Procedures Tenured v. Non-Tenured Tenured Have a property interest in their continued employment. Property interest is a substantive right and procedural.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNLV FACULTY SENATE TENURE & PROMOTION FORUM Oct. 2, 2012 Oct. 2, 2012 Thanks to the Past Chairs: Dr. John Filler Dr. Ceci Maldonado Dr. Nasser Daneshvary.
Advertisements

School of something FACULTY OF OTHER TOO MANY RIGHTS AND NOT ENOUGH RESOLUTION Adrian Slater These slides and related presentation do not constitute legal.
Presented by: NC State University Office of General Counsel 2011 Faculty Review/Grievance Panel Workshop.
MYTHS, WIVES’ TALES & URBAN LEGENDS DEBUNKING ER MISCONCEPTIONS JUNE 2014.
Faculty and EPA Professionals Grievance Procedure Conducting an Effective Grievance Hearing Presented by: The Office of Legal Affairs 2008.
Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
Procedural Justice and Ethics in Employee Relations
Proposed Revisions to Section 5 (Review & Evaluation of Faculty Performance) of the Faculty Handbook Spring, T&P Oversight Committee Office.
Constitutional Law Part 7: Due Process and Fundamental Rights Lecture 4: Procedural Due Process.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 10 Tenure, Dismissal, and Due Process This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law.
Avoiding Civil Rights and Employment Practices Claims Division of Risk Management Department of Insurance.
Chapter 10: Recruitment, Tenure, Dismissal and Due Process EDAD 859
Collective Bargaining in Academia – Analyzing the “Upswing” Kathi S. Westcott, Associate Counsel.
Superintendent Hearings David V. Cirillo, Esq. Assistant Director Personnel & Labor Relations July 30, 2009.
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
Ryan J. Service.  Four short briefs involving cases of academic dismissal  In general, most cases reviewed plaintiffs/students are suing on grounds.
Overview of the Claims and Appeals Process February 2010.
Employment and Tenure Crystal Hirst Under the Fourteenth Amendment, tenure provides teachers with a unique right to due process should his or her actions.
Current Legal Issues in Risk Management February 16, 2011 Presented by: Phillip L. Hartley Harben, Hartley & Hawkins, LLP.
Chapter #6- Agency Adjudication When Agencies Make Decisions - Adjudications How is an adjudication different from a rule? –Rules apply to everyone in.
Making Your Board and Management Team Meetings OPMA Compliant Association of Washington Public Hospital Districts.
Administrative Law Chapter 2 - Part I. Takings Review What is a "taking"? What due process is involved? What about compensation? How is compensation measured?
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
EMPLOYMENT LAW FOR SOCIAL SERVICES ATTORNEYS Fundamentals of Social Services Law November 16, 2004 Diane M. Juffras Institute of Government.
Joerg Tiede, Assembly of State Conferences/Committee A Liaison.
B. Proposed Revisions to UT HOP 3.16 Threatened Faculty Retrenchment (D )— Janet Staiger (professor, radio- television-film and committee chair).
Employment Law. The Employment Relationship Twofold: contractual framework with statutory overlay The basic contract: services in exchange for reward.
By Aidan, Lochie, Curtis. WORKPLACE DISPUTES  Negotiation: Is a method of compromising disputes within a workplace. This easygoing approach usually.
Due Process and Equal Protection
Discipline and Dismissals Lecture 15
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT AND LABOR LAW
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER THREE Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Stages of an Arbitration Arbitration Week in Palestine Session #4 December 9,
Review of Plessy v. Ferguson Cartoon from www. landmarkcases
Bases for Academic Senates: What Are We And What Are Our Roles? Craig Rutan, Area D Representative Cynthia Rico, South Representative.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Developing Administrative Simplification: Selected Experiences.
1 Chapter 4 Adjudications. 2 Types of Due Process Substantive Due Process refers to limits on what government can regulate Federal - commerce clause,
Students, the Law and Public Schools
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Cuddy & McCarthy, LLP1 SUPERVISION, EVALUATION, & TERMINATION/DISCHARGE OF SCHOOL EMPLOYEES ByRamon Vigil, Esq. Cuddy & McCarthy, LLP NMASBO 2012.
Teacher’s Freedom of Speech
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) UNION COLLEGE.
DEALING WITH THE PROBLEM EMPLOYEE John Ashby
Discipline and Dismissals Lecture 12.  Must be fair.  RSA courts have decided that “Fairness” constitutes: 1.Substantive Fairness - Pertaining to reason;
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Tenure,
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
Towards improvement: Institution of appeal in public procurement – topical procedural and evidentiary issues Kyiv, April , 2012 Oleksandr Voznyuk.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
Unit 9 Seminar Business Organizations. Things to do this unit: UNIT 9 – Read Chapter 13 and 14 – Respond to the Discussion Board – Attend the Weekly Seminar.
Legal Issues in Administrator Evaluation, Dismissal and Nonrenewal Nancy Hungerford, The Hungerford Law Firm Dec. 3, 2015.
HIPAA Privacy Rule Implementation Status Report Richard M. Campanelli, J.D. Director, Office for Civil Rights Before the The Tenth National HIPAA Summit.
Discipline and Terminations: Wrongful Discharge Act, Just Cause, Discipline Basics, and Other Items for Employers for Employers Michele Puiggari Midwinter.
Chapter 19.  Equal opportunity in employment: The rights of all employees and job applicants  To be treated without discrimination  To be able to sue.
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) The Last Gasp of Liberal United States Supreme Court Due Process Jurisprudence 1.
The Twelve Most Important Public Employment Law Developments Ever Bob Joyce PANC Asheville October 5, 2015.
UNITS 4:3-4:4 Patients’ Rights and Legal Directives for Health Care.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
Unit 5 – The Employee Stakeholder Prof. Dawn Courtright Copyright (c) Dawn Courtright All Rights Reserved.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Education Employment Procedures Law of 2001
Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU
Sabrina Johnson and lisa kimble Educational Law
Everything you need to know but were never told by the CSU…
Due Process and the Peace Officer Bill of Rights
Due Process 41.1.
Presentation transcript:

Procedures Tenured v. Non-Tenured Tenured Have a property interest in their continued employment. Property interest is a substantive right and procedural due process must be provided to a tenured professor before termination. Non-Tenured If non-renewed at end of contract term, have a right to procedural due process if: –employee has an objective expectation of renewed employment –if college’s policies and procedures give them procedural rights

What is tenure? Professor William Van Alstyne of Duke University wrote: Tenure, accurately and unequivocally defined, lays no claim whatever to a guarantee of lifetime employment. Rather, tenure provides only that no person continuously retained as a full-time faculty member beyond a specified lengthy period of probationary service may thereafter be dismissed without adequate cause.... [T]enure is translatable as a statement of formal assurance that... the individual's professional security and academic freedom will not be placed in question without the observance of full academic due process. W. Van Alstyne, Tenure: A Summary, Explanation, and ‘Defense’, AAUP BULL. 57:329 (1971), reprinted in Matthew W. Finkin, The Case for Tenure 3, 4 (1996) (emphasis added).

What is tenure? Faculty tenure in higher education is, in its essence, a presumption of competence and continuing service that can be overcome only if specified conditions are met. Faculty tenure is similar to civil service protection and to judicial tenure. It is not a lifetime guarantee of a position. –Tenure is usually provided for in: –an institution's governing documents (bylaws, state statutes, etc.); –the faculty handbook; –an individual faculty member's letter of appointment; and/or –if applicable, collective bargaining agreements. Donna E. Euben, Tenure: Current Perspectives and Challenges, American Association of University Professors (October 2002).

Substantive v. Procedural Due Process Procedural due process is required when government (state school) action adversely affects a substantive right. In the context of tenured professors, the substantive right is their property interest in their continued employment. Once it is established that a protected property interest exists, procedural due process must be afforded the property right holder before he may be deprived of it.

Due Process for Tenured Faculty The minimum procedural due process to be afforded a tenured professor who opposes proposed termination under the Fourteenth Amendment requires the professor: 1.Be advised of the cause or causes of his termination in sufficient detail to fairly enable him to show any error that may exist; 2.Be advised of the name and nature of testimony of witnesses against him; 3.Be afforded a meaningful opportunity to be heard in his own defense at a reasonable time after such advice; and 4.Before a tribunal that both possesses some academic expertise and has apparent impartiality toward the charges.

Procedural Due Process The college must do more than offer the tenured professor the opportunity to request a hearing. The hearing must meet the constitutional minimums and it must take place before termination. Termination before a procedural due process hearing is ineffective because the effective date of termination cannot precede the due process hearing as a matter of law.

The Due Process Hearing Minimum requirements of procedural due process are: –Notice of the cause(s) for termination in sufficient detail to fairly enable her to show any error that may exist; –Notice of the names and the nature of the testimony of witnesses against her; –At a reasonable time after such notice, must be given a meaningful opportunity to be heard in her own defense; –A hearing should be before a tribunal that has some academic expertise and has apparent impartiality toward the charges.

The Due Process Hearing, cont. Due process procedures contemplate that the employee will be advised of the evidence against him, and that he will be given an effective opportunity to rebut that evidence Always consult your policies for specific notice or procedural requirements for the due process hearing

Non-tenured employees Non-tenured employees have a constitutional right to procedural due process when they have an objective expectation of renewed employment May also be entitled to procedural due process pursuant to the college’s policies and procedures Always have right to substantive due process regardless of tenure status

Expectation of Employment Employee who has an expectancy of continued employment may be deprived of that expectancy by mere ceremonial compliance with procedural due process. A professor may have a property interest in her job even without a formal contractual tenure provision, through an implied contract, verbal pledges, policies or practices of the institution, or through informal understandings with administration.

Expectation of Employment, cont. Examples of ways a college can create expectancy of continued employment without tenure: –Assurances of renewal –Promises for a probationary contract –Practices of giving employee opportunity to remedy employment problems, rather than non-renewal Expectation of continued employment may be likely in a college that has no explicit tenure system even for senior members of its faculty that nonetheless may have created such a system in practice.

Property Interest in Policies Grievance policy Practices and procedures Official accreditation documents –Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools requires that “[t]ermination and non-renewal procedures must contain adequate safeguards for protection of academic freedom.” –College’s accreditation reports may indicate “good cause” is necessary for termination

Substantive Due Process Regardless of tenure, an employee cannot be dismissed or not be rehired for constitutionally impermissible reasons such as race, religion, or the assertion of rights guaranteed by law or the Constitution College policies should guarantee a full due process hearing if an employee raises an issue of violation of legally protected rights as the cause for non-renewal or dismissal

The Biased Tribunal As part of the due process hearing, an employee is entitled to a fair tribunal –Should have some academic expertise and apparent impartiality toward the charges Sources of bias which are sufficient to disqualify decision-makers: –prejudgment of the facts –personal interest

The Due Process Hearing: Problems to Avoid Make sure the grievant receives adequate notice of the hearing –If grievant asks for more time to gather evidence, hire an attorney, or has a legitimate scheduling conflict, give her more time If the grievant requests documents relevant to her complaint, make these documents available to her before the hearing Give the grievant sufficient time to present her evidence and testimony

First Amendment Retaliation Cases A public college professor cannot be punished in retaliation for having sought to protect her lawful and constitutional right under the First Amendment Plaintiff must show that speech is constitutionally protected and that the speech was a substantial or motivating factor in the decision non-renew or dismiss