matthijs Kerkvliet
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April Agenda Doha 2009, 18th meeting of WGITA Activities after Doha Results of the questionnaire Proposal to continue Discussion
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April Doha 2009 Views of project team members Discussion about scope Decision: Rethink project by: –Defining scope –Assess needs and contributions
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April Activities after Doha Further scoping Online survey, autumn 2009 (all 37 WGITA-members) Rethink project
Survey results
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April Country experience: Global map
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April Country experience: Europe
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April ERP-systems in use: Global map
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April ERP-systems in use: Europe
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April SAI audit experience: Global map
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April SAI audit experience: Europe
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April SAI audit views: Global map
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April SAI audit views: Europe
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April SAI guidance needs: Global map
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April SAI guidance needs: Europe
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April SAI contribution: Global map
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April SAI contribution: Europe
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April SAI contribution views: Global map
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April SAI contribution views: Europe
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April Summary of survey results Response: low (14 out of 37) Needs: –9 SAIs expressed needs –Needs vary (‘we want it all’) Contribution: –6 SAIs prepared or able to contribute –Contribution mainly technical issues
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April Conclusions Costs/ benefits don’t justify to proceed as planned (One or two guidance papers won’t fulfil the needs) Find another way of knowledge sharing
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April Proposal Share knowledge and guidance material bilaterally Start this by connecting demand and supply of expertise during the meeting NL prepared to facilitate
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April Mapping needs and contribution PhaseViewCountry (needs) Country (contribution) Technical Kuwait, Austria, Lithuania, Sweden, Slovakia, Poland, Colombia Slovakia, Colombia, South Africa Organisational Netherlands, Kuwait, Austria, Lithuania, Sweden, Slovakia, Poland, Colombia Netherlands Political Netherlands, Kuwait, Lithuania, Sweden, Slovakia, Poland, Colombia Netherlands, Slovakia Use Implementation Technical Australia, Kuwait, Austria, Lithuania, Sweden, Slovakia, Poland, Colombia Australia, Canada, Slovakia, Colombia, South Africa Organisational Netherlands, Kuwait, Austria, Lithuania, Sweden, Slovakia, Poland, Colombia Political Netherlands, Kuwait, Lithuania, Sweden, Slovakia, Poland, Colombia Slovakia
Discussion