Designing an Assessment System for the Race to the Top Edward Haertel School of Education Stanford University RTTT Public Meeting, General Assessment Denver,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Formative Assessment Initiative In 2008, Colorado Legislature passed Senate Bill titled Colorado Achievement Plan for Kids (CAP4K) Expand.
Advertisements

The Teacher Work Sample
Bringing it all together!
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
The Common Core State Standards. What is the Common Core (CCSS)? A state-led effort to develop a common set of standards in English language arts (ELA)
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Test Design.
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Brian Roget – Assistant Director Assessment Development and Construction Mathematics and Science Office of Curriculum and Assessment October 12, 2011.
Boulder, Colorado March 3, 2011 Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
New York State Teacher Certification Examinations: Academic Literacy Skills Test July 29, 2013.
PARCC Assessment Math Shifts Becky Justus Math Teacher Greene County Tech Junior High PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member.
Academic Standards. The New Academic Standards Notable Changes Fewer, clearer, higher P-12 Prepared Graduates (PSWR) Grade Level Articulation Concepts.
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
Common Core State Standards: Changing the Game Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor June 27, 2011.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
CWA Pilot Workshop: Civil Rights Investigations March 2011.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.
Edward A. Shafer, Director, CTE Technical Assistance Center of New York,
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Tran Keys, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation, Santa Ana USD
Carlos Martínez Group Leader – Standards and Assessments U.S. Department of Education.
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: What You’ll Need to Know 2008 Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 4-6, 2008.
EHS and EMS Presentation 11/12/10 With thanks to Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor, James B. Hunt, Jr. Institute.
Michigan State Assessments: What Do Families Need to Know?
NEW STANDARDS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Connecticut Common Core Standards.
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
May 13, 2011 Getting to Know the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Construct-Centered Design (CCD) What is CCD? Adaptation of aspects of learning-goals-driven design (Krajcik, McNeill, & Reiser, 2007) and evidence- centered.
The Alabama College and Career Ready Standards Unpacking Presented by: Jennifer Dunnagan and Cara Whitehead, NBCT Rainbow Middle School, Rainbow City,
Chris Eldredge Kate Collins Middle School 8 th Grade Math July 29, 2010.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
A Closer Look Quality Goals Appropriate Assessments.
Race to the Top Assessment Program: Public Hearing on High School Assessments November 13, 2009 Boston, MA Presenter: Lauress L. Wise, HumRRO Aab-sad-nov08item09.
What’s the Big Idea?? Big Ideas, Benchmarks, Enduring Understandings, Essential Questions…What’s the Difference?
Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
“ Public education is open to all children - no matter their ability, heritage, or economic background. It is the promise of our future ” Denise Juneau,
LaKenji Hastings, NWLC Assessment Program Specialist Georgia Milestones Parent Informational.
Colorado Standards Transforming teaching and learning in the 21 st Century.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
An Introduction. How NCCSS come about? What do we do now that we have it? What today is NOT about Venting Discussing what’s “wrong” with our kids.
D 4 Understanding the Common Core State Standards & Assessment Katie McKnight, Ph.D.
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers
PROJECT/PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING: Who’s Doing the Thinking?
CTE Standards Perkins Grant Management System
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Presentation transcript:

Designing an Assessment System for the Race to the Top Edward Haertel School of Education Stanford University RTTT Public Meeting, General Assessment Denver, Colorado December 1,

What’s Different This Time? In the absence of well-defined and demanding standards, education in the United States has gravitated toward de facto national minimum expectations, with curricula focusing on low-level reading and arithmetic skills and on small amounts of factual material in other content areas. Most current assessment methods reinforce the emphasis on these low- level skills and processing bits of information rather than on problem solving and critical thinking. The adoption of world- class standards would force the Nation to confront today's educational performance expectations that are simply too low. NCEST Report,

New Ideas Common Standards ◦ fewer, clearer, higher? Aligned assessments of individual growth Explicit attention to range of assessment types / formats, content sampling, item release plans, etc. 21 st century technology ◦ computer-based testing, longitudinal growth models, Evidence-Centered Design, … 3

Old Ideas If assessments are aligned to standards, then growth in test scores will track intended schooling outcomes Essentially all valued schooling outcomes can be captured by test performances of ◦ students working alone ◦ without “smart workplace” resources ◦ answering clear questions with clear answers 4

Old Ideas One assessment system will “do it all” ◦ track progress  of students / schools / … ◦ inform decisions  about graduation / college readiness / career readiness / college course placement ◦ support improvement  in teaching / learning / instructional programs ◦ determine effectiveness  of schools / principals / teachers 5

6 Theories of Action are, if anything, less clear than in 1992 A Theory of Action is a chain of logical propositions that “connects the dots,” explaining step by step, in commonsense terms, how the assessment system, accountability system, and related reforms will lead to improved learning outcomes

Rethinking Old Ideas To Make New Ideas Work Aligning tests and curricula to common standards is not sufficient to create a coherent system 7 Content Standards Curriculum & Instruction Assessments ?

Rethinking Old Ideas To Make New Ideas Work Aligning tests and curricula to common standards is not sufficient to create a coherent system 8 Content Standards Curriculum & Instruction Assessments ?

11th Grade History / Social Studies US Discuss the significant domestic policy speeches of Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush, and Clinton (e.g., education, civil rights, economic policy, environmental policy). 9

Item Testing US

High School Biology BI6.f Students know at each link in a food web some energy is stored in newly made structures but much energy is dissipated into the environment as heat. This dissipation may be represented in an energy pyramid. 11

Item Testing BI6.f 12

Rethinking Alignment It is not enough for each item to be somehow connected to one or more standards Assessments, standards, and curriculum and instruction must all be considered together ◦ Curriculum-embedded formative assessments ◦ Portfolios incorporating well-specified, externally scorable components 13

Rethinking Old Ideas To Make New Ideas Work Testing need not imply that students work alone, without references or resources, on small tasks with one right answer ◦ Well-structured problems (Frederiksen, 1984) ◦ Content-lean, process-constrained tasks (Baxter & Glaser, 1998) ◦ Sequestered Problem Solving (Bransford & Schwartz, 1999) 14

Rethinking What It Means to Take A Test A comprehensive assessment system must also include ◦ ill-structured problems with multiple solutions that are better or worse, not right or wrong ◦ content-rich, process-open tasks requiring flexible, adaptive application of coherent knowledge structures to solve novel problems ◦ tests of preparation for future learning – measuring skill in approaching new problems, “knowing with” as well as “knowing how” or “knowing that” 15

Rethinking Old Ideas To Make New Ideas Work A single form of testing cannot satisfy the full set of RTTT design requirements ◦ Sole reliance on external, on-demand tests will fall short, even if constructed-response items are included ◦ Sole reliance on external, on-demand tests will fall short, even if interim / benchmark assessments are included 16

Rethinking Multiple Indicators A comprehensive assessment system must use multiple forms of evidence ◦ curriculum-embedded assessments ◦ extended projects ◦ a range of student performances including  finding, organizing, and evaluating information  analyzing and synthesizing data  planning and carrying out investigations  solving unfamiliar, open-ended problems  written reports and oral presentations 17

Rethinking Multiple Indicators Different forms of assessment, organized in different ways, may be required for ◦ improving instructional decision making in the classroom ◦ tracking student growth and predicting college or career readiness ◦ accountability 18

Rethinking Multiple Indicators Standards, assessments, curriculum, and instruction must be aligned and coherent ◦ horizontal links across content areas ◦ vertical links across grade levels Assessment at the classroom or school level may employ matrix sampling ◦ different students answer different questions to provide better group-level information ◦ some assessment system components may not yield individual scores 19

Summary We must RETHINK Alignment ◦ not just test-to-standards, but instead a coherent, simultaneous consideration of standards, assessments, curriculum and instruction, and I might add, teacher preparation 20

Summary We must RETHINK what it means to take a test ◦ not just sequestered problem solving, with tidy questions and routine problems, but also complex tasks  with multiple solutions judged by multiple criteria  sometimes worked out over an extended time  sometimes involving collaboration  sometimes requiring students to figure out what information they need and where to find it 21

Summary We must RETHINK multiple indicators ◦ not just a broader mix of item formats ◦ not just interim plus end-of-year tests ◦ some portion of classroom assessment must be sufficiently documented and structured so as to be incorporated into comprehensive assessment systems to meet multiple needs 22

23 Thank you