DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
Dispute Resolution Under the Congressional Accountability Act
Presented by: NC State University Office of General Counsel 2011 Faculty Review/Grievance Panel Workshop.
Sexual Harassment Seminar Mechanisms in Lingnan University to deal with sexual harassment Presented by Li Kam-kee, Director of Administration.
Honor Council Orientation Cheryl Scheid, Ph.D. Vice Chancellor Academic, Faculty and Student Affairs Dean, College of Graduate Health Sciences
Grievances & Appeals CPAC Brown Bag 15 May 2001 Jim Baugh & Steve Rayle.
10/09/01 Overview Purpose of this presentation:
Faculty and EPA Professionals Grievance Procedure Conducting an Effective Grievance Hearing Presented by: The Office of Legal Affairs 2008.
Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE POLICY SUMMARY FACTS Goals of the Employee Grievance Policy: Provide procedural consistency across the agencies and universities of.
Proposed Dispute Process 10/22/13 Time LimitsUnionCompanyHR ArbitrationWithin 20 days of Step Four decision Step Four (Mediation Committee) Meet as soon.
Mission Statement 2 We are dedicated to a single purpose: Empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity. We accomplish this.
SCHOOL GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE (D EP E D O RDER N O. 35, S. 2004) Division Executive Meeting April 25, 2014.
Goddard Space Flight Center Office of Human Capital Management Christina LaFountain, Employee Relations Program Manager Code 115
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Actuaries.
Honor Council Orientation Cheryl Scheid, Ph.D. Vice Chancellor Academic, Faculty and Student Affairs Dean, College of Graduate Health Sciences
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
Anti-Discrimination & Harassment Policy
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
To Arbitrate or Not to Arbitrate WINTER EXECUTIVE BOARD 2014.
Harassment, Intimidation, and Bullying Policies and Legislation
SA Judicial Council 2008/2009 Explanation of Duties, Powers, and Processes.
The Use of Counseling and Discipline to Improve Employee Productivity.
B. Proposed Revisions to UT HOP 3.16 Threatened Faculty Retrenchment (D )— Janet Staiger (professor, radio- television-film and committee chair).
1 Mr. Tony McCourt Ombudsman for the Defence Forces Presentation to Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions 5 th November, 2014.
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT LECTURE NO
Grievance. Some important points from collective agreement Leaves Wages Designated University holidays Hours of work and work assignment.
DEALING WITH HARASSMENT AND ABUSE COMPLAINTS Lt (NL) James Smith VANCOUVER ISLAND DIVISION.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Orientation for Newly Elected Members to the Council of Academic Professionals Get acquainted with your new responsibilities Prepared by Liezl Bowman,
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
A Senator’s Guide to the Judicial Brief By the Judiciary Committee *This PowerPoint is available on Blackboard*
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
Harassment / Discrimination Annual District Training
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS Mission Statement The mission of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners is to protect the health, welfare,
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) UNION COLLEGE.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
 Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 20 (Part XX) was proclaimed dealing with Violence Prevention in the Work Place.  Work Place Violence.
IDEA FORMAL COMPLAINTS Administrative Accountability Branch Kentucky Department of Education Understanding the Self-Investigation Process.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
Welcome Managing concerns and complaints How should schools handle complaints? This session links to guidance from the DfE and local authorities, and looks.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
What Is Police Misconduct? Any action performed by a law enforcement officer that is criminal, unconstitutional, or against established rules, regulations,
1 Diocesan Canonical Changes Duncan A. Bayne Vice-chancellor Diocese of Olympia Title IV.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
Employee concerning other employees or employment conditions
Filing an Academic Grievance
Mason County School District
Sexual Harassment Seminar
ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE Internal Occurrence Reporting and Investigation.
Washington County Schools Harassment and Grievance Policy
EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE POLICY SUMMARY FACTS
Administering Human Rights Legislation
SCHOOL DISTRICT 8 HARASSMENT AWARENESS - Brief Yearly TRAINING
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
National Health and Safety Conference October 2018
Associate Vice President for Affirmative Action
Title IX Proposed Regulations
Flagler College Student Disability Grievance Procedure
Presentation transcript:

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures

OLD: What Constitutes a Grievance - A grievance is an allegation by an employee that there has been a violation, misinterpretation, misapplication, discriminatory or unreasonable application of a University policy, procedure, rule, or regulation regarding the employee's employment conditions. The appeal process in the employee grievance procedure is not a formal court proceeding. It is an investigation into allegations with the intent to resolve those deemed factual. Discussions about work-related complaints should begin with the person's immediate supervisor. If this effort does not produce a satisfactory resolution of the problem within a reasonable time frame, the grievant may appeal to his or her peer employee group for consideration through the Administrative and Professional Grievance Committee. Grievance allegations between employees represented under different grievance policies will be decided under the jurisdiction of the grievance policy which first receives and responds to the grievance. Issues of discrimination, harassment and other civil rights issues should be referred immediately and directly to the Office of Affirmative Action/EEO. NEW: Removal of the word “discrimination”. Discrimination procedures are NOT handled through a Grievance Procedure and this will eliminate any confusion.

OLD: General Procedure for Resolution of Grievances - A member of the University Administrative and Professional employee group who believes that he or she has a grievance must discuss the matter thoroughly with his or her immediate supervisor. This discussion should be initiated by the grievant within fifteen working days (excluding weekends and authorized University holidays) after the grievant becomes aware of the subject of the grievance and in no event later than six months after the occurrence giving rise to the grievance. During this discussion, the grievant must define clearly the nature of the grievance and specifically request that a decision be made by the supervisor. The supervisor will respond with a decision as soon as possible but no later than 15 working days after the discussion. If the supervisor does not provide a timely response or if the grievant is not satisfied by the response, the grievant may request that the Administrative and Professional Grievance Committee provide informal mediation. NEW: Gives up to 45 Days from the occurrence for mediation and grievance proceedings to begin. The person to whom the grievance has been filed has 10 days to respond.

OLD: Mediation handled by Grievance committee members. Not adequately trained to handle process. NEW: The Mediation process is handled prior to Grievance Proceedings. The grievant has 30 days to contact Human Resources to request a mediation. This is not a required step in the process.

OLD: Committee polled to determine if an issue is grievable. Discussion of facts presented to all committee members in this process. NEW: The Chair of the Grievance Committee now reviews the allegations and makes a determination (within 5 days) without exposing the complaint to the entire committee prior to a decision being made if it can be grieved. Human Resources is in an advisory role to the Chair. Eliminates bias.

OLD: Liaison person is appointed by the Grievance Committee Chair to serve the Hearing Panel. They assist the Panel by arranging facilities, witnesses, routine support as needed. (this was typically HR in the past) NEW: Chair of the Grievance Committee takes over these responsibilities.

OLD: Representation: Grievant has the right to have anyone represent them and have them assist at the hearing. If an attorney was hired by either party, Grievance Chair was to be notified. The attorney was allowed to participate in Hearing due to lack of clarity in procedure. Peer review process reduced to mock trial for many. NEW: Representation has been clarified. The procedure indicates grievant’s advisor/representative is in an advisory role only and is not allowed to take charge of presentation or interrogate the other party/witnesses. If an attorney is hired by either party, the other person is required to let the Chair know so that the other party can be made aware. Also, now an Attorney follows the same guidelines as advisors and are not allowed to participate, just be an advisor to the party.

OLD: Leave Time issues: Liaison or Representative selected by Grievant (employed by the University) was allowed to take off from their job duties without having to take annual leave. NEW: During preparation for the Hearing, Representatives are required now to work on this with the grievant on their own time. During the Formal Hearing they are allowed to be absent from work without having to take annual leave.

OLD: Arrangement of Grievance Hearings …The Hearing Panel will ensure that a thirty-day interval occurs between the official announced date for the grievance hearing and actual hearing date to allow for the preparation of statements. NEW: Chair of the Committee distributes the documents and establishes a hearing date and location at the earliest convenient time for all parties involved. Committee is not waiting on HR or any other group to establish dates for hearing.

OLD: The grievant had 15 working days to produce a statement of the grievance after the Hearing Panel had been selected. NEW: This is completed at the beginning when the form is filled out. Expedites process for parties.

OLD: Final Disposition given to VP or President. Allowed 60 days to review and make recommendations. NEW: VP or President is given 30 days to review.

NEW IN PROCEDURE: *Definition of what is and is not grievable *Creation of form to assist employee with format – simplifies procedure. *Establishes procedure for centralized file retention *Allows an affidavit by a witness who can not attend the Formal Hearing. *Time limitations added/process specified from start to finish

General Advantages to New Procedure *Simplified Process. *Confidentiality is provided. Chair reviews (and determines if issue is eligible to be grieved) prior to entire committee seeing the documents. *Confidential file retention. *Definition of what is and is not grievable. *Time limits enhances process. Process reduced typically from 6-8 month period down to 3-4 month proceedings. *Mediation is provided separate from Grievance. *Protection to the Hearing Panel and Grievance Committee by requiring Attorneys to be in an advisory role to the grievant/supervisor rather than participating in the proceedings. *Allows witnesses to have an affidavit submitted if they can not be in attendance.