LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Tier II Reading Intervention Evelyn Johnson, Ed.D. Margo Healy, M.Ed. Cristianne Lane, M.Ed. Lee Pesky Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Students Struggle: Perception vs. Reality
Advertisements

How the Sonday System Product Line is Being Used
RtI Response to Intervention
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Chapter 9 - Fluency Assessment
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Response to Intervention (RtI)
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Chapter 9: Fluency Assessment
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
A multi-level prevention system, which integrates assessment and intervention to maximize student achievement and to reduce behavioral problems.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia
Fountas & Pinnell Leveled Literacy Intervention.
K-3 ELA Common Core State Standards Job Alike #3 – Foundational Skills 3:00 – 4:30 & 3:45 – 5:15 Grades K - 3.
Fluency. What is Fluency? The ability to read a text _______, _________, and with proper __________ –_________: ease of reading –_________: ability to.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Dr. Kelley. Share LiveText Assignment Discuss at table (rubric, typed AIP, student assessments):  The assessment tools you used.  What you learned.
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Developing Literacy in English- language Learners: Key Issues and Promising Practices Diane August David Francis Claude Goldenberg Timothy Shanahan.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
The Idaho State Department of Education Presents: “ELLA” Early Learning Literacy Activities This program is designed to support the most important early.
Wisconsin’s New Kindergarten Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
Kathryn Catherman Stephanie Lemmer. Read all Select 5 Pair share: “Did you know …” dialogue Info for whole staff?
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
Work Sample Seminar1 Work Sample Seminar Screening Assessments, File Review, & Context Part 1 Portland State University.
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
School-wide Data Analysis Oregon RtI Spring Conference May 9 th 2012.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Response to Instruction: Using Data to Make Decisions PRESENTER: Lexie Domaradzki.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Literacy Programs System 44 Exit Criteria: SPI Advancing, 40+ Fluency Score, series 13 + READ 180 Exit Criteria: SRI 4th 595; 5th 760;
Cindy Edwards, Administrative Supervisor Response to Intervention, Dyslexia/504 August 2, 2011 A Multi-Tiered Prevention System.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
First Grade Reading Workshop
Digging Deeper with Screening Data: Creating Intervention Groups Gresham-Barlow School District September 8, 2011.
Response to Instruction and Intervention. The Big Picture Anita L. Archer, Ph.D. Educational Consultant
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
 Students in grades Kindergarten through twelfth  Classroom teacher, reading specialist, interventionist  Can be administered individually, some assessments.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
Literacy Assessments Literacy Workgroup Marcia Atwood Michelle Boutwell Sue Locke-Scott Rae Lynn McCarthy.
1 Tour Guides D. Barton, S. Kravet, W. Oliver and C. Smart Chapter 9 Journey Through A First Grade Differentiation Plan “Mr. Hartline’s Difficult Assignment”
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Using Data to Implement RtI Colleen Anderson & Michelle Hosp Iowa Department of Education.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Tier II Reading Intervention
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
Early Reading Skills: Alphabet and Phonics
DIBELS.
Progress monitoring Is the Help Helping?.
Easy CBM – Curriculum Based Measurement Phonics with Focus on Fluency
Chapel Hill ISD Reading First Initiative
DIBELS: An Overview Kelli Anderson Early Intervention Specialist - ECC
Presentation transcript:

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Tier II Reading Intervention Evelyn Johnson, Ed.D. Margo Healy, M.Ed. Cristianne Lane, M.Ed. Lee Pesky Learning Center

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Agenda Benefits of Strong Tier 1 and Tier 2 Instruction Entry Criteria The Four BIG Questions – Identifying the Issues English Language Learners The Journey!

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 What is at stake? What are the benefits to a student, school or community when students are proficient readers?

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 “From the first day of kindergarten to the last day of elementary school, children substantially define themselves as readers, and this has enormous influence on their development as learners and members of society. Those who succeed in becoming fluent, strategic, and joyful readers are not guaranteed success in school or in life, but they are well on their way. However, those who do not succeed in reading, or who become reluctant readers, face long odds in achieving success in school and life” Slavin, Lake, Chambers, Cheung & Davis, 2009

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 RTI is a System of Instruction Tier I instruction is strong and comprehensive (80% proficient). Tier II interventions focus on specific components of reading to respond to the specific needs of individual students. Students are usually taught in small groups, but identified individually by reliable formal and informal assessments. RTI

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 The “Simple View” of Reading “Reading comprehension is the product of decoding and listening comprehension.” Gough and Tunmer

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Big Picture of Reading Cognition: Thinking Comprehension Vocabulary Decoding: Reading Words Phonics Phonemic Awareness Oral Language Fluency RTI

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Isolating the Reading Issues Going back to the simple definition of reading we can use a series of 4 questions to group students and plan interventions. 1.Can the student read grade-level text? 2.Is there a decoding problem? 3.Does the student comprehend text? 4.What if the student is not making progress?

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #1: Does the student read grade-level text? Screeners: ISAT reading scores ORF* measures IRI measures Oral reading fluency (also known as R-CBM) Assessment

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Reality Check! What do you already know about these students (grades, etc.)? What information are you passing to the next grade? What is your system for collecting and sharing student level data?

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Normal Distribution Curve

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 AIMSweb AIMSweb National Norm Tables will translate an R-CBM score to a percentile rank. For example, a student scoring a “2” on the first grade fall IRI (LSF), could be anywhere from the 20 th -48 th percentile.

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Normal Distribution Curve

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 AIMSweb Average = 26 th -75 th percentile Below Average = 11 th -25 th percentile High risk = Below the 11 th percentile Decision Point

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 “Take Aways...” Regarding resources, our systems must be efficient and inform our decisions regarding who receives further testing and intervention services.

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Establish a Data Management System At the district level At the school level At the classroom level

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #1: Can the student read grade level text? What are you using for screeners? What is your criteria for determining which students need additional assessments?

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #1: Does the student read grade-level text? YES Administer a decoding intervention. NO Is there a decoding problem? YES Continue with core instruction. Process

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #2: Is there a decoding problem? Diagnostic Tools: – ORF miscue analysis – Phonics/decoding surveys (example: CORE*) – San Diego Quick – Phonological awareness tests (K-2...) – Other (program placement tests, Words Their Way spelling inventories) *Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. Tools

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Big Picture of Reading Cognition: Thinking Comprehension Vocabulary Decoding: Reading Words Phonics Phonemic Awareness Oral Language Fluency RTI

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Simulation #1 An oral reading fluency “miscue analysis” can help a teacher better understand a student’s decoding abilities and other skills as well. These can be quite informal... or formal.

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #2: Is there a decoding problem? Diagnostic Tools: – ORF miscue analysis – Phonics/decoding surveys (example: CORE) – San Diego Quick – CORE* phonological awareness tests (K-2...) – Other (program placement tests, Word Their Way spelling inventories) *Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. Tools

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 CORE Phonics Survey Part A: letter names (uppercase) Part B: letter names (lowercase) Part C: consonant sounds Part D: long and short vowel sounds Part E: short vowels Part F: consonant blends with short vowels Part G: short vowels, digraphs, trigraphs

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Part H: R-controlled vowels Part I: long vowel spellings Part J: variant vowels Part K: low frequency vowel and consonant spellings Part L: multisyllabic words

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Reality Check! Be efficient... What do you already know about this student? What information do you need?

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #2: Is there a decoding problem? Diagnostic Tools: – ORF miscue analysis – Phonics/decoding surveys (example: CORE*) – San Diego Quick – Phonological awareness tests (K-2...) – Other (program placement tests, Words Their Way spelling inventories) *Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. Tools

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #2: Is there a decoding problem? Diagnostic Tools: – ORF miscue analysis – Phonics/decoding surveys (example: CORE*) – San Diego Quick – Phonological awareness tests (K-2...) – Other (program placement tests, Words Their Way spelling inventories) *Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc. Tools

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Evidence-based Intervention Model Direct, systematic, explicit decoding instruction What is the recipe? Resources: IES Practice Guides on Reading (WWC) CORE Manual Instruction

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Simulation #2 ## ) ( * w

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Lesson Examples Example

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Progress Monitoring Progress monitoring (R-CBM) Progress monitoring is a scientifically based practice that is used to assess a student’s academic performance and evaluate the effectiveness of instruction. Progress monitoring can be used at the district, school, classroom and student level. Program measures are assessments that teachers use to assess skills taught in the intervention program. Growth charts are graphs or charts that document progress relative to the exit criteria (the target). Definitions

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #2: Is there a decoding problem? What is your system for identifying students with decoding problems? What is the plan once students are identified?

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Big Picture of Reading Cognition: Thinking Comprehension Vocabulary Decoding: Reading Words Phonics Phonemic Awareness Oral Language Fluency RTI

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter Can the student read grade-level text? YES Administer a decoding intervention. NO 3. Does the student comprehend text? YES Administer fluency Intervention. NO Administer comprehension/ vocabulary intervention. NO 2. Is there a decoding problem? YES Continue with core instruction. Process

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #3: Does the student comprehend the text? Possible indicators that students are struggling: Miscue analysis/ errors when reading Low R-CBM and/or inaccurate R-CBM Low standardized test scores Poor ISAT reading scores Low grades Poor performance on assignments Observations Low language skills Misbehavior Low MAZE scores Assessment

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Simulation #3 How do you know when students can’t comprehend? What don’t/can’t they do? Example

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Evidence-based Intervention Model Direct, explicit instruction in vocabulary Direct, explicit instruction in comprehension strategies Instruction

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Vocabulary Recommendations ( 1. Select vocabulary wisely (Beck and McKeown) 2. Explicitly teach vocabulary (Beck, Marzano, CORE) 3. Teach students strategies for unlocking unfamiliar words (Graves) Instruction

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 The simple view of strategies! 1. Look within the word (word parts) 2. Look around the word (use context) 3.Look to what you already know (background knowledge) 4. Look for resources (people, resources) Instruction

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Reciprocal Teaching Model RT is widely used as a Tier I comprehension model. It is also an effective, powerful instructional strategy for Tier II intervention with a strong evidence base (WWC). Instruction

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Model, Guided Practice, Independent Practice

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Video Clip: Middle School Video Clip: Summarization 6 Reciprocal Teaching Part 1

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Progress Monitoring Back to the indicators Program measures R-CBM (with high accuracy) Unprompted retells System

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #3: Does the student comprehend? What is your system for identifying students with comprehension problems? What is the plan once students are identified?

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Big Picture of Reading Cognition: Thinking Comprehension Vocabulary Decoding: Reading Words Phonics Phonemic Awareness Oral Language Fluency RTI

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Can the student read grade-level text? YES Administer a decoding intervention. NO Does the student comprehend text? When ORF is low, also administer fluency Intervention. YES Administer fluency intervention. NO Administer comprehension/ vocabulary intervention. NO Is there a decoding problem? YES Continue with core instruction.

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 “Extra Time on Text” If decoding, comprehension and vocabulary have been eliminated, then the student mostly likely needs fluency practice. Instruction

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Intervention Models Repeated readings (with comprehension checks) Partner reading (Timothy Rasinski) Instruction

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Progress Monitoring R-CBM Rubrics Read at a good pace Made few mistakes Attended to punctuation Read smoothly

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #3, Part 2: Fluency Practice What is your system for identifying students with fluency problems? What is the plan once students are identified?

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter Can the student read grade-level text? YES Administer a decoding intervention. NO 3. Does the student comprehend text? When ORF is low, also administer fluency Intervention. YES Administer fluency intervention. NO Administer comprehension/ vocabulary intervention. NO 2. Is there a decoding problem? YES Continue with core instruction. Process 4. What if the student is not making progress?

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #4: What if the student is not making progress?

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Question #4: What if the student is not making progress? Examine Tier I instruction Review the components of strong Tier 2 instruction (strong/weak chart from first training) Consider attendance Solicit help from parents Consider how peers are progressing Eliminate physical problems Document behaviors/strategies that may impact progress

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Recommendations for English Language Learners

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Big Picture of Reading Cognition: Thinking Comprehension Vocabulary Decoding: Reading Words Phonics Phonemic Awareness Oral Language Fluency RTI

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 ELL Evidence-based Recommendations * Provide focused, intensive small-group interventions for English learners determined to be at risk for reading problems. Although the amount of time in small-group instruction and the intensity of this instruction should reflect the degree of risk, determined by reading assessment data and other indicators, the interventions should include the five core reading elements (phonological awareness, phonics, reading fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension). Explicit, direct instruction should be the primary means of instructional delivery. * IES Practice Guide (What Works Clearinghouse)

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Continued Provide high-quality vocabulary instruction throughout the day. Teach essential content words in depth. In addition, use instructional time to address the meanings of common words, phrases, and expressions not yet learned.

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Continued Ensure that teachers of English learners devote approximately 90 minutes a week to instructional activities in which pairs of students at different ability levels or different English language proficiencies work together on academic tasks in a structured fashion. These activities should practice and extend material already taught.

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Wrap-Up What did today’s training validate for you? With your group, identify your next steps in this important journey...

LPLC Tier II Reading Intervention, Winter 2011 Thank You! Contact: Dr. Evelyn Johnson Cristianne Lane

Statewide Special Education Technical Assistance (SESTA ) Gina Hopper, Director Katie Bubak, Statewide Consultant Training materials can be found at

Project Sponsor Idaho Department of Education Special Education Division Richard Henderson, Director