Access Point One: Purpose and Modeling Access Point Two: Close and Scaffolded Reading Instruction Access Point Three: Collaborative Conversations Access.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nancy Frey and Doug Fisher San Diego State University
Advertisements

Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. Chpt 7 ~ Differentiating Teaching ADAPT Strategy to Analyze and Differentiate Teaching for Individuals and.
In the Era of the Common Core Standards Network Meeting, January 11, 2012 Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Assessment for Learning.
The Gradual Release Model of Instruction November 21, 2011 O.
Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
CA 2012 ELD Standards Appendix B
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Objective Develop an understanding of Appendix B: CA ELD Standards Part II: Learning About How English Works.
Collaborative Conversations Doug Fisher, PhD San Diego State University.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Reciprocal Teaching.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Science Research Simulation Task Science High School Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Implementing RtI 2 Douglas Fisher
Collaborative Conversations
Scaffolding Instruction Reading and Writing in the Language Classroom.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
Close Reads in the ESL Classroom Tanya Hill, M.Ed, NBCT Kate Bond Elementary Session 3: 10:20-11:20 Session 4: 11:20-12:20 Survey: 12:20-12:30.
Access Point One: Purpose and Modeling Access Point Two: Close and Scaffolded Reading Instruction Access Point Three: Collaborative Conversations Access.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
Module 1/ Chapter 1 Ramping Up for Complex Texts By Nancy Frey and Doug Fisher 1.1.
Access Point One: Purpose and Modeling
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Puget Sound ESD– Session 3 December 12,
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Engaging Students: Speaking and Listening Standards.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Puget Sound ESD December
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Things to prepare  Highlighters  Summary/Synthesis – chart paper/Post-It chart paper  Mr. Sketch Markers  Curriculum Spiral Map (CCSS) (in color) 
Designing Standards-based Rubrics KY Writing Project Conference September Sit with.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Collaborative Learning. (c) Frey & Fisher, 2008 TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY Focused Instruction Guided Instruction “ I do it ” “ We.
Access Point One: Purpose and Modeling Access Point Two: Close and Scaffolded Reading Instruction Access Point Three: Collaborative Conversations Access.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Science & Literacy - Text Complexity “Beyond the Land of Oz” Sid Larson, Literacy Consultant CESA2 Dr. Kevin Anderson.
Effective Expression Through Accountable Talk. Learning Targets Learn the four stages of accountable talk Learn and practice four protocols for teaching.
Ways to Assess Individuals During Group Work. Learning Targets Investigate strategies that promote individual accountability in group work. Discuss difficulties.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, February 2014 NTI.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Better Learning Through Structured Teaching Douglas Fisher www
Chapter 1 Integrating UBD and DI An Essential Partnership.
Intentional - Purposeful - Explicit NOT SCRIPT Don’t need more prescription but more precision. Precision requires: 1.Teachers know students 2.Teachers.
EngageNY.org Session 6: Using Protocols Purposefully.
Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
February 19, 2013 EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION.  After achieving a working knowledge and components of explicit instruction, teachers will self-assess their.
Climbing inside… Creating Effective Close Reading Lessons.
KLC Meeting Explore the two samples provided considering the following questions: What are some of the possible similarities you see in how you.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS AND THE SOCRATIC SEMINAR Mendez Fundamental – November 7, 2012 Presented by: Katherine Rich Topic: Common Core for Special.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
COMMON CORE FOR THE NOT-SO-COMMON LEARNER
Academic Conversations
Collaborative Conversations
Professor of Education
Reading Closely For Textual Details
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
Strategic Teaching Professional Development
Presentation transcript:

Access Point One: Purpose and Modeling Access Point Two: Close and Scaffolded Reading Instruction Access Point Three: Collaborative Conversations Access Point Four: An Independent Reading Staircase Access Point Five: Demonstrating Understanding and Assessing Performance 4.1

What’s Our Purpose for Module 4? Understand the value and necessity of student peer interaction in collaborative learning. Analyze the differences in grade-level expectations in Speaking and Listening Standard Anchor 1 in CCSS. Look closely at the essential indicators and key elements of collaborative learning structures. Explore the most effective collaborative learning structures to support students in accessing complex texts:  literature circles  discussion roundtables  reciprocal teaching  collaborative strategic reading 4.2

4.3 Is a critical linchpin in the process of assessing complex texts Supports student learning in the absence of the teacher Provides opportunities for students to apply skills and strategies Allows for authentic practice of academic language Collaborative Learning

“ According to this standard, students have to discuss the complex texts they have been reading. Not only will this aid them in comprehending the text, but it will also provide them with practice in critical thinking, argumentation, and using evidence in their responses.” 4.4 Frey, N.,& Fisher, D. (2013). Rigorous Reading: 5 Access Points for Helping Students Comprehend Complex Texts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Directions for Jigsaw Procedure for Quality Indicators of Task Complexity to Build Strong Structures for Collaborative Learning 1. Work in groups of four or five. 2. Each group chooses a different task complexity indicator: a.Designs that require students to work together (also read introduction after Building Structures for Collaborative Learning) b.Structures that elevate academic language. c.Structures that ensure grade-level work d.Designs that allow for productive failure 3. Read corresponding section in Chapter 4 (5–7 minutes). 4. Write down salient points on chart paper to share with group (5 minutes). 5. Think of your group as the expert learners on this indicator and the larger group (your audience) as the novice learners. 6. Have fun and be creative! 4.5

4.6  Rethink demanding content with new learning structures.  Use language frames to building academic language.  Remember that productive failure is good and healthy.  Maintain a level of academic rigor.  Consider task complexity and the degree of student engagement. Collaborative Learning Quality Indicators

Collaborative Learning Key Elements  Post, teach, and revisit norms for interaction.  Group students heterogeneously.  Have students set goals.  Promote individual and group accountability. 4.7

Consider Classroom Collaboration What works well? What can be improved? Are students engaged? What are your support needs? 4.8

Through collaborations today you probably  Reread the text.  Talked with group members to analyze and synthesize meaning.  Used specialized (academic) language for this content. Isn’t this what we are asking our students to do? Reflect:  Did all your group members contribute to the task?  Did you contribute to the task? Next session: Access Point Four: Independent Reading Staircase 4.9